Progress Report on GEANT Study of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Progress Report on GEANT Study of

Description:

a fractional energy cut) 35 - 105 (24 - 60) hits on longest track, combined views (Red indicates different cut for 2/3 radiation length sampling) CUTS ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: rra95
Category:
Tags: geant | cut | progress | report | study

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Progress Report on GEANT Study of


1
R. Ray 4/26/03
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized
Detectors
  • Implement containerized detectors in GEANT.
    Consider
  • 1/3 XL and 2/3 XL sampling configurations.
  • Use MINOS event generator, off-axis neutrino
    spectrum
  • Weight interaction vertex in GEANT by number of
    target
  • nucleons in various materials
  • Parabolic fit to multiple tracks in an event.
    Assume
  • longest track is electron.

2
GEANT Implementation
Corner Blocks 10 x 10 x 10 cm3
2 mm thick steel skin
6.06 x 2.49 x 2.44 m3 shipping container
Detector dimensions 5.94 x 2.39 m2
2.8 cm thick Wood Floor (not shown)
5 cm x 5 cm box beams 1 cm wall thickness
3
Consider two configurations 1/3 radiation
length sampling 2/3 radiation length sampling.
Detector x, y readout at each station. 3 cm cells
Absorber Polyethylene air 1/3 XL, r0.70, 10
detector stations.
Absorber Polyethylene air 0.625 XL, r0.73, 6
detector stations.
4
50 kton Detector 4 x 10 x 50 Stack of Containers
15 cm horizontal and 20 cm vertical gaps
between detectors in adjacent containers
Cell Guides
50 kt of absorber 2.1 kt of steel 0.7 kt of
wood 0.14 kt of Al.
y
z
x
5
Weighted Neutrino Energy Spectra
ne CC
Flat neutrino spectrum generated between 0.5 -
3.5 GeV for ne and 0.5 - 20 GeV for nm. Weight
applied at analysis level.
nm NC
6
Event Reconstruction
  • Essentially same as described yesterday by
    Leslie
  • Hough Transform - step through slope and
    intercept space
  • Find best straight line fit. Iterate.
  • Assign hits within ? 15 cm of fit to track.
  • Final parabolic fit to track.
  • Eliminate all but the first few hits on track
    from further
  • consideration
  • Repeat to look for additional tracks.

7
ne charged current
8
ne charged current
9
ne charged current
10
ne charged current
11
nm Neutral Current
12
nm Neutral Current
13
nm Neutral Current
14
nm Neutral Current that Passes Cuts
15
CUTS
  • ? 1 reconstructed track in each view
  • c2 of longest track in each view lt 50
  • 10 (6) or more hit planes in each view
  • Width of longest track (RMS) in each view lt 5.5
    cm2
  • gt 1.4 hits/plane ave for longest track, combined
    views
  • Fraction of hits on longest track/total hits gt
    0.80, combined views
  • ( a fractional energy cut)
  • 35 - 105 (24 - 60) hits on longest track,
    combined views
  • (Red indicates different cut for 2/3 radiation
    length sampling)


Calculate Figure of Merit signal events/sqrt(ne
beam nm NC) normalized to LOI flux for 50
kton detector
16
1/3 Radiation Length Sampling
ne CC
nm NC
Cut distributions are weighted, successive
17
1/3 Radiation Length Sampling
ne CC
nm NC
Cut distributions are weighted, successive
cm2
cm2
18
1/3 Radiation Length Sampling
ne CC
nm NC
Cut distributions are weighted, successive
19
1/3 Radiation Length Sampling
ne CC
nm NC
Cut distributions are weighted, successive
GeV
GeV
GeV
GeV
20
2/3 Radiation Length Sampling
ne CC
nm NC
Cut distributions are weighted, successive
21
2/3 Radiation Length Sampling
ne CC
nm NC
Cut distributions are weighted, successive
cm2
cm2
22
2/3 Radiation Length Sampling
ne CC
nm NC
Cut distributions are weighted, successive
23
2/3 Radiation Length Sampling
ne CC
nm NC
Cut distributions are weighted, successive
GeV
GeV
GeV
GeV
24
1/3 Radiation Length Sampling
ne CC nm NC ne Center nm Center ne Beam nm Beam
Total Events (weighted) (467.8) 89.7 487.4 90.6 487.3 82.7
c2 lt 50 408.9 30.2 444.0 31.9 364.8 26.4
Nplanex,y ? 10 270.7 11.0 321.0 12.1 170.5 8.4
Track width gt 5.5 211.0 5.3 252.4 5.5 121.3 3.8
Ave hits/plane ? 1.4 185.6 0.8 221.4 1.0 98.9 0.6
Frac of hits on track gt 0.80 156.8 0.2 184.0 0.12 82.9 0.13
Hits on track bet 35-105 152.5 0.2 180.0 0.08 78.0 0.1
Efficiency 0.326 0.002 0.369 0.0009 0.160 0.001
Number of Events (LOI, 50 kt) 238.6 28.5 270.3 12.6
FOM 32.6 44.1
Events initiated in absorber Assumes 25
events from ne in beam
25
X
26
2/3 Radiation Length Sampling
ne CC nm NC ne Center nm Center ne Beam nm Beam
Total Events (weighted) 472.8 82.4 487.4 79.0 486.7 73.4
c2 lt 50 349.2 17.9 384.4 21.2 250.6 15.1
Nplanex,y ? 10 262.3 11.4 303.5 12.5 145.0 8.8
Track width gt 5.5 206.1 5.6 228.2 5.7 107.3 3.9
Ave hits/plane ? 1.4 171.4 1.6 197.0 1.6 86.3 1.3
Frac of hits on track gt 0.80 142.8 0.58 165.2 0.4 72.5 0.49
Hits on track bet 24-105 121.6 0.31 146.1 0.12 56.4 0.10
Efficiency 0.257 0.004 0.300 0.001 0.116 0.001
Number of Events (LOI, 50 kt) 188.3 53.6 219.4 20.7
FOM 21.3 32.5
Events initiated in absorber Assumes 25
events from ne in beam
27
Summary
  • Electron efficiency and background rejection
    attainable with containerized
  • detector appear reasonable, but you do pay
    a price in electron efficiency.
  • Background from structural elements negligible.
  • Difference between 1/3 XL and 2/3 XL sampling
    larger than in other analysis.
  • Requires more investigation.
  • Still to do
  • Simulate beam ne and nm CC
  • Add cross-talk (need a model) and RPC
    inefficiency
  • Final optimization of cuts
  • Generate new, high-statistics MC samples to
    smooth out peaks from large
  • weight events and obtain final results
    independent of training samples.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com