How Does Digitization Affect Scholarship - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

How Does Digitization Affect Scholarship

Description:

Further Questions and Discussion. We find a consistent significant impact from digitization. ... Findings and Discussion I. Findings and Discussion II ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: ith3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How Does Digitization Affect Scholarship


1
How Does Digitization Affect Scholarship?
  • Mark McCabe
  • University of Michigan
  • Roger Schonfeld
  • Ithaka
  • Christopher Snyder
  • Dartmouth College
  • May 13, 2007

2
Objectives
  • What are the scholarly impacts of various
    business models for journal publishing?
  • How do various business models for journal
    publishing affect the value derived by authors
    and readers?

3
Natural Experiment
  • Beginning in 1995 publishers and content
    aggregators began digitizing current and archival
    content and placing it online.
  • However, as late as 2005 (the endpoint of our
    analysis) backfiles for many journals remained
    offline.
  • We explore the impact of online access on
    citation practices.

4
Previous Studies
  • Many previous studies of this relationship find
    large effects but were flawed.
  • For example, did the best journals, at least in
    some disciplines, gain an online presence
    earlier?
  • This study avoids these problems Variation in
    journal quality for content published prior to
    1995 is unlikely to be related to online
    strategies adopted by publishers after 1995.

5
People, Funding, and Timeline
  • Researchers
  • Mark McCabe, Professor of Economics, University
    of Michigan Principal Investigator
  • Chris Snyder, Professor of Economics, Dartmouth
    Co-Principal Investigator
  • Roger Schonfeld, Manager of Research, Ithaka
  • Funded by a grant from The Andrew W. Mellon
    Foundation
  • Data collection is completed, analysis is
    underway and nearly completed, working paper
    should be available in mid 2008

6
Our Data
7
Our Data
  • Three Disciplines
  • History
  • Economics and Business
  • Biological and General Sciences
  • Hundreds of publishers, aggregators, and archives
    provided data
  • 100 journals in each discipline, comparing
    journal-year by journal-year
  • 50 that were digitized early on
  • 50 that were digitized only more recently or not
    at all
  • Examine citations TO these journals that appeared
    in ANY journal from 1980 to 2005
  • Complete citation databases obtained from ISI

8
Disciplinary Differences
  • Citation activity is greatest in science, then
    economics, then history
  • Citation activity is growing in all three
    disciplines (1980-1994 vs. 1995-2005)
  • Authorship is most heavily concentrated in
    Anglophone countries in history (82), then
    economics (73), then science (55)
  • In all three, authorship is becoming less
    concentrated in Anglophone countries (moving
    towards both Western Europe and the rest of the
    world)

9
Preliminary Findings, 1956-2005
10
For Economics, Online Access Boosts Citations 10
Overall
Citations relative to age 49
Online
Offline
Years since publication
Notes Results from negative binomial regression
with age dummies, digital dummy aggregated across
channels for any presence, restricted to
1956-2005 publication years
11
Online Advantage, by Discipline
12
Online Advantage, by Discipline and Geography
13
Further Questions and Discussion
14
Findings and Discussion I
  • We find a consistent significant impact from
    digitization. At the same time, it is an order of
    magnitude less than the changes observed over
    time. Is the impact large or small and what
    implications if any are there?
  • Why is the impact so much greater in Science?
    Lack of working paper culture, unlike economics?
    How to explain history?
  • Preliminary evidence suggests that conditional on
    never being cited prior to 1995, online access
    increases the rate of citation to such new
    articles. How does this increase compare to the
    norm? Who is responsible?

15
Findings and Discussion II
  • What accounts for the greater citation impacts
    outside of the English-speaking lands?
  • In Europe, relatively poor access to print
    content and scientific networks is alleviated by
    online access or
  • Europeans cite differently or
  • Key online channels diffused earlier and more
    widely in English-speaking countries
  • We have a small number of non-English language
    titles can we measure a converse effect, i.e.
    bigger citation impacts in English-speaking
    countries?

16
How Does Digitization Affect Scholarship?
  • Roger C. Schonfeld
  • rcs_at_ithaka.org
  • (212) 500 2338
  • www.ithaka.org/research/citation-analysis
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com