Smith (1986) Raising Capital - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Smith (1986) Raising Capital

Description:

... are negative and larger in magnitude than those associated with preferred stock or debt. ... and larger in absolute magnitude than for the corresponding ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: busi222
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Smith (1986) Raising Capital


1
Smith (1986) Raising Capital
  • Table 1 Stock markets reaction to announcements
    of security offerings of various types
  • Industrial/HI Growth Utility/LOW
    Growth
  • Common stock -3.14 -0.75
  • Preferred stock -0.19 0.08
  • Convertible pref. stock -1.44 -1.38
  • Straight bonds -0.26 -0.13
  • Convertible bonds -2.07 --
  • statistically insignificant

2
  • Table 1 Stock markets reaction to announcements
    of security offerings of various types
  • Average abnormal returns are non-positive.
  • Abnormal returns associated with common stock
    offerings are negative and larger in magnitude
    than those associated with preferred stock or
    debt.
  • Abnormal returns associated with convertible
    securities are negative and larger in absolute
    magnitude than for the corresponding
    non-convertible security.
  • Abnormal returns associated with sales of
    securities by high-growth companies are negative
    and larger in absolute magnitude than those for
    low-growth companies .

3
  • Three hypotheses can potentially explain the
    above market reaction to new security offerings.
  • Optimal Capital Structure
  • There is an optimal debt-to-total capital ratio
    for a company.
  • Deviations from this optimal debt-to-total
    capital ratio will decrease company value.
  • (Question Why would managers ever deviate from
    the optimal debt-to-total capital ratio?)

4
  • Debt-Value Function Movements along the curve.
  • D0 to D1 Issuing equity. Company value goes
    down. Consistent with empirical evidence.
  • D0 to D2 Issuing debt Company value goes down
    Evidence inconsistent with data.

V0
Value of Company
V1
V2
D1
D0
D2
Debt/Total Capital
5
  • Debt-Value Function Shift of the curve.
  • Movements along the leverage value function
    cannot be differentiated from shifts in the
    function.
  • Hence, hypothesis is not very useful.

V0
Value of Company
V1
V2
D1
D0
D2
Debt/Total Capital
6
  • Implied Changes in Net Operating Cashflow
  • Firms cashflow identity
  • Market is trying to estimate net income by
    assuming only one other variable in the equation
    changes and the other four stay constant.
  • Table 2 Implied increase (decrease) in net
    income increases (decreases) share price.

New debt New equity Net income Interest
payment Dividend New investment
7
  • Table 2 Implied increase (decrease) in net
    income increases (decreases) share price.
  • Type of Announcement 2-day Return ()
  • Implied INCREASE in expected cashflow
  • Common Stock Repurchases
  • Intra-firm tender offer 16.2
  • Open mkt. Repurchase 3.6
  • Dividend Increases
  • Dividend initiation 3.7
  • Dividend increase 0.9
  • Special dividends 2.1
  • Investment increases 1.0

8
  • Table 2 Implied increase (decrease) in net
    income increases (decreases) share price.
  • Type of Announcement 2-day Return ()
  • Implied DECREASE in expected cashflow
  • Security sales
  • Common stock -1.6
  • Preferred stock 0.1
  • Convertible preferred -1.4
  • Straight debt -0.2
  • Convertible debt -2.1
  • Dividend decreases -3.6
  • Investment decreases -1.1

9
  • Implied Changes in Net Operating Cashflow
  • Explains non-positive market reaction to new
    equity offerings. Does not explain differential
    reaction to
  • debt and equity
  • convertible and non-convertible
  • high-growth and low-growth companies .

10
  • Information Asymmetry
  • Market analysts are less well-informed about a
    firms intrinsic value than managers.
  • Managers will issue equity if
  • Funds are needed to finance a very high positive
    NPV project.
  • Firms stock is overvalued in the market.
  • Market assumes that managers are issuing equity,
    because the stock is overpriced.
  • Explains negative market reaction to equity
    offerings.

11
  • Information Asymmetry (continued)
  • Since debt and preferred stock are more senior
    claims to equity, their value is less sensitive
    to changes in firm value.
  • Explains less negative market reaction to debt
    and preferred.
  • High-growth companies have greater information
    asymmetry.
  • Explains less negative market reaction to
    high-growth and low-growth companies.

12
  • Information Asymmetry (continued)
  • Since debt and preferred stock are more senior
    claims to equity, their value is less sensitive
    to changes in firm value.

Value of Debt Claim
X
Firm Value
Value of Equity Claim
X Face Value of Debt
X
Firm Value
13
  • Two hypotheses explain most of the markets
    reaction to new security offerings.
  • Implied Changes in Net Cashflow
  • Information Asymmetry
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com