Cabinet Termination - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Cabinet Termination

Description:

Majority and minimal winning cabinets. Does not explain differences between countries ... An event' causes cabinet termination with some probability ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: indridiin
Learn more at: https://www.msu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cabinet Termination


1
Cabinet Termination
  • Are cabinets unstable?
  • Italy, French Fourth Republic
  • Germany, Luxemburg, Austria
  • Explanations
  • Party system
  • Coalition attributes
  • Structure of the bargaining system
  • Events

2
The End
  • A cabinet ends with
  • A change in membership
  • A formal resignation
  • A change in prime minister
  • An election

3
Coalition Stability Regime Attributes
  • Various factors
  • Number of Parties
  • Size of Party System
  • Presence of Anti-System Parties
  • Ideological Polarization
  • Oppositional Influence
  • Salience of Elections
  • Formal Investiture Requirement

4
Coalition Stability Regime Attributes
  • Clear differences between countries in terms of
    stability
  • Appears to be unrelated to the number of parties
    in the countries
  • Moreover, changes in the number of parties
    within countries does not have an influence on
    duration
  • Strom Salience of elections (and investiture
    requirement and oppositional influence)

5
Coalition Attributes and Cabinet Stability
  • Majority/Minority/Surplus Cabinets
  • Ideological compatible
  • Findings
  • Majority and minimal winning cabinets
  • Does not explain differences between countries
  • Ideology does not appear to matter

6
Bargaining Environment
  • Polarity of party system
  • Uni- Bipolar stable
  • Centre vs. off-centre
  • Multipolar unstable
  • Stability Luxemburg, Ireland, Austria, Germany,
    Iceland, Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Belgium,
    Netherlands, Denmark 1971-87, Belgium 1971-1987,
    Finland, Italy

7
Events
  • Previous explanations are deterministic
  • The events approach argues that unexpected
    events are important
  • An event causes cabinet termination with some
    probability
  • Compatibility with bargaining system explanation
  • King et. al.

8
Who gets what?
  • Office Payoffs
  • Cabinet Portfolios
  • Non-cabinet Positions
  • Patronage
  • Ministerial Portfolios
  • Fairness/proportionality
  • Role of policy

9
Who gets what?
  • Ministerial Portfolios
  • Close relationship between number of seats in
    legislatures and cabinet seats
  • Small party bias
  • Surprising? Bargaining Power?
  • Uni- and Bipolar systems best predicted by
    proportionality. Why?

10
Who gets what?
  • Ministerial Portfolios
  • Bargaining power and big portfolios
  • Portfolio preference
  • Policy Payoffs
  • Parties manifestos
  • Coalition agreements
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com