Health Canada Review and International Liaison - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Health Canada Review and International Liaison

Description:

... establishment of bioequivalence by requiring a Canadian Reference Product (CRP) Same route of administration as CRP. Same conditions of use as the CRP ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: hcu969
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Health Canada Review and International Liaison


1
  • Health Canada Review and International Liaison
  • Brigitte Zirger, Director
  • Bureau of Policy, Science and International
    ProgramsTherapeutic Products Directorate Health
    Canada
  • Access to Medicines and Intellectual Property
    Workshop
  • April 21, 2007

2
New Drug Review Process (Innovator)
3
(No Transcript)
4
Review of Generic New Drugs
  • Food Drugs Act and Regulations amended 1995
  • Allow for a generic manufacturer to file an ANDS
  • Allows for establishment of bioequivalence by
    requiring a Canadian Reference Product (CRP)
  • Same route of administration as CRP
  • Same conditions of use as the CRP
  • Ensured safety, efficacy and high quality

5
Review of Generic New Drugs
ANDS
Patent check
Pharmaceutically equivalent and/or Bioequivalence
data
(Canadian Reference Product required)
Review
Bioequivalence info PM/ label
Chemistry Manufacturing Pharmaceutical
equivalent
Approval recommended
NOC issued (approval declaration of
Bioequivalence)
NOC on HOLD (until patent issued get resolved)
Patent Check
Provincial Assessment (related to formularies)
6
TPDs International Program
  • International Regulatory Cooperation (bilateral)
  • Bilateral initiatives with other Regulatory
    Authorities on specific initiatives, e.g., MOUs
    to share information, joint initiatives on drugs
    or medical devices
  • International Harmonization (multilateral)
  • International Conference on Harmonization (ICH)
  • Chair, Global Cooperation Group of non-ICH
    Regions
  • Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF) medical
    devices
  • Pan-American Network of Drug Regulatory
    Harmonization (PANDRH)
  • World Health Organization (Expert Committees)
  • Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO)
  • Capacity Building and Technical Assistance
  • WHO PQP and WHO Alternative Procedure (CAMR)
  • Bilateral initiatives
  • Foreign Delegations and study session

7
Dimensions of Medicines Regulation
  • Oversight
  • Government
  • Public, Professionals
  • NGOs, Media
  • Levels
  • Central
  • Region
  • District
  • Community
  • Legal and Administrative Structures
  • Policy and Legislation
  • Organization
  • Human resources
  • Financing
  • Facilities

Regulatory functions
Inspection GMP, GCP, GLP
Information control of promotion
Marketing Authorization
  • Technical
  • Elements
  • Standards norms
  • Guidelines
  • SOPs
  • Forms
  • Certification

Licensing of Persons, premises, and firms
Monitoring drug quality safety
Authorization of clinical trials
8
Regulatory Gaps A Global Picture
192 Member States
Developed
20 developed 50 Varying 30 limited or no
capacity
Developing a
Developing b
Developing c1
LDC/CPA - a
Developing c2
LDC/CPA - b
9
WHOs Pre-qualification of Essential Medicines
  • UN Action Plan for expanding access to medicines
  • HIV/AIDS
  • Malaria
  • Tuberbulosis
  • Reproductive Health (Oct 2006 1st Expression of
    Interest)
  • Ensuring the safety, efficacy and quality of
    medications procured by international funds

10
Why is pre-qualification needed?
  • Problems
  • Millions of people living with HIV/AIDS, TB and
    malaria have no or limited access to treatment
  • Substandard and counterfeit products in different
    countries
  • Weak or absent QA systems in the medicines supply
    chain
  • Significant investment in procurement, but
  • There was no harmonized quality assurance system
    for procurement
  • Wide range of quality in drugs procured
  • Risks
  • Poor quality or counterfeit products
  • Risk to patients, toxic reactions, treatment
    failure, resistance
  • Risks undermining public confidence

11
PQP Basic Principles
  • Voluntary for participating manufacturers
  • Legitimate General procedures and standards
    approved through WHO Expert Committee involving
    all WHO Member States and WHO Governing bodies
  • Widely discussed
  • e.g., International Conference of Drug Regulatory
    Authorities (ICDRA), involves more than 100 DRAs
  • Transparent
  • all information posted to the website
    http//mednet3.who.int/prequal/
  • Open to both innovators and multi-source/generic
    manufacturers
  • Currently no cost for applicants

12
Expected outcome of pre-qualification
  • Public lists of products and manufacturing units
  • Meeting international norms and standards on
    quality, safety and efficacy
  • Capacity building and harmonization
  • DRAs, manufacturers, WHO treatment programs,
    NGOs, procurement organizations
  • Ongoing quality monitoring
  • Pre-qualified products
  • Pre-qualification of QC labs (pilot project,
    current focus on AFRO)
  • Facilitate access to treatment
  • Through fair procurement mechanisms (e.g.,
    tender, competition based on the same quality
    standards)
  • WHO commitment to developing better access to
    quality medicines

13
How pre-qualification is organized?
  • WHO manages and organizes the project on behalf
    of the United Nations
  • Provides technical and scientific support, and
    assures that international norms and standards
    are applied to the assessment, inspection (GMP,
    GCP, GLP) and quality control
  • Partners
  • Aid and funding organization
  • Assessors and Inspectors
  • Mainly qualified assessors from National Drug
    Regulatory Authorities (also from Nationals
    Quality Control Laboratories) of ICH and
    associated countries, and inspectorates belonging
    to PIC/S

14
Assessment of Product Dossiers
  • 8-16 professional assessors from DRAs meet in
    Copenhagen for 1 week, every 2 months
  • Use a first review / second review system
  • Requests for clarification and assessment report
    signed by both reviewers
  • Provides opportunity for capacity building by
    pairing experienced assessors with those less
    experienced complements formal training
    activities

15
Alternate Procedures
  • Innovator products
  • Abridged procedure if the product approved by
    stringent authorities like the EMEA and US FDA
  • Assessment report from the DRAs, WHO Certificate
    of Pharmaceutical Product (CPP), batch
    certificate, update on changes
  • Trusting the scientific expertise of
    well-established DRAs
  • Multisource products
  • Quality information
  • Efficacy and safety bioequivalence study or
    clinical study report via alternate procedure for
    US FDA, EU Article 58 and CAMR)
  • Commercial Sample requested but not always tested
    before prequalificaiton

16
(No Transcript)
17
Steps of Pre-qualification
  • Expression of Interest published by WHO for
    required medicines
  • Guidance on application process and dossier
    preparation provided on the WHO website
  • Dossier received at UNICEF in Copenhagen and Site
    Master File in WHO, Geneva
  • Screening of the dossier and samples
  • Assessment of the dossier and preparation of a
    written report and assessment letter
  • Outcome of the assessment communicated to the
    supplier

18
Steps of Pre-qualification - continued
  • Inspection of the site(s) of manufacturing and
    follow-up inspection when necessary ? GMP
    compliant list of manufacturers
  • Inspection of the Research Laboratory or Contract
    Research Laboratory (CRO) where the
    bioequivalence study has been performed ? GCP
    compliant list of CROs
  • Conclusion and listing of the product in the
    prequalification list
  • Publication of the WHO Public Assessment and
    Inspection Reports (WHOPARs and WHOPIRs)
  • Assessment of the variations when submitted,
    market survey, de-listing if necessary
  • Re-qualification after 3-5 years
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com