OIF I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

OIF I

Description:

OIF I & II MPS AFTER ACTION REVIEW: Some Thoughts. Maj Brad Martin, 3d MAW ... Class IX block. AAOE vs unit ... Jack tester and load testing jacks. Damaged ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: Point9
Category:
Tags: oif | jackblock

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OIF I


1
OIF I II MPS AFTER ACTION REVIEW Some Thoughts
  • Maj Brad Martin, 3d MAW AAOE Asst OIC

2
WERE WE READY FOR MPS OFFLOAD?
  • MSgt Hoffman 12 months prior to deployment

3
OFFLOAD PREPARATION PARTY
  • The OPP is responsible for preparing the
    ships off-load systems, lighterage, and embarked
    MPE/S for off-load. OPP responsibilities include
    the preparation of the ships cranes, winches,
    and fuel/water discharge systems, and initial
    de-preservation and preparation of MPE/S. (MCWP
    3-32)

4
ARRIVAL ASSEMBLY OPERATIONS ELEMENT
  • Provide initial C2 within the assembly area
  • Obtain receipts for MPE/S and verify items with
    the MAGTF
  • Distribute MPE/S to unit equipment reception
    points (ERPs) per the MAGTF Cmdrs distribution
    plan
  • Provide liaison with the AAOG
  • Coordinate security in the assembly areas
  • Oversee preparations for combat
  • Provide throughput reports to the AAOG as
    directed by the AA plan
  • Ref MCWP 3-32

5
AVN LOGISTICS DIVISON MISSION
  • Receive and issue AGSE, Class III(P), mobile
    facilities (MF), and Class V(A) to designated
    units
  • Maintain 100 accountability
  • Within limits of time and capability, de-preserve
    and conduct required PMs on AGSE
  • Provide status reports detailing attainment of
    MPF avn log capability
  • Provide liaison to the AAOG if required
  • Perform other tasks as required

6
ALD AAOE ORGANIZATION
7
IMRL SECTION
  • Provide accurate inventory mgmt and sub-custody
    of IMRL gear and containers to the using units
  • Report status of attainment and issue
  • Identify non-receipt of IMRL gear and containers
  • Consolidate records for reconstitution

8
AGSE SECTION
  • Remove AGSE from containers and coordinate
    offload of AGSE from ground transportation assets
  • Stage AGSE for issue to the using unit
  • Assist IMRL section in identification and
    inventory of AGSE
  • Conduct de-preservation/PM of AGSE within time
    and capability limitations

9
ORDNANCE SECTION
  • Coordinate reception, inventory and laydown of
    Class V(A) containers at the ASP until relieved
    by the MALS
  • Coordinate rqmts for repositioning Class V(A)
    beyond the ASP
  • Assist in removing AWSE from containers and
    relocating as required
  • Assist the IMRL section in identification and
    inventory of AWSE
  • Conduct de-preservation/PM of AWSE within time
    and capability limitations
  • BPT provide SME to the LFSP/AAOG for Class V(A)
    container ops at the port/airfield

10
OIF I GOALS
  • Provide rapid distribution of supplies and
    equipment to enable stand up of required combat
    capability
  • Maintain the highest level of accountability
    possible
  • Conduct all actions in a safe manner with no
    significant injuries or incidents

11
OIF I BY THE NUMBERS
  • OIF I AAOE STATS
  • 7 officers, 132 enlisted
  • Activated 12 Dec 02, deployed 14 Jan 02,
    deactivated 25 Feb 02
  • Accidents/injuries 0/0
  • Offload stats
  • 11 ships (Dual MPSRON offload)
  • Total line items received 87,700
  • Containers received 1409 / 99.9
  • AGSE 417 / 100
  • AGSE items received 5,801 / 100

12
PRE-DEPLOYMENT ISSUES
  • Lack of experience, knowledge, training
  • AAOE/OPP roster in place wrong MOSs personnel
    from every 3d MAW base
  • No SOP
  • Single site vs dual site capability
  • Data challenges (knowledge, source)
  • Lack of trust in arrival of MPS and quality
  • Delay in MEF guidance / enabler activation
  • Lack of unit participation in MPS planning
  • PDSS critical
  • Neither LAMS nor MDSS II meet rqmts

13
OMG FACTOR
14
ATTACK PLAN
  • ALD commenced planning 9 months in adv with key
    staff
  • Conducted detailed subject review
  • Mission analysis
  • Drilled down from AAOG to ALD section functions,
    T/O, trng/licensing/cert rqmts, equip/supplies
    rqmts, MHE rqmts, comm, ERP/AAOE laydown, info
    mgmt, AGSE distribution, inventory tracking
    system
  • Used MMC 7 and several other visits to BIC
  • Provided detailed conops to MALS
  • Developed middleware to provide inventory and
    reporting
  • Team well prepared to conduct mission within
    known parameters

15
DISTRIBUTION OF MPE/S
  • The success or failure of the MPF operation
    may be determined by the effectiveness of methods
    established to distribute, account for, and
    control the issuance of MPE/SAn effective
    distribution plan will contribute to throughput
    and ensure strict accountability and security are
    maintained. (MCWP 3-32)

16
INITIAL ISSUES
  • Dual site requirement Al Jaber, Ali Al Salem
    (ALD lead)
  • Preplanned rqmts not available
  • Impact of having fwd element in place
  • ERP/unit advons not deployed with AAOE
  • Base construction took early focus
  • Interaction with HN

17
OPERATION ISSUES
  • Weather impact
  • Prioritization of onward movement from port to
    meet emerging mission rqmts
  • Lack of avn log liaison at port
  • TCN convoy support
  • Force protection
  • Explosive certifications
  • Safety
  • Misdirected equipment
  • Not structured to support convoy ops
  • Lack of MHE and HE
  • Lack of admin vehicle support
  • Flightline fire bottles

18
WEATHER
19
OPERATION ISSUES
  • Lot control
  • Rqmt to assist with RSOI of unit gear
  • Comm class and unclas
  • Reallocation of MPSE/S
  • LAMS vs MDSS II
  • Embark vs Avn Log Div
  • Priority of decontainerization
  • Maint pubs, HAZMAT, Break out kits
  • Class IX block
  • AAOE vs unit responsibilities

20
OPERATION ISSUES
  • Light units
  • Hydraulic contamination maintenance
  • Pre heaters
  • Hyd jennies
  • SATS tents, clamshells, LMEs
  • OPP prep and maintenance of TA-35, Entwhistle
    crane, Cobra crane need right MOSs
  • MF configurations (6 maint, 12 SU-12)
  • Electrical load banks
  • Jack tester and load testing jacks
  • Damaged equipment (x50)
  • Excess unit equipmentMPS equip not used

21
WHAT CAUSED THE DAMAGE?
  • Improper towing
  • High speeds
  • Rough terrain
  • Sharp turns
  • Improper or lack of securing loads on contracted
    HN transport vehicles
  • Vehicles running over AGSE tow bars at the port
  • Material Handling Equipment (MHE) ops

22
Broken Brake Rod
This bracket connects to the brake handle which
is on the front of the trailer.
23
K-4A Ordinance trailer SN GHY049 Wrecked during
convoy from port to AAOE when a civilian drive
pulled in front of HUM V. Tie rods, tow bar,
and trailer frame were broken.
24
MEP-105 with front axle broken SN DZ01331,
DZ01326, DZ01293, DZ01313, DZ01333.
25
MEP-105 SN DZ01293 Front end broken off when
unit was dropped off a forklift at the port.
26
NC-10C SN MNR 079 Steering broken off. Evidence
of this unit being towed or backed with the
steering bound up all the way to the left. Damage
to the left leaf spring where tongue of the NC-10
was forced against during movement.NC-10C SN
MNR065 (not shown) Screen from under side of
NC-10 has been torn from forklift, unknown if
further damage has occurred due to lack of fuel.
27
Light Unit with tow bar and steering bent.
Evidence of this unit being towed and turned to
sharp for the steering of the unit to handle.
Numerous light units showed up with bent tow
bars. SNs with bent tow bars TAR157, TAR018,
TAR020, TAR144, TAR153, TAR248, TAR140, TAR157,
TAR144.
28
TA-80 SN 14704 Container with tug inside rolled
off civilian truck during sharp turn. Truck did
not have container locks or tie down straps for
the transportation of cargo containers. Steering
wheel and other areas were bent but the tug was
operable.
29
RECONSTITUTION
  • Huge effort
  • MARFOR responsibility
  • Had to wait for significant decisions to be made
  • Location critical to AGSE repair
  • Unit inventory accuracy and maintenance essential
    to ensure success

30
WHY SUCCESSFUL
  • Detailed planning
  • Close coord with MALS and supporting MAWs
  • Capabilities in place upon arrival
  • Heavy emphasis on safety
  • Outstanding SNCOs and junior officers with the
    freedom to make decisions to meet the mission
  • Harsh discipline

31
OIF II STATS
  • Personnel AAOE 145, Surge and throughput
    drivers 61, OPP 34
  • Activated 6 Jan 04, deployed 1 Feb 04,
    deactivated 4 Apr 04
  • 5 MPS ships (selected offload), 2 amphibs, 11 MSC
    ships
  • Stats
  • MPS Containers 773 / 155
  • MPS AGSE 441 items / 91
  • Personnel
  • Convoy 1418
  • Intra theater airlift 2500
  • Helo 342

32
OIF II STATS
  • Stats
  • Total cargo received 14,000 STs
  • Convoys
  • Unit 18 / 514 vehicles
  • CULT HETS 172, TT 490 (orig 20/400)
  • Cargo, intra theater air 900 short tons
  • Transient personnel 4860
  • Max personnel 2570
  • Bottled water 2100 cases
  • MREs 720 cases
  • Small arms ammo 897,100 rounds
  • Contracted support 70,000
  • Vehicle supt (bus/SUV) 14 / 13

33
OIF II ISSUES
  • Different ball game RSOI vs MPS reception /
    selective download
  • Single site (Camp Udairi) USA, real estate,
    billeting, comm, roads
  • Only two OIF I vetsno stab roster
  • Late guidance from MEFdelay in activation
  • Variations between source databases
  • Recurring database changes prior to deploying
  • Location / PDSS
  • Selected offload, offload constraints
  • TCN convoy supportlack of tiedowns
  • Reduced avn log MPS missionexpanded to include
    airfield coord and AACG/DACG

34
OIF II ISSUES
  • Unit involvement in custody and prioritization of
    onward movement
  • Synch movement of unit enablers with AAOE
  • Intermixing unit and MPSE/S
  • Movement control
  • No notice of changes in playbook and distribution
  • Advantage of containerizationproblem with
    recontainerization
  • Quality of MPS vs unit gear
  • Admin challenges
  • G3/G5 reps
  • ALD port LNO success in trng and damage mitigation

35
OIF II ISSUES
  • Intrasit visibilityNOT!
  • Division of responsibility for ops in the COMMZ
    (ie helo build up)
  • Comm
  • Force protection concerns
  • Purchasing authority
  • No vis on MPS AGSE readiness
  • Should we be moving a MALS 500 miles on
    unimproved roads in a hostile environment?

36
BOTTOM LINE
  • Despite the many challenges, we were successful
    in large part due to motivated professionals
    like..

Note This is a paid advertisement.
37
Where do we need to go?
  • Need to educate our community as well as the
    ground community
  • Need to integrate our prepo processes with IL
  • MSC level SOPs critical
  • Train as we intend to fight
  • Clear guidance from MEF
  • ERPs/units advons must move with AAOE
  • Resolve TPFDD with MPS arrival
  • What should be on MPS and FIE? Non IMRL items
    and funding?
  • Look at how best to use MFs
  • Resolve problem with LAMS/SERMIS/MDSS II

38
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com