Title: Theorybased Recruiting Practices
1Theory-based Recruiting Practices
- Derek S. Chapman, Ph.D.,
- University of Calgary, Canada
- David A. Jones, Ph.D.
- University of Vermont, USA
2(No Transcript)
3Traditional approach to understanding recruiting
- Decision making
- Applicant perspective
4Methods used to study recruiting
- Direct methods
- Surveys listing preferences
- Interviews
- Focus groups
- Indirect methods
- Policy capturing
- Experimental designs
- Quasi experiments
5But
- Does not tell us how to recruit
- What my clients want
- Much of the work done in recruiting to date is
lacking in theory (Barber, 1998 Rynes 1993)
6There is nothing so practical as a good theory
7Proactive Recruiting
- Marketing
- Stevens Mitchell Tripp 1990 Cable Turban,
2001 Mauer Howe Lee, 1992 - Branding
- Cable Turban, 2000 Collins Stevens, 2000
- Employer of Choice- what about the rest of us?
8Problems with marketing approaches
- Importance of Decision (Petty Caccioppo, 1986)
- Centrality to life (Dukeritch Harquail, 1994)
9Recruitment as Persuasion
- The application of scientifically-derived
persuasive techniques by organizational
representatives, in which accurate info is used
to promote favorable attitude formation and
change among applicants or potential applicants
regarding their future employment in a particular
organization.
10Centrality of P-O Fit
- Schneiders ASA model
- Congruence between personal values and values of
the org. - Higher P-O fit greater attraction less
turnover higher job sat. - P-O fit is the strongest determinant of most
recruiting outcomes (Chapman et al. 2003). - Perceived fit most important.
11Traditional P-O Fit Approaches
- Measurement (e.g., Edwards, 1994)
- Applicant values
- Org values
- Self-selection
- RJP
- Socialization?
12Perceived fit influenced by two processes
- Perception of org. attributes
- E.g., compare pay to others in industry
- Influence criteria used in job choice
- E.g. Quality of Life vs. Salary
13Integrating Persuasion P-O Fit
Persuasion
Perceived Organizational Attributes
Perceived Personal Values
Perceived Fit
14Anatomy of an Attitude
Evaluative Component
Cognitive Component
Attitude Object
Behavioural Component
15Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)
- Petty Cacioppo, 1981
- EL how motivated and able people are to assess
the central merits of the attitude object - Low peripheral processing
- High central processing
16Petty Wegener
Source
Affective Processes
Message
Attitude Change
Cognitive Processes
Recipient
Behavioral Processes
Context
17Refocusing techniques
- Time perspective shifting (Mullner Chapman,
2000) - Perspective shifting (Brown Chapman, 2002)
- Referent comparisons (Brown Chapman, 2002)
- Level of fit shifting- e.g., emphasize
occupational over organizational opportunities - Type of fit shifting- e.g., supplementary fit vs.
complementary fit (uniqueness versus fitting in)
diversity implications (Piasentin Chapman, 2003)
18Brown Chapman, 2002 Nurses (n 174)
attraction to rural areas
19Hearts or Minds?
- Attitudes may be affectively based or cognitively
based - Matching message to attitude is most effective
- E.g., if attitude toward military service
affectively based, - UN humanitarian aid vs. benefits of training or
salary
20Integrating Persuasion and RJP
- Debate over efficacy of RJP
- Very small to nil effects on turnover,
performance (Premack Wanous) - Negative effects on attraction (Saks et al.)
21Chapman Co, 2004
22Chapman Co, 2004
23Possible objections to Persuasive recruiting
- Ethical
- Assumes interference in a natural process
- Subject to biases and motivated reasoning (Kunda,
1990) - Incomplete information (Rynes et al)
- Improper weighting of information (Dawes et al.)
- Overweighting of negative info (Ordonez et al.
1999) - Unrealistic expectations
- RJP evidence is very weak
- Post entry socialization a larger factor
- Only honest info is a must
24Conclusions
- Recruiting has largely ignored the persuasion
literature - Recruiting practices based on persuasion theory
have a good chance of working - Persuasion practice and research would benefit
from recruiting perspective