Theorybased Recruiting Practices - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Theorybased Recruiting Practices

Description:

Theory-based Recruiting Practices. Derek S. Chapman, Ph.D., University of ... Centrality to life (Dukeritch & Harquail, 1994) Recruitment as Persuasion ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: derekc4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Theorybased Recruiting Practices


1
Theory-based Recruiting Practices
  • Derek S. Chapman, Ph.D.,
  • University of Calgary, Canada
  • David A. Jones, Ph.D.
  • University of Vermont, USA

2
(No Transcript)
3
Traditional approach to understanding recruiting
  • Decision making
  • Applicant perspective

4
Methods used to study recruiting
  • Direct methods
  • Surveys listing preferences
  • Interviews
  • Focus groups
  • Indirect methods
  • Policy capturing
  • Experimental designs
  • Quasi experiments

5
But
  • Does not tell us how to recruit
  • What my clients want
  • Much of the work done in recruiting to date is
    lacking in theory (Barber, 1998 Rynes 1993)

6
There is nothing so practical as a good theory
  • Kurt Lewin

7
Proactive Recruiting
  • Marketing
  • Stevens Mitchell Tripp 1990 Cable Turban,
    2001 Mauer Howe Lee, 1992
  • Branding
  • Cable Turban, 2000 Collins Stevens, 2000
  • Employer of Choice- what about the rest of us?

8
Problems with marketing approaches
  • Importance of Decision (Petty Caccioppo, 1986)
  • Centrality to life (Dukeritch Harquail, 1994)

9
Recruitment as Persuasion
  • The application of scientifically-derived
    persuasive techniques by organizational
    representatives, in which accurate info is used
    to promote favorable attitude formation and
    change among applicants or potential applicants
    regarding their future employment in a particular
    organization.

10
Centrality of P-O Fit
  • Schneiders ASA model
  • Congruence between personal values and values of
    the org.
  • Higher P-O fit greater attraction less
    turnover higher job sat.
  • P-O fit is the strongest determinant of most
    recruiting outcomes (Chapman et al. 2003).
  • Perceived fit most important.

11
Traditional P-O Fit Approaches
  • Measurement (e.g., Edwards, 1994)
  • Applicant values
  • Org values
  • Self-selection
  • RJP
  • Socialization?

12
Perceived fit influenced by two processes
  • Perception of org. attributes
  • E.g., compare pay to others in industry
  • Influence criteria used in job choice
  • E.g. Quality of Life vs. Salary

13
Integrating Persuasion P-O Fit
Persuasion
Perceived Organizational Attributes
Perceived Personal Values
Perceived Fit
14
Anatomy of an Attitude
Evaluative Component
Cognitive Component
Attitude Object
Behavioural Component
15
Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)
  • Petty Cacioppo, 1981
  • EL how motivated and able people are to assess
    the central merits of the attitude object
  • Low peripheral processing
  • High central processing

16
Petty Wegener
Source
Affective Processes
Message
Attitude Change
Cognitive Processes
Recipient
Behavioral Processes
Context
17
Refocusing techniques
  • Time perspective shifting (Mullner Chapman,
    2000)
  • Perspective shifting (Brown Chapman, 2002)
  • Referent comparisons (Brown Chapman, 2002)
  • Level of fit shifting- e.g., emphasize
    occupational over organizational opportunities
  • Type of fit shifting- e.g., supplementary fit vs.
    complementary fit (uniqueness versus fitting in)
    diversity implications (Piasentin Chapman, 2003)

18
Brown Chapman, 2002 Nurses (n 174)
attraction to rural areas
19
Hearts or Minds?
  • Attitudes may be affectively based or cognitively
    based
  • Matching message to attitude is most effective
  • E.g., if attitude toward military service
    affectively based,
  • UN humanitarian aid vs. benefits of training or
    salary

20
Integrating Persuasion and RJP
  • Debate over efficacy of RJP
  • Very small to nil effects on turnover,
    performance (Premack Wanous)
  • Negative effects on attraction (Saks et al.)

21
Chapman Co, 2004
22
Chapman Co, 2004
23
Possible objections to Persuasive recruiting
  • Ethical
  • Assumes interference in a natural process
  • Subject to biases and motivated reasoning (Kunda,
    1990)
  • Incomplete information (Rynes et al)
  • Improper weighting of information (Dawes et al.)
  • Overweighting of negative info (Ordonez et al.
    1999)
  • Unrealistic expectations
  • RJP evidence is very weak
  • Post entry socialization a larger factor
  • Only honest info is a must

24
Conclusions
  • Recruiting has largely ignored the persuasion
    literature
  • Recruiting practices based on persuasion theory
    have a good chance of working
  • Persuasion practice and research would benefit
    from recruiting perspective
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com