Decarbonisation of Transport Fuels - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Decarbonisation of Transport Fuels

Description:

Realization of the 120gCO2/km for cars would reduce total CO2 emissions by cars ... Surface of arable land is too small to realise volume targets ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: koe50
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Decarbonisation of Transport Fuels


1
Decarbonisation of Transport Fuels
  • Dr. Aat Peterse
  • March 6 2007

2
About TE
  • Members in
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • Estonia
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Hungary
  • Italy
  • Netherlands
  • Norway
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Romania
  • Russia
  • Spain
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • UK

Russia!
3
Structure
  • Fuel efficiency remains the 1st priority
  • Breaking down biofuels
  • TEs policy preference

4
Fuel efficiency is the first priority
  • Car CO2 emissions increased by 16 since 1990
  • Realization of the 120gCO2/km for cars would
    reduce total CO2 emissions by cars with 11 per
    2020and save car owners 25 on their fuel bill
    (5000 in a cars lifetime)
  • Doubling fuel efficiency before 2020 is feasible
    and called for by EP

5
Breaking down biofuels
  • Dispersed, small-scale conversion of biowaste in
    transport fuel for local use
  • Large scale production and distribution of
    dedicated crops to fuel transport competing with
    food crops production
  • Opportunities for farmers and nature protection
    in 1st and 3rd worlds
  • Risks for biodiversity and social deprivation in
    1st and 3rd worlds
  • Disappointing CO2balance as a substitute

6
German Experts (SRU) conclusions are negative
  • Intensive production of energycrops conflicts
    with nature protection goals
  • Surface of arable land is too small to realise
    volume targets
  • There is no business case for biofuels
    ( langfristig nicht wettbewerbsfaehig )

7
Decarbonisation is the preferred solution
  • Is more effective environmentally because
    reduction of GHG will be defined (a volume target
    does not discriminate between good and bad)
  • Allows organic growth of the biofuels market
    (discouraging bad biofuels and encouraging the
    good)
  • In line with californian LCFS
  • More flexible and generic and therefore more
    cost-effective

8
Conclusions
  • Biofuels should not replace energy efficiency
    objectives
  • Biofuels are not necessarily sustainable
  • The introduction of biofuels should be
    facilitated by focusing on their sustainability
    performance of all fuels

9
For more informationwww.transportenvironment.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com