Let the Punishment Fit the Crime - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Let the Punishment Fit the Crime

Description:

Impose social cost as a tax and individual internalizes social cost ... study 404 DUIs, for 2/3rds breathalyzer measures differed by at least 0.01 from blood alcohol. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: rpresto
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Let the Punishment Fit the Crime


1
Let the Punishment Fit the Crime
Indro Chakraborty R. Preston McAfee
2
Let the Punishment Fit the Crime

Alleged
Indro Chakraborty R. Preston McAfee
3
Local Externalities
  • Some externalities have nonlinear individual
    effects
  • Automobile speed
  • Alcohol consumed
  • Perfume worn
  • Noise
  • Some emissions

4
Piguouvian Tax
  • Local externalities can be regulated with an
    individual Pigouvian tax
  • Nonlinear fines for speeding
  • Impose social cost as a tax and individual
    internalizes social cost

5
Princeton, NJ Speeding Fines
MPH Over Speed Limit
6
Piguouvian Tax
  • Local externalities can be regulated with an
    individual Pigouvian tax
  • Nonlinear fines for speeding
  • Impose social cost as a tax and individual
    internalizes social cost
  • But theory assumes externalities observable

7
Radar Guns
  • Headline
  • Radar gun clocks palm tree going 86 MPH

8
Radar Gun Accuracy
Redacted to preserve fair use
9
Finnish Penalties
  • HELSINKI, Finland (Reuters) -- One of Finland's
    richest men has been fined a record 170,000 euros
    (217,000) for speeding through the center of the
    capital, police said on Tuesday.
  • Jussi Salonoja, 27, heir to his family's sausage
    business, was caught driving 80 km per hour (50
    miles per hour) in a 40 kph (25 mph) zone last
    Thursday, the police said.
  • Finnish traffic fines vary according to the
    offender's income.

10
Typos
  • AUDIT FINDS ERRORS IN DRUG SEIZURES.
  • The Los Angeles Police Department continues to
    have problems with discrepancies in the amount of
    drugs reported seized and the actual amount
    confiscated.
  • LAPD officials attributed the problems to
    careless errors'' such as writing down the
    wrong information or calculation errors.
  • We found no evidence that seized narcotics were
    mishandled or misappropriated,'' Tuttle said.
    We are concerned, however, that the variances
    appear to be so common.''

11
Blood Alcohol Levels
  • Breath readings vary at least 15 percent from
    actual blood-alcohol concentrations.
  • Simpson, Accuracy and Precision of Breath-Alcohol
    Measurements for a Random Subject in the
    Postabsorptive State, 33(2) Clinical Chemistry
    261 (1987)
  • In study 404 DUIs, for 2/3rds breathalyzer
    measures differed by at least 0.01 from blood
    alcohol.
  • 32(4) Journal of Forensic Sciences 1235 (1987)

12
Melvin Effects
  • Many breath testing machines assume a 2,100-to-1
    ratio in converting alcohol in the breath to
    estimates of alcohol in the blood. However, this
    ratio varies from 1,900 to 2,400 among people and
    also within a person over time.
  • Each one degree of body temperature above normal
    will cause a substantial elevation (about 8) in
    apparent BAC.

13
Are Alcohol Effects Nonlinear?
Redacted to preserve fair use
14
Are Alcohol Effects Nonlinear?
Redacted to preserve fair use
15
Are Alcohol Effects Nonlinear?
Redacted to preserve fair use
16
Are Alcohol Effects Nonlinear?
Redacted to preserve fair use
17
Are Alcohol Effects Nonlinear?
Redacted to preserve fair use
18
Basic Model
  • Risk neutral agent has net benefit B(x)
  • Choice x imposes social cost s(x)
  • Signal y generated given x
  • Penalty p(y) assessed
  • Agent chooses x to
  • max B(x) Ep(y)x

19
Observational Error Example
  • Signal y x e, Ee 0
  • Penalty s(y) is not Pigouvian tax
  • s convex, then too large
  • Right tax satisfies
  • Ep(y)xs(x)

20
Closed Form Solution
  • s(x)x2, Ee2?2
  • Let

21
Multiplicative Errors
  • Choice x, Externality s(x)
  • Signal y xe, Ee 1
  • Assume Eei lt ? for all i.
  • If s(x)x2,

22
Multiplicative Errors Solution
  • If s is analytic, express with Taylor series
  • Now let

23
General Model
  • Risk neutral agent
  • Externality function s is continuous on compact
    set
  • Density f(yx) of signal
  • Goal Find penalty function p so that

24
Separating Probability Distns
  • A density f separates probability distributions
    if for any densities g ? h,

25
Separating Probability Distns
  • A density f separates probability distributions
    if for any densities g ? h,
  • Separation is necessary. If separation fails,
    there are distinct g, h with


26
Necessity
  • If separation fails,
  • Not all s can be supported

27
Theorem
  • The density f separates probability distributions
    if and only if for every continuous s, there is a
    continuous p satisfying
  • Corollary to Hahn Banach Theorem

28
Approximations
  • What does p look like for an arbitrary s?
  • Consider a small additive error be
  • p(x,0)s(x)

29
Derivatives
  • Thus
  • And hence

30
More Derivatives
  • Thus

31
Approximation
  • Or b 1
  • Thus, for small gambles, p is less than s if s is
    convex

32
Approximation with Multiplicative Errors
  • With multiplicative errors, approximation similar

33
Risk Aversion
  • Assume constant absolute risk aversion to
    eliminate wealth effects
  • Parameter ?
  • Problem

34
Small Variance Approximation
  • Using the same methods

35
Conclusions
  • Erroneous measurements common
  • Radar guns
  • Theft
  • Emissions
  • Proved existence of adjustments
  • If and only if measurement distinguishes
    behavioral strategies

36
Conclusions, Continued
  • Offer approximation
  • valid for small additive measurement error
  • Exact for quadratic s.
  • Not necessarily non-negative.

37
Penalties for Drunk Boating
Redacted to preserve fair use
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com