FAO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

FAO

Description:

Using seed as an entry point for increasing incomes for farmers and ... Identification & management of different value added chains. Linkage between parties ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: jeanlou6
Category:
Tags: fao | molecular

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FAO


1
Seed Alliance Without BoundarySAWIBA holistic
approach for success
  • FAO
  • September 7th 2009
  • Presentation
  • Jean-Louis DUVAL FAO consultant
  • Michael LARINDE FAO AGPS

2
Seed Alliance Without BoundarySAWIB
  • The basic concept
  • Using seed as an entry point for increasing
    incomes for farmers and increased food production

3
Presentation
  • SAWIB Concept
  • FAO initiative for Global partnership on seed
    security
  • A scheme to explain this holistic approach
  • Why SAWIB Responding to the Food Crisis?
  • Why seed and plant varieties could be the support
    of this holistic approach
  • A framework for the organization
  • A first feedback
  • Results of the survey regarding developed /
    developing countries relationship

4
Concept
  • Driving demand for seed by increasing marketing
    opportunities to the food industry
  • Doing this through
  • Linking with the international seed companies
  • Linking with the food industry
  • Linking with the International Agri-Food
    Network members.
  • FAO serving as a facilitator of the initiative.

5
Seed Alliance Without Boundary SAWIBAn FAO
initiative for Global Partnership on Seed Security
  • In order to establish a sustainable seed supply
    and thereby facilitate food security of member
    countries, the Plant Production and Protection
    Division (AGP) started an initiative termed Seed
    Alliance Without Boundaries (SAWIB)
  • The seed based initiative will cut across crop
    production and food industry domains with an
    holistic approach.

6
Seed Alliance Without Boundary SAWIBAn FAO
initiative for Global Partnership on Seed Security
  • The objective is to create a forum to bring
    together stakeholders from the private and public
    sector of developed and developing seed and food
    industries for dialog that will facilitate the
  • a) transfer of technological and entrepreneurial
    skills for sustainable seed production and
    distribution
  • b) linkage of seed sector with farmers or crop
    producers and
  • c) linkage of crop producers to
    crop-value-addition industries.

7
Seed Alliance Without Boundary SAWIBAn FAO
initiative for Global Partnership on Seed Security
  • Overall, the initiative will facilitate the
    creation of seed industry that is market-driven
    and ensure sustainable use of plant genetic
    resources for food and agriculture.
  • The first public-private-sector dialogue under
    this initiative took place in February 2009.

8
Seed Alliance Without Boundary SAWIBAn FAO
initiative for Global Partnership on Seed Security
  • The SAWIB will enhance the synergy of the
    public-private sectors and comparative advantages
    of developed and developing countries to
    facilitate access to innovation and products of
    biotechnology for the seed industries and effect
    linkages amongst crop producers, agricultural
    inputs producers/suppliers, industrial consumers
    of raw agricultural produce and food industries.
  • The collaboration will be mutually beneficial as
    it will help in exploiting the agro-ecological
    potentials of developing countries for off-season
    seed production of advanced seed industries.
  • Overall, the initiative will facilitate the
    creation of seed industry that is market-driven
    in developing countries.

9
Seed Alliance Without BoundarySAWIB
  • Scheme of the value chain
  • An holistic approach

10
(No Transcript)
11
Seed Alliance Without BoundarySAWIB
  • WHY?
  • Responding to the Food Crisis

12
Why SAWIB Excerpts fromResponding to the Food
Crisis (1)
  • Measures, activities and policies to boost
    agricultural production
  • The provision of sufficient quantities of inputs,
    particularly high-quality seeds and fertilizers,
    is considered a major priority for coping with
    the present food crisis.
  • However, this should be implemented through a
    comprehensive system approach, coupled with a
    medium-term strategy to improve the efficiency of
    the whole production and marketing chain for
    inputs, as part of the development of more
    efficient agricultural systems.

(1) Responding to the food crisis synthesis of
medium-term measures proposed in inter-agency
assessments. FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF
THE UNITED NATIONS - WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME Rome,
2009 - This report has been supported with funds
from the European Union. http//www.fao.org/docrep
/011/i0769e/i0769e00.HTM
13
Why SAWIB Excerpts fromResponding to the Food
Crisis (2)
  • Programmes for inputs and related crop production
    services
  • Private sector participation in seed
    multiplication and distribution is minimal, and
    the policy and legislation framework does not
    provide adequate incentives and conditions to
    foster development of the seed sector.
  • Access to commercial fertilizer is also
    constrained by factors that include high costs,
    lack of commercial supply and distribution
    outlets, and inadequate participation from the
    private sector.
  • For both seeds and fertilizer, insufficient
    credit facilities and a lack of integration
    between farm inputs and outputs are major
    limitations.

14
Why SAWIB Excerpts fromResponding to the Food
Crisis (3)
  • Cross-cutting issues
  • Capacity building The need for an agro-food
    system approach should be more reflected in
    capacity building programmes, including not only
    production, but also processing and marketing.
  • Institution building In addition to the
    necessary development of farmers organizations,
    there is also need to increase efforts to
    identify and implement innovative institutional
    mechanisms, such as public-private partnerships,
    particularly for the upstream and downstream
    sectors.
  • More attention should be given to the major
    contribution that improved rural finance can make
    to the overall development of the agro-food
    sector.

15
Why SAWIB Excerpts fromResponding to the Food
Crisis (4)
  • The need for global approaches and policy
    coherence
  • At the production level, even when the actions
    proposed focus on specific inputs such as seeds
    and fertilizers, it is necessary to adopt a
    global agricultural system approach that takes
    account of all physical and human factors, and
    provides the framework for increased public and
    private investments in agriculture.
  • Actions at the production level have to be
    complemented by actions at the upstream and
    downstream levels within an overall agro-food
    perspective encompassing the whole value chain.
  • A variety of initiatives in Africa aim to develop
    the seed sector, but coordination and
    collaboration among actors are very limited.

16
Seed Alliance Without BoundarySAWIB
  • The plant variety is the link of the value chain

17
Seed Alliance Without Boundary SAWIBPlant
variety is the link of the value chain
  • The mission of seed entrepreneur is the
    demonstration of the value of his varieties.
  • The Variety is the backbone of the value
    recognition of supply chains
  • It is a major contribution to extension services
  • Seed-men and seed-women are the conductor of the
    value chain

18
Why choosing value chain production as a new
model of development?
  • Based on the market demand the food security
    challenge
  • All actors of the value chain will support the
    use of the plant variety needed
  • The identification of value chain will create
    added value to be shared among members
  • Creation of rural employment along the value chain

19
Seed Alliance Without BoundarySAWIB
  • Framework for the organization and
    operationalization
  • Networking

20
Framework for the organization and
operationalization
  • Linking the actors of the value chain
  • Linking seed companies, agro dealers,
    processors...
  • Private and public association
  • Policy and regulation

1. Seeking for Expertise
2. Linkage Sponsorship
3. Market Development
Variety
21
Market driven value added chain
  • Markets studies will high light appropriate crops
    and value chains
  • Another model comes from the experience of
    off-season

22
Framework for the organization and
operationalization of SAWIB
  • Services (output activity - objective)
  • Identification management of different value
    added chains
  • Linkage between parties
  • Identification linkage of sponsors
  • Facilitate the relationship between parties
  • Organization of expert consultations, training
    sessions, study tours
  • Publications success stories and guidelines,
    market studies, statistics
  • Website

23
Framework for the organization and
operationalization of SAWIB
  • How
  • Define organization
  • Finance business model
  • Networking
  • National, regional global organizations and
    companies
  • Public and private sectors
  • Phases
  • 1. Obtain the collaboration / agreement of
  • International Agri-Food Network members
  • Financing parties
  • 2. Focus on few easy crops and countries
  • 3. Further development with other crops and
    countries.

24
Feedback from the Industry on SAWIB initiative
  • From the Supermarket
  • No answer
  • From the food-industry
  • Global brand names our processes are protected
    by company secret
  • Commodities (rice oil) interesting approach
  • From the seed industry
  • Positive support
  • From the fertilizer industry
  • The SAWIB approach is in line with our approach
  • From the crop protection industry
  • How to contribute to SAWIB success 

25
Results of the survey
  • A survey has been realized in 2009 to measure the
    situation regarding the relationship between
    developed and developing countries

26
Survey analysis
  • Purpose
  • A view from the seed industry in the relation
    between developed and developing countries
  • 1 122 questionnaires sent
  • 66 answers
  • Not concerned
  • Company secret
  • I will come back
  • 31 forms fulfilled
  • from 19 countries

27
Survey analysisExchange of germplasm or
varieties (1)(2)
  • Contracting party from developed country
  • Receiving party from developing country
  • Open pollinated
  • Yes 14 No 11
  • Hybrid
  • Yes 19 No 6
  • Open pollinated
  • Yes 16 No 5
  • Hybrid
  • Yes 19 No 2

The exchange seems to be easier for hybrid than
OP The No explanation for OP are Due to very
risk of illegal propagation, mainly in non UPOV
countries but not only, IP, PVP Laws
28
Survey analysisTechnologies and technology tools
(3)
  • Contracting party from developed country
  • Receiving party from developing country
  • Yes 17 No 1
  • Ag biotech
  • Biotechnology
  • Biotechnology, seed technology under binding
    agreements
  • Breeding and biotech capabilities
  • Breeding methods
  • Chemistry, crop protection
  • Germplasm
  • Lab techniques machinery
  • Molecular
  • Seeds
  • Yes 15 No 7
  • Ag biotech
  • Biotechnology
  • Breeding and biotech capabilities
  • Breeding tissue culture, marker technology
  • Breeding tools
  • Chemistry
  • Herbicide resistance biotech, molecular, primers
  • Molecular
  • Seeds
  • Various

Large exchange, same view between contracting and
receiving parties
29
Survey analysisSkill and know how (4)
  • Contracting party from developed country
  • Receiving party from developing country
  • Yes 19 No 8
  • Breeding technology 2
  • Crop and seed production know how
  • field management
  • field screening
  • plant breeding
  • production processes
  • Quality in production
  • Seed production 3
  • technology, expertise, IP
  • training
  • various
  • Yes 12 No 11
  • breeding skills
  • breeding tissue culture, marker technology
  • diseases resistance breeding, healthy oil
    breeding
  • Seed production
  • technology, expertise, IP
  • various

30
Survey analysisProduction Hybrid / OP (5) (6)
  • Contracting party from developed country
  • Receiving party from developing country
  • Hybrid Yes 4 No 2
  • Corn, sunflower, vegetables, flowers
  • Main limiting factors IP protection, know how,
    climatic adaptation, too many papers.
  • OP Yes 17 No 9
  • Canola, cotton, cereals, beans, forage,
    ornamentals, soybean, vegetables, flowers
  • Main limiting factors IP protection and climatic
    adaptation
  • Hybrid Yes 8 No 15
  • Corn, sunflower, vegetables, flowers
  • Main limiting factors parent lines protection,
    to be competitive
  • OP Yes 6 No 16
  • Clover, rapeseed, vegetables, alfalfa, flowers
  • Main limiting factors IP protection, no demand,
    not feasible

Easier to exchange germplasm in hybrid than
producing on site due to IP protection and
31
Survey analysisWinter nursery (7)
  • Contracting party from developed country
  • Receiving party from developing country
  • Yes 8 No 20
  • Corn, cotton, sunflower, oilseed, triticale,
    vegetables
  • Limiting factors costs, movement of germplasm
  • Yes 6 No 17
  • Corn, cotton, vegetables, sunflower, rapeseed,
    flowers
  • Limiting factors costs, movement of germplasm

Same evaluation from developed and developing
countries
32
Survey analysisBusiness linkage and marketing (8)
  • Contracting party from developed country
  • Receiving party from developing country
  • Yes 22 No 3
  • Limiting factors
  • ability to commit a contract,
  • cost of seed,
  • no sufficient variety protection,
  • mentality of potential partners
  • Yes 20 No 2
  • Limiting factors
  • expensive seeds from developed countries

Highest rank for Yes both side but still some
limiting factors to take into account!
33
Survey analysis
  • Activity of the companies
  • Size of the activity
  • Breeding Yes 23 No 7
  • Production Yes 27 No 1
  • Marketing Yes 29 No 0
  • 0 to 10 M 6
  • 10 to 50 M 11
  • 50 to 200 M 4
  • More 8

Major companies have replied to the survey
34
Thank you for your attention
35
Preliminary remarks from seed companies
  • Need to be practical and make impact on the
    ground within the projects
  • Each partys mission is identified and bring
    their core competencies focused on each project
  • Planning and resources dedicated to success
  • good clear plan in writing
  • goals to achieve
  • stay on track
  • sort out misunderstanding
  • Coordination to have all parties on board on the
    same targets and in due time
  • Publicity / aids / communication
  • Precise timing for development versus business
    relationship
  • Self sustainability as the ultimate step of the
    support
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com