Title: Federal Budgets and Public Policy
1Macro
ECON
McEachern 2008-2009
13
CHAPTER
Federal Budgets and Public Policy
Designed by Amy McGuire, B-books, Ltd.
2The Federal Budget Process
- Federal budget
- Outlays
- Government purchases
- Transfer payments
- Revenues
- Specific period
- Federal government shifted focus
- From national defense
- To redistribution
LO1
3Exhibit 1
LO1
Defenses Share of Federal Outlays Declined Since
1960 and Redistribution Increased
4Presidential and Congressional Roles
- The President
- Budget proposal
- Budget request from each agency
- The budget of U.S. government to Congress
- Council of Economic Advisors
- Economic report of the President
- House and Senate
- Budget committees Budget resolution
LO1
5Presidential and Congressional Roles
- Budget deficit Outlays gt Revenues
- Stimulates AD in short run
- Reduces national saving
- Long run hinder economic growth
- Budget surplus Revenues gt Outlays
- Dampens AD in short run
- Boosts domestic saving
- Long run promote economic growth
LO1
6Problems with Federal Budget Process
- Continuing resolutions
- Instead of budget decisions
- Lengthy budget process
- Uncontrollable budget items
- No separate capital budget
- Overly detailed budget
LO1
7Possible Budget Reforms
- Biennial budget (two-year budget)
- Simplify the budget document
- Federal spending
- Capital budget
- Operating budget
LO1
8Fiscal Impact of the Federal Deficits
- Rationale for deficits
- Outlays that increase economys productivity
- Budget philosophies and deficits
- Annually balanced budget
- Cyclically balanced budget
- Functional finance
LO2
9Fiscal Impact of the Federal Deficits
- Federal deficits since birth of the nation
- 1789-1930
- Deficit 33 of years (war)
- Since the Great Depression
- Deficit 85 of years
- 1980s relatively large deficits
- Large tax cuts
- High defense spending
- 1990s improved economy
- Decreasing deficits
- By 1998 surplus
LO2
10Fiscal Impact of the Federal Deficits
- Federal deficits since birth of the nation
- 2001 recession
- Tax cuts
- Higher federal spending
- Deficits
- Weak recovery
- War against terrorism
- 2003, deficit 3.5 of GDP
- 2007 stronger economy
- Rising stock market
- Deficit 1.2 of GDP
LO2
11Exhibit 2
LO2
After Decades of Federal Budget Deficits,
Surpluses Appeared from 1998 to 2001, But
Deficits Are Back
12Fiscal Impact of the Federal Deficits
- Why have deficits persisted?
- Tax cuts
- Spending increase
- Federal officials
- Not required to balance the budget
- Elected officials
- Big spending programs
- Small taxes
- Pork-barrel spending
LO2
13Fiscal Impact of the Federal Deficits
- Increase federal deficits
- National saving reduced
- Interest rates higher
- Investment
- Discouraged (crowding out)
- Stimulated (crowding in)
LO2
14Fiscal Impact of the Federal Deficits
- The twin deficits
- Finance huge deficits
- U.S. Treasury sells IOUs
- High interest rates
- Greater demand for
- U.S. trade deficit increase
- Foreigners buy U.S. assets
- Increase I
- Decline S
LO2
15Fiscal Impact of the Federal Deficits
- The short-lived budget surplus
- Tax increases
- 1990, spending cuts
- Decrease deficits
- Slower growth in federal outlays
- 1990-2000 reduced U.S. military abroad
- Interest rates decreased
- A reversal of fortune in 2001
- Recession Terrorist attacks
- Great federal spending
- 2002 federal deficit
LO2
16Exhibit 3
LO2
During the 1990s, Federal Outlays Declined
Relative to GDP and Revenues Increased, Turning
Deficits into Surpluses, But Not for Long
17Reforming Social Security and Medicare
LO2
- Social Security
- From current workers, employees
- To current retirees (pensions)
- 1,000 per month
- Medicare
- From payroll taxes
- To short-term medical care for the elderly
- 11,000 per beneficiary in 2007
Case Study
18Reforming Social Security and Medicare
LO2
- 76 million baby boomers
- 1940 42 workers per retiree
- 2007 3.3 workers per retiree
- 2030 2.1 workers per retiree
- Reforms
- Increase taxes
- Reduce benefits
- Raise the eligibility age
- Smaller annual increases
- Reduce benefits to wealthy retirees
Case Study
19Exhibit 4
LO2
Government Outlays as a Percentage of GDP
Declined Between 1994 and 2007 in Most Major
Economies
20The National Debt
- National debt
- Net accumulation of past deficits
- Measuring the national debt
- Gross debt
- U.S. Treasury notes by federal agencies
- Debt held by the public
- U.S. Treasury securities
- Households Firms
- Banks (include the Fed)
- Foreign entities
LO3
21Exhibit 5
LO3
Federal Debt Held by the Public as a Percentage
of GDP Since 1940
22The National Debt
- International perspective on public debt
- Different economies
- Different fiscal structures
- 44 of GDP
- Australia
- No debt
- Italy
- Debt 94 of GDP
LO3
23Exhibit 6
LO3
Relative to GDP, U.S. Net Public Debt in 2007 Was
About Average for Major Economies
24The National Debt
- Interest on the national debt
- Buyers of federal securities
- Individuals, 25
- Institutions, 1 million
- Increasing interest rates
- 1 percentage point increase in nominal interest
rate - Interest cost increase 51 billion per year
LO3
25Exhibit 7
LO3
Interest Payments on Federal Debt Held by the
Public as a Percentage of Federal Outlays Peaked
in 1996
26The National Debt
- Who bears the burden of debt?
- Billing future taxpayers
- For current spending
- We owe it to ourselves
- Future generations
- Service the debt
- Receive the payments
- Foreign ownership of debt
- Increase burden of debt
- Future generations of Americans
LO3
27Exhibit 8
LO3
Foreign Holders of U.S. Treasury Securities
28The National Debt
- Crowding out and capital formation
- Deficit spending, long run
- Borrowed funds invested in public capital
- Increased productivity
- Increased standard of living
- Borrowed funds current expenditures
- Less capital formation
LO3
29The National Debt
- Intergenerational view of deficits and debt
- Welfare of generations
- Tied together
- Parents now
- Consume less
- Save more
- Reduce the burden on next generation
- Issues
- People with no children
- Informed of federal spending
LO3
30LO3
An Intergenerational View of Deficits and Debt
- Barro model
- assumes parents are concerned about the welfare
of their children, who, in turn, - are concerned about the welfare of their children
- and so on for generations.
Case Study
31LO3
An Intergenerational View of Deficits and Debt
- Barro Parents can reduce the burden of the
federal debt on future generations by - consuming less
- saving more
Case Study
32LO3
An Intergenerational View of Deficits and Debt
- As governments substitute deficits for taxes,
parents consume less/save more to increase
gifts/bequests to their children. - If greater saving offsets federal deficits,
deficit spending will not increase AD because the
decline in consumption will negate the fiscal
stimulus provided by deficits. - This offsets future burden of higher debt and
neutralizes effect of deficit spending on AD,
output, and employment.
Case Study
33LO3
An Intergenerational View of Deficits and Debt
- Critics
- The evidence fails to support his theory because
large federal deficits coincided with lower, not
higher, saving rates. - Those with no children may be less concerned
about the welfare of future generations. - Theory assumes people are aware of federal
spending and tax policies and about the future
consequences of current policies.
Case Study