Title: Blogging and Defamation Laws
1Blogging and Defamation Laws
2Overview
- Discussion will focus on 2 things
- Actions initiated against bloggers and
- (Residual) rights as a consequence of the
actions.
3Actions Initiated Against Bloggers
- Various actions. Typically
- Defamation suits
- Prosecutions under the Sedition Act
- Detentions under ISA or
- Actions under the Communications and Multimedia
Act
4Defamation
- Suits related to blogs
- January 2007 - NST vs. Jeff Ooi, NST 4 Ors. vs.
Ahiruddin Attan (Rockybru) - March 2008 - Nordin Kardi UUM vs. RPK, Dato
Seri Abdul Azim Mohd. Zabidi vs. RPK - June 2008 - Lt-Col Aziz Buyong Lt-Col Norhayati
Hassan vs. RPK - August 2008 - Datuk Muhammad Shafee Abdullah vs.
RPK, FN Dairies Sdn. Bhd. vs. Edward Skading - NOTE Suit against Detikdaily (a news portal)
disregarded.
5Defamation
- Orders granted in defamation suits range from
- Damages
- Injunction
- Contempt proceedings
- Imprisonment (criminal defamation) and
- Fines (criminal defamation).
- NOTE Pre-action discovery proceedings to
discover identity of users may also be an option.
See Stemlife Berhad v. Bristol-Myers Squibb (M)
Sdn. Bhd. and Datuk Muhammad Shafee Abdullah v.
RPK
6Sedition
- Detentions and prosecutions under the Sedition
Act - Public Prosecutor vs. RPK (May 2008)
- Public Prosecutor vs. Syed Akbar Ali (May 2008)
- Public Prosecutor vs. Syed Azidi (Kickdefella)
September 2008 - Upon conviction
- Fine, imprisonment or both see s. 4(1) and
- prohibition against issuance or circulation of
material by Court (see s. 10)
7Internal Security Act
- Detentions under ISA RPK
- 12th. September 2008 (Section 73 60 day
detention by Police Officer) - 24th. September, 2008 Section 8(1) 2 year
detention by Minister - Can result in indefinite detention due to right
of extension s. 8(7) ISA
8Communications and Multimedia Act
- ISPs blocking access to website pursuant to
provisions of Communications and Multimedia Act
1998 (CMA) Malaysia Today (RPK) August, 2008 - Also note that Complaints Bureau can grant other
reliefs written reprimand, fine and removal of
content in question.
9Consequence of Actions
- Chilling effect on freedom of speech and
expression on Malaysia - Loss of credibility - participants will choose to
be anonymous - Narrower space for speech and expression
- What rights left for free speech and
expression?
10Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Overview
- Rights preserved by the following
- Federal Constitution
- Defences to defamation proceedings
justification, qualified privilege and fair
comment - Exceptions to sedition
- ISA policy and law
11Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Constitution
- The Federal Constitution
- Article 10(1)
- (a) every citizen has the right to freedom of
speech and expression
12Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Constitution
- Right to free speech DOES NOT extend to matters
affecting security of the Federation (or part
thereof), public order, morality, contempt of
court, defamation or incitement to any offence.
Art. 10(2) - Right also DOES NOT extend to questioning special
privileges, sovereignty of the Rulers etc. Art.
10(4) See Sedition Act
13Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Constitution
- Cases PP. v. Lau Dak Kee and Mark Koding v. PP
(not basic structure). Cf. PP. v. Madhavan Nair,
Lee Kuan Yew v. Chin Vui Khen, Article 10(2) and
10(4) - Case law - rights exist but can be watered down
by legislation passed under Art 10(2) or 10(4)
rights are residual.
14Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Defamation
- Excluded from your right of free speech and
expression is the right to defame another Art.
10(2) - Meaning of defamation - cant injure someones
reputation. E.g. - Writing letters to friend saying PLC is
defrauding investors arguably, defamatory of
PLC - Speak at a forum claiming building is badly
designed arguably, defamatory of architect - Creating a fake page on the Internet of a
personality defamatory of personality? - Does this mean that you can never say or write
anything which injures someones reputation?
15Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Defamation
- NO - as evident by defences applicable to
defamation cases - Statement was true strongest defence.
(justification) - Had a legal, social or moral duty to provide
statement to a particular recipient. E.g. Teacher
commenting to parents about child being naughty.
(qualified privilege)
16Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Defamation
- Expressing an opinion acceptable if facts were
reasonably accurate and published in the public
interest. (fair comment) - Put another way there is a right to defame in
specified circumstances
17Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Defamation
- Questions
- What if you hyperlink the home page of a website
with defamatory information or images? - See International Telephone Link Pty. Ltd. v. IDG
Communications Limited Anor and The New Straits
Times Press (Malaysia) Bhd. v. Ahirudin Attan - What if you hyperlink to a specific page on
another web site which contains defamatory images
or page? - See Stemlife Berhad v. Bristol-Myers Squibb (M)
Sdn. Bhd. and cf. Bunt v. Tilley 3 All ER 336
2006 EWHC 407 (QB)
18Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Defamation
- What if you use tags, categories or keywords to
enable a defamatory image or defamatory page
contained on another web site to be discovered? - See Hird v. Wood 1894 34 SJ 234
19Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Sedition
- Sedition Act passed in 1948 prior to
Independence - What is seditious? See s. 3 Sedition Act, 1948
no disaffection to be made against Ruler or
Government, no promotion of ill-will and
hostility between races, no questioning of
special privilege etc.
20Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Sedition
- What can be blogged or commented about? See s.
3(2) Sedition Act, 1948 - can point out mistakes made by Ruler
- can point out errors or defects in any Government
or constitution, or in legislation, or in the
administration of justice with a view of
remedying errors or defects - except in respect of special privilege etc, can
point out, with a view of removal, any matters
producing ill-will between races etc.
21Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Internal Security Act
- Precursor (Emergency Regulations Ordinance 1948)
conceived to combat armed insurgency of the MCP - Stated purpose of Act by 1st Prime Minister to
combat communists - My Cabinet colleagues and I gave a solemn
promise to Parliament and the nation that the
immense powers given to the government under the
ISA would never be used to stifle legitimate
opposition and silence lawful dissent
22Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Internal Security Act
- Act shouldnt apply to civilians but case law
rejects this - Right to be informed of grounds of arrest and
this should not be vague Art. 5(3) Federal
Constitution and Abd Malek Hussin v. Borhan Hj.
Daud Ors 2008 1 CLJ 264 - Right to file a writ demanding the release of the
detainee subject to proving that detention is
unlawful Nik Adli bin Nik Abdul Aziz v. Ketua
Polis Negara
23Residual Right to Free Speech and Expression
Internal Security Act
- Right for initial inquiries to be made by police
under s. 73 (being initial detention provision)
BEFORE final detention under s. 8 Tan Sri Raja
Khalid bin Raja Harun - If arrest and detention proves to be wrongful,
right to sue for damages Abd Malek Hussin v.
Borhan Hj Daud Ors
24Conclusion
- It is a paradox that every dictator has climbed
to power on the ladder of free speech.
Immediately on attaining power each dictator has
suppressed all free speech except his own.
Herbert Hoover - The most stringent protection of free speech
would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire
in a theater and causing a panic. Oliver Wendell
Holmes, Jr. - Despite the obvious tension, what should be our
course for the future?