Ulrich%20Sperhake

1
Numerical simulations of high-energy
collisions Of black hole
Ulrich Sperhake Friedrich-Schiller Universität
Jena
Work with E.Berti, V.Cardoso, J.A.Gonzalez,
F.Pretorius
Relativity Seminar Austin, 18th March 2008
Work supported by the SFB TR7
2
Overview

• Black holes in physics

• General Relativity

• Ingredients of numerical relativity

• Results

• High energy collisions

• Summary

3
1. Black holes in physics
4
Black Holes predicted by GR

• Black holes predicted by Einsteins theory of
  relativity

• Term Black hole by John A. Wheeler 1960s

• Vacuum solutions with a singularity

• For a long time mathematical curiosity

• valuable insight into theory

• but real objects in the universe?

• That picture has changed dramatically!

5
How to characterize a black hole?

• Consider light cones

• Outgoing, ingoing light

• Calculate surface area

of outgoing light

• ExpansionRate of

change of that area

• Apparent horizon

Outermost surface with zero expansion

• Light cones tip over due to curvature

6
Black Holes in astrophysics

• Black holes are important in astrophysics

• Black holes found at
• centers of galaxies

• Structure of galaxies

• Important sources of
• electromagnetic radiation

• Structure formation in
• the early universe

7
Fundamental physics of black holes

• Allow for unprecedented tests of fundamental
  physics

• Strongest sources of Gravitational Waves (GWs)
• Test alternative theories of gravity
• No-hair theorem of GR
• Production in Accelerators

8
Gravitational wave physics

• Accelerating bodies produce GWs

• Weber 1960s

• Bar detector
• Claimed detection probably not real

• GWs displace particles

• GW observatories GEO600, LIGO, TAMA, VIRGO
• Bar detectors

9
The big picture
Detectors
Physical system
observe
test
Provide info
describes
Help detection

• Model
• GR (NR)
• PN
• Perturbation theory
• Alternative Theories?

• External Physics
• Astrophysics
• Fundamental Physics
• Cosmology

10
2. General relativity
11
The framework General Relativity

• Curvature generates
• acceleration

geodesic deviation
No force !!

• Description of geometry

Metric
Connection
Riemann Tensor
12
The metric defines everything

• Christoffel connection

• Covariant derivative

• Riemann Tensor

• Geodesic deviation

• Parallel transport

13
How to get the metric?

• The metric must obey the Einstein Equations

• Ricci-Tensor, Einstein-Tensor, Matter tensor

Trace-reversed Ricci
Matter

• Einstein Equations

• Take metric
• Calculate
• Use that as matter tensor

• Solutions Easy!

• Physically meaningful solutions Difficult!

14
The Einstein equations in vacuum

• Spacetime tells matter how to move,
• matter tells spacetime how to curve

• Field equations

Second order PDEs for the metric components
Invariant under coordinate (gauge) transformations

• System of equations extremely complex Pile
  of paper!

Analytic solutions Minkowski,
Schwarzschild, Kerr,
Robertson-Walker,
Numerical methods necessary for general
scenarios!
15
3. The basics of numerical relativity
16
A list of tasks

• Target Predict time evolution of BBH in GR

• Einstein equations

• Cast as evolution system
• Choose specific formulation
• Discretize for Computer

• Choose coordinate conditions Gauge

• Fix technical aspects

• Mesh-refinement / spectral domains
• Excision
• Parallelization
• Find large computer

• Construct realistic initial data

• Start evolution and wait

• Extract physics from the data

Gourgoulhon gr-qc/0703035
17
3.1. The Einstein equations
18
31 decomposition

• GR Space and time exist together as
  Spacetime

• Numerical relativity reverse this process!

• ADM 31 decomposition

Arnowitt, Deser, Misner (1962) York
(1979) Choquet-Bruhat, York (1980)
3-metric
lapse
shift

• lapse, shift Gauge

• Einstein equations

6 Evolution equations
4 Constraints

• Constraints preserved under evolution!

19
The ADM equations

• Time projection

Hamiltonian constraint

• Mixed projection

Momentum constraints

• Spatial projection

Evolution equations
20
The structure of the ADM equations

• Constraints

• They do not contain time derivatives

• They must be satisfied on each slice

• The Bianchi identities propagate the constraints

If they are satisfied initially, they are always
satisfied

• Evolution equations

• Commonly written as first order system

• Gauge

• Equations say nothing about lapse and shift
  !

21
The ADM equations as an initial value problem

• Entwicklungsgleichungen

22
Alternatives to the ADM equations

• Unfortunately the ADM eqs. do not seem to work
  in NR !!

Weak hyperbolicity Nearby initial data can
diverge
From each other super-exponentially

• Many alternative formulations have been
  suggested

• Two successful families so far

• ADM based formulations BSSN

Shibata Nakamura 95, Baumgarte Shapiro 99

• Generalized harmonic formulations

Choque-Bruhat 62, Garfinkle 04, Pretorius 05
23
The BSSN equations
24
3.2. Gauge choices
25
The gauge freedom

• Remember Einstein equations say nothing about

• Any choice of lapse and shift gives a solution

• This represents the coordinate freedom of GR

• Physics do not depend on

So why bother?

• Avoid coordinate singularities!

• Stop the code from running into the physical
  singularity

• No full-proof recipe, but

• Singularity avoiding slicing

• Use shift to avoid coordinate stretching

26
3.3. Initial data
27
Initial data problem
Two problems
Constraints, realistic data

• York-Lichnerowicz split
• Rearrange degrees of freedom

• Conformal transverse traceless
• Physical transverse traceless
• Thin sandwich

York, Lichnerowicz
OMurchadha, York
Wilson, Mathews York

• Conformal flatness Kerr is NOT conformally
  flat!

Non-physical GWs problematic for high energy
collisions!
28
2 families of initial data

• Generalized analytic solutions

Isotropic Schwarzschild
Time-symmetric, -holes
Brill-Lindquist, Misner (1960s)
Spin, Momenta
Bowen, York (1980)
Punctures
Brandt, Brügmann (1997)

• Excision Data IH boundary conditions on
  excision surface

Meudon group Cook, Pfeiffer Ansorg

• Quasi-circular

• Effective potential
• PN parameters
• helical Killing Vektor

29
4. Extracting physics
30
Basic assumptions

• Extracting physics in NR is non-trivial !!

• Newtonian quantities are not always
  well-defined !!

• We assume that the ADM variables

Lapse
Shift
3-metric
Extrinsic curvature
are given on each hypersurface

• Even when using other formulations, the ADM
  variables

are straightforward to calculate
31
Global quantities

• ADM mass Global energy of the spacetime

• Total angular momentum of the spacetime

By construction all of these are time-independent
!!
32
Local quantities

• Often impossible to define !!

• Isolated horizon framework

Ashtekar and coworkers

• Calculate apparent horizon

• irreducible mass, momenta associated with horizon

• Total BH mass

Christodoulou

• Binding energy of a binary

33
Gravitational waves

• Most important result Emitted gravitational
  waves (GWs)

• Newman-Penrose scalar

Complex 2 free functions

• GWs allow us to measure

• Radiated energy

• Radiated momenta

• Angular dependence of radiation

• Predicted strain

34
Angular dependence

• Waves are normally extracted at fixed radius

are viewed from the source frame !!

• Decompose angular dependence

• Modes

• Spin-weighted spherical harmonics

35
5. Status of black hole simulations
36
A very brief history

• First attemts Hahn and Lindquist 1960s,
  Eppley and Smarr 1970s

• Breakthrough Pretorius 2005, Brownsville,
  NASA Goddard 2005

• Problems

• Computer resources

• AMR

• Instabilities Gauge, Equations

• Now about 10 codes

• GHG

• Moving puncture

37
The BBH breakthrough

• Simplest configuration

• GWs circularize orbit
• quasi-circular initial data

Pretorius 05

• BBH breakthrough

• Initial data scalar field

• Radiated energy

25 50 75 100 4.7 3.2 2.7 2.3

• Eccentricity

38
Astrophysical binaries basics

• 4 stages of BBH merger

• Newtonian inspiral (not GW driven)

• Post-Newtonian (PN) inspiral phase (GW driven)

• merger (Numerical Relativity)

• Ring-down (Perturbation Theory)

• Free parameters

• 1 Total mass (merely a scaling factor)

• 1 Mass ratio

• 6 Spin

• 1 Eccentricity GWs circularize orbit

• NR can only simulate the last orbits

39
Astrophysical binaries Results

• Equal-mass, non-spinning binaries

• of the total mass of the system

• GWs quadrupole dominated

• Good agreement with PN predictions for GW
  emission

• Recoil or kick

• Unequal mass and/or spin kick

• Certain spin configurations

Enough to eject BHs from galaxies
Observations such large kicks not generic

• Spin-flip

• Merger spin realignment

• X-shaped radio sources

40
Zoom whirl orbits
Pretorius Khurana 07

• 1-parameter family of initial data linear
  momentum

• Fine-tune parameter

Threshold of immediate merger

• Analogue in gedodesics !

• Reminiscent of

Critical phenomena
41
6. High energy collision
42
Motivation

• No known mechanism to accelerate BHs to

• Such collisions unlikely to occur in
  astrophysical scenarios

• But

• Probe GR in the most dynamic range

• Near the speed of light, structure is lost

Collisions might describe generic collisions

• Test cosmic censorship

• Threshold of immediate merger Pretorius 2006

Indication of unexpected phenomena
43
Setup of the problem

• Take two black holes

Total rest mass
Initial position
Linear momentum

• For now Equal-mass, head-on

• Target GW energy

Mode distribution of GW energy
44
Analytic studies of a single boosted BH

• Analytically studied case

• Schwarzschild boosted with

Aichelburg-Sexl metric

• Planar shock wave travelling along

• Minkowskian everywhere else

• No event horizon!

45
Analytic studies of a BH binary

• Superpose two Aichelburg-Sexl metrics

Shock waves collide Penrose, Eardley Giddings

• Future trapped surface!

• Max. gravitational radiation
  Penrose

• Perturb superposed Aichelburg-Sexl metrics

DEath Payne 90s
First correction term reduces GWs to
46
Analytic studies of a BH binary

• Instant Collision approximation

Applied to superposed Aichelburg-Sexl
metric Smarr Adler Zeks
Energy spectrum
i) Flat at sufficiently low
ii) Radiation isotropic in the limit
iii) Functional relation
iv) Multipole structure

• Numerical simulations Grand Challenge 90s

Limited accuracy, mild boosts
47
Numerical simulations

• LEAN code Sperhake 07

• Based on the Cactus computational toolkit

• BSSN formulation

• Puncture initial data Brandt Brügmann 1996

• Elliptic solver TwoPunctures Ansorg 2005

• Mesh refinement Carpet Schnetter 04

• Numerically very challenging!

• Length scales

Horizon Lorentz-contracted Pancake

• Mergers extremely violent

• Substantial amounts of unphysical junk
  radiation

48
Case example

• Boost

• initial separation

• Total radiated energy

• Mode energy

• Junk radiation

49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
55
(No Transcript)
56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
Modes
60
Modes
61
Modes
62
Modes
63
Modes
64
Modes
65
Energy spectrum

• Junk radiation affects spectrum for small
  separations

66
Conclusions

• Introduction to Numerical Relativity

• NR has solved the binary problem

• Key results on kicks, spin-flips, PN, data
  analysis

• High energy collisions

Penrose limit
Numerical simulations very difficult (junk
radiation!)
Merger radiation for

• Todo Improve accuracy, larger

67
Gravitational recoil

• Anisotropic emission of GWs radiates momentum
• recoil of remaining system

• Leading order Overlap of Mass-quadrupole
• with
  octopole/flux-quadrupole
• Bonnor Rotenburg 61, Peres 62,
  Bekenstein 73

• Merger of galaxies

Merger of BHs
Recoil
BH kicked out?
68
Gravitational recoil

• Escape velocities

Globular clusters
dSph
dE
Giant galaxies
Merrit et al 04

• Ejection or displacement of BHs has
  repercussions on

• Structure formation in the universe

• BH populations

IMBHs via ejection?

• Growth history of Massive Black Holes

• Structure of galaxies

69
Kicks of non-spinning black holes

• Simulations PSU 07, Goddard 07

• Parameter study Jena 07

• Target Maximal Kick

• Mass ratio

• 150,000 CPU hours

• Maximal kick
• for

• Convergence 2nd order

• Spin

70
Super Kicks

• Test Rochester-Prediction Jena 07

• Two models

Lean Bam

• Model I

• Lean code
• Moving puncture method version
• Not quasi-circular
• Resolutions

• Model II Safety check with independent code
  BAM

71
Convergence

• Discretization error