Personality and emotion in animals - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Personality and emotion in animals

Description:

Podberscek, A. L. & Gosling, S. D. (2000) ... Gosling, S. D. & John, O. P. (1999) ... Gosling, S. D. (2001) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:239
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: liverpoolh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Personality and emotion in animals


1
Personality and emotion in animals
  • Darwin suggested continuity of emotional
    expression across species (e.g. jealousy, rage,
    curiosity)
  • Early researchers (e.g. Yerkes, Hebb) studied
    individual differences in temperament or emotion
  • Later work (on e.g. primates, dogs, cats,
    octupus, goats) focuses on stable, underlying
    traits, and whether trait ratings relate to
    observable behaviour.

2
Main concerns in animal personality research
  • Has adopted similar theroretical basis to human
    personality work
  • Focus on small number of underlying dimensions
  • Centrality of role of traits
  • Nomothetic approach assumed
  • Issues of reliability and validity
  • Trait-behaviour correspondences assumed
  • Distinction between implicit and explicit
    personality theories

3
Formal and lay approaches
  • Explicit personality theories based on
    quantitative measurements and observations
  • Implicit personality theories based upon
    subjective observations or impressions
  • Yeroen is calculating by nature. In an almost
    nervous way he keeps a close watch on his
    intersts. No one else is considered when he is
    pursuing his goal. He is a real go-getterLuit
    is a much more sociable individual than Yeroen.
    He has an open and friendly character and sets
    great store by company. He practically always
    seems to be in a good mood and creates a
    reliable impression. de Waal
    (1998)

4
Objective and subjective accounts of animal mind
Objective Subjective Detached Involved Quant
itative Qualitative Reason Experience Mechano
morphic Anthropomorphic Professional Lay
5
Personality in pets
  • Assumptions of personality important in the
    human-pet relationship
  • Some research suggests personality attributions
    of pets are a function of personality of owners
    (OFarrell neurotic dogs and humans)
  • Are attributions real reflections of personality
    traits in animals or do they reflect owner
    attributions (see Podberscek Gosling)

6
Possible questions
  • What kinds of evidence do we have that animals
    show personality differences?
  • Is it easier to think about personality
    differences in some species, compared to others?
  • Is it possible to talk about an animals
    personality in a way that is not anthropomorphic?
  • What aspects of the human-animal relationship may
    shape personality attributions?
  • To what extent could a standard set of
    personality trait terms be applied across
    species?

7
References
  • Podberscek, A. L. Gosling, S. D. (2000).
    Personality research on pets and their owners
    conceptual issues and review. In Podberscek, A.
    L., Paul, E. S. Serpell, J. A. (eds) Companion
    Animals and Us. Cambridge Cambridge University
    Press.
  • Gosling, S. D. John, O. P. (1999).
    Personality dimensions in nonhuman animals a
    cross-species review. Current Directions in
    Psychological Science, 8, 69-75.
  • Gosling, S. D. (2001). From mice to men What
    can we learn about personality from animal
    research? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 1, 45-86.
  • Kidd, A. H. Kidd, R. M. (1980). Personality
    characteristics and preferences in pet ownership.
    Psychological Reports, 46, 939-949.
  • Perrine, R. M. Osbourne, H. L. (1998).
    Personality characteristics of dog and cat
    persons. Anthrozoos, 11, 33-40.
  • De Waal, F. B. M. (1998) Revised ed. Chimpanzee
    Politics Power and Sex among Apes. Baltimore
    Johns Hopkins University Press.

8
References
  • Crist, E. (1997). From questions to stimuli, from
    answers to reactions the case of Clever Hans.
    Semiotica, 113-1/2, 1-42
  • Povinelli, D.J., Bering, J. and Giambrone, S.
    (2000). Toward a science of other minds escaping
    the argument by analogy. Cognitive Science, 24
    (3), 509-541
  • Soproni, K., Miklosi, A., Topal, J. and Csanyi,
    V. (2001). Comprehension of human communicative
    signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of
    Comparative Psychology, 115 (2), 122-126
  • http//fulltext.asp?resultSetIdR00000000hitNum2
    booleanTermpetfuzzyTerm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com