Title: Dan Hooper
1Dark Matter Annihilations and the WMAP Haze
- Dan Hooper
- Particle Astrophysics Center
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
- dhooper_at_fnal.gov
Fermilab September 10, 2007
2Dark Matter
- Evidence from a wide range of astrophysical
observations including rotation curves, CMB,
lensing, clusters, BBN, SN1a, large scale
structure - Each observes dark matter through its
gravitational influence - Still no observations of dark matters
electroweak interactions (or other
non-gravitational interactions)
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
3Dark Matter
- Evidence from a wide range of astrophysical
observations including rotation curves, CMB,
lensing, clusters, BBN, SN1a, large scale
structure - Each observes dark matter through its
gravitational influence - Still no observations of dark matters
electroweak interactions (or other
non-gravitational interactions) - The particle identity of dark matter remains
unknown
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
4The Thermal Abundance of Weakly Interacting
Massive Particles
- T gtgt m?, ?s in thermal equilibrium
- T lt m?, number density of ?s become Boltzmann
suppressed - T m?/20, Hubble expansion dominates over
annihilations, freeze-out occurs - Precise temperature at which freeze-out occurs,
and the density which results depends on the
WIMPs annihilation cross section
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
5The Weak Scale and Weakly Interacting Massive
Particles
- As a result of the thermal freeze-out process, a
relic density of WIMPs is left behind ? h2 xF
/ lt?vgt - For a particle with a GeV-TeV mass, to obtain a
thermal abundance equal to the observed dark
matter density, we need an annihilation cross
section of lt?vgt pb - Generic weak interaction yields
- lt?vgt ?2 (100 GeV)-2 pb
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
6The Weak Scale and Weakly Interacting Massive
Particles
- As a result of the thermal freeze-out process, a
relic density of WIMPs is left behind ? h2 xF
/ lt?vgt - For a particle with a GeV-TeV mass, to obtain a
thermal abundance equal to the observed dark
matter density, we need an annihilation cross
section of lt?vgt pb - Generic weak interaction yields
- lt?vgt ?2 (100 GeV)-2 pb
Numerical coincidence? Or an indication that
dark matter originates from EW physics?
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
7Astrophysical Probes of Particle Dark Matter
Direct Detection -Momentum transfer to
detector through elastic scattering
Indirect Detection -Observation of
annihilation products (?, ?, e, p, etc.)
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
8Indirect Detection of Dark Matter
?
- WIMP Annihilation Typical final states
include heavy fermions, gauge or Higgs bosons
?
W-
W
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
9Indirect Detection of Dark Matter
?
- WIMP Annihilation Typical final states
include heavy fermions, gauge or Higgs bosons - 2) Fragmentation/Decay Annihilation
products decay and/or fragment into some
combination of electrons, protons, deuterium,
neutrinos and gamma rays
?
W-
q
W
q
?
e
?0
p
?
?
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
10Indirect Detection of Dark Matter
?
- WIMP Annihilation Typical final states
include heavy fermions, gauge or Higgs bosons - 2) Fragmentation/Decay Annihilation
products decay and/or fragment into some
combination of electrons, protons, deuterium,
neutrinos and gamma rays - 3) Synchrotron and Inverse Compton Relativistic
electrons up-scatter starlight to MeV-GeV
energies, and emit synchrotron photons via
interactions with magnetic fields
?
W-
q
W
q
?
e
?0
p
?
?
?
e
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
11Indirect Detection of Dark Matter
Neutrinos from annihilations
in the core of the Sun Gamma Rays from
annihilations in the galactic
halo, near the galactic center, in dwarf
galaxies, etc. Positrons/Antiprotons from
annihilations throughout the galactic
halo Synchrotron Radiation from electron/positron
interactions with the magnetic fields of the
inner galaxy
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
12Indirect Detection With Synchtrotron
- Electrons/positrons produced in dark
matter annihilations inverse Compton scatter
with starlight and emit synchrotron
photons as they propagate through the galactic
magnetic fields - For electroweak-scale dark matter, the resulting
synchrotron radiation falls within the frequency
range of WMAP
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
13WMAP As A Synchrotron Telescope
- In addition to CMB photons, WMAP data is
contaminated by a number of galactic
foregrounds that must be accurately subtracted - The WMAP frequency range is well suited to
minimize the impact of foregrounds - Substantial challenges are involved in
identifying and removing foregrounds
Thermal Dust
Soft Synchrotron
WMAP
Free-Free
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
14WMAP Foregrounds
- Soft Synchrotron - From SN shocks morphology
traced by the 408 MHz Haslam map - Free-Free - Hot gas electron/ion thermal
Bremsstrahlung morphology traced by the H?
recombination line map (Finkbeiner, 2003) - Thermal/Spinning Dust -Emission
from vibrating and spinning dust grains
morphology traced by the SFD98 dust map
(Schlegel et al.) and the 94 GHz
Finkbeiner map
Thermal Dust
Soft Synchrotron
WMAP
Free-Free
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
15Synchrotron
Free-free
T S Dust
WMAP
CMB
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
16Synchrotron
Free-free
T S Dust
WMAP
Well, actually No
CMB
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
17Synchrotron
Free-free
_
T S Dust
WMAP
CMB
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
18The WMAP Haze
22 GHz
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
19The WMAP Haze
22 GHz
After known foregrounds are subtracted, an excess
appears in the residual maps within the inner
20? around the Galactic Center
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
20The WMAP Haze
22 GHz
- Initially interpreted as likely thermal
bremsstrahlung (free-free emission)
from hot gas (104-106 K) - This interpretation has since been ruled out
by the lack of a corresponding H?
recombination (X-ray) line - Appears to be hard synchrotron emission from a
new population of energetic electrons/positrons
in the inner galaxy - -Too hard to be supernovae shocks
- -Too extended to be a singular event (GRB,
etc.) - Very Difficult to explain astrophysically
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
21Dark Matter and the WMAP Haze
- In 2004, Doug Finkbeiner suggested that the
WMAP Haze could be synchtrotron from
electrons/positrons produced in dark
matter annihilations in the inner galaxy
(astro-ph/0409027) - In particular, he noted that
- 1) Assuming an NFW profile, a WIMP mass of 100
GeV and an annihilation cross section of 3x10-26
cm3/s, the total power in dark matter
annihilations in the inner 3 kpc of the Milky Way
is 1.2x1039 GeV/sec - 2) The total power of the WMAP Haze is between
0.7x1039 and 3x1039 GeV/sec
22 GHz
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
22Dark Matter and the WMAP Haze
- In 2004, Doug Finkbeiner suggested that the
WMAP Haze could be synchtrotron from
electrons/positrons produced in dark
matter annihilations in the inner galaxy
(astro-ph/0409027) - In particular, he noted that
- 1) Assuming an NFW profile, a WIMP mass of 100
GeV and an annihilation cross section of 3x10-26
cm3/s, the total power in dark matter
annihilations in the inner 2 kpc of the Milky Way
is 1.2x1039 GeV/sec - 2) The total power of the WMAP Haze is between
0.7x1039 and 3x1039 GeV/sec
22 GHz
Coincidence?
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
23Electron-Positron Diffusion
- When electrons/positrons are produced in dark
matter annihilations, they travel through the
galaxys tangled magnetic fields, losing energy
via synchtrotron and inverse Compton - Resulting spectrum can be calculated by solving
the diffusion-loss equation - For 10-50 GeV e/- in the inner
galaxy, leads to 0.1-1 kpc diffusion
(1-10?)
Source Term
Diffusion Constant
Energy Loss Rate
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
24Fitting The Haze To The Dark Matter Halo Profile
- When the effects of diffusion
are accounted for, we find that an
NFW halo profile (? ? R-1) under produces
the WMAP haze at small angles - Angular distribution of the haze matches that
found for a cusped halo profile, with ? ? R-1.2 - Although the precise result of this fit depends
on the diffusion parameters adopted (magnetic
fields, starlight density, etc.), the approximate
result (slope of -1.1 to -1.3) is fairly robust
?(R) ? R-1.2
Significant systematic errors
?(R) ? R-1 (NFW)
Hooper, G. Dobler and D. Finkbeiner,
arXiv0705.3655
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
25Dark Matter Annihilation Radiation and the
Spectrum of the WMAP Haze
- To some extent, the Haze is seen in all five of
WMAPs frequency bands (although significant
systematic errors make the high frequency
information somewhat unreliable) - By comparing the ratio of the intensities at 22
and 33 GHz from the inner galaxy, the responsible
electron/positron spectrum can be constrained,
and along with it the dark matter mass and
annihilation modes
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
(Caution statistical errors only)
26Dark Matter Annihilation Radiation and the
Spectrum of the WMAP Haze
- The WMAP data are consistent with a ratio of
intensities at 22 and 33 GHz within the
range of 1.0-1.4 - For WIMPs annihilating to gauge bosons or
leptons, a WIMP with a mass in the
range of 50 GeV to multi-TeV
is acceptable - For a WIMP annihilating to b quarks, 200 GeV
to multi-TeV is favored
bb
WW, ZZ
??
ee
??
Hooper, G. Dobler and D. Finkbeiner,
arXiv0705.3655
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
27The Dark Matter Annihilation Cross Section
- For a given annihilation mode, diffusion
parameters and halo profile, we can calculate the
annihilation cross section needed
to normalize the observed
intensity of the WMAP Haze - For a typical 100-1000 GeV WIMP, the annihilation
cross section needed is within a factor of 2-3 of
the value needed to generate the density of dark
matter thermally (3x10-26 cm3/s) No boost
factors are required!
bb
WW, ZZ
??
??
ee
Hooper, G. Dobler and D. Finkbeiner,
arXiv0705.3655
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
28Testing the Haze-Dark Matter Connection With
Gamma-Rays
- Advantages of Gamma-Rays
- Propagate undeflected (point sources possible,
angular information) - Propagate without energy loss (spectral
information) - Rapid development in both space (GLAST) and
ground-based (HESS, MAGIC, VERITAS)
technologies
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
29Gamma-Rays From The Galactic Center
- Simulations predict that the GC contains very
high densities of dark matter (and high
annihilation rates) - Long considered likely to be the brightest dark
matter annihilation region in the sky - HESS, MAGIC, WHIPPLE and CANGAROO each claim
positive detection of TeV gamma-rays - Evidence for dark matter, or other astrophysics?
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
30Gamma-Rays From The Galactic Center
- Spectrum as measured by HESS extends to at least
10TeV - Consistent with a constant power-law spectrum
- To fit with dark matter would require a very
heavy particle (15-30 TeV) - Far too heavy for
a neutralino - A very heavy dark matter candidate
also fails to match the spectral
shape reported by HESS
Power-Law Fit
Heavy DM
HESS Collaboration, PRL, astro-ph/0610509
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
31Gamma-Rays From The Galactic Center
- The GC is a region rich in extreme astrophysical
objects - Particle acceleration associated with
supermassive black hole? - Aharonian and Neronov (astro-ph/0408303),
- Atoyan and Dermer (astro-ph/0410243)
- This astrophysical source represents a very
daunting background for future dark matter
searches to compete with
Hooper, Perez, Silk, Ferrer and Sarkar, JCAP,
astro-ph/0404205
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
32Gamma-Rays From The Galactic Center
- Prospects for GLAST and other future gamma-ray
experiments are reduced as a result of this new
background - Range of annihilation rates observable with
GLAST is reduced considerably - Other potential sources of dark matter
annihilation radiation become more
interesting (dwarf spheroidal galaxies,
the diffuse background, etc.)
Excluded by HESS
Excluded by EGRET
GLAST Reach
GLAST Reach (neglecting BG)
Hooper and G. Zaharijas, PRD, hep-ph/0603540
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
33Gamma-Ray Signals of The Dark Matter-WMAP Haze
Connection
- The observed properties of the Haze can be used
to calculate the intensity and angular
distribution of gamma rays from dark matter
annihilations from the inner galaxy - An angular distribution and intensity similar to
this prediction would provide an important
confirmation of the dark matter origin of the
haze Conversely the absence of such a signal
would refute the hypothesis (highly falsifiable!)
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
34Gamma-Ray Signals of The WMAP Haze
Projected GLAST Error Bars
Inner 0.1?
0.3?-0.5?
background
Annihilations to heavy fermions or gauge
bosons and easily identifiable by GLAST
annihilations to muons/electrons are unlikley to
be observable
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
Dobler, Finkbeiner, Hooper, Zaharijas, in
preparation
35The WMAP Haze In Light Of Planck
- Planck (launch in 2008) will represent a
major step forward from WMAP - Improved frequency coverage
- Much greater polarization information
(synchrotron emission is highly polarized) - Improved angular resolution
- At frequencies above 100 GHz, all foregrounds
other than emission from thermal dust are
negligible subtracting one
foreground rather than the several
(3 or 4) required at WMAP frequencies will
enable for a much more robust confirmation of the
synchrotron origin of the Haze - Systematic uncertainties are expected to be
reduced by more than an order of magnitude
relative to WMAP
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
36What About Other Claims of Evidence For Dark
Matter Annihilation?
- The HEAT positron excess
- 511 keV emission from the galactic bulge
- EGRETs galactic gamma ray spectrum
- EGRETs extragalactic gamma ray spectrum
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
37The HEAT Positron Excess
- In its 1994-95, 2000 flights, the HEAT
balloon-based cosmic ray detector observed an
excess of positrons relative to electrons in
the 7-30 GeV range - Measurements from AMS-01 add some support
- Combined statistical significance of several
(4-5) sigma, neglecting (likely important, but
difficult to evaluate) systematic uncertainties
E. Baltz and J. Edsjo, PRD, astro-ph/9808243
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
38The HEAT Positron Excess
- Strengths
- Fit to data can be easily improved if dark
matter component is included - Weaknesses
- Messy astrophysics
- Requires annihilation boost of 50 or more
(possible, but unlikely), or non-thermal dark
matter production - Prospects
- PAMELA data (August?) should clearly confirm or
refute this signal, and measure the spectrum up
to much higher energies
PAMELA
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
39511 keV Emission from the Galactic Bulge
- INTEGRAL/SPI observed bright 511 keV emission
from the bulge of the Milky Way (1.3 x 1043
positrons injected per second) - Gaussian, spherically symmetric morphology
(FWHM of 8) - The source of these positrons remains unknown
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
40511 keV Emission from the Galactic Bulge
- Type Ia supernovae are unable to generate the
observed injection rate (too few escape) - Hypernovae (type Ic SNe) or gamma ray bursts
could potentially generate enough positrons if
high estimates for rates are considered - Even if the injection rate is sufficient, a
mechanism is required to transport from disk to
bulge - appears to be somewhat difficult
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
41511 keV Emission and MeV Dark Matter
- The INTEGRAL morphology matches well that which
would be generated through the annihilation
(or decay) of dark matter - 1-10 MeV dark matter particles annihilating to
ee- could simultaneously generate the measured
dark matter relic abundance, and the observed 511
keV emission - (Boehm, Hooper, Silk, Casse, Paul, PRL,
astro-ph/0309686)
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
42511 keV Emission and MeV Dark Matter
- Strengths
- Challenging to explain 511 signal with non-exotic
astrophysics - Weaknesses
- Somewhat difficult to construct a viable particle
physics model with an MeV WIMP - Prospects
- No clear path to confirmation or exclusion of the
MeV dark matter hypothesis (perhaps 511 emission
from dwarf galaxies?)
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
43EGRETs Galactic Gamma Ray Spectrum
- EGRET observed an excess of gamma rays above 1
GeV, compared to the the most simple galactic
cosmic ray models - Coud be the product of a 50-100 GeV WIMP
(W. de Boer et al, PLB, hep-ph/0511154
Astron.Astrophys, astro-ph/0508617
astro-ph/0408272)
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
44EGRETs Galactic Gamma Ray Spectrum
- The same dark matter annihilation spectrum can
fit the shape of the GeV excess in all regions of
the sky - To normalize the intensity of each region,
however, requires a departure from a
simple halo profile - De Boer, et al. introduce two rings of dark
matter near the galactic plane at
4 and 14 kpc from galactic center (8x1010
M? tidally disrupted dwarf galaxy? motivated
by rotation curves)
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
(W. de Boer et al, A.A., astro-ph/0508617)
45EGRETs Galactic Gamma Ray Spectrum
- With a standard treatment of cosmic ray
diffusion, far too many antiprotons are produced
in this scenario - To reconcile, anisotropic diffusion, strong
convection away from (and outside of) the disk
and local spatial variations are required
Prediced in de Boer model
Prediction from standard secondary cosmic ray
production
(Bergstrom, Edsjo, Gustafsson and Salati, JCAP,
astro-ph/0602632)
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
46EGRETs Galactic Gamma Ray Spectrum
- Strengths
- Consistent with a neutralino or other
EW-scale WIMP - Similar spectral shape over sky
- Weaknesses
- Non-standard dark matter distribution is
needed (two rings) - Conflict with antiprotons unless
non-standard comic ray diffusion is invoked - The GeV excess can plausbily be reduced or
eliminated without dark matter by modifying the
diffusion model - Prospects GLAST will clear up these questions
considerably
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
47EGRETs Extragalactic Gamma Ray Spectrum
- EGRET has also detected a diffuse, extragalactic
gamma ray signal, which becomes more intense
above 1 GeV - Integrated signal from dark matter annihilations
throughout the universe could produce a
potentially observable signal (Ullio,
Bergstrom,Edsjo 2002) - Intensity depends critically on dark
matter distribution - cuspy halos and
substructure are required - The EGRET extragalactic diffuse spectrum
can be fit by annihilations from a 500 GeV
neutralino (or other WIMP)
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
Elsasser and Mannheim, PRL, astro-ph/0405235
48EGRETs Extragalactic Gamma Ray Spectrum
- Strengths
- Consistent with a (somewhat heavy) neutralino or
other WIMP - Weaknesses
- Not a particularly distinctive signal,
could easily be astrophysical - High annihilation rate needed either large
degree of very cusped substructure, or a
non-thermal WIMP - Signal from our galactic center would have
been seen, unless cusp is removed by
tidal effects (S. Ando, PRL, astro-ph/0503006) - Prospects GLAST will clearly resolve
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
49Signal Required Particle Physics Required Astrophysics
WMAP Haze 100 GeV to multi-TeV WIMP, 3x10-26 cm3/s annihilation cross section Cusped halo profile, standard diffusion, no boost factors
HEAT Positron Excess 50-1000 GeV WIMP Either large (non-thermal) annihilation cross section OR Large boost factor (50 or more)
INTEGRAL 511 keV Emission MeV particle, p-wave annihilator with 3x10-26 cm3/s annihilation cross section Mildly cusped halo profile
EGRET Diffuse Galactic 50-300 GeV WIMP Either large (non-thermal) annihilation cross section OR Large boost factors two massive rings of dark matter in the galactic plane non-standard, highly convective diffusion model
EGRET Diffuse Extragalactic 500 GeV WIMP Either large (non-thermal) annihilation cross section OR Large boost factors/highly cusped profiles Conflict with Milky Way unless Galactic Center is exceptional
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
50Signal Required Particle Physics Required Astrophysics
WMAP Haze 100 GeV to multi-TeV WIMP, 3x10-26 cm3/s annihilation cross section Cusped halo profile, standard diffusion, no boost factors
HEAT Positron Excess 50-1000 GeV WIMP Either large (non-thermal) annihilation cross section OR Large boost factor (50 or more)
INTEGRAL 511 keV Emission MeV particle, p-wave annihilator with 3x10-26 cm3/s annihilation cross section Mildly cusped halo profile
EGRET Diffuse Galactic 50-300 GeV WIMP Either large (non-thermal) annihilation cross section OR Large boost factors two massive rings of dark matter in the galactic plane non-standard, highly convective diffusion model
EGRET Diffuse Extragalactic 500 GeV WIMP Either large (non-thermal) annihilation cross section OR Large boost factors/highly cusped profiles Conflict with Milky Way unless Galactic Center is exceptional
Dan Hooper - Dark Matter Annihilations
and the WMAP Haze
51Conclusions
- WMAP data, after the subtraction of known
foregrounds, contains an excess from the region
around the center of the Milky Way - The WMAP
Haze - Consistent with synchrotron emission from
energetic electrons/positrons from
dark matter annihilations with - -A cusped halo profile
- -A 100 GeV to multi-TeV WIMP
- -An annihilation cross section within a factor
of 2-3 of the value required of a thermal relic
(3x10-26 cm3/s)
52Conclusions
- We may very well be looking at the first
detection of supersymmetry or other TeV scale
physics beyond the Standard Model - Future measurements by GLAST and PLANCK will
clarify the nature of the WMAP Haze - The dark matter - WMAP Haze connection is a
clearly falsifiable/verifiable hypothesis - With GLAST and Planck, in a couple of years,
we will know one way or the other