Title: Project HERMES
1Project HERMES
- Preliminary Task Force Meeting
- Copenhagen, 20 September 2005
2Key Topics
- Project Name
- Project main aims and objectives
- Completed steps
- Benchmark across European Medical Societies
- Benchmark across National Respiratory Societies
- Project developments
- Creation of a Task Force
- Development of a Core Syllabus through a modified
Delphi process - Implementation of the Syllabus (Curriculum,
Training Centres, Diploma) - HERMES Website
3Why Hermes?
- HERMES Harmonised Education in Respiratory
Medicine for European Specialists - Hermes in Greek mythology, is the god of
boundaries and of the travellers who cross them
4Project History
- 1994 ERJ Publication Report of the working party
of the UEMS Monospecialty Section on Pneumology
on training requirements and facilities in
Europe, which provided recommendations for a
European Pneumology Training Programme, including
specific training in pneumology, facilities and
resources and specific programme content. - In its conclusion, it mentioned the possibility
of introducing a European examination as well as
of assessing training centres, provided that it
be in step with other European specialties. - Today, in 2005, such structures have come true in
many other specialties, and it is thus time for
Pneumology to move forward.
5Global Project Aims
- Develop a core syllabus so as to define standards
of education and training for respiratory
specialists in Europe. - Identify the elements of a curriculum to meet the
identified standards. - Provide learners and educators with high quality
standardised learning/teaching material. - Define requirements for accredited training
centres. - Define requirements for a future European
Certificate in Respiratory Medicine.
6Benchmark across Medical Specialties in Europe
7Sample of surveyed European Medical Societies
8Sample of surveyed European Boards (UEMS)
9Main findings (1)
- At least 15 specialties have developed
consensus-based syllabi, which they have in most
cases used as a basis to develop further
educational projects. - At least 15 specialties offer a European
Examination. In a few cases, these European
examinations have already replaced national
examinations in some countries, such as
Switzerland. However, as a rule, they do not
represent a licence to practice.
10Main findings (2)
- At least 6 specialties have programmes to
accredit Training Centres. To ensure high
quality, such programmes include site visits by
an international evaluation team. These visits
are paid for by the assessed centres. Benefits of
publishing lists of accredited centres include an
increase in the quality of training as well as of
mobility for trainees.
11Main findings (3)
CME PG Courses Other courses
Core competences
E-learning modules
Curriculum
European Examination
Core syllabus
Other teaching materials
Training centres
12Benchmark across national societies
13National participation
Participation rate 80
14National training structures
15Interest for the project
16Suggested project developments
- Development of a Core Syllabus (2005-2006)
- Set up of an Educational Task Force which will
work on the development of a consensus-based
syllabus for training and education - Proposed Chair R. Loddenkemper, Co-chair P.
Haslam. - Educational Task Force to include a working group
of 6 experts and a group representing partner
organisations. It will further rely on at least
one expert in each participating country. - Methodology Modified Delphi process
17HERMES Organisation chart
Executive Committee
ERS SCHOOL
Part I
Part II
Part III
18Proposed Task Force members
- Prof Robert Loddenkemper, Chair
- Dr Patricia Haslam, Co-chair and School Chair
starting September 2005 - Expert working group
- Dr Gerrard Phillips (UK representative - chairman
of UK Specialty Advisory Committee) - Prof Jean-François Muir, (Southern Europe
representative, responsible for curriculum
matters in France) - Prof Magyar Pál, (Eastern Europe representative
responsible for curriculum matters in Hungary) - Scandinavian representative- to be named
- Partner organisations Advisors
- Dr Martin Muers, ERS Secretary General,
representing ERS - Prof. Claudio Donner, representing UEMS Section
of Pneumology - Dr Robin Stevenson, representing EBAP
- Prof. Max Zach, representing ERS Paediatrics
Assembly - Prof. Alexander Chuchalin, representing non-EU
countries (Russia) - FERS representative to be named
19Consensus development Delphi process
- Task Force prepares first draft content
- Round 1 open questionnaire sent to all
respondents for additional suggestions / comments - Round 2 questionnaire in which all respondents
have to rank items identified in round 1 - Plenary meeting discussion of Round 1 and 2
outcomes - Round 3 questionnaire in which all respondents
have to re-rank items in the light of what has
been discussed at the plenary meeting - Task Force proceeds to final selection of items
20Delphi process structure and timeline
Conclusion Jul-Aug 06
Plenary meeting May 06
Delphi 2 March-Apr 06
Delphi 1 Dec-Feb 06
Delphi 3 May-Jun 06
TF
TF
TF
TF
Select draft syllabus
Collate comments
Collate mean scores
Draft final syllabus
PLENARY MEETING
Nationalrespondents
Nationalrespondents
Nationalrespondents
Open comments
Rank items 1
Rank items 2
21Reference Documents
- Dijkman JH, Martinez Gonzales del Rio J,
Loddenkemper R, Prowse K, and Siafakas N (1994),
Report of the working party of the "UEMS
Monospecialty Section on Pneumology" on training
requirements and facilities in Europe, European
Respiratory Journal, 7, pp.1019-1022 - Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes,
European Board of Pneumology (1995), UEMS Charter
on Training of Medical Specialists in the EU
Requirements for the specialty Pneumology, - Zach M.S, Long Range Planning Committee,
Paediatric Assembly of the European Respiratory
Society, Committee on Paediatric Respiratory
Training in Europe, European Board of Paediatrics
(2002), Paediatric respiratory training in
Europe syllabus and centres, European
Respiratory Journal, 20 (6), pp. 1587-1593 - National Syllabi and Curricula
22Further suggested project developments
- Development of a comprehensive training
curriculum (2006-2007) - Define process through which content included in
the Syllabus is delivered (aims and objectives,
teaching methods, assessment and educational
strategies) - Implementation of the Syllabus and Curriculum
(2006-2008) - Production of educational / training material
- Production of a list of Accredited Training
Centres - Definition of criteria for the elaboration of a
politically acceptable European diploma
23Next steps
- Wednesday, Sept. 21 ERS School meeting
- Discussion regarding Educational Task Force
application - If Task Force approved
- First official TF meeting in November
- Start of the Delphi process before the end of the
year.
24HERMES Website
- www.fersnet.org/hermes/home.htm
25Thank you for your attention