Chapter 2: Fundamentals of Structuring - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 2: Fundamentals of Structuring

Description:

... responsibility for the representations and warranties) ... Owner trusts tend to be used most commonly for auto, student, home equity, and equipment loans. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: landeco
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 2: Fundamentals of Structuring


1
Chapter 2 Fundamentals of Structuring
  • Andrew Davidson
  • Anthony B. Sanders
  • Lan-Ling Wolff
  • Anne Ching

2
Issuers motivations legal, accounting and tax
Considerations
  • From the point of view of the issuer,
    securitization may be viewed as a sale or a
    financing, and in many ways securitization has
    features of both.
  • Because of this dual nature, securitization
    reflects many motivations of the issuer including
    financial, regulatory, tax, accounting and
    strategic considerations.

3
Selling assets versus securitizing assets
  • Financial (economic) motivations for selling
    assets rather than securitizing them
  • risks are transferred to the buyer (with the
    seller retaining responsibility for the
    representations and warranties)
  • costs of the transactions are generally lower
    than securitization
  • the issuer must determine whether the proceeds
    from the securitization, after taking into
    account the value and risk of the retained
    classes, represents greater value than an
    outright sale of the loans.

4
Balance sheet analysis an example
  • XYZ has total assets of 300 million, of which,
    200 million are a loan portfolio that they seek
    to sell or securitize.
  • XYZ has equity equal to 10 percent of its assets.
  • XYZ estimates its cost of capital by taking the
    weighted average of the components of their
    liabilities.
  • On this basis, XYZ might be encouraged to sell or
    securitize whenever the cost of securitization is
    less than the cost of capital

5
Example (continued)
6
Example (continued)
7
Results of securitization
  • After the securitization, the size of XYZs
    balance sheet is greatly reduced as proceeds from
    the securitization are used to pay down debt (see
    Table 2.2).
  • The securitization of 200 million in loans will
    result in cash proceeds of 190 million.
  • The bonds issued had an all-in cost of 6.5
    percent (based on the yields of the bonds and
    expenses).
  • XYZ will retain a residual (equity-like
    component) interest in the securitization.
  • XYZ values that component at 15 million.
  • This results in a gain-on-sale of 5 million. The
    resulting balance sheet is shown in Table 2.3.

8
Example (continued)
9
Profitability of securitization
  • XYZ sees the securitization as being profitable
    using two separate analyses.
  • First, the securitization resulted in a profit of
    5 million.
  • Second, the all-in cost of the bonds of 6.5
    percent was less than XYZs cost of capital of
    8.35 percent as calculated in Table 2.2.
  • Even if XYZ blends in the cost of equity of 25
    percent on the 10 million not received as cash
    in the securitization, the blended cost of
    securitization is 7.43 percent.

10
The impact of the retained residual
  • The XYZ analysis is too simplistic, however,
    because it fails to take into account the risk of
    the retained residual.
  • The residual bears much of the credit risk of the
    original loan portfolio, and may even have
    substantial interest-rate and prepayment risk.
  • Investors in the companys debt may require
    higher yields or a higher amount of capital to
    maintain the same yield.
  • Moreover, given the illiquid nature of the market
    for residuals, it may be difficult for the firm
    to verify the value of the residual. If the
    appropriate value of the residual should have
    been 9 million rather than 15 million, then the
    firm actually lost money on the securitization
    transaction.

11
The structuring process
  • Tax issues
  • Asset-backed securities and mortgage-backed
    securities are generally issued by trusts because
    income is not generally subject to taxation at
    the trust level.
  • Bankruptcy issues
  • The trust establishes a legal separation between
    the issuer and the pool of assets deposited into
    the trust.
  • In the case of a corporate bankruptcy, the
    bankruptcy-remote trust cannot be consolidated
    with the other assets of the insolvent company.
  • This allows investors to continue to receive
    proceeds without interruption from the underlying
    loan pool.

12
Issuing vehicles
  • Grantor trusts
  • Owner trust
  • REMICs
  • FASITs

13
Issuing vehicles grantor trusts
  • A grantor trust is the simplest type of trust
    because principal and interest from the
    underlying loan pool is simply passed through
    to investors.
  • Investors, commonly referred to as certificate
    holders, are treated as owners of the underlying
    collateral and are entitled to a pro rata share
    of cash flow generated from the underlying loan
    pool.

14
Issuing vehicles owner trusts
  • Owner trusts are more flexible structures because
    they allow for the creation of multiple-class
    securities with varying maturities, which appeal
    to a broader range of investors.
  • Unlike grantor trusts, principal payments can be
    accelerated or delayed with respect to specific
    classes and do not have to mirror the underlying
    cash-flow patterns of the collateral. In the case
    of a fast-pay class, principal payments are
    made until the class with the earliest stated
    maturity is fully retired, even though the
    underlying collateral may have loan terms of up
    to thirty years.
  • Owner trusts tend to be used most commonly for
    auto, student, home equity, and equipment loans.

15
Issuing vehicles REMICs
  • A REMIC or real estate mortgage investment
    conduit is another important vehicle used for
    securitizations.
  • REMICs were created primarily as a means of
    issuing multiple-class securities backed by
    mortgages or real property not subject to tax at
    the trust or entity level as long as they are in
    compliance with REMIC requirements as stated in
    the Tax Reform Act of 1986.
  • REMICs can take many legal forms including
    corporations, partnerships, and trusts, or as a
    segregated pool of assets.
  • REMICs are the vehicle of choice for
    multiple-class, sequential-pay mortgage-backed
    securities.

16
Issuing vehicles FASITs
  • FASITs or financial asset securitization
    investment trusts were created in 1996 at the
    request of credit card sponsors to provide
    similar tax relief as REMICs for revolving
    non-mortgage assets.
  • To date, FASITs have not been widely used even by
    the groups that sponsored the legislation in 1996.

17
Types of securities issued
  • Type of securities issued depends on the issuing
    vehicle.
  • The main features of the issuing vehicles are
    summarized in Table 2.4 and brief descriptions of
    the various types of securities are contained in
    Table 2.5.

18
Types of securities issued
19
Table 2.5 Securities descriptions
  • Pass-through certificates
  • Pass-through certificates are treated as owners
    of the trust and entitle holders to a pro rata
    share of principal and interest payments.
  • The composition of the asset pool cannot change
    over time and the trust cannot reinvest any
    payments received from the asset pool.

20
Table 2.5 Securities descriptions
  • Stripped pass-through certficates
  • Interest-only (IO) and principal-only (PO) strips
    are examples of stripped pass-through
    certificates in which ownership rights to
    interest and principal are completely separated.
  • IO and PO strips entitle investors to 100 percent
    ownership of either interest or principal,
    respectively.
  • POs are similar to zero-coupon bonds because they
    are purchased at substantial discounts and repay
    principal in one bullet payment.
  • Investors typically purchase POs because they
    either expect a high rate of prepayments or wish
    to hedge against declining interest rates.
  • IOs, on the other hand, are purchased by
    investors who expect low prepayments and who want
    to hedge against losses resulting from rising
    interest rates.

21
Table 2.5 Securities descriptions
  • Senior/subordinated pass-through certificates
  • Passthrough certificates can have both senior and
    junior classes, in which the rights of the junior
    classes to receive principal is subordinated to
    senior classes.
  • Callable pass-through certificates
  • Pass-through certificates can also have an
    embedded call option, which entitles the holder
    to purchase the trust assets for cash.
  • Pay-through bonds
  • Pay-through bonds represent debt obligations of a
    legal entity rather than ownership interests and
    are mostly commonly issued by owner trusts.

22
Table 2.5 Securities descriptions
  • REMIC interests
  • Regular interests are treated as ownership
    interests in the underlying mortgages.
  • Only one residual interest allowed per REMIC.
  • FASIT interests
  • Single class of ownership interest and one or
    more class of regular interests.

23
Credit enhancement and the role of rating agencies
  • Once the type of issuing vehicle has been
    established, the issuer will face the decision of
    how to structure the resulting class of
    securities.
  • A driving force behind this decision will be the
    level of credit enhancement necessary to achieve
    a given credit rating (AAA, AA, A, BBB, etc.) for
    each of the various classes of the security.
  • The basis for the required credit enhancement is
    the estimated losses for each of the classes
    under a range of modeling assumptions.
  • This is the point at which the credit rating
    agencies (e.g., SP, Moodys, Fitch) enter into
    the process.

24
Foreclosure frequency and loss severity
  • The rating agencies will forecast loss coverage
    amount as a product of foreclosure frequency and
    loss severity.
  • Foreclosure frequency represents the percentage
    of the loans that will default over the life of
    the transaction.
  • Loss severity represents the losses experienced
    by the transaction and consists of any loan
    amounts not recovered as a result of foreclosure
    or other sale of the loan.
  • Severity includes all costs of liquidation as
    well as any accrued interest not paid by the
    borrower.
  • The rating agencies will establish different
    levels of foreclosure frequency and loss severity
    for the various rating levels.

25
Credit enhancement
  • Rating agencies will conduct a careful weighting
    of each of these loan characteristics for the
    overall pool in order to determine the ultimate
    credit enhancement level.
  • Excess interest, subordination,
    over-collateralization, and spread accounts are
    all examples of internal credit enhancement.
  • Corporate guarantees, bond insurance, and letters
    of credit (LOC) are all examples of external
    credit enhancement.

26
Excess interest
  • Excess interest represents the difference between
    the coupon or interest rate paid by the borrowers
    and the coupon or interest rate paid to the
    certificate holders.
  • Generally the interest rate paid by borrowers is
    higher than the interest rate paid to the
    certificate holders.
  • This difference, called the excess interest, is
    available to cover any losses that occur during
    that period.
  • Thus, if a loan defaults, the excess interest
    could be used to make payments to the certificate
    holders.

27
Subordination
  • In a typical subordinated transaction, the rights
    of junior classes of investors to receive
    principal and interest are subordinated to the
    rights of the senior classes.
  • More importantly, the junior classes are in a
    first-loss position and shield senior classes
    from potential principal and interest shortfalls
    resulting from defaults or credit losses.

28
Over-collateralization
  • Over-collateralization (OC) is a form of
    subordination and represents the difference
    between the certificate balance (sometimes
    referred to as bond balance) and the underlying
    loan balance.
  • An original OC amount is established when the
    transaction is issued.
  • For example, if 100 million of bonds were
    secured by 102 million of collateral, the OC
    amount would be equal to 2 million (102 million
    minus 100 million equals 2 million).
  • Another way of stating this is that the
    transaction is over-collateralized by 2 percent.
  • What this means is that this transaction can
    withstand losses equal to the OC, plus any excess
    spread available before senior certificate
    holders incur any losses.

29
Spread accounts
  • In contrast to OC, excess interest/spread is
    deposited into an account that accumulates over
    time to cover any current losses of the
    underlying pool.
  • Once a deal has reached its target level, any
    remaining excess spread is distributed to the
    residual holders.

30
External credit enhancement.
  • Credit enhancement can also be provided by an
    external guarantor.
  • The primary sources of external credit
    enhancement are corporate guarantees or monoline
    insurers.
  • A corporation can guaranty full and timely
    payment of interest and principal on a
    transaction, regardless of the performance of the
    collateral.
  • While this is generally viewed as atypical, it is
    actually the most prevalent form of credit
    enhancement
  • The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
    (Freddie Mac) and the Federal National Mortgage
    Association (Fannie Mae), which are
    government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), issue
    corporate guarantees for the timely payment of
    interest and ultimate repayment of principal for
    all of the mortgages and CMOs they issue.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com