Rubrics: Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Rubrics: Design

Description:

Facets: Melody; ear training; harmonics; rhythm; bowing & backup; & confidence ... Quality Levels for Melody' -- Analytic Example: String Improvisation. Pro ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:50
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: rebeccal4
Category:
Tags: design | melody | rubrics

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rubrics: Design


1
Rubrics Design Use
  • To insert your company logo on this slide
  • From the Insert Menu
  • Select Picture
  • Locate your logo file
  • Click OK
  • To resize the logo
  • Click anywhere inside the logo. The boxes that
    appear outside the logo are known as resize
    handles.
  • Use these to resize the object.
  • If you hold down the shift key before using the
    resize handles, you will maintain the proportions
    of the object you wish to resize.
  • Rebecca Langrall, Ed. D.
  • Faculty Development Workshop
  • Wichita State University
  • March 19, 2004

2
Overview
  • Prior Knowledge Questions
  • Defining Attributes
  • Exercises
  • Break out Sessions
  • Refining existing rubrics
  • Developing new rubrics based on targeted outcomes

3
First Thoughts
  • Write for a minute about your
  • ? ?s
  • ? Comments
  • ? Concerns
  • about rubrics

4
Prior Knowledge
  • Turn to someone near you and take turns
    discussing what each of you wrote
  • Identify themes among the people at your table.

5
Possible Questions
  • Why use them?
  • What are rubrics?
  • When are they useful?
  • How do you design them use
  • them reliably?

6
Why Use Rubrics?
  • Capture conceptual understanding
  • application of knowledge
  • For all stakeholders, can clarify
  • expectations and degrees of
  • outcome mastery

Empower students to become more
independent self- reflective
7
What are Rubrics?
  • Originally First letter
  • in an Illumination

Now A systematic scoring
methodology to make qualitative
assessment evaluation more reliable
and objective by applying
pre-determined criteria
  • Names facets of the targeted performance
  • Describes quality levels for each aspect

8
Two Types
1. Holistic A complex performance is
evaluated scored as a whole.
  • E.g. Collaborative learning
  • http//www.horizon.nmsu.edu/ddl/collaborativerub
    .html
  • U.S. History
    http//score.rims.k12.ca.us/history/scoring_guide.
    html
  • Pro
  • Accommodate overlap-
  • ping criteria
  • Less time to create than
  • an analytic rubric

Con Student may exhibit traits at 2 or
more levels at the same time While
scoring, criteria for each level may be
time consuming to review.
9
Analytic Rubrics
2. Analytic Separate facets of the
performance are defined, and independently
evaluated scored
Example String improvisation development
  • Facets Melody ear training
  • harmonics rhythm
  • bowing backup confidence

10
Excerpt from an Analytic Rubric for String
Improvisation
Quality Levels for Melody --
11
Analytic Example String Improvisation
  • Pro
  • Sharper focus on target for student, teacher,
    others
  • Student is equipped with specific feedback for
    improvement
  • Student sees value in work beyond a letter grade

Con Time needed to articulate components of
target performance and find language clear enough
to define performance levels effectively.
12
When To Use Rubrics?
  • Yes, for measuring
  • Content analysis of open-ended data
  • Complex, authentic processes /or
  • products, e.g.
  • Written or oral narratives
  • Diagrams or models
  • Behavioral demonstrations
  • No, for measuring
  • innate attributes impervious to
  • instruction. (Popham,1997)
  • Close-ended data forced choice response

13
How to Make Rubrics
  • Tip 1 Avoid odd of quality levels
  • Tendency to dump to the middle to avoid
  • making finer judgments
  • Four levels provide clearer variations to
  • guide student self-assessment

14
Rubric Development Tip 2
  • Define poles and work inward
  • ? Additive approach -- quantify skills /or
  • specify changing conditions

Core I Dispositions Rubric Excerpt

Communicates disagreement/ disapproval of others
statements, states an alternative position, and
provides justification for that position
15
Rubric Development Tip 2
  • Define poles and work inward
  • ? Error pattern approach, e,g,
  • U.S. History Rubric for Research
  • Presentation
  • http//12.166.242.211/faculty/cwalton/rubric.htm


16
Rubric Development Tip 3
  • Unpack abstract language Aim for recognition
  • vs interpretation

Professionalism Goal 4 compile maintain
important educational information in order to
share with the school and community.
17
Rubric Development Tip 4
  • Involve students in development process

? Offer samples of student work. Have students
use the rubric and associated standards to
critique both the samples the rubric.
Incorporate their feedback.
Results in a high degree of task ownership
understanding of the evaluation criteria
18
Rubric Development Tip 5
  • Continua can offer more precision

19
Rubric Development Tip 6
  • Rubric development is an iterative process

20
What about Reliability?
  • Relates to consistency across time and among
  • scorers
  • Purpose objectives must guide development.
  • Need to develop shared perceptions of nature of
  • target and what achievement evidence looks
    like.
  • Identify anchor samples to accompany
    descriptors.
  • Be aware that fatigue and mood can affect
    intra-rater
  • reliability

21
Caveats
  • A well designed rubric cannot compensate for a
    poorly designed assessment instrument. Moskal
    Leyden, 2000

Faculty as a group must clearly delineate their
specific expectations by level for all rated
features. (Pino, B.G., 1998)
22
Comments Questions
23
References
  • Haag, S. Kenimer, A. (2003). Constructing
    rubrics for open-ended activities. ASEE
    Workshops, June 22, 2003. Available on line at
  • http//www.eas.asu.edu/assess/ppt/Rubrics20wors
    hoop203-14_2002.ppt
  • Pino, B.G. (1998). Prochievement testing of
    speaking Matching instructor expectations,
    learner proficiency level, and task type. Texas
    Papers in Foreign Language Education, 3 (3), 119
    - 133. ED427522
  • Moskal, G. M. Leydens, J.A. (2000). Scoring
    rubric development Validity and reliability.
    Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation,
    7(10). Retrieved March 14, 2004 from
    http//PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v7n10.
  • Popham, W.J. (1997). Whats wrong and whats
    right with rubrics. Educational Leadership,
    55(2). Available on line at http//www.ascd.org/
    safeschools/el9710/pophamrubric.html

24
Image Credits
  • Errorclassic.mountainzone.com/.../
    photo07_int.html
  • Feedback www.wildtech.org/ feedback.htm
  • Profesionalism www.pafossearch.com/
    housekeeping.php
  • Psalm Page umsis.miami.edu/kwisniew/ misc.htm
  • Self-Evaluation www3.sympatico.ca/jim.rowe2/
    p12-8.htm
  • Thumbs Down www.cafeshops.com/absenteeshirts/
    130050
  • Thumbs Up www.labor.iu.edu/.../Media20Files2
    0Main.htm

25
Contact Information
  • Rebecca.Langrall_at_wichita.edu
  • Phone (636) 537 - 4665
  • Fax (636) 536 - 4629
  • Address
  • 1838 Elmsford Lane
  • Chesterfield, MO 63005
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com