The times they are achangin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

The times they are achangin

Description:

Precession. minimum. Eccentricity. minimum. Gibliscemi, Sicily, Italy ... Precession. minimum. Lignite-marls cycles, Mio-Pliocene, Greece. Ptolemais quarry, Greece ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: Hil75
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The times they are achangin


1
The times they are a-changin
(Bob Dylan, 1964) Wout Krijgsman Paleomagnetic
laboratory Fort Hoofddijk Utrecht
University
2
Time in the geological and Fort Hoofddijk
contextdates and rates
Tools Biostratigraphy Magnetostratigraphy Astroch
ronology Isotopic dating
Aims Marine-continental Paratethys-Mediterranean
Synchrony-diachrony Event stratigraphy
3
Geological Time ScaleGradstein et al. (2004)
Neogene based on astronomical ages
Paleogene based on radio-isotopic ages
4
Messinian Chronology
Messinian GSSP at Oued Akrech 7.251 Ma (Hilgen
et al. 2000 Episodes)
5
Messinian Chronology
Zanclean GSSP at Eraclea Minoa 5.333 Ma (Van
Couvering et al. 2000 Episodes)
6
Biostratigraphy
  • Problems
  • Reworking
  • Taxonomy
  • Diachrony
  • Ages

7
Magnetostratigraphy
  • Problems
  • Correlation
  • Primary signal vs overprint
  • Ages

8
Problem Correlation Only significant
magnetostratigraphic dating if unique pattern
fit!
9
Problem Correlation Only significant
magnetostratigraphic dating if unique pattern
fit!
Magneto age 7.6 0.1
K/Ar age 6.16 0.30
Garces et al., 2001
10
Problem Ages Geomagnetic Polarity
Time Scale (GPTS) is not independent on other
dating techniques
11
Problem The times they are
a-changing Ages change with time!
12
Astrochronology
  • Problems
  • Cycle recognition
  • Phase relation
  • Correlation
  • Astronomical solution

13
Astrochronology correlation of cyclic variations
in the geological record to computed astronomical
(age) curves
14
Milankovitch cycles
15
Sapropel-marl cycles, upper Miocene, Sicily
Eccentricity minimum
Precession minimum
Gibliscemi, Sicily, Italy
16
Partial Unit-Stratotype of the Zanclean stage
(Lower Pliocene)
Punta di Maiata, Sicily, Italy
17
Lignite-marls cycles, Mio-Pliocene, Greece
Precession minimum
Ptolemais quarry, Greece
18
Sand-marls cycles, Mio-Pliocene, Romania
PONTIAN Acc. rate in C3r
137cm/kyr Periodicity cycles 22.7kyr
Putna river section,eastern Carpathians
19
Clay-carbonate cycles, Miocene, Spain
Orera section, Spain
20
Clay-carbonate cycles, Triassic, USA
Painted desert/Petrified forrest, Arizona
21
MioceneAPTS
  • Astrochronology for the Late Miocene
  • Sections on Crete correlated bed-to-bed to Sicily
  • Hilgen et al. (1995)
  • EPSL

22
Messinian evaporites Northern Apennines (Italy)
23
Messinian Chronology
24
Chronology
Evaporites synchronous all over Mediterranean at
5.96 Ma
Astrochronology Mediterranean Messinian (Krijgsman
et al. 1999 Nature)
25
Chronology evaporites
Cyclostratigraphy Italy Evaporites 16 cycles
(Marabini and Vai, 1988)
26
Chronology evaporites
Cyclostratigraphy Spain Evaporites 14-17 cycles
(Dronkert, 1976 M.S.G.l. Fortuin et al., 2000
Sed. Geol.)
27
Chronology evaporites
Top of Lower Evaporites 5.60-5.52 Ma (Krijgsman
et al. 2001 Sed. Geol.)
28
La93 ltgt La2004
29
Isotopic dating
  • Problems
  • Technique (K/Ar vs Ar/Ar)
  • Error determination
  • Mineral dating standards

30
Problem error determination
this ratio is measured on a mass spectrometer,
precision depends on e.g. measurement protocol,
mass discrimination
decay constant
J is an irradiation parameter and its accuracy
depends on an accurately known age of a mineral
standard. Further, optimizing irradiation
conditions can reduce the influence of
interfering nuclear reactions
31
Problem mineral dating standards Fish Canyon
Tuff
32
Betic Corridor problem
K/Ar age of 6.16 0.30
Ar/Ar age of 7.71 0.11
Magnetostratigraphy Tortonian Salinity Crisis
Fortuna Basin (Garces et al. 1998 2001 EPSL
Basin Research)
33
Problem Technique Garces et al. (2001)
Magnet. age 7.6 0.1 Ma Bellon et al. (1983)
K/Ar age 6.16 0.30 Ma Kuiper et al. (2002)
Ar/Ar age 7.71 0.11 Ma
34
Intercalibration Isotopic ages and astronomical
ages
Faneromeni section Messinian, Crete
35
40Ar/39Ar vs astronomical ages
6.94 Ma
Fan-a1, Crete Miocene, marine 2? 0.01 Ma N
44 3 different irradiations
6.65
6.75
6.85
6.95
7.05
7.15
Age (Ma)
Kuiper et al., 2003
36
40Ar/39Ar vs astronomical ages
Ptolemais SLM3T
Ptolemais SR3M
4.39 Ma
4.31Ma
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
Age (Ma)
Age (Ma)
Messadit Me-1
Messadit Me-11
6.45 Ma
6.58 Ma
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
Age (Ma)
Age (Ma)
37
Intercalibration Isotopic ages and astronomical
ages
Kuiper et al., 2008 Morocco / Spain Messinian
38
Intercalibration Isotopic ages and astronomical
ages
Kuiper et al., 2008 Morocco / Spain Messinian
39
Intercalibration Isotopic ages and astronomical
ages
K/T Boundary Zumaia (Spain) new age of 65.96 Ma
40
Mediterranean vs Paratethys Late Miocene -Early
Pliocene
41
Evolution of the Time Scales from Eastern
Paratethys
10 TIMES longer
42
Carpathians foredeep
EC
SC
  • Vasiliev et al., 2004 2005

43
Carpathians foredeep
Pontian
Dacian
  • Stoica et al., submittted

44
Putna Valley
PONTIAN Acc. rate in C3r
137cm/kyr Periodicity cycles 22.7kyr
45
Southern Carpathians
Eastern Carpathians
46
Astronomical Polarity Time Scale (APTS) for the
Mediterranean Neogene
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com