CRIMINALISTICS CHAPTER 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 65
About This Presentation
Title:

CRIMINALISTICS CHAPTER 3

Description:

CRIMINALISTICS CHAPTER 3 PHYSICAL EVIDENCE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE Impossible to list all items that could be important at crime scene\ Practicle to list those that ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:517
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 66
Provided by: ValuedGate703
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CRIMINALISTICS CHAPTER 3


1
CRIMINALISTICS CHAPTER 3
  • PHYSICAL EVIDENCE

2
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
  • Impossible to list all items that could be
    important at crime scene\
  • Practicle to list those that scientific
    examination can yield significant results
  • Investigator needs to be familiar with
  • Recognition Collection analyses
  • Laboratory procedures and capabilities

3
COMMON TYPES OF PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
  • Lists and definitions or examinations

4
BLOOD, SEMEN SALIVA
  • All suspected saples
  • Liquid or dried
  • Animal or human
  • Subjected to serological examination (DNA) to
    determine
  • Identity
  • Origin

5
DOCUMENTS
  • Handwriting or Typewriting
  • Determine authenticity or Source
  • Related Items
  • Paper
  • Ink
  • Indented writing
  • Obliterations
  • Burned or Charred documents

6
DRUGS
  • Controlled substances seized in violation of the
    law
  • Sale
  • Distribution
  • Manufacture
  • Possession

7
EXPLOSIVES
  • Devices containing explosive charge
  • Residue from scene of explosion to examine for
    suspected explosive charge

8
FIBERS
  • Natural or synthetic fibers
  • Transfer may be helpful in establishing
    relationship between objects/persons

9
FINGERPRINTS
  • Latent or other prints
  • Establish identity
  • Place at scene

10
FIREARMS
  • Firearms, Projectiles, cartridges
  • Identify
  • Compare
  • To other exemplars
  • To firearms
  • Firearms residue
  • Present?
  • Distance angle

11
GLASS
  • Glass particles or fragments
  • Transfer evidence
  • Window panes with holes
  • Sequence origin
  • Broken windows
  • Characteristics

12
HAIR
  • Animal or human
  • Origin
  • Race
  • Body area
  • Comparison
  • Root present
  • DNA

13
IMPRESSIONS
  • Tire or Shoe prints in soft material
  • Fabric Impressions
  • Bite marks

14
PAINT
  • Liquid or dried
  • Transfer from one surface to another
  • Identification
  • Comparison

15
PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
  • Arson
  • Residues identified at fire scene (accelerants)
  • Oil or grease stains
  • Comparisons to place at scene

16
PLASTIC BAGS
  • Identification
  • Comparison to known
  • Fracture match

17
POLYMERS
  • Plastic, Rubber, etc
  • Identification
  • Comparison to objects at scene

18
SERIAL NUMBERS
  • Usually falls under firearms
  • Stolen property
  • Defaced serial numbers restored

19
SOIL AND MINERALS
  • Link a person or object to location
  • Examples
  • Soil found on clothing or vehicles
  • Soil found on tools

20
TOOL MARKS
  • Usually under firearms
  • Impressions made by tool

21
LIGHTS
  • Mainly vehicle
  • Conducted to determine on/off during crash

22
WOOD
  • Other vegetative material
  • Comparison
  • To link suspect to scene

23
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
  • IDENTIFICATION
  • COMPARISON

24
MATHEMATICAL PROBABILITY
  • Underlies virtually every human action
  • Based on idea that the outcome of an event can be
    logically estimated
  • Estimate based on known conditions, past
    performance , experience with similar events
  • Familiar example (coin toss)

25
PROBABILITY
  • Blood as example
  • Four major types
  • O 40 820
  • A 40 820
  • B 15 320
  • AB 5 120
  • Any blood stain must be one of these types

26
Probability
  • Significance
  • Probability of occurrence of different types
  • Ex O is 8 times more common than AB
  • If O found fewer people eliminated than if AB is
    found
  • AB sample is therefore higher quality evidence
    than type O

27
Probability
  • The greater the frequency of occurance the less
    significance attached
  • Must also consider concept of Mutually Exclusive
  • Events that by nature preclude other events
  • Not possible for individual to have two types
  • Therefore if type A found at scene the blood did
    not come from person with any other type

28
PROBABILITY
  • Some forms of physical evidence do not lend
    themselves to statistical evaluation
  • Example Do not know statistical probability of a
    particular configuration of a toolmark
  • Value must be estimated base on experience
  • Must form an opinion as to value of evidence

29
PROBABILITY
  • Experience has shown that microscopic
    relationships between the impression and the tool
    are so specific to be unique
  • The basis of the opinion must be experience that
    equips the examiner to note the unique points
    that distinguish the item from a larger body of
    occurances

30
IDENTIFICATION
  • Definition
  • The determination of the physical or chemical
    identity of a substance with as near absolute
    certainty as existing analytical techniques will
    permit

31
IDENTIFICATION
  • EXAMPLES
  • Suspected drug sample identified to contain
    cocaine
  • Residues from a fire identified to contain
    gasoline
  • Sample found at scene identified as blood
  • May determine species
  • Vegetable material identified as type of wood

32
IDENTIFICATION
  • 1.Adoption of standard testing procedures
  • must give characteristic results for standard
    testing materials
  • Testing permanently established
  • used to establish identity
  • test results must be same on unknown as on a
    known sample

33
IDENTIFICATION
  • 2. The number and type of tests must be
    sufficient to exclude all other substances
  • Must devise an analytical scheme that will
    eliminate all but one substance
  • If identify white powder as cocaine must exclude
    every other drug

34
IDENTIFICATION
  • No simple rules as to what constitutes thorough
    and foolproof analytical scheme
  • Each type of evidence requires different type of
    tests
  • Some may be identified with one test, some may
    require many
  • Little or no control over the quality or quantity
    of samples submitted

35
IDENTIFICATION
  • The forensic scientist must conclude in many
    cases
  • What point the analyses is concluded
  • The criteria for positive identification
  • Conclusion beyond reasonable doubt for court
  • Most disciplines have SOP

36
COMPARISON
  • OF KNOWN AND UNKNOWN

37
COMPARISON
  • Definition
  • An analysis that subjects a suspect speciman and
    a standard/reference specimen to the same tests
    and examinations for the ultimate purpose of
    determining whether or not they have a common
    origin.

38
COMPARISON
  • Examples
  • Place a suspect at scene by noting similarities
    between hair found at scene to known hair of
    suspect
  • Similar to or consistent with and could have a
    common origin

39
COMPARISON
  • Examples
  • Place vehicle at scene of hit and run by noting
    similarities between paint found on victim
    clothing and known paint from vehicle
  • Chemical and physical property match
  • could have common origin
  • Fracture match
  • have a common origin

40
COMPARISON
  • Forensic comparison two step process
  • 1. Combinations of select properties are chosen
    from the suspect and the standard/reference
    specimen for comparison
  • How many properties are chosen depends on the
    type of material
  • Overriding consideration must be the ultimate
    evidential value of the conclusion

41
COMPARISON
  • 2. When examination is completed the examiner
    must be prepared to render a conclusion with
    respect to the comparison
  • Do they come from same source
  • If one property does not agree, no common origin
  • If all properties compared agree are they from
    common origin (not necessarily)

42
COMPARISON
  • Physical match
  • The most definite point of comparison between
    objects
  • Example point of screwdriver and shaft from
    which it broke
  • Any item that suggests a rip, tear, or breakage
    should lead to a search for its counterpart

43
INDIVIDUAL CHARACTERISTICS
  • Definition
  • Evidence that can be associated with a common
    source with a high degree of probability
  • Examples
  • Matching ridge characteristics of two
    fingerprints
  • Matching striations on bullets
  • Matching irregular and random wear patterns on
    footwear

44
INDIVIDUAL
  • Not possible to state with mathematical exactness
    the probability that specimens are of common
    origin. (exception DNA)
  • Conclusion that probability is so high as to defy
    mathematical calculations or human comprehension
  • INDIVIDUAL
  • Example Fingerprints
  • Several mathematical models proposed
  • One model probability of two individuals with
    same fingerprint 1 x 10 followed by 60 zeros
  • Practical millions of prints compared over 100
    years never found two the same

45
RARITY
  • Exceptional circumstances connected with the
    place, time or general conditions under which
    physical evidence is discovered can heighten its
    quality
  • Example A hairpin found near murdered wonam may
    not be of as much value as a mans tie clasp

46
CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
  • Definition
  • Properties of evidence that can only be
    associated with a group and never with a single
    source
  • Disappointments when Lab unable to relate
    evidence to a common source with a high degree of
    probability

47
CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
  • Weakness
  • Inability of examiner to assign exact or
    approximate probability values to the comparison
    of most pyhsical evidence
  • Scientist attempt to creat or update statistical
    databases when possible
  • Mostly forensic scientist must rely on personal
    experience to interpret significance of comparison

48
CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
  • Efforts made to find individual evidence
  • Fingerprints, DNA, Firearms match
  • Most physical evidence is class match
  • Majority of evidence in case is subjetive
  • Eye witness, confessions, informant
  • Physical evidence provides corroboration

49
CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
  • Trying to find define the significance of class
    evidence in exact mathematical terms is difficult
    if not impossible
  • Class evidence by definition is not unique
  • Only objects that exhibit a significant amount of
    diversity are appropriate for physical evidence
  • colored fibers v. white cotton

50
CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
  • Must provide evidence that would convince a
    reasonable man that there is no other explanation
  • Dealing with more than one type of physical
    evidence, their collective presence leads to a
    high degree of certainty

51
CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
  • Must consider reality in courtroom
  • Weight or significance left entirely to jury
  • Lay people usually give scientist high degree of
    significance
  • Scientific testimony takes on more reliability in
    courtroom
  • Given great weight in deliberations

52
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
  • When does class characteristic become individual
    characteristic
  • Source of debate and disagreement
  • EXAMPLES
  • How many striations to match bullet
  • How many paint layers to individualize
  • How many ridges to match fingerprint

53
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
  • Find as many characteristics as possible to
    compare substances
  • Significance decided by
  • Quality of evidence
  • Composition of evidence
  • Case history
  • Examiners experience
  • Conclusion can reach from speculation to near
    certainty

54
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
  • Properties and characteristics
  • Practical limits
  • Extreme No two things are alike in every detail
  • Modern analytical techniques have become too
    sensitive in some cases
  • Learning how to use instruments part of work
  • Proficiency to interpret findings critical

55
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
  • CRIME SCENE RECONSTRUCTION

56
CRIME SCENE RECONSTRUCTION
  • Team event
  • Reconstruct events that occurred
  • Prior to crime
  • During crime
  • Subsequent to crime
  • Collaborative effort including
  • Law enforcement, criminalist, Medical examiners

57
RECONSTRUCTION
  • All professionals bring unique perspective
  • Try to answer questions about crime
  • How many people involved
  • Cause of death
  • Was there an attempt to cover up
  • Physical evidence plays critical role in
    reconstructing events

58
RECONSTRUCTION
  • Physical evidence can
  • Support accounts given by witnesses/suspects
  • Contradict accounts given by witnesses/suspects
  • Generate leads
  • Confirm reconstruction to jury
  • Physical evidence is the foundation of
    reconstruction

59
RECONSTRUCTION
  • Actions law enforcement must take to optimize
    reconstruction
  • 1. Crime scene protection and security
  • A continuous process (beginning to end)
  • Evidence can be destroyed by walking through
  • There is the possibility of contamination from
    persons allowed in the scene

60
RECONSTRUCTION
  • 2. Preliminary examination
  • See scene as left by perpetrator
  • Experience and physical evidence critical
  • Captures nature of scene
  • Hypothesize what happened
  • Document observations
  • Determine how scene should be worked

61
RECONSTRUCTION
  • 3. Involve other professionals
  • Medical examiners
  • Position of body
  • Injuries
  • Has body been moved
  • Clothed before or after death
  • Cause of death
  • Estimate of time of death (not very accurate)

62
RECONSTRUCTION
  • 3. Other professionals
  • Criminalists
  • Approximate bullet path (lasers)
  • Blood spatter analysis (chapter 12)
  • Glass penetration (Chapter 4)
  • Gunshot residue for distance (Chapter 15)

63
RECONSTRUCTION
  • From text
  • Reconstruction supports a likely series of
    events by the observation and evaluation of
    physical evidence, as well as statements made by
    witnesses and those involved with the incident

64
RECONSTRUCTION
  • Team effort
  • Put together different pieces of the puzzle
  • Need right connections to show relationship
    between victim, suspect, and crime scene
  • Can play a vital role in helping jury arrive at
    proper verdict

65
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com