Title:
1Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New
Economy
- Barbara Ehrenreich and Arlie Russell Hochschild,
in Rothenberg, Ed., Beyond Borders Thinking
Critically About Global Issues, 2006.
2Globalization has transformed work/family life
for women in rich poor countries
- Women from poor countries are moving to rich
ones, to work as nannies, maids sex workers - Many women in rich countries are succeeding in
male world careers only by turning over care of
children, elderly parents, and homes to women
from the Third World - These women typically lack help from male partners
3female underside of globalization
- Millions of women from poor countries in the
south migrate to do the womens work of the
north work that affluent women are no longer
able or willing to do - Migrant women often leave their own children back
home, in the care of grandmothers, sisters,
sisters-in-law
4Pattern of female migration reflects a worldwide
gender revolution
- In both rich poor countries, fewer families can
rely solely on a male breadwinner - In the U.S., the earning power of most men has
declined since 1970, and many women have gone to
work to make up the difference - So who will take care of the children, the sick,
the elderly?
5Hypothesis The lifestyles of the First World
are made possible by a global transfer of the
services associated with a wifes traditional
rolechild care, homemaking, and sexfrom poor
countries to rich ones
6To generalize and oversimplify
- In an earlier phase of imperialism, northern
countries extracted natural resources and
agricultural products from lands they colonized - Today, while still relying on Third World
countries for agricultural and industrial labor,
the wealthy countries also seek to extract
something harder to measure and quantify, that
can look very much like love
7Precedents for the globalization of traditional
female services
- In ancient Middle East, women of vanquished
populations were routinely enslaved, to serve as
household workers and concubines for victors - Among the Africans brought to N America as slaves
in the 16th 19th centuries, 1/3 were women
children, and many became concubines and domestic
servants - 19th century Irishwomen and rural Englishwomen
migrated to English towns cities to work as
domestics in homes of growing upper-middle class
8feminization of migration
- 1950 1970, men predominated in labor migration
to northern Europe from Turkey, Greece, and North
Africa - Since then, women have been replacing men
- In 1946, women were fewer than 3 of the
Algerians and Moroccans living in France by
1990, they were more than 40 - Now, half of worlds 120 million legal illegal
migrants are believed to be women - Women migrants from many sending countries
actually outnumber men, sometimes by a wide
margin (See pp. 533-534)
9US household workforce has changed w/ life
chances of different ethnic groups
- In late 19th century, Irish and German immigrants
served the northern upper middle classes, then
left for factories as soon as they could - Black women replaced them, accounting for 60 of
all domestics in the late 1940s, and dominated
the field until other occupations opened up - West coast maids were disproportionately Japanese
American until that group found better options - Today, ethnicity of workforce varies by region
Chicanas in the Southwest, Caribbeans in New
York, native Hawaiians in Hawaii, whites, mostly
rural, in Maine - (Ehreneich, Maid to Order The Politics of Other
Womens Work Harper's, 4/1/2000)
10Govts of some sending countries actively
encourage women to migrate
- Migrant women are more likely than male
counterparts to send hard-earned wages back home
to families - Generally, they send anywhere from half to nearly
all of what they earn - Remittances have critical impact on lives of
families and kin, as well as on cash-strapped
Third World govts
11Care deficit pulls migrants from Third World
and postcommunist countries poverty pushes them
- Throughout western Europe, Taiwan, Japan, and
esp. in US, womens employment has increased
dramatically since the 1970s - As rich countries have grown richer, poor
countries have become poorer in absolute
relative terms - Global inequalities in wages are particularly
striking - To qualify for loans, IMF/WB structural
adjustment programs demand poor countries devalue
their currencies and cut public spending - Increasing incentives for migration to more
fortunate parts of the world
12Globalization of womens work is NOT a simple
synergy of needs among women
- Fails to account for failure of First World
governments to meet the needs created by womens
entry into workforce - The American andto a lesser degreeEuropean
welfare state has become a deadbeat dad - US does not offer public child care, nor insure
paid family and medical leave - Omits the role of men, who still do less than
their fair share of domestic work - Often leaving working women with a second shift
13Push factors not so simple either
- Absolute poverty not a push factor
- Female migrants not the most impoverished
- They are typically more affluent and better
educated than male migrants - Such women are likely to be enterprising and
adventurous enough to resist the social pressures
to stay home and accept their lot in life - Noneconomic factors also influential
- To escape expectation to care for elderly family
members, to give paychecks to husband or father,
to defer to an abusive husband - A practical response to divorce or need to raise
children as single mother - Other factors may make men of poor countries less
desirable as husbands (e.g., unemployment and
related social problems such as alcoholism and
gambling)
14Globalization of child care housework brings
independent women of world together but not as
sisters allies with common goals
- Instead they come together across a great divide
of privilege and opportunity
15Global relationship of women mirrors traditional
relationship b/w sexes
- The First World takes on a role like that of the
old-fashioned male in the family - Poor countries take on a role like that of the
traditional woman within the family - A division of labor feminists critiqued when it
was local has now, metaphorically speaking,
gone global