PIERRE BOURDIEU - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

PIERRE BOURDIEU

Description:

PIERRE BOURDIEU The Sociology of Class, Lifestyle and Power Bourdieu s Key Claims Social class is the elementary social fact We continue to live in highly ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:223
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: Socialology
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PIERRE BOURDIEU


1
PIERRE BOURDIEU
  • The Sociology of
  • Class, Lifestyle and Power

2
Bourdieus Key Claims
  1. Social class is the elementary social fact
  2. We continue to live in highly stratified,
    class-based societies
  3. Society works to keep the upper classes powerful
    and the lower classes powerless
  4. A lot of this happens unintentionally not
    deliberate manipulation by the powerful

3
OUTLINE
  1. Bourdieus biography
  2. Main aims
  3. Social action
  4. Habitus, capital, field
  5. Education field
  6. Social reproduction
  7. Criticisms

4
Bourdieus Biography
  • 1930 2002
  • - Born in the Béarn region of France
  • - Peasant background
  • - Star pupil degrees in philosophy
  • and anthropology
  • - Professor of Sociology, College de France
    (1980)
  • - Political figure Media personality
  • - An Outsiders Sociology

5
Main Aims
  • To understand why social inequalities
  • a) are reproduced over time
  • Retention of wealth, prestige, power by elites
  • (reproduction)
  • b) are generally accepted by the lower classes
  • To liberate social actors from oppressive social
    and mental conditions
  • - reveals structures actors not fully aware of
  • - shows society could be organised differently

6
Main Aims
  • 3) Reconcile and synthesise separate schools of
    sociological thought
  • Marxism (class power)
  • Durkheimian sociology (division of labour
    worldviews of different groups)
  • Weberian sociology (focus on social action
    attention to empirical details)
  • Phenomenology
  • (how people perceive the world they live in how
    social power shapes perceptions)

7
Main Aims
  • 4) Transcend dualisms
  • - Subjective OR Objective
  • - Social Structure OR Action/Agency
    (Structuration)
  • Theory OR Empirical sociology
  • Quantitative OR Qualitative
  • Use of multiple research methods
  • Interviews, questionnaires, documents, etc.

8
Main Aims
  • 5) Connect different social spheres
  • Sociology of education, sociology of politics,
    sociology of mass media, etc.
  • See how each sphere connects with, and affects,
    the others
  • 6) Encourage reflexivity
  • Sociology of sociology
  • See how social forces shape the ways in which
    sociologists see things
  • - Sociologist studies him/herself sociologically

9
Social Action
  • (Weber Parsons)
  • 1) A person
  • who has resources
  • 2) Person thinks in certain ways
  • has certain goals
  • thinks of ways (means) to achieve them
  • goals and means shaped by culture
  • 3) Has to act in particular social contexts
  • Contexts shape the persons thinking acting
  • Contexts shape how successful (or not) the person
    is in achieving their goals

10
  • 1) A person has particular goals
  • (these may be thought about fully consciously or
    only semi-consciously)
  • 2) They try to pursue those goals using certain
    strategies
  • (also consciously or semi-consciously)
  • 3) They have certain resources at their disposal
  • (some people have more resources than others)
  • 4) They act in certain social contexts
  • Success 1) having a large amount of the right
    sort of resources 2) having appropriate
    strategies
  • Failure 1) having the wrong sort of resources
  • 2) having inappropriate strategies

11
  • a) A person (social actor) (shaped by a
    habitus)
  • who has resources (capital)
  • b) Person thinks in certain ways
  • - thinking is semi-conscious practical reason
  • - both goals and strategies shaped by the habitus
  • c) Person has to act in particular social
    contexts
  • (fields)
  • d) Person has to interact with other people
  • (social games) (Actors players)
  • How successful a person is in a particular field
    depends on how appropriate their habitus and
    capital is for the game played in that field

12
  • Sporting analogy
  • 1) Social life is a series of games
  • 2) You need the right skills to play those games
    successfully
  • e.g. tennis skills rugby playing
  • 3) Skills the capital you possess
  • 4) Your habitus dictates the capital you possess
  • 5) Some people have more capital than others
  • EXAMPLE the game of education
  • Appropriate skills cultural capital
  • Appropriate habitus middle class habitus

13
Habitus, Capital, Field
  • Habitus (plural habitus)
  • Components
  • - ways of thinking / ways of acting
  • - bodily habits
  • - tastes likes and dislikes
  • Whole way of life / lifestyle

14
  • a) Each class has its own habitus
  • Working class habitus
  • Middle class habitus
  • Lower working class (least capital)
  • Upper working class (some capital)
  • Lower middle class (more capital)
  • Upper middle class (most capital)
  • b) Each individuals habitus is the
  • habitus of their class
  • e.g. working class person, working class habitus

15
  • c) Socialised into particular ways of thinking
    and acting
  • Primary socialisation
  • Secondary socialisation
  • d) Experience the habitus as natural - the
    condition of doxa
  • Could have been socialised very differently

16
  • e) Each habitus has its own set of tastes
  • Likes / dislikes
  • Beautiful / disgusting
  • Moral / immoral, etc.
  • f) Tastes are socially stratified
  • Upper middle class taste highest
  • Lower middle class taste middling
  • Working class taste lowest

17
BOURDIEU - RECAP
  • 1. Society still very much class-based
  • 2. Reproduction of privilege
  • Elites pass advantages onto their children
  • Non-elites pass disadvantages onto their children
  • 3. Social life is a series of games, occurring in
    fields
  • Success appropriate habitus capital

18
Habitus - continued
  • f) Tastes are socially stratified
  • Upper middle class taste highest
  • Lower middle class taste middling
  • Working class taste lowest

19
  • g) Cultural power
  • Elites have the power to define their tastes and
    their culture as the best
  • - the most sophisticated, refined,
    tasteful, etc.
  • Upper middle class habitus - sense of superiority
  • Lower middle class habitus aspirational
  • Working class habitus sense of inferiority
    defensiveness mocking of middle class
    pretentions

20
  • Capital
  • HOW MUCH capital does a person have?
  • WHAT TYPE of capital does a person have?
  • Economic capital
  • - money resources
  • Cultural capital
  • knowledge of legitimate culture / High
    Culture
  • Linguistic capital speaking properly
  • Social capital
  • - social networks (knowing influential people)

21
  • a) AMOUNT TYPE of capital
  • gt class membership
  • e.g. LOW AMOUNT of all 3 TYPES
  • lower working class
  • e.g. HIGH AMOUNT of all 3 TYPES upper middle
    class
  • b) Habitus STRONGLY INFLUENCES both the amount
    type of capital a person has
  • The more upper middle class the habitus
  • gt the more capital the person has

22
Cultural Capital Economic Capital
(Upper WC)
(Lower WC)
23
  • Field
  • a) Level of individuals experiences
  • - different social contexts
  • e.g. school, work, leisure
  • - contexts where social games are played
  • b) Level of Society
  • - separate social spheres
  • e.g. education system, economic system, system of
    leisure and recreation, etc.

24
  • c) Fields are based around specific types of
    capital
  • e.g. education field educational capital
  • (a particular sort of cultural capital)
  • d) Success in the game played in a field
  • having a large amount of the right type of
    capital for that field
  • e) Fields are organised to the advantage of
    elites
  • Not level playing fields
  • Fields are organised to favour the sorts of
    capital elites happen to possess

25
  • f) Reproduction of inequalities
  • - Successful actors have large amounts of the
    right sort of capital for the fields they are in
  • - They pass that capital onto their children
  • - (Opposite unsuccessful actors pass onto their
    children small amounts of useful capital and
    large amounts of useless capital)
  • THE WINNERS KEEP WINNING
  • THE LOSERS KEEP LOSING
  • (Most of the time)

26
EDUCATION FIELD
  • Against the conventional view
  • Meritocracy intelligence diligence
  • Social mobility
  • Educational success
  • Having the right sort of capital
  • Cultural Capital (CC)
  • High CC gt good qualifications
  • Elites use CC to get large amounts of educational
    capital (good qualifications)

27
  • Possessors of high CC
  • Upper middle class
  • Comes from their habitus (esp. home life)
  • Possessors of intermediate CC
  • Lower middle classes
  • Possessors of low CC
  • Working classes (esp. Lower WC)
  • Habitus gt CC gt educational capital

28
  • Hidden curriculum
  • 1) Unintentional evaluations by teachers
  • Conscious level
  • - Childs intelligence and diligence
  • good work, articulate, bright, attentive,
    etc.
  • Unconscious level
  • Teachers have middle class habitus
  • Teachers respect CC
  • - Evaluations in terms of amount of CC the child
    has (due to its habitus)
  • sloppy work, inarticulate, lazy,
    disruptive, etc.

29
  • 2) Child feels sense of
  • - worthiness (if CC is high)
  • - unworthiness (if CC is low)
  • Feelings translate into effort performance
  • Naturally clever / Naturally untalented
  • High CC virtuous circle
  • Low CC vicious circle
  • OUTCOME
  • Middle class success and working class failure
    are reproduced across generations
  • This happens mostly unintentionally

30
  • Social Reproduction
  • High cultural capital gt
  • High educational capital gt
  • Access to good jobs gt
  • High wealth (economic capital)
  • Upper middle class parents advantage their
    children
  • 1) Economic capital gt access to good schools
  • 2) Cultural capital gt good at school
  • 3) Social capital gt useful connections

31
  • Upward social mobility
  • It is possible for LMC and WC individuals
  • But only for a relatively small number
  • Capitalist society needs a working class
  • Capitalist society needs to show itself as
    meritocratic and democratic
  • Everyone goes to school all have the same
    chances
  • c) Upper middle classes can play the game
    better
  • Easier access to good schools
  • Can cope with grade inflation

32
  • Downward social mobility
  • The upper middle classes greatest fear
  • Children occupy lower social positions than
    parents
  • Parents pass on capital that is not useful, as
    societys fields change over time
  • e.g. high CC gt non-vocational Arts degrees
  • BUT if changing economy requires vocational
    technical qualifications gt CC not much use

33
  • Middle class defence mechanisms
  • Transform one sort of capital into another sort
  • 1) Use economic capital to get new sorts of
    educational capital
  • - home familiarity with sophisticated technology
  • - school extra tuition in employable skills
  • 2) Use social capital to get entry into good
    jobs
  • 3) Use economic cultural capital to create new
    sorts of jobs
  • e.g. cultural service sector jobs
    aromatherapy, interior decoration, style
    consultancy, etc.

34
Criticisms of Bourdieu
  • Explains EVERYTHING in terms of habitus, capital
    field
  • Circular assumes what he will find
  • key concepts supposed to be guides to research
    but turn into certainties
  • 3. Overemphasises class?
  • - other sources of inequality downplayed?
  • non-class-based habitus?
  • 4. Outdated and context-specific?
  • France in the 1960s/70s
  • Society and culture more complex now?
  • 5. Defence can use his concepts to understand
    changing social conditions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com