Title: Unit 7.2 Cognition: Thinking and Problem Solving
1Unit 7.2 Cognition Thinking and Problem Solving
2Fact 1
- The brain is awesome and we know nothing about
it
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8No, but really there are reasons she will be
forever alone. Girls got some moves?
9Really really annoying.
10How is all that possible and you can speak and
pick up a pencil without thinking about it?
11The Cognitive Niche Steven Pinker (Harvard)
- Three key ideas to note
- Computation
- Evolution (genetic survival)
- Specialization
121. Computation
- The function of the brain is information
processing - Problem What is intelligence, and how can a hunk
of matter (such as a brain) achieve it?
13- Intelligence pursuit of goals by inference
(knowledge of logic, statistics and cause/effect) - Romeo and Juliet
- Goal touch Juliets lips
14Romeos Inference
- If C is between A and B, they cannot touch. If
A goes over C, C is no longer between A and B.
Therefore, to touch Juliets lips, go over the
wall
15How computation works in the brain
- Goals and knowledge are information they are
represented as patterns in bits of matter in the
system. - System is designed so that one representation
causes another, and the changes mirror the laws
of logical or statistical inference
16In other words
- Romeos going to go over the wall because his
brain made it possible due to his intellectually
based cognition, or his inference
17Evolution and Specialization
- 2. Evolution already covered in Behavior
Genetics chapter - Whats the argument for evolution in how our
brains work? - 3. Specialization a theory of everything
doesnt exist - Specific parts of the body have specific
functions that have evolved over time
18In other words
- We have specialization because every different
type of problem requires a different tool for
solving - Cognition problem solving?
- Heart-based problem solving?
- Nervous system based problem solving
19The Limits of Human Intuition
- A man bought a horse for 60 and sold it for
70. Then he bought the same horse back for 80
and again sold it, for 90. How much money did he
make in the horse business?
20Super simple, right?
- Most common answer 10
- You actually make 20
- How do you do it?
- Comparing total amount paid out with total amount
taken in (160-14020) - Most American college students answer incorrectly
- Most German banking executives get it wrong
21Lets try again
- A man bought a horse for 60 and sold it for
70. Then he bought firewood for 80 and then
sold it, for 90. How much money did he make?
22Information processing model
- Organize items into mental groupings
- Called concepts
- Form concepts from prototypes
- Representative of the most typical member of a
category - Complex concepts schemas
23How do you give someone directions?What mental
processes do you go through?
24Lets try some more logic puzzles
- All members of the cabinet are thieves. No
composer is a member of the cabinet. - What conclusion can you draw? Is there one?
- Yes! There is a valid conclusion
- Some thieves are not composers or there are
thieves who are not composers
25How about another
- Some archaeologists, biologists, and chess
players are in a room. None of the archaeologists
are biologists. All of the biologists are chess
players. What follows? What conclusions can you
draw? - Pinker found that most people will say that none
of the archaeologists are chess players not
valid - What is valid is to say that some chess players
are not archaeologists.
26One more for extra credit
- If you love, then you suffer when your loved ones
suffer. If you hate, then you suffer when your
enemies flourish. So, since you must love or
hate, either you suffer when your loved ones
suffer or you suffer when your enemies flourish. - Inductive or deductive?
- If you love, then you suffer when your loved ones
suffer - If you hate, then you suffer when your enemies
flourish - Since you must love or hate
- You suffer when your loved ones suffer or you
suffer when your enemies flourish. - Assuming all premises are true, in their own
reality without any other options available, this
is best constructed as a deductive argument
because the conclusion cannot be false based on
the premises.