Title: The Lifecycle of a Faculty Member
1The Lifecycle of a Faculty Member
- Melanie T. Cushion, Ph.D.
- Senior Associate Dean for Research, COM
- Professor, Tenured
- Department of Internal Medicine
- Research Career Scientist, VAMC
2Lifecycle
New and diverse faculty through targeted and
strategic recruiting at all levels- University
and College efforts
Faculty transition from full-time teaching and
research to phased process of professionally
rewarding work- mentoring, lecturing,
philanthropy Emeritus Centers
Significant losses of young faculty, esp. women
due to stressed in this balance UC- LEAF,
Provost, AAUP -day care, tenure extensions, time
off
Concept of lifelong learning Need for time and
resources to retool skills as knowledge advances
in chosen fields
Thomas A. Kochan, March/April 2011m MIT
Newsletter
3Unfortunately.
4A few things to keep in mind as you begin
5People you should get to know
- Department Chair and division chiefs
- Full professors within your department and
division - Colleagues with whom a research collaboration is
possible - Colleagues who have a good understanding of any
health and safety risks associated with your
research - Administrators and business administrators
- Institutional memory and key contacts
- Organizational charts of the College and
University
6Promotion and Tenure Requirements
- Record of Action form- basic info with position
you are seeking - Department Directors recommendation letter and
signature on RoA - Department APT Committee Chairs recommendation
- Curriculum vitae
- Letters of recommendation
- 3 for Instructor to Assistant
- 3 external and 3 internal for Asst. to Associate
Associate to Professor and Tenure Review - Clinical, Educator, Field Service, Adjunct,
Volunteer and Secondary Tracks- 3 from
individuals who can assess activities - Letter of appointment
- Copies of all annual evaluations
- Personal Statement
- Documentation of excellence and effectiveness in
teaching/and - or mentoring
7Develop a 5 year plan
- Sit down and write a 5 year plan
- Prepare an experimental schedule for Year 1
- Learn to LOVE Gantt Charts
8Year 1
- Set up your lab ASAP
- Try to remodel, order equipment, hire techs
before you arrive - Learn the COM ground rules for tenure
- Ask for a faculty mentor if you are not assigned
one - Need someone who will help wade through office
politics and advise regarding the byzantine
academic world - Scientific mentor as well
- Get to work
- Write up your post doc research if pending
- Plan experimental schedule
- Apply for small internal and external grants
- Accept committee responsibilities, but avoid
becoming bogged down - death by committee
9Year 2
- Publish the research you did in your first year
- Apply to NIH, DOD etc for small grants (R03, R21,
AHA) - HAVE YOUR COLLEAGUES READ YOUR GRANTS
- Apply the Rule of 3
- Consider leadership/management course
10Year 3- Reappointment time!
- Check with mentors that you are on the right
course - Get departmental checklist for dossier
information - Resubmit R21 etc Submit R01
- Apply for internal funding, small external
grants, explore Pharma
11Years 4, 5 and 6
- You should begin to be recognized in your field
for your research - If not, discuss with mentor, dept. chair for
steps towards visibility (e.g. suggestion session
on your subspecialty at a national meeting - Funding
- If you dont have it, this is a danger
- Keep this as your 1 priority
- Teaching is limited at COM
- Participate in ongoing courses as part of a team
- Offer to organize a grad school course
- Review manuscripts
- Take on departmental and university committee
memberships - Build your networks within UC and externally
- Sit on Study sections
- Write book or reviews
12To Improve Promotion and Success
- MAKE A TIMELINE OF IMPORTANT DATES for the ARPT
Process - Provide sufficient prep time (e.g.letters of
recommendation turn around) - Be aware of your responsibilities for dossier
components
13To Improve Promotion and Succes
- DOCUMENTS YOU WILL NEED
- Curriculum vitae/ Annual evaluation
- Desktop enter on the fly, both sources
- Research Directory (some Colleges do and some
dont) - THE RULE OF 3
- Activities count in 3 different ways, e.g.
write a grant, use the Introduction for a review
manuscript, lecture slides (avoid self-plagiarism
though) - Join a committee write a policy (product) that
you can claim identify collaborators or
important administrative faculty - STANDARDIZED FORMAT
- Reverse chronological order for publications!
14TIPS
- Letters of recommendation
- Begin cultivating peers and upper level faculty
who are nationally and internationally recognized
EARLY (dont be shy!) - International and national conferences,
colloquia, workshops etc - Create a social scientific network to bounce
ideas, ask questions, recommend as reviewers - Most will be happy to help as they too have
needed such letters and understand the importance
of networking - Flattery usually works
- Annual evaluations
- Update on the fly to avoid trying to remember
all your accomplishments the day before it is due - Use the time to set realistic goals and assess
progress - Update 3-5 year plan based on attainment (or not)
of goals - Ask for help
- Dont forget professional development
15TIPS
- Personal Statement
- Use to highlight accomplishments, e.g. research
grants, awards - Re-iterate how you have hit the requirements
for promotion/tenure/reappointment - Provide future plans for the upcoming year (s)
- Document leadership of other professional
training - Documentation of excellence and effectiveness in
teaching and/or mentoring - Teaching evaluations standard forms if not, plan
surveys for your students to document teaching
effectiveness - Work and subsequent placement of graduate
students - Early career faculty should describe their
mentoring program - Mid- and senior faculty should list mentees,
workshops, seminars devoted to mentoring and
successes or learning objectives satisfied of the
various programs - Identify leadership in charge of mentoring in
your department and - volunteer for training and participation
16The Review Process
- Year 2-3 of employment, promotion and tenure
dossier is created - Before the end of 3rd year, AAUP-represented
faculty committee vote to recommend appointment
for another 3 years - After the vote, Dept. Chair meets to discuss any
problems that may hinder future progress - The dossier is submitted to the COM ARPT
committee then to the Dean- Provost-President-
Board of Trustees - Year 5- letters are solicited from internal and
external experts in your area - Tenured faculty review dossier and vote on your
tenure - Follows same route Dept. Chair, ARPT committee,
Dean, Provost, President, Board of Trustees
17Right to Appeal
- Faculty have the right to write a letter
rebutting the Departmental Committee or
Department Chairs recommendation - Entered into the dossier as a formal document