INM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

INM

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Last modified by: Ernesto Rodriguez Camino Created Date: 1/1/1601 12:00:00 AM Document presentation format: Presentaci n en pantalla – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: knm9
Category:
Tags: inm | heat | soil

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: INM


1
INMs contribution to ELDAS project
  • E. Rodríguez and
  • B. Navascués
  • INM

2
Outline
  • Latest modifications in the HIRLAM surface
    package (assim.param.)
  • Work on progress
  • 3 planned experiments REF,ELD,SVA, (TIL?)
  • Definition of REF experiment
  • Preliminary exercise (HIRLAM TR No.59)
  • Evaluation strategy
  • Physiography ECOCLIMAP
  • Time schedule

3
Latest modifications of the HIRLAM surface
package (assim.param.)
  • Explicit treatment of soil water freezing/thawing
  • Re-computation of structure functions for T2m and
    RH2m analyses
  • New snow depth analysis based on OI
  • Additional tile for snowed bare and low
    vegetation surfaces (use of predictive equations
    for snow albedo, density. Freezing/thawing of
    water retained by snow)
  • Subgrid run-off (consequence of RhoneAggr
    Experiment)
  • Tuning of Zo for certain land uses

4
Subgrid runoff (Dumenil Todini, 1992)
5
Work on progress
  • Implementation of the SVA assimilation of soil
    moisture (Balsamo) on the HIRLAM system
    preliminary tests
  • Tests with the new physiographic database
    ECOCLIMAP in the HIRLAM environment

6
3 planned experiments
  • REF
  • ELD same as REF but with soil moisture generated
    by CNRM
  • SVA same as REF but with SVA assimilation of
    soil moisture (Gianpaolo)

7
Definition of the REF experiment (I)
  • Latest reference HIRLAM version (6.2.0) Some
    of the improvements in the pipeline
  • No tiles (acceptable degradacion!)
  • Both HIRLAM and the soil moisture generator model
    (CNRM) should use the same physiography. Ideally
    the CNRM should produce vegetation and soil
    fields (from ECOCLIMAP?) for both models
  • Grid geometry? HIRLAM usually runs on a rotated
    grid. Minimize (or suppress) horizontal
    interpolations! ARPEGE grid ? HIRLAM grid using
    closest grid point for both climate files
    (ECOCLIMAP) and SWI

8
Tiling versus no tiling
9
Definition of the REF experiment (II)
  • 3D-VAR assimilation, 6h cycling
  • Lateral Boundaries ECMWF analysis
  • 0.2ºx0.2ºx31L
  • SL timestep
  • Domain? DMR?
  • 48h forecast from 00 (or 12) UTC analysis only

10
Parallel runs (H5.1.1)
  • Comparison against version 5.1.1, using DMR (0.5
    degrees, 31L, ECMWF area)
  • Summer case (1-15 July 1995)
  • Winter case (1-14 Jan. 1996)
  • Fall case (1-15 Oct. 1994)
  • Spring case (12-28 April 1998) thanks to Simo
    Järvenoja

11
Preliminary exercise close to the REF experiment
  • Seasonal assimilation experiment (Apr.95?Apr.96)
    mainly designed to assess the long term behaviour
    of the surface HIRLAM package (param assim).
  • See HIRLAM Tech.Rep.No.59 (available from HIRLAM
    web page)
  • Time evolution of slow evolving variables and
    diagnostic tools to assess performance of the
    surface analysis.
  • Also topics as convergence of the assimilation
    algorithm and evolution of different tiles within
    a grid square are thoroughly discussed.

12
Explore subgrid evolution
Possibly and depending on our resources, well
run a 4th experiment with tiling structure same
as REF, but including the same land tiles as in
the HIRLAM reference system
13
Number of effective soil moisture corrections
14
Evaluation strategy for the 3 experiments
  • Soil moisture evolution (over the whole domain,
    over Europe, over specific regions)
  • Study of soil moisture analysis increments
  • Near surface maps (T2m, RH2m) of monthly averaged
    bias, rms error
  • Verification scores against surface stations
    (T2m, RH2m) and radiosoundings.
  • Surface heat fluxes
  • Single grid point diagnostics
  • Compare ELDAS products (precip., radiation and
    heating rates) with the corresponding HIRLAM
    fields.

15
(No Transcript)
16
ECOCLIMAP database(Masson et al., 2003) (I)
  • Global and high resolution dataset (1-km).
  • Detailed information over Europe coming from
    CORINE and PELCOM projects.
  • Use of full resolution maps of the vegetation
    index NDVI to provide the appropiate temporal and
    spatial scales.
  • 215 ecosystems allowing a better assignement of
    vegetation parameter sets. (90 over Europe)
  • Use of aggregation rules to derive surface
    parameters at the desired model resolution and
    for mixed ecosystem pixels.
  • It allows the tiling approach, as used by the
    HIRLAM surface scheme.

17
Topics for discussion on ECOCLIMAP
database(Masson et al., 2003) (II)
  • It is highly sophisticated as compared with the
    current HIRLAM physiographic description and it
    allows many possible choices
  • Vegetation parameters (veg, lai, Zoh, Zom, alb,
    Rsmin, frac, emis, ...) with monthly or decennial
    (10 days) frequency.
  • Compatible with tiling.
  • Not yet enough tested in HIRLAM system.
  • Straightforward usage for lat/lon coordinates.

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
Time schedule
  • First trial for 3 experiments (REF, ELD and SVA)
    (1-6 June 2000) (Dec. 2003)
  • May ? Dec 2000 with REF exp. started (Dec. 2003)
  • May ? Dec 2000 with SVA exp. started (Jan. 2003)
  • May ? Dec 2000 with ELD exp. (?)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com