Title: Environmental security and conflict
1Environmental security and conflict
- Rafael Grasa
- Universitat AutĂ²noma de Barcelona
- Â rafael.grasa_at_uab.es
2(No Transcript)
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5Armed conflicts, 19462005
For the data, see Harbom, Högbladh Wallensteen
(2006) and www.prio.no/cscw/armedconflict. In
this figure, the number of conflicts is
normalized by the number of independent
countries. Figure created by Lars Wilhelmsen.
6Armed Conflicts in 2005
Countries with conflict on their territory in
2005 (dark brown color), countries with conflict
on their territory after the end of the Cold War
(light brown color), and the geographical centre
of the conflict (red circle). Source Halvard
Buhaug, on the basis of the Uppsala/PRIO conflict
data, see www.prio.no/cscw/armedconflict.
7Evolution of the security concept
Traditional national (military) security Now
process, multidimensional----Process Common
security Comprehensive security - national
security (freedom from war and occupation) -
political security (freedom from repression) -
economic and social security (freedom from want)
- cultural security (freedom from
ethnic/religious oppression) - environmental
security Insecurity should be reserved for major
threats!
8Environmental security
- Environment physical factors that condition
human affairs (UNESCO enviroment human beings) - Environmental security means to reduce or prevent
- environmental consequences of war
- environmental disasters at the level of war
- erosion of the earths carrying capacity
- natural disasters
- war and armed conflict resulting from
environmental change
9Consequences of Armed Conflict
- Battle-related deaths and war-related deaths
- Genocide and politicide in war and after
- Destruction of physical and human capital, slow
ec. growth - Weaker social norms and political chaos
- Weapons proliferation, crime
- Refugees and internally displaced persons
- Regional effects
- Environmental destruction (e.g. landmines)
- - Vietnam War
- - Gulf War
- - Landmines and cluster weapons
- - Nuclear winter
10Environmental disasters at the level of war
- Resource scarcity as public health problem
- lack of clean freshwater and sanitation
- Industrial accidents
- Bhopal, 1984, 2000 people killed Chernobyl Aral
Sea - Pollution
- industry and transportation in cities
- Climate change
- - sea-level rise, flooding, drought
11Natural disasters
- Can be as effective killers as war or worse
- Indian Ocean Tsunami in December 2004 killed
225,000 - Natural disasters 19952004 killed gt 800,000
- Volcanic eruptions and meteor strikes even more
deadly - Most natural disasters are (by definition) not
man-made - But some may be exacerbated by man/human activity
- UN High-Level Panel dramatic increase in major
disasters demonstrates how environmental
degradation exacerbates the destructive potential
of natural disasters - Climate change
- - sea-level rise, flooding, drought
12Environmental factors in conflict Five views
- Neomalthusianism Resource scarcity/demography
leads to conflict (Homer-Dixon) - Political ecology Its the distribution of
resources! - Cornucopianism There is no inherent resource
scarcity (critic to Neomalthusianism) - Institutionalism Cooperation can overcome
scarcity - Resource curse Resource abundance is the problem
13The Malthusian Model
- Population grows exponentially
- Food production grows linearly
-
- Positive checks (higher death rate)
- War, famine, and pestilence
- Negative checks (lower birth rate)
- Abortions, infanticide, birth control
14The neo-Malthusian model
- Population pressure high resource consumption
- Resource depletion
- Resource scarcity
- Resource competition
- Armed conflict
15The Homer-Dixon Model
- Demand-induced scarcity
- (mainly driven by population growth)
- Supply-induced scarcity
- (mainly driven by depletion or degradation of a
resource) - Structural scarcity
- (mainly driven by resource distribution)
16Some arguments for the scarcity thesis
- Resource scarcity is the single most important
issue in armed conflict if you include
territory - This is even more true after the end of the Cold
War - Territorial disputes can be proxies for disputes
about other scarce resources (minerals, energy
sources, food, water, etc.) - Sharing a river seems to contribute to
international conflict - Historical evidence of resource scarcity leading
to internal fighting and even societal collapse - Ambiguous evidence from the present linking
scarcity of water and land to internal conflict
17Studies of effects of resource scarcity
- Hauge Ellingsen (1998) environmental
degradation stimulates civil war - - Theisen but these findings cannot be
replicated - - State Failure Task Force (1998) environmental
degradation does not stimulate state failure - - de Soysa (2002) change variables do not
measure degradation - Binningsbø et al. (2005) ecological footprint ?
peace - few robust findings for internal conflict
- more robust findings for water and interstate
conflict
18Cornucopian objections
- methodological
- economic
- political
- demographic
19Methodological objections
- few systematic studies
- many studies limited to countries in conflict
- spurious factors is poverty the key?
- is resource scarcity a cause of conflict or an
effect?
20Economic objections
- environmental Kuznets curve
- resources can be substituted
- technological innovation
- market pricing
21Air pollution an environmental Kuznets curve?
Income per person, 1985 PPP
SO2 levels in 47 cities in 31 countries. Source
Lomborg (2001 176), mainly based on World Bank
data
22The long-term decline in food prices
World Bank, various sources (personal
communication with Betty Dow, Commodities
Information Analyst, Development Prospects Group,
World Bank, 7 September 2006). The price is
weighed by the Manufactures Unit Values Index and
is given in constant 1990 USD, thus reflecting
real prices. For the trend to reflect real food
availability all markets have to be open (in
order to make the price mechanisms work
properly). If this caveat holds, there seems to
be a marked decline in global food prices up to
the mid 1980s when it stabilizes. The peak in
1974 is due to increased production costs (and
perhaps increased hoarding) due to the 1973 oil
crisis.1
23Political objections
- Democracy and environmental performance (or
commit-ment) - - Freedom of information
- - Pluralism
- - Pragmatism
- - International cooperation
- - Market orientation
- - Greater respect for human life
- The democratic peace (internal, external)
- Cooperation trumps conflict
24Environmental cooperation
- Law of the Sea
- River authorities
- Joint hydroelectric projects
- Cooperation cuts across conflict boundaries
- Webs of interdependence?
- Towards an International Dike Authority for
Low-Lying Areas?
25Demographic objections
- Population pressure may not always be harmful
- Ester Boserup
- Julian Simon
- Limited impact of three forms of population
pressure - population density
- population growth
- youth bulges
- Global population explosion has been called off
26World population, 1950-2300
Source World Population to 2300.
ST/ESA/SER.A./236. New York United Nations,
Population Division, 2004, www.un.org/population/p
ublications/longrange2/WorldPop2300final.pdf.
27The resource curse
- Abundance of natural resources lead to
- low economic growth
- corruption
- poor governance
- resource capture and looting
28Natural resources and civil war
29Criticism of the resource curse literature
- Share of natural resources exports to GDP does
not reflect lootability (saqueo) - Results are not robust
- Case selection, as in neo-malthusian stories
- Nation-level data too rough
30Diamonds and conflict I
Source Halvard Buhaug, Scott Gates Päivi
Lujala, 2003. Lootable Natural Resources and the
Duration of Armed Civil Conflict, 1946-2001,
paper presented at the 11th Norwegian National
Meeting in Political Science, Trondheim, 810
January.
31Diamanter og konflikter II
Source Elisabeth Gilmore, Päivi Lujala, Nils
Petter Gleditsch Jan Ketil Rød, 2005. 'Conflict
Diamonds A New Dataset', Conflict Management and
Peace Science 22(3) 257292.
32Opium and coca cultivation since 1950
Source Päivi Lujala, NTNU, unpublished.
33Will the future be different from the past?
- Are we eroding the earth's carrying capacity?
- - neomalthusians and cornucopians
disagree sharply - Many gloomy predictions in the past were wrong
- - population, food, raw materials
- Are changes now less reversible?
- - biodiversity loss, soil erosion and
deforestation less so - Is the best strategy to prevent or to alleviate?
- - global warming
34Some tentative conclusions
- Cornucopians are justified in questioning the
apocalyptic visions of global man-made collapse - - global warming a major uncertainty
- Neomalthusians rightly point to local scarcity
conflicts over land, water, etc. - - but these are low-level conflicts and tied to
the quality of government and the level of
development - The 'resource cursers' argue correctly that some
conflicts are fueled by natural resource wealth - - but some of their generalizations are as
hasty as those of the neomalthusians - Liberal policies provide our best general answer
to threats to human security, including
environmental - - promote democracy by peaceful means!
35The commodity-conflict relation is becoming
better understood
- Primary commodities strongly associated with
conflict, and oil in particular - Two key mechanisms
- (1) through the weakening of the state
- (2) through the financing of rebels, sometimes by
corporations - Effect (1) seems dominant but some clear cases of
effect (2) also - Here follow 5 suggestions for dealing with these
governance problems
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38Recommendation 1
- Publication of Payments Make it mandatory
- The Problem with Voluntary Compliance
- The countries where voluntary compliance is least
likely are the countries where you need it most - If voluntary compliance fails, corporations will
still want to deal with unrepresentative
governments - If it succeeds, regimes in resource rich
countries are still likely to be overthrown, more
so than governments in corporations home
countries - Advantages of Mandatory Compliance
- For governments Mandatory requirements can
strengthen the position of willing governments - For corporations It can level the playing field
in cases where corporations compete against other
corporations that are not constrained by human
rights concerns - Practicalities
- There are different ways this can be done
delisting, through IFI conditionality, through
other legislation
39Recommendation 2
- Establish a Global Public Information Center
- The Problem
- Lack of transparency about what is transparent!
- What deal did Chad get? I dont know, Chadians
dont know. We are not sure even what we are
supposed to know about this transparent deal - Suggestion Establish a single site, posting
relevant legislation bids and contracts from all
resource producing states - Advantages
- Makes it obvious when documents are not available
- Posting could be used as a condition for
financing - Practicalities Could be hosted by the World
Bank, by the OSI
40Recommendation 3
- Maintain Income Taxes
- The Problem States accessing resource revenues
are tempted to drop income axes, in part because
they are distortionary, in part because they are
difficult to collect and sometimes unpopular. But
doing this weakens the linkages between the state
and society. - Suggestion Maintain Income Taxes
- Advantages
- Avoid hollowing out of state structures
- Make revenues dependent on national income
- Make revenues dependent on popular support
- Practicalities Use natural resources revenues
for targeted expenditure not for general
budgetary support
41Recommendation 4
- Get corporations involved at the peace
negotiations table - The Problem
- The implementation of peace negotiations is often
jeopardized by the lack of employment
possibilities for ex-combatants. Investors fears
of a re-start of conflict can become
self-fulfilling prophecies. - Advantages of getting corporations involved at
the peace negotiations table - For corporations Awareness of quality of deals
and interests of groups - For the country Help provide basis and
confidence in economic terms of the deal - Risks
- May stifle competitions
- Moral hazard
42Recommendation 5
- Make contracts conditional upon criteria for
Regime Recognition - The Problem Successful mining may lead to the
desire to capture the state. Whoever gets the
sate gets control of the assets. This increases
political risk. - Suggestion. Tie accounts and contracts to
available mechanisms for recognizing regimes - For example Regimes recognized by the African
Union - For example Establish club criteria for
recognition, similar to the Millennium Challenge
Account provisions
43(No Transcript)