Title: GEF and Capacity Development: background and future perspectives UNDP-GEF National Capacity Self-Assessment (NCSA) Regional Workshop 17-19 June, 2005, Tunis, Tunisia ***
1GEF and Capacity Development background and
future perspectives UNDP-GEF National Capacity
Self-Assessment (NCSA) Regional Workshop 17-19
June, 2005, Tunis, Tunisia
- Tom Twining-WardUNDP-GEF, New York
2GEF and Capacity Development
- CD is one of the most critical issues for both
donors and developing countries and without
sufficient local capacity, development is
unlikely to succeed. - WSSD and Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness
have reaffirmed the priority of building the
capacity of developing countries. - The past decade witnessed steadily increasing
requests from the global environmental
conventions to enhance efforts to build the
capacity of developing countries to meet their
objectives and obligations under the Rio
Conventions. - The Second GEF Assembly recommended that capacity
development should be identified and addressed in
a systematic manner and called for the GEF to
foster synergies among global environmental
conventions through capacity development
activities.
3 Capacity Development Initiative (CDI)
- Strategic Partnership between UNDP and the GEF
Secretariat - Activities and Outputs of the CDI
- Regional Workshops
- Selected national need-assessments
- Regional Reports
- Strategic Framework approved by GEF Council
- Immediate Approval of National Capacity Self
Assessments - Further development of other elements of
Strategic Framework
4CDI (Contd)
- The CDI identified a critical need for national
capacity to upstream policy-making, enact
legislation, regulation or other administrative
measure based on knowledge generated on
environment. - This includes supporting initiatives to reform
and clarify institutional mandates, alignments
and responsibilities. - Also recognized that sustaining this capacity
requires creating an environment conducive to
on-going learning, review and change at all
levels individual, institutional and systemic. - Countries participating in the CDI also gave top
priority to strengthening capacity for increasing
public awareness and knowledge to increase public
understanding and gather support to integrate
environmental issues into development.
5Convention Guidance
- Capacity building is the underlying theme of
several decisions starting from the GEF Assembly,
Council and global environmental conventions for
which GEF is the financial mechanism. - As the conventions introduce new areas for
implementation, including new protocols, the need
for capacity building shifts and GEF support will
be based upon continuous prioritization by
countries. - Convention guidance to the GEF has continuously
assigned priority to providing financing for
capacity development to assist Parties to
implement the conventions. - Throughout the past decade, guidance from the CBD
and UNFCCC to the GEF has requested funding for
country-driven capacity-development activities. - Within the deliberations of the UNCCD as well as
the Stockholm Convention, capacity development to
assist countries to meet the objectives of the
Conventions has been strongly emphasized.
6GEF and Capacity Development
- Capacity development for global environmental
management became a significant area of focus for
the GEF. - In November 2003 the Council approved a Strategic
Approach to Enhance Capacity Building. - The GEF business plan (05-07) identifies capacity
building as a strategic priority that cuts
across all focal areas, and anticipates that GEF
resources are to be directed towards capacity
development consistent with the Strategic
Approach. - This approach is also in line with broader GEF
thinking on the need to enhance synergies among
focal areas and program future activities in the
broader context of integrated natural resource
management.
7GEF Resources for Capacity Development
Methods for access to GEF Resources (Pathways)
4. Program for critical capacity building
activities in LDCs SIDS
1. National Capacity Self-Assessments NCSAs
2. Enhanced attention to capacity building in
regular projects
3. Targeted and cross-cutting capacity building
projects
8Other GEF-funded CD Activities
- National Dialogue Initiatives (NDI)
- promote outreach and multi-stakeholder
participatory consultations in recipient
countries. - Focal Point Support Program
- improve country support by increased
participation and ownership in the project
identification process by facilitating national
consultations among different stakeholders. - enhanced awareness among national policymakers
and key stakeholders through the development of
case studies, good practice notes and targeted
dissemination of GEF program information. - Enabling Activities (EAs)
- primary objective of EAs is preparation of
national reports, but they also serve to build
some capacity in the process.
9GEF Strategic objectives in GEF-4 (2006-10)
- The objective in GEF-4 will be to recognize and
strengthen the inter-relationships amongst
capacity, global environmental impacts and
performance across the GEF focal areas. - This will be done through the pathways provided
in the Strategic Approach to provide assistance
for capacity development approaches geared to
achieving and mainstreaming global environmental
benefits. - Financing for two of the pathways (embedding
capacity building elements within the GEF
projects and filling strategic gaps by supporting
targeted focal area capacity building projects)
will be funded through the resources programmed
for the focal areas. Indicators will be
incorporated in project proposals that will allow
for tracking of capacity building outcomes. - Financing for critical cross-cutting capacity
development projects identified in the NCSAs and
for initiating country programs for LDC/SIDS will
be financed under the corporate programs
allocation.
10Conclusions
- GEFs Strategic Approach to enhance capacity
building offers significant new opportunities for
countries. - The NCSA is as a strategic positioning tool and
framework for countries and entry point to access
funds from other GEF pathways. - Important for countries to tailor process and
outputs in this context. - The likely introduction of a Resource Allocation
Framework (RAF), further reinforce the need for
countries to increasingly focus on developing
national capacities to enhance their performance
in project delivery and ensure the existence of
adequate capacity at all levels