P1247176263jAzIv - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

P1247176263jAzIv

Description:

... Toyota would possibly surpass General Motors as the largest auto manufacturing ... sixth company, NUMMI, being a joint venture between Toyota and General Motors. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: Sco753
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: P1247176263jAzIv


1
Where was your car built? A look at the trend of
Japanese Manufacturers building there cars in the
United States
On April 24th, a story was on MSNBC said
Toyota would possibly surpass General Motors as
the largest auto manufacturing company in the
world. In another recent online story,
there has been speculation that the Big 3 may
someday include one or more of the Japanese
manufacturers. This is not only because of sales,
but also because of the amount of production they
are now doing in the United States. In
this report, I want to show how U.S. Auto
production has changed for the traditional idea
of the Big 3 to a climate where the Houston
Rockets now play at the Toyota Center and the
top two truck plants for hours needed per vehicle
are Nissan.
The Spreadsheet to the right shows the top twenty
car and light truck plants in the US by the hours
per vehicle required for each unit. The listing
includes the plant name, type of vehicles
produced, and hours required per vehicle. Below
the listings are a total of the cars produced by
the top twenty plants, the number of those cars
that are foreign cars. And the percentage of
those vehicles that are foreign. The
information used to create this chart is from
2002. This means that some of the newest plants,
including the new Toyota truck plant in San
Antonio, are not included in the comparison.
This sheet shows that the Big Three do have
efficient plants, but the combination of
efficiency and production allow the seven foreign
plants in the list to produce 42 of the cars.
These maps were generated form information taken
ten years ago. Notice that even then, the
Foreign manufacturers were beginning to build
plants throughout the United States. One thing
to notice is how most new plants, including the
foreign plants avoid the clustering that was
prevalent with the older plants. Also, newer
plants are built in more rural areas. This is due
to lower properties costs as well as the ability
of the manufacturing corporation to negotiate a
better incentive package for building in a
particular area. The foreign plants also avoid
Michigan, see Region 5. Critics say that the
foreign manufacturers try to avoid heavily
unionized areas, allowing them more freedom in
how they run their plants, which would explain
why the only Michigan plant is the AAI joint
venture in Flat Rock.
The chart to the right shows the difference in
hours per vehicle for all of the major
manufacturers in the United States. The number of
hours required to build each vehicle has a direct
effect on the cost per vehicle, and therefore the
companys profits per vehicle. As you can see,
the top five companies are Japanese owned with
the sixth company, NUMMI, being a joint venture
between Toyota and General Motors. Recent reports
have said that the gap in hours per vehicle is
now closing, but the US manufacturers are not
able to match the Japanese production methods.
  • Method
  • The information for the project was
    obtained from a number of sources. Tiger files,
    from the US Census Bureau were used for the maps.
    These files provided more than ample detail for
    the project.
  • The next source was the U.S. Environmental
    Protection Agency. The EPA provided listings of
    auto plants divided by region. These regional
    divisions were very valuable, allowing the
    information to be broken down into regions rather
    than a map of the entire United State with all
    plants marked. The only odd thing about the
    Regions was the missing numbers. There is no
    Region 1 for example.
  • The next source was the Harbour Report.
    This report is generated by Harbour Consulting
    and gives an independent breakdown of
    manufacturing plants in the United States along
    with where they rank in various production
    categories.
  • This report is not in normal circulation, but our
    library does have copies from some prior years.
    The Report is actually done in two phases.
  • For the Map portion
  • Break down the states into their regions as
    described by the EPA. Using Arc Map, go in and
    Select by attribute using the Name attribute
    to select the individual states.
  • Take each individual plant and cross reference
    the listing with the EPA list. Once a plant is
    found, open the EPA report on the plant and find
    the geographic information on the plant. This
    will allow you to know where the plant is to be
    placed on the map.
  • Go back to Arc Map and open the map of the region
    that contains the plant in question. Find the
    correct longitude and latitude for the plant and
    place the marker at this spot.
  • Generate your output maps
  • For the statistical portion
  • Collect the information from the Harbour Report.
    This includes, but is not limited to each plants
    Hours-Per-Vehicles, total production, brand
    produced, and style produced.
  • Enter the relevant figures into an excel
    spreadsheet.
  • Enter the calculations you wish to use with the
    figures into the Excel spreadsheet. These would
    include calculations for total number of cars
    produced by the top twenty plants, number of
    foreign cars produced by the top twenty plants,
    percentage of foreign cars, etc
  • Generate your output spreadsheets and charts.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com