Phylogenybased classification - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Phylogenybased classification

Description:

Strict consensus trees only contain monophyletic groups common to all trees produced ... Monophyletic grouping are used in classifications b/c they are the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: jbou2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Phylogenybased classification


1
Phylogeny-based classification
  • Lecture 3

2
Choosing trees
  • Seems simple to determine the evolutionary
    history of a group of organisms
  • Problems -homoplasy
  • Parallelism appearance of similar character
    states in unrelated organisms
  • Reversal derived character state changes back to
    the ancestral state

3
Choosing trees
  • Groups w/ 2 or more ancestral sources in which
    parallel similarities have evolved are
    polyphyletic
  • Makes it difficult to determine the order of
    origin (p. 22)
  • How is one to determine which is the correct tree?

4
Choosing trees
  • Occams razor do not generate a hypothesis any
    more complex that is demanded by the data
  • Apply principle of parsimony
  • Works well when evolutionary rates are relatively
    slow enough that chance similarities
    (independently derived) do not overwhelm
    characters shared by the common ancestor
  • Minimum-distance method
  • Based on minimizing dissimilarities

5
Choosing trees
  • Maximum likelihood method
  • Based on theories concerning probability of
    change from one character state to another then
    using the probabilities to calculate the
    likelihood that a given diagram explains the data
    observed
  • In reality there are many possible networks and
    the answer is not obvious
  • Use programs to evaluate all possible trees

6
Summarizing evolutionary trees
  • Systematists want to see what groups are found in
    all of the shortest trees produced during
    analysis
  • Consensus tree
  • Strict consensus trees only contain monophyletic
    groups common to all trees produced
  • Majority-rule tree show groups that appear in 50
    or more of the trees

7
Which tree?
  • The phylogenic tree is actually a model like
    all models, assumptions are made
  • Mutation is random
  • 11 relationship b/t gene and character
  • How many genetic switches are involved?
  • What is the possibility of a reversal?
  • Are some characters harder to change than others?
  • Weighting ex pubescence is likely easier to
    change than leaf anatomy
  • Typically all characters are given equal weight

8
Constructing a classification
  • Classifications communicate information
  • Should be stable
  • Multiple name changes make communication
    difficult
  • Should be predictive
  • Provide info about a plant
  • Monophyletic grouping are used in classifications
    b/c they are the result of evolution
  • More predictive and reflect genealogy

9
Constructing a classification
  • Phylogenetic classifications can be used
  • To search for
  • Specific genes
  • Biological products
  • Biological control agents
  • Potential crop species
  • In conservation
  • To provide a framework for bio knowledge
    comparative studies

10
Constructing a classification
  • 2 steps
  • Delimitation naming of monophyletic groups
  • Ranking the groups placing them in a hierarchy
  • Herein lies the controversy which ranking is
    correct??

11
Constructing a classification
  • Cladistic classification only monophyletic groups
    are named, not paraphyletic groups
  • Many exs of paraphyletic groups such as the
    bryophytes (liverworts, hornworts, mosses)
  • bryophytes implies a close relationship, when
    this is not the case
  • Not all monophyletic groups are named b/c it
    would be cumbersome
  • Ex Liquidamber (sweetgum)
  • Ex over ½ Poaceace is one large clade, but has
    no formal name

12
Constructing a classification
  • There really isnt any set criteria used to
    decide which monophyletic groups should be named,
    but the following criteria is generally used
  • Strength of evidence must be strong
  • Should have a set of characters which distinguish
    it (the clade) from other clades (diagnoses)
  • Must have an obvious morphological character
  • For ex a field biologist (like me) doesnt care
    cant use the fact that a clade is
    characterized by an amino acid position in a
    certain molecule BUT if it has a particular
    morph. characteristic, then I do care b/c I can
    diagnose the plant

13
Constructing a classification
  • Also, group size is important for memorization
    purposes
  • Ex liquidamber could be separated into 2 groups
    ea. w/ 2 species ea., but why?
  • Finally, nomenclatural stability
  • Remember its used for communication constant
    name changes are a big pain

14
Ranking
  • Biological classification is useful b/c those who
    are not systematists can use the system
  • Botanical classification uses a system developed
    in the 18th century (Linnaean ranks)
  • KPCOFGS
  • This system can be used to express phylogenetic
    relationships
  • Remember this is a construct

15
Ranking
  • Also, recall that not all monophyletic groups are
    named (p. 36)
  • Sequencing convention taxa forming an
    asymmetrical part of a cladogram may be placed at
    the same rank arranged in the order of
    branching
  • Ex Poaceace (p. 36)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com