Animal Learning Operant Conditioning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Animal Learning Operant Conditioning

Description:

Pigeons will peck at stimuli associated with the presentation of food and drink, even when pecking has no effect on the delivery of reinforcers. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:118
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: keithcl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Animal Learning Operant Conditioning


1
Animal Learning- Operant Conditioning
  • Keith Clements

2
Aims
  • To consider the nature of reinforcement in
    operant conditioning and how differing
    reinforcement schedules alter responding.
  • To examine the extent to which biological
    constraints may influence the course of operant
    conditioning.

3
Applying Operant conditioning
  • Operant conditioning can produce novel behaviours
    through shaping.
  • Shaping involves gradually rewarding closer
    approximations to the desired behaviour.
  • Any stimulus which increases the frequency of
    behaviour is a reinforcer.
  • As well as primary reinforcers, secondary or
    conditioned reinforcers can be used to reward
    behaviour.

4
Partial reinforcement reinforcement schedules.
  • Ratio schedules provide reinforcement after a
    number of responses. Interval schedules impose a
    delay after each reinforcer, during which no
    further reinforcement is available. Each may be
    fixed or variable
  • e.g.
  • FR 10 every tenth response is rewarded
  • VR 8 an average of 8 responses are needed for
    each reward
  • FI 60-sec after a reward is delivered no further
    rewards can be earned until a minute has passed
  • VI 30-sec after a successful response no further
    reward is available until around 30 seconds have
    passed

5
Responding under partial reinforcement schedules
Variable schedules, in particular, produce
greater resistance to extinction than continuous
reinforcement
6
The nature of reinforcement
  • Drive reduction theories. Hull (1943)
    reinforcement results from the reduction of the
    drive associated with a physiological need
  • The 'Premack principle'. Premacks probability
    differential theory (1965) views reinforcement as
    creating a contingency between two behaviours.
    High probability behaviours can reinforce low
    frequency ones

7
Ad Lib
With Contingency in place
Eating Lever pressing
8
After training
Eating Lever pressing
9
Contingency shaped behaviour Operant principles
apply to learning through direct experience of
the consequences of behaviour. Sometimes,
particularly in human studies, behaviour departs
from the typical patterns. Often humans perform
very badly by comparison with rats or
pigeons! Skinner (1969) argued that this was
because people are capable of Rule-governed
behaviour We can also acquire verbal rules about
the consequences of behaviour without directly
experiencing those consequences. Such behaviour
is often insensitive to it's consequences. Human
behaviour may also differ from that of other
species because of the prior histories of
reinforcement people bring with them.
10
What do animals learn during operant conditioning?
  • Latent learning (Tolman Honzik, 1930)
  • Learning need not involve an immediate change in
    behaviour
  • Tolman argued maze learning involves the
    formation of cognitive maps.
  • He viewed behaviour as goal-directed, whereas
    early behaviourists such as Hull or Thorndike
    viewed behaviour as automatically elicited by
    environmental stimuli.

11
Reinforcer Devaluation
  • e.g. Colwill Rescorla (1985)
  • Pressing a lever allowed rats to obtain food
    pellets
  • Pulling a chain gave access to sugar water.
  • One group was given free access to food pellets
    then made ill
  • When both the lever and chain were present
    (without reinforcement) this group made few lever
    presses but continued to pull the chain.
  • Illness after drinking sugar water had the
    opposite effect.
  • Operant responses are produced because they are
    associated with their consequence

12
Biological constraints
  • Breland Breland's (1961) "misbehaviour of
    organisms". They identified Instinctive drift,
    whereby species-specific behaviours would intrude
    during operant responding.
  • Autoshaping (first demonstrated by Brown
    Jenkins, 1968) provides one example of a
    situation where such behaviours may facilitate
    operant conditioning. Pigeons will peck at
    stimuli associated with the presentation of food
    and drink, even when pecking has no effect on the
    delivery of reinforcers.
  • E.g. see http//go.owu.edu/deswartz/procedures/au
    toshaping.html

13
References
  • Last weeks references cover operant conditioning.
  • The Classics in the History of Psychology web
    site http//psychclassics.asu.edu includes the
    paper by Breland and Breland, describing their
    experiences, and one by Tolman, setting out his
    alternative to the version of behaviourism which
    dominated the study of learning at the time.

14
Where am I?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com