Aucun titre de diapositive

1

• SRC

2
Safety Regulation Commission

• EIGHTEENTH MEETING
• Brussels, 7/8 October, 2003

3
Agenda Item 1 - Chairmans Welcome and
Introduction

4

Agenda Item 2 - Approval of Agenda
5
Agenda Item 3 - Report of SRC17

6
Agenda Item 4 - AGAS

7
Agenda Item 4 - AGAS
4.1 - Programme Update
8
AGAS Programme Update

• Strategic Safety Action Plan approved by
  Provisional Council - April 2003
• Referred to Implementation Co-ordination Group
  (ICG) for further development
• SAF
• SRU
• AGAS Programme Office
• Development of Implementation Master Plan
  (IMP)

9
AGAS IMP

• Takes the 8 areas for high priority action and
  converts them into a Work Breakdown Structure
  (WBS)
• Defines
• Work Packages
• Lead Actors
• Timescales
• Deliverables
• Addresses all stakeholders

10
AGAS Programme Update

• The SRC is invited to -
• note the content of this paper
• review and approve the attached draft AGAS
  Implementation Master Plan as part of its
  submission process to the Provisional Council.

11
Agenda Item 4 - AGAS
4.2 - Runway Incursions
12
Action Plan

• has been consulted with SRC, ACG, PC
• has been agreed at PC 16 to be distributed
  mainly via National regulators
• feed back is requested

13
Actions

• RFC 0346 - European Action Plan for Prevention of
  Runway Incursions, Implementation Actions by
  National Aviation Safety Authorities
• Deadline 22 September 2003
• Joint effort between SRC and Agency
• Replies received 18 of 41 ECAC States

14
Questionnaire

• Joint effort of SRU and the Agency
• Questions
• Q1 Have the Action Plan been received by your
  organisation?
• Q2 Have the Action Plan been distributed to the
  interested parties at national level?
• Q3 What status has been given to the Action
  Plan?
• Q4 Have recommendations from the Action Plan
  been allocated to stakeholders at national level?
• Q5 Have targets been set for each
  recommendation?
• Q6 Are these targets different from those in the
  Action Plan?
• Q7Have any recommendations already been
  implemented?
• Q8Have Local Runway Safety team been established?

15
Summary of replies

• Q1 Have the Action Plan been received by your
  organisation ?
• YES 17 NO 1
• Q2 Have the Action Plan been distributed to the
  interested parties at national level ?
• YES 15 NO 3
• Q3 What status has been given to the Action Plan
  ?
• MANDATORY 3
• RECOMMENDATION 5
• LEFT TO THE DISCRETION OF DECISION BODIES 2
• NONE 1 NOT CLEAR 1
• ALL ABOVE 2 NOT DECIDED 4

16
Summary of replies

• Q4 Have recommendations from the Action Plan
  been allocated to stakeholders at national level?
  
• YES 9 NO 7
• UNDER STUDY 1 NOT CLEAR 1
• Q5 Have targets been set for each
  recommendation?
• YES 4 NO 13
• UNDER STUDY 1
• Q6 Are these targets different from those in the
  Action Plan?
• NO 2 NOT APPLICABLE 15 UNDER STUDY 1

17
Summary of replies

• Q7 Have any recommendations already been
  implemented?
• YES 10 NO 4
• NOT YET 1 UNDER STUDY 1
• NOT APPLICABLE 2
• Q8 Have Local Runway Safety team been
  established?
• YES 10 NO 8

• Initial conclusions
• Evidences required not produced
• Level of replies 18 out of 41 ECAC States
• Not a priority at national level

18
What next ?

• Runway Safety Steering Committee meeting
  09.10.2003
• Summary report will be presented
• Strategy to monitoring the implementation of
  Action Plan Task Force and Steering Committee
• Strategy to help States in implementing the
  Action Plan - Task Force

19
Recommendations

• The SRC is invited to
• note the report
• take note of the feed back on the Action Plan
• support the implementation of the actions from
  the Action Plan at national level in co-operation
  with interested parties/national stakeholders

20
Agenda Item 5 - SRC Work Programme

21
SRC Work Programme

• Revised as a short-form easy-reference
  document (SRC Decision)
• Now encompasses AGAS outcomes
• Intended to supersede
• SRC Doc 3 Edition 5.0
• Work Allocation Plan
• Still in Draft form

22
SRC Business Planning Process
23
AGAS Consistency

• Each AGAS Work Package is also reflected
  directly within the SRC W.P.
• Traceable through
• Preserving identical wording
• AGAS reference in priority column
• AGAS references will be replaced with AGAS
  Work Package reference when IMP is finally
  approved

24
Inputs from AGAS into SRC
25
(No Transcript)
26
SRC Work Programme

• Programme is complete except for
• Final list of EATM Programmes
• Final approval of AGAS WBS
• Any further SRC Decisions
• Will be completed following PC 18
• Will lead to new Resourcing Plan

27
SRC Work Programme

• The SRC is invited to -
• note the content of this paper as the basis for
  revision of the SRC Work Programme
• review the revised SRC Work Programme document
  (SRC Doc. 3 Edition 5.1 Draft Issue)
• provide comments to SRU by no later than the
  31st. October 2003 on its contents.

28
Agenda Item 6 - Interfaces

29
Agenda Item 6 - Interfaces
6.1 - EC Single European Sky
30
Agenda Item 6 - Interfaces
6.1 - EC Memorandum of Co-operation Update
31
Agenda Item 6 - Interfaces
6.2 - SAF SRU / EATM
32
Agenda Item 6 - Interfaces
6.2 - SAF ACAS Compliance Phase II
33
Agenda Item 6 - Interfaces
6.2 - SAF Relationship DAP/SAF and DAS/SSM
34
Agenda Item 6 - Interfaces
6.3 - RC ENPRMs
35
Agenda Item 6 - InterfacesRC
6.3 - Conformity Assessment Task Force
36
Single European Sky

• The Single European Sky Regulations promotes and
  mandates the use of-
• generic harmonisation/standardisation processes
  for products/services
• generic conformity assessment procedures for
  products in ATM
• They have the potential to modify significantly
  the way ATM safety regulation (inc. oversight) is
  conducted today

37
Topics

• Global and New Approach
• SES Draft Interoperability regulation
• Implementation of New/Global approach
• Proposal for a joint RU/SRU Task Force
• RC and SPG views
• Way Forward
• Recommendation to SRC

38
Global and New Approach
39
Technical Harmonisation and Standardisation (1)

• Directives 98/34/EC of the European Parliament
  and of the Council (June 98) amended by Directive
  98/48/EC lays down
• A procedure for the provision of information in
  the field of technical standards and regulations
  and of rules on Information Society services
• in order to promote the smooth functioning of
  the internal market. (so called New Approach)

40
Technical Harmonisation and Standardisation (2)

• The Directives apply to-
• any industrially manufactured product, and
  applicable technical regulations
  specifications
• any service normally provided for remuneration,
  at a distance, by electronic means and at the
  individual request of a recipient of services,
  and applicable rule.
• The Directive aims at ensuring maximum
  harmonisation of rules standards at European
  level.

41
Conformity Assessment (1)

• Council Decision 93/465/EEC (July 93) concerns
• modules for the various phases of the conformity
  assessment procedures and the rules for the
  affixing and use of the CE conformity marking,
  which are intended to be used in the technical
  harmonization directives
• for the assessment of conformity of products to
  ensure they are in conformity with Essential
  Requirements

42
Conformity Assessment (2)

• The Council Decision applies to-
• products placed on the market
• The Decision aims at ensuring their conformity to
  the requirements expressed in the provisions of
  the Essential Requirements/Directives, in
  particular with regard to the health and safety
  of users and consumers.
• Conformity assessment is organised into modules.

43
(No Transcript)
44
Conformity Assessment (3)

• Essential requirements (directive or regulation)
• must specify a conformity assessment procedure,
  which is to be applied by the manufacturer before
  the product may be put on the market, and this is
  materialised by a CE marking (however some
  directives and regulations do not require a CE
  marking, and this is the case of Draft SES
  Regulation 2001/237).
• If some third party assessment required
• Conducted by Notified Bodies that have been
  designated by Member States
• Directive/Regulation must also define the
  requirements applicable to such bodies.

45
SES Draft Interoperability Regulation

• Implementation of New/Global approach

46
SES Rule Making hierarchy
Common Essential Requirements (Mandatory)
Implementing Rules (Mandatory)
Community Specifications (Voluntary Standards)
47
SES Supervision framework (1)

• Certification of ANSPs against Common
  requirements
• Based on surveys and inspections (subsidiarity
  principle)
• Verification of compliance
• Compliance Verification processes anticipated for
  constituents and systems, nothing for procedures
  etc..
• Implementing Rule should contain the type of
  compliance verification mechanism (and what is
  potentially required of Notified bodies)

48
SES Supervision framework (2)

• Presumption of conformity with ER/IR
• if manufacturer issues an EC declaration of
  conformity or suitability for use of
  constituents
• if compliance of constituent with Community
  Specifications
• ANSP issues a EC declaration of verification of
  systems with technical file
• Notified bodies, third party empowered to carry
  out verification tasks and to issue certificate
  of compliance based on outcome

49
SES Conformity Assessment
Implementing Rule (constituent/system)
Ops concepts Procedures ?
Generic Modules
?
Presumption of compliance with ER/IR
Guidance
?
Manufacturer (constituent)
?
ANSP (system)
50
Main issues of SES supervisory function

• Articulation of safety across the supervisory /
  verification of compliance functions
• Consistency with verification approval
  procedures used
• for ATM ground systems by national Safety
  Authorities and ANSPs
• for ATM avionics systems

51
Main issues of SES supervisory function

• Conformity assessment ATM element lifecycle
• black box white box
• Involvement of Notified bodies (role,
  responsibility, activities, resources)

52
Proposal for a joint RU/SRU Task Force

• Focus on Conformity Assessment in ATM/CNS

53
RU/SRU Initiative

• Harmonised application of conformity assessment
  is instrumental for SES
• EUROCONTROL, Safety regulators, ANSPs have
  accumulated experience in the field of
  verification and approval of ATM systems
• Appropriate measures for SES conformity
  assessment need to be defined
• Creation of a Task Force to address conformity
  assessment

54
Objectives of the Task Force

• To share a common understanding of
• EC harmonisation (EC Directive 94/34/EC) and
  conformity assessment procedures (Council
  Decision 93/465/EEC)
• The SES rule making and certification/supervisory
  concepts across the EC SES regulatory package
  proposals
• Existing regulatory approval approaches in
  aviation and more specifically in ATM.

55
Objectives of the Task Force

• To assess the suitability of existing modules as
  defined by Decision 93/465 for conformity
  assessment of ATM systems/procedures and define
  additional modules as required
• To develop principles for a harmonised
  implementation of standardisation procedures and
  ATM conformity assessment processes
• To develop principles for the harmonised
  definition of conformity assessment requirements,
  to be described within each SES implementing
  rule.

56
Working Arrangements

• Participation
• The TF will be co-chaired by RU and SRU and will
  involve
• EUROCONTROL Member States (regulators and ANSPs)
• The European Commission, EASA
• The EUROCONTROL Agency
• The Industry.

57
Working Arrangements

• Reporting
• An interim report will be submitted to the RC
  and SRC to present initial findings and to
  confirm the possibility to address further
  objectives
• Time scale
• Expected all lifetime of the Task-Force one
  year (66)

58
Positions of SPG and Regulatory Committee

• The creation of a jointly led RU/SRU Task Force
  to address conformity assessment aspects has been
  approved by
• SPG (SPG 3 4)
• the RC (RC 6)

59
Way Forward

• Finalise discussions with the Commission
• Once SRC approval is confirmed
• distribute Terms of Reference and relevant
  documents
• Determine final list of TF members
• Tentative first meeting is planned for November,
  20th, 2003

60
Recommendations (1)

• Note SPG advice and the position of the RC on the
  establishment of the proposed Task Force
  Conformity Assessment of ATM/CNS Systems
• Support the creation of a joint RU/SRU Task Force
  to refine the conformity assessment of CNS/ATM
  systems and propose appropriate measures for the
  harmonised implementation of the conformity
  assessment activities

61
Recommendations (2)

• Nominate a maximum of five representatives from
  the ATM safety regulatory community.
• Proposed candidates
• Mr Calvo- Spain

62
Recommendations (3)

• Request SPG to agree on any further changes to
  the Draft TORs which would potentially result
  from the discussions between EC and RU/SRU.

63
Agenda Item 6 - Interfaces
6.4 - ICAO, ANC11
64
ICAO 11th ANC

• 22nd September - 3rd October
• 600 delegates
• Over 200 Working Papers
• 90 (/-) Information Papers
• Strong EUROCONTROL safety input
• 6 papers (3 s.man 3 s.reg)
• Good representation
• Good international coordination

65
ICAO 11th ANC

• Agenda Item
• 2.1 Safety Management (18)
• 2.2 Safety Certification (6)
• 2.3 Safety Regulation (3)
• 2.4 Global Aviation Safety Plan (1)

66
Key Issues

• General consistency and support for a formal
  approach to safety
• European (EUROCONTROL) position is the
  dominant direction in this area - keynote
  papers
• Excellent coordination between States
• Good consistency with US / Aus
• Support from other continents

67
Key Issues

• Setting of Safety Levels/Targets at
  National/Regional/Global levels
• Just Culture
• Protection in law for individuals reporting
  occurrences
• Role of Human Factors in ATM

68
Key Issues

• Difference on Certification - systems vs.
  organisations/services
• ICAO to carry out studies into the
  feasibility of both
• Will also address the question of a
  Certification Manual for ATS
• Calls for revision/expansion of provisions for
  personnel qualification

69
Key Issues

• In safety regulation, EUROCONTROL work even
  more prominent
• World-wide support (Canada, China,..)
• Included to some extent in the draft ICAO
  Safety Management Manual
• Some ICAO resistance on the question of formal
  safety assessment of SARPs

70
Key Issues

• The story continues.
• ANC Report recommendations
• Final report as WP 197, available on the ICAO
  Website...

71
ANC 11 Recommendations

• Harmonisation of safety assessment /
  management in SARPs and PANS
• Harmonisation of safety assessment in
  development of safety-related SARPs
• Implementation of systematic safety management
  for ATS and aerodromes
• Establish acceptable levels of safety and
  safety objectives for ATS/aerodromes

72
ANC 11 Recommendations

• Guidance material for ADREP 2000
• States to share ATM occurrence info.
• ICAO guidelines for adopting adequate national
  legal measures for protecting sources and free
  flow of safety info.
• Development of guidance material on safety
  monitoring during normal ATS operations,
  including LOSA.

73
ANC 11 Recommendations

• ICAO investigate need for development of
  provisions for safety certification of ATM
  systems and service-providers
• ICAO encourage States to develop safety
  oversight capabilities and procedures

74
Agenda Item 7 - EATM Programmes

75
Agenda Item 7 - EATM Programmes
7.1 Status Report
76
Agenda Item 7 - EATM Programmes
7.1 - Status Report of the SRC Interface with
EATM Programmes (Update from SRC 17)
77
RVSM

• Last deliverable Post Implementation Safety Case
• POSC sent out to SRC for comments
• SRVG re-activated meeting 23.05.03
• CRD sent to the Programme
• Programme feedback sent to SRU
• SRU to circulate the CRD with Programme comments
  for final SRC validation

78
ECAC Airspace Strategy

• The Phase under consideration is Operational
  Improvement 1A - Harmonise ICAO Airspace
  Classification of all Upper ECAC Airspace above a
  Common Agreed Level
• The Safety Plan which contains also the Safety
  Policy, FHA, PSSA, SSA, National Safety Plans has
  been under review (RFC 301 and RFC 307)
• The SRC Formal response sent to Project Manager
  the feedback from the programme went out to SRC
  on 16.05.03 (RFC 330) and the SRC comments on it
  were sent to the Programme (24.07.03)
• Programme final respond received on 27.08.03

79
8.33 HEP

• The 8.33 Horizontal Expansion Programme has been
  implemented end October 2002
• The RAD-8.33 formally released on 18.02.03
• The Plan for Post Implementation Safety Case was
  sent out to SRC for comments on 24.03.03 RFC
  closed on 02.05.03 (no comments received)
• The POSC v 0.2 was sent out to SRC for comments
  on 30.09.03 (RFC 350, open till end October)

80
Coming soon...

• GBAS Cat I FHA, planned Q4 2003
• Mode-S PSSA (initially planned second half 2003)

81
Recommendations

• The SRC is invited to-
• note the status report
• request SRU for any update of the fact sheets
  containing the status of the SRC work related to
  the EATM Programmes with which SRC has a formally
  established interface

82
Agenda Item 7 - EATM Programmes
7.2 - 8.33 POSC
83
Agenda Item 7 - EATM Programmes
7.3 Mediterranean Free flight (MFF)
84
Agenda Item 7 - EATM Programmes
7.4 UAVs
85
Why a Joint Task Force?

• A joint Task-force is justified by the close
  relation between ATM issues and Aircraft issues
  in the case of UAV.
• The need for regulatory work was identified both
  within JAA and EUROCONTROL

86
Assumptions

• Should allow for take-off and landing a normal
  airports and use of normal airspace.
• Should accommodate various size and technologies
  of UAVs
• Should accommodate various kinds of operations

87
Terms of Reference

• Develop a concept for UAVs regulations
• Design Manufacture and maintenance of UAVs.
• Operations of UAVs (in particular approval of
  operators)
• Rules of the Air
• Security issues
• Concept ?
• Outline and guiding principles for such
  regulations
• Not draft regulations !
• Objective of regulating UAVs
• To protect third parties airborne and on the
  ground
• Not address failure of the mission.

88
Terms of Reference

• Concept to be based on
• An identification of the various UAV technologies
  and an identification of possible use.
• Consider the creation of categories
• Identify lower mass limit for regulation at
  European level
• Review existing material (Existing or draft
  standards Research studies)
• Consider the use of a total system approach
• Deliverables
• A concept with its justification and
  recommendations for future work
• Time scales
• Report by September 2003extension till first
  JAAC of 2004 approved

89
UAV Task Force organisation

• General
• ICAO
• Airworthiness and continued airworthiness
• Environment
• Operation Maintenance and licensing.
• Air Traffic Management
• Security

90
UAV Task Force organisation

• Sub-group I General, safety and Security
• Sub-group II Airworthiness Continued
  Airworthiness and Environment
• Sub-group III Operations, Maintenance and
  Licensing.
• ATM to be handled within the EUROCONTROL system.
  A two-way dialogue will exist with the UAV
  Task-Force

91
Layout agreedin September
92
Next Steps

• Task-Force internal process
• Outside consultations before presentation to JAAC
• Conclusion

93
Task-Force Internal process

• Leaders to confirm on each Paragraph/
  sub-paragraph of the first draft report
  September 4
• Leaders to provide their input to Central JAA
  (CJAA) September 30
• First Draft report distributed to all task-force
  members October 7
• Comments from all to leaders with copy CJAA
  October 31. Particular attention to interfaces
  issues

94
Task-Force Internal process

• Meeting of Task-Force leadership to produce
  second draft report Two days in week 47 (17-21
  November)
• Second draft report sent to all Task Force
  members November 28
• Agreement on third draft report Plenary
  Task-Force meeting two days in week 50 (8-12
  December)

95
Outside consultations before presentation to
JAAC

• First draft sent to Central JAA Divisions for
  advance reactions October 7. Meeting Task- Force
  leadership? with them week 44 (27 to 31 October)
  to gather reactions.
• Advance reactions in EUROCONTROL?
• Other advance reactions?

96
Outside consultations before presentation to
JAAC

• Formal outside consultation of JAA on third
  draft report Division/ Sectorial teams
  EUROCONTROL system others? December 19. (With
  copy to all task-force members)
• Comments from outside consultation January 30,
  2004.
• Review of comments by Task Force leadership two
  days in week 7 (February 9-13) agreement by the
  Plenary Task-Force on the third day

97
Outside consultations before presentation to JAAC

• Transmission to JAAC mid-week 8 should allow to
  respect JAAC procedures assuming a meeting early
  March

Conclusion

• Tight schedule
• Involve quick consultation to reach the deadline
• Support is needed from everyone

98
Recommendations

• The SRC is invited to
• note the report
• approve the course of action (tight schedule)
• support SRU with inputs/comments when required
  within the consultation process (RFCs)

99
Agenda Item 8 - ESARR Issues

100
Agenda Item 8 - ESARR Issues
8.1 ESARR 1 - Status
101
Agenda Item 8 - ESARR Issues
8.2 ESARR Transposition - ESARR 2 Mapping
102
WP 18.03 Attachment
103
Approach

• Technical assessment
• ESARR2 Ed 2.0 and EC94/56 and 42/2003 Directives
• Description of the ESARR content and ESARR 2
  requirements retained to ease EC assessment of
  the report

104
Main Conclusions (1)

• There is a certain amount of overlapping in a
  number of areas
• There are no contradictory requirements or
  statements between ESARR 2 and EC Directives
  2003/42 and 1994/56
• EC Directive 2003/42 is limited to reporting. The
  requirement to investigate safety occurrences is
  not evident in this Directive

105
Main Conclusions (2)

• 94/56 is limited to the investigation of
  accidents and serious incidents
• Geographical coverage is wider for ESARR 2
• EC Directives have no clear applicability to
  military stakeholders like in ESARR 2

106
Main Conclusions (3)

• Main drawback are the missing parts from ESARR2
• Contextual data to be collected and stored
  (Appendix A - section A2)
• Results of the assessment/investigations to be
  stored (Appendix A section A3)
• Minimum content of the summary reports to be
  exchanged (Appendix B)

107
Main Conclusions (4)

• Main sub-requirements from ESARR 2 missing
• 5.1.5. (expertise of the investigation team,
  timing of the investigation process and of
  remedial actions)
• 5.1.6 (determination of the severity and risk)
• 5.1.7 (analysis of the causes)
• 5.1.8 (development and oversight of the safety
  recommendations, intervention and corrective
  actions implementation)

108
Main Conclusions (5)

• The Directives lack of DEFINTIONS/TAXONOMY
• Technical Incidents might be excluded from
  exchange of information (phase 3 of ESARR 2)
• Door open for safety benchmarking

109
FINALLY

• ALL states that have implemented ESARR 2
  considering a mandatory reporting scheme ARE
  compliant with the 2003/42 Directive (ATM part).

110
Recommendations

• SRC is invited to
• a) agree the formally submission of the SRU
  report to the EC
• b) agree to put the SRU report in SRC formal
  consultation process, in order to become an ESARR
  Advisory Material for ESARR 2 (EAM2)

111
Agenda Item 8 - ESARR Issues
8.3 ESARR 6 - PC
112
Agenda Item 8 - ESARR Issues
8.3 ESARR 6 - PC
113
WP 18.04 3 attachments Flimsy 4

• ATT1 - PC Paper
• ATT2 - ESARR 6 Ed 0.5
• ATT3 - CRD on ESARR 6 Ed 0.2
• Flimsy 4 - ESARR 6 - DEFINITIONS

114
ESARR 6 Consultation Process
Jan2001-Oct2002
Nov2002-Jan2003
March-Sep 2003
Oct 2003
SRC Consultation
EUROCONTROL Consultation SRC Final
SRC-ASW Development and review
SRC APPROVAL
PROPOSED ISSUE 0.6
ESARR 6 WD Edition 0.12
ESARR 6 Edition 0.5
PC18
115
ESARR 6 - PC

• On 11th of September COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT
  ACHIEVED -
• Request to add definitions for the key terms that
  are not plain language and which were found NOT
  to be show stopper during ASW
• Flimsy 4 list the definitions to be added before
  going to PC

116
ESARR 6 - PC contd
117
ESARR 6 - PC contd

• ESARR 6 requires ESARR 3 and 4 to be implemented,
  i.e
• assess the criticality of those ATM functions
  supported by software
• perform, in accordance with the principles of
  ESARR 4, a hazard and risk analysis of the ATS
  environment in which the system is required to
  operate
• develop system-level safety requirements which
  describe the functionality and performance
  required of the system in order to support a
  tolerably safe ATS, and
• Identify the failure modes which the software
  must detect and mitigate in order to meet the
  system safety requirements, including generic
  failures such as security threats, loss of
  communications, and loss of power.

118
Recommendations

• SRC is invited to
• agree with the incorporation of the missing
  definitions in the ESARR 6 proposed edition 0.5
• agree the contents of the 3 attachments of WP
  18.04 (Att2 modified as above)
• agree the submission of the ESARR 6 for adoption
  and approval at the forthcoming 18th Session of
  the Provisional Council/Permanent Commission.

119
Agenda Item 8 - ESARR Issues
8.4 ESIMS
120
19 ESIMS visits between August 2002 and 24
September 2003.
121
ESIMS

• SRU was able to develop
• a list of recommendations to the States visited
• recommendations for SRC/PC to consider in order
  to help States implement ATM safety regulation in
  a consistent manner
• ESIMS visits are to be proposed to remaining ECAC
  member States in 2004

122
Way Forward

• AGAS recommendations to be taken into account
• ESIMS is to be further strengthened as a formal
  audit programme in full co-ordination with ICAO
  and EC
• Preparation and approval in 2004
• Training of auditors and initiation of audits in
  2005

123
Agenda Item 8 - ESARR Issues
8.5 Outcome of Closed Sessions
124
Status

• States having shared their experience at SRC
  Closed sessions are-
• Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, Czech Republic,
  Denmark, Finland, France, EUROCONTROL ASRU,
  Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, FYROM, The
  Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Romania and the
  Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, U.K,
  and Poland.

125
Status

• States having a nominated SRC Commissioner by
  SRC17 and which have not been in a position to
  report
• Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Monaco Slovenia and
  Turkey.
• States having no nominated SRC Commissioners and
  having therefore not reported are
• Albania, Luxembourg and Malta.

126
Way Forward

• De-identified findings in SRC18.05
• Issues raised and proposed resolutions have been
  fed into development of SRC WPG
• Working arrangements proposed in SRC WPG
• on a per ESARR basis
• Sharing on lessons learned
• Improvements of regulatory material

127
Agenda Item 9 - SRC Annual Safety Report

128
Agenda Item 10 - SRC Procedures
129
Overview

• SRC/SRU procedures are a key element in the
  business management system
• procedures will be put in place for all major
  areas of work
• all SRC Procedures will be subject to formal
  consultation and approval to SRC level

130
Current Status
131
Consultation

• SP01 SP04 have already been sent to SRC for
  formal consultation
• SP01 has recently been approved following formal
  SRC consultation (RFC 0338)
• SP04 received no adverse comments (RFC 0342)

132
SRC Policy Documents

• contents of SRC Policy Document 6 (SRC External
  Relations Policy) have been transferred into SP04
• consistent with SRC Decision D-16/15/1 regarding
  the rationalisation of SRC Policy Documents

133
Recommendations

• The SRC is invited to
• approve SRC Procedure 04 for formal release
• approve the withdrawal of SRC Policy Document 6
• note that SRC Procedures 03 05 are to be sent
  to SRC for formal consultation

134

Agenda Item 11 - Lessons not learned
135
Agenda Item 12 - Training Update

136
ATM Safety Regulatory Training Programme PC 18
feed back

• To progress the definition of requirements for a
  robust ATM Safety Regulatory Training Programme
  and syllabus, in a manner which ensures its
  consistency and complementarity with Agency ATM
  Safety Management training initiatives and SRC
  deliverables

137
PC 18 feed back

• To explore further with IANS as well as with
  national safety regulators the need for, and best
  means of ATM safety regulatory training
• In the light of b), to explore ways in which the
  provision of the SRC ATM Safety Regulatory
  training audit modules could be progressively
  transferred to IANS

138
PC 18 feed back

• until this transfer is possible, to deliver the
  SRC ATM Safety Regulatory training audit module.
• request Director General, in co-ordination with
  the Safety Regulation Commission, to allocate to
  IANS the task of development and delivery of
  robust ATM safety regulatory training services,
  in a manner fully compliant with SRC requirements

139
Needs expressed

• Overall introduction to
• European legal and institutional context,
• current and future
• International standards applicable to ATM
  equipment and procedures
• SRC TORs, working arrangements etc..
• Regulatory concepts
• objective vs prescriptive regulation
• SMS based regulation
• Roles of a safety regulator
• Interface with ANSPs

140
Needs expressed

• Guidance on what national regulator should do to
  implement ATM safety regulation (ESARR 1) and
  ESARRs-
• Organisation of ATM safety regulatory function
• Setting up national safety minima /TLS
• detailed guidance and practical examples
• Rule making
• Safety Oversight

141
Needs expressed

• General familiarisation on ESARRs
• Detailed Training on ESARRs
• explanation, rationale
• safety oversight processes
• safety regulatory oversight/approval of changes
  to ATM
• meaning and use of RADs

142
Needs expressed

• Detailed Training on skills/techniques
• safety audit
• approval of ANSP, on going safety oversight
• ESARR 4 related (incl. PSSA/SSA)
• hazard identification
• risk analysis and statistical apportionment
• risk/safety assessment techniques
• human factor in safety
• ESARR 2 related (secondments to SRU)

143
Others

• Order of magnitude 200 over 5/6 years
• Exchanges of experience in SRC working
  arrangements
• Exchange of experts across countries
• under SRC Work Programme (to facilitate European
  network of safety reg. Experts)
• secondments to SRU

144
Way Forward

• Priority- ESARR 2 related training in
  co-ordination with EATM SAF and IANS
  (requirements, skills, ASTs and tools)
• Training strategy, plan and priorities end
  2003/early 2004 in coordination Agency
• Development of SRC training requirements per
  module
• Contribution to module development and delivery

145
Recommendations to SRC

• To note that PC18 accepted SRC proposals with
  regard to ATM Safety Regulatory Training
• To note the needs expressed by 18 States with
  regard to ATM Safety Regulatory Training
• To note the proposed way froward to the
  development of a Training strategy, development
  and delivery of ATM safety regulatory training.

146
Agenda Item 13 - SRU Budget

147
Agenda Item 14 - Any Other Business

148
Agenda Item 14 - Any Other Business
14.1 - 2003 Meetings
149
Agenda Item 14 - Any Other Business
14.2 - 2004 SRC Meeting Dates
150
SRC Meetings 2004

• SRC19 Monday, 23 February Tuesday, 24
  February 2004
• SRC20 Tuesday, 25 May
• Wednesday, 26 May 2004
• SRC21 Tuesday, 21 September
• Wednesday, 22 September 2004

151

• SRC