Title: OConnor
1OConnor Sabato,Chapter 4 Civil Liberties
- Presentation 4.1 The Role of the Bill of Rights
in American Govt.
2Key Topics
- Introduction
- The Bill of Rights
- The Incorporation Doctrine
- The Selective Incorporation of the Bill of
Rights
- 1st Amendment Guarantees Freedom of Religion
- The Establishment Clause
- The Free Exercise Clause
3Introduction
- The opening story about an elementary school
principal announcing a random search of
students
- Why did the principal feel he/she had a right to
search students?
- Do students have rights against random searches?
- Why was the teacher fired? Were her rights
violated?
41a) What does the opening story tell you about
the nature of civil liberties?
- Individual rights must be balanced against other
values
- Expectation of privacy must be weighed against
the safety of the community
- Isaiah Berlin Freedom for the wolf is death for
the sheep!
51b) The Bill of Rights the Framers
- The framers of the Constitution could not foresee
the evolution of society
- They did not have abortion, gay rights, or the
right to die in mind
James Madison is widely credited as the
primary architect of the Bill of Rights
61bi) The Nonabsolute Nature of Civil Liberties
- Courts and lawmakers are often required to
balance competing interests
- Do we want individual liberty or safety
- Are we willing to allow the FBI to tap private
citizens phone lines in order to keep us safe
from terrorists?
71bii) The Problem of Irreconcilable Claims
- Two liberties are often in conflict
- The right of people to seek provide abortion
conflicts with Prolife supporters belief that
abortion is murder
Members of People for Life picketing
Sen. Arlen Specter. Picture from the
People for Life website.
81c) What are Civil Liberties?
- Personal rights freedoms that the federal govt.
cannot take away
- Civil liberties place constraints on the ability
of the govt. to arbitrarily control the beliefs
or behavior of its citizens
- The existence of civil liberties provides the
basis for limited govt.
91c) Rights as Trumps
- American constitutional scholar Ronald Dworkin
- Dworkin argues that rights are like trumps in a
game a cards
- Cannot be abridged w/out violating the rule of law
NYC University Prof. Ronald Dworkin. Picture cou
rtesy NYCU
Website.
102) The Bill of Rights
- Most state constitutions included bill of rights
- The new Constitution was viewed by many in the
states as a threat to the rights and liberties of
citizens
- Anti-federalists did not trust the new govt.
112a) The Framers the Bill of Rights
- The framers debated whether or not to include a
national bill of rights
- The motion was rejected as a potentially
dangerous expansion of national power
- The national govt. was viewed as a mechanism for
coordinating the states
- Not intended to directly regulate citizens
122ai) The Ratification Process the Bill of Rights
- Anti-federalists fought hard for inclusion of a
bill of rights
- Several states only ratified the Constitution on
the condition that a bill of rights be included
- James Madisons role
- Campaigning in an anti-federalists district
- Promised to lend his talents to secure a
national bill of rights
- Won the race and kept his promise (a most
nauseous task, he was reported to have said)
132aii) The Significance of the 9th 10th
Amendments
- The first ten Amendments to the Constitution
contain the Bill of Rights
- The legalistic implications of the 9th Amendment
- The listing of rights does not mean that other
rights do not exist
- The 10th Amendments reserved powers clause
- Powers not delegated to the natl. govt. are
reserved to the people and the states
142b) The Incorporation Doctrine
- Barron v. Baltimore (1833) the Supreme Court
ruled that the Bill of Rights applied to the
national govt. not the states
- The ratification of the 14th Amendment
fundamentally changed the relationship between
the Bill of Rights and the states
- Implied that the states must respect some or all
of the protections in the Bill of Rights
152bi) The Supreme Court the 14th Amendment
- The Supreme Court refused to interpret the 14th
Amendments due process clause as making the
Bill of Rights applicable to the states
- In 1897, however, the SC began to increase its
jurisdiction over the states
- Imposed a substantive due process standard
- Demanded that states demonstrate a valid
exercise of its police powers to regulate
citizens health, welfare, or public morals
162bii) Gitlow v. New York (1925)
- Several states passed sedition laws that banned
speech critical or disrespectful of govt.
- Benjamin Gitlow, a socialist, printed
distributed a manifesto calling for the overthrow
of the American govt.
- Convicted in NY, appealed to the Supreme Court,
claiming his right to speech had been violated
172biii) Gitlow cont.
- The Supreme Court upheld the conviction
- However, the Court also concluded that the states
were not completely free to limit forms of
political expression
- Some freedoms are fundamental therefore
protected by the due process clause of the 14th
Amendment
182biv) Near v. Minnesota (1931)
- Jay Near published a weekly Minneapolis newspaper
that regularly printed vicious attacks on various
groups
- Arrested under a state criminal libel law that
prohibited malicious, scandalous or defamatory
publications
- Near appealed his conviction, and the Court held
that, while liberty of the press may be abused,
immunity of the press from previous restraint is
still necessary
192c) Selective Incorporation
- The Court has chosen to incorporate only the most
important freedoms
- Therefore, some but not all of the protections in
the Bill of Rights have been made applicable to
the states
- The Court applies a heightened standard of review
for freedoms it views as essential for a
functioning democracy
202ci) Palko v. Connecticut (1937)
- Palko robbed a music store and killed a police
officer
- Jury convicted of 2nd-degree murder sentenced
him to life in prison
- The state appealed, arguing confusing jury
instructions had led to a bad verdict
- Palko was retried, convicted of 1st-degree
murder, and sentenced to death
212cii) Palko cont.
- Palko appealed, arguing that the 2nd conviction
violated the 5th Amendments prohibition of
double jeopardy
- The Court upheld the 2nd conviction, arguing that
protection from double jeopardy was not an
essential freedom
- Palko was executed in 1938
223) 1st Amendment Guarantees
- 63 of Americans belong to a church or synagogue
- Still, many public figures fear that America is
becoming an atheist nation
- The dangers of infusing religion into politics
Is religion important to you?
233i) Religion in the Colonies
- Many of the framers were deeply religious
- However, many were non-religious, and viewed God
as similar to a watch-maker, who created the
world took no part in its day-to-day workings
- Many colonists fled to the New World to escape
religious persecutions however, most colonies
actively persecuted religious minorities
243ii) Colonial Intolerance
- Most colonies were intolerant of religious
dissent
- Example of the Salem Witch Trials in
Massachusetts colony in 1692
The hanging of Bridget Bishop, June 10
1692. Picture courtesy Famous Am. Trials
website.
253iii) Colonial Intolerance cont.
- Colonies angered when the British Parliament
established Anglicanism Roman Catholicism as
the official religions in the colonies
- The 1st Continental Congress sent a letter of
protest that Catholicism be one of the official
religions
263iv) Religion and the Constitution
- The reality of religious diversity
- Puritans in MA
- Quakers in PA
- Catholics in Maryland
- Article VI no religious Test shall ever be
required as a Qualification to any Office or
Public Trust under the United States
273v) The First Amendment
- Begin, Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof.
- Establishes provisional boundaries to the state
regulation of religion
- However, those boundaries are not absolute
283a) The Establishment Clause
- Conflict over the meaning of the establishment
clause
- How high is the wall of separation between
church and state?
- Have allowed state subsidies of private religious
educational institutions
- However, the Court has consistently ruled that
state-sponsored school prayer violates the
establishment clause
293ai) The Lemon Test
- Based on Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Practices are
constitutional if
- Secular purpose
- Neither advanced nor inhibited religion
- Did not foster excessive govt. entanglement
with religion
- Since 1980s, the Court has shown a willingness
to lower the wall of separation ignore the
Lemon test
303aii) Establishment cont.
- Historically, the Court adopted books only to
state aid of religious institutions
- Books go to children, not the schools
- In 2000, the Court voted to uphold a federal aid
provision extending books and computers to
religious schools
- The school voucher issue also clearly touches
on the establishment clause
313b) The Free Exercise Clause
- Guarantees that individuals are free to worship
as they see fit within reason!
- When state laws conflict with religious law and
practices, the state can limit the practice
- However, the state must show that a legitimate
purpose is served in the prohibition
323bi) Practices Banned
- Polygamy marrying multiple partners is banned
- Drug Use using drugs as part of a religious
ceremony can be prohibited
- Snake Handling handling poisonous snakes can be
prohibited
333bii) Prohibition or Accommodation?
- The Court has generally concluded that state
interests outweigh free exercise interests
- Should states seek to promote greater citizen
involvement in religion?
- What goals are served by state neutrality in the
exercise of religion?