OConnor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

OConnor

Description:

1b) The Bill of Rights & the Framers ... The framers debated whether or not to include a national bill of rights ... Constitution contain the Bill of Rights ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: rsu
Category:
Tags: bill | oconnor | of | rights

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: OConnor


1
OConnor Sabato,Chapter 4 Civil Liberties
  • Presentation 4.1 The Role of the Bill of Rights
    in American Govt.

2
Key Topics
  • Introduction
  • The Bill of Rights
  • The Incorporation Doctrine
  • The Selective Incorporation of the Bill of
    Rights
  • 1st Amendment Guarantees Freedom of Religion
  • The Establishment Clause
  • The Free Exercise Clause

3
Introduction
  • The opening story about an elementary school
    principal announcing a random search of
    students
  • Why did the principal feel he/she had a right to
    search students?
  • Do students have rights against random searches?
  • Why was the teacher fired? Were her rights
    violated?

4
1a) What does the opening story tell you about
the nature of civil liberties?
  • Individual rights must be balanced against other
    values
  • Expectation of privacy must be weighed against
    the safety of the community
  • Isaiah Berlin Freedom for the wolf is death for
    the sheep!

5
1b) The Bill of Rights the Framers
  • The framers of the Constitution could not foresee
    the evolution of society
  • They did not have abortion, gay rights, or the
    right to die in mind

James Madison is widely credited as the
primary architect of the Bill of Rights
6
1bi) The Nonabsolute Nature of Civil Liberties
  • Courts and lawmakers are often required to
    balance competing interests
  • Do we want individual liberty or safety
  • Are we willing to allow the FBI to tap private
    citizens phone lines in order to keep us safe
    from terrorists?

7
1bii) The Problem of Irreconcilable Claims
  • Two liberties are often in conflict
  • The right of people to seek provide abortion
    conflicts with Prolife supporters belief that
    abortion is murder

Members of People for Life picketing
Sen. Arlen Specter. Picture from the
People for Life website.
8
1c) What are Civil Liberties?
  • Personal rights freedoms that the federal govt.
    cannot take away
  • Civil liberties place constraints on the ability
    of the govt. to arbitrarily control the beliefs
    or behavior of its citizens
  • The existence of civil liberties provides the
    basis for limited govt.

9
1c) Rights as Trumps
  • American constitutional scholar Ronald Dworkin
  • Dworkin argues that rights are like trumps in a
    game a cards
  • Cannot be abridged w/out violating the rule of law

NYC University Prof. Ronald Dworkin. Picture cou
rtesy NYCU
Website.
10
2) The Bill of Rights
  • Most state constitutions included bill of rights
  • The new Constitution was viewed by many in the
    states as a threat to the rights and liberties of
    citizens
  • Anti-federalists did not trust the new govt.

11
2a) The Framers the Bill of Rights
  • The framers debated whether or not to include a
    national bill of rights
  • The motion was rejected as a potentially
    dangerous expansion of national power
  • The national govt. was viewed as a mechanism for
    coordinating the states
  • Not intended to directly regulate citizens

12
2ai) The Ratification Process the Bill of Rights
  • Anti-federalists fought hard for inclusion of a
    bill of rights
  • Several states only ratified the Constitution on
    the condition that a bill of rights be included
  • James Madisons role
  • Campaigning in an anti-federalists district
  • Promised to lend his talents to secure a
    national bill of rights
  • Won the race and kept his promise (a most
    nauseous task, he was reported to have said)

13
2aii) The Significance of the 9th 10th
Amendments
  • The first ten Amendments to the Constitution
    contain the Bill of Rights
  • The legalistic implications of the 9th Amendment
  • The listing of rights does not mean that other
    rights do not exist
  • The 10th Amendments reserved powers clause
  • Powers not delegated to the natl. govt. are
    reserved to the people and the states

14
2b) The Incorporation Doctrine
  • Barron v. Baltimore (1833) the Supreme Court
    ruled that the Bill of Rights applied to the
    national govt. not the states
  • The ratification of the 14th Amendment
    fundamentally changed the relationship between
    the Bill of Rights and the states
  • Implied that the states must respect some or all
    of the protections in the Bill of Rights

15
2bi) The Supreme Court the 14th Amendment
  • The Supreme Court refused to interpret the 14th
    Amendments due process clause as making the
    Bill of Rights applicable to the states
  • In 1897, however, the SC began to increase its
    jurisdiction over the states
  • Imposed a substantive due process standard
  • Demanded that states demonstrate a valid
    exercise of its police powers to regulate
    citizens health, welfare, or public morals

16
2bii) Gitlow v. New York (1925)
  • Several states passed sedition laws that banned
    speech critical or disrespectful of govt.
  • Benjamin Gitlow, a socialist, printed
    distributed a manifesto calling for the overthrow
    of the American govt.
  • Convicted in NY, appealed to the Supreme Court,
    claiming his right to speech had been violated

17
2biii) Gitlow cont.
  • The Supreme Court upheld the conviction
  • However, the Court also concluded that the states
    were not completely free to limit forms of
    political expression
  • Some freedoms are fundamental therefore
    protected by the due process clause of the 14th
    Amendment

18
2biv) Near v. Minnesota (1931)
  • Jay Near published a weekly Minneapolis newspaper
    that regularly printed vicious attacks on various
    groups
  • Arrested under a state criminal libel law that
    prohibited malicious, scandalous or defamatory
    publications
  • Near appealed his conviction, and the Court held
    that, while liberty of the press may be abused,
    immunity of the press from previous restraint is
    still necessary

19
2c) Selective Incorporation
  • The Court has chosen to incorporate only the most
    important freedoms
  • Therefore, some but not all of the protections in
    the Bill of Rights have been made applicable to
    the states
  • The Court applies a heightened standard of review
    for freedoms it views as essential for a
    functioning democracy

20
2ci) Palko v. Connecticut (1937)
  • Palko robbed a music store and killed a police
    officer
  • Jury convicted of 2nd-degree murder sentenced
    him to life in prison
  • The state appealed, arguing confusing jury
    instructions had led to a bad verdict
  • Palko was retried, convicted of 1st-degree
    murder, and sentenced to death

21
2cii) Palko cont.
  • Palko appealed, arguing that the 2nd conviction
    violated the 5th Amendments prohibition of
    double jeopardy
  • The Court upheld the 2nd conviction, arguing that
    protection from double jeopardy was not an
    essential freedom
  • Palko was executed in 1938

22
3) 1st Amendment Guarantees
  • 63 of Americans belong to a church or synagogue
  • Still, many public figures fear that America is
    becoming an atheist nation
  • The dangers of infusing religion into politics

Is religion important to you?
23
3i) Religion in the Colonies
  • Many of the framers were deeply religious
  • However, many were non-religious, and viewed God
    as similar to a watch-maker, who created the
    world took no part in its day-to-day workings
  • Many colonists fled to the New World to escape
    religious persecutions however, most colonies
    actively persecuted religious minorities

24
3ii) Colonial Intolerance
  • Most colonies were intolerant of religious
    dissent
  • Example of the Salem Witch Trials in
    Massachusetts colony in 1692

The hanging of Bridget Bishop, June 10
1692. Picture courtesy Famous Am. Trials
website.
25
3iii) Colonial Intolerance cont.
  • Colonies angered when the British Parliament
    established Anglicanism Roman Catholicism as
    the official religions in the colonies
  • The 1st Continental Congress sent a letter of
    protest that Catholicism be one of the official
    religions

26
3iv) Religion and the Constitution
  • The reality of religious diversity
  • Puritans in MA
  • Quakers in PA
  • Catholics in Maryland
  • Article VI no religious Test shall ever be
    required as a Qualification to any Office or
    Public Trust under the United States

27
3v) The First Amendment
  • Begin, Congress shall make no law respecting an
    establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
    free exercise thereof.
  • Establishes provisional boundaries to the state
    regulation of religion
  • However, those boundaries are not absolute

28
3a) The Establishment Clause
  • Conflict over the meaning of the establishment
    clause
  • How high is the wall of separation between
    church and state?
  • Have allowed state subsidies of private religious
    educational institutions
  • However, the Court has consistently ruled that
    state-sponsored school prayer violates the
    establishment clause

29
3ai) The Lemon Test
  • Based on Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Practices are
    constitutional if
  • Secular purpose
  • Neither advanced nor inhibited religion
  • Did not foster excessive govt. entanglement
    with religion
  • Since 1980s, the Court has shown a willingness
    to lower the wall of separation ignore the
    Lemon test

30
3aii) Establishment cont.
  • Historically, the Court adopted books only to
    state aid of religious institutions
  • Books go to children, not the schools
  • In 2000, the Court voted to uphold a federal aid
    provision extending books and computers to
    religious schools
  • The school voucher issue also clearly touches
    on the establishment clause

31
3b) The Free Exercise Clause
  • Guarantees that individuals are free to worship
    as they see fit within reason!
  • When state laws conflict with religious law and
    practices, the state can limit the practice
  • However, the state must show that a legitimate
    purpose is served in the prohibition

32
3bi) Practices Banned
  • Polygamy marrying multiple partners is banned
  • Drug Use using drugs as part of a religious
    ceremony can be prohibited
  • Snake Handling handling poisonous snakes can be
    prohibited

33
3bii) Prohibition or Accommodation?
  • The Court has generally concluded that state
    interests outweigh free exercise interests
  • Should states seek to promote greater citizen
    involvement in religion?
  • What goals are served by state neutrality in the
    exercise of religion?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com