PS 142 War and Peace - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

PS 142 War and Peace

Description:

Austria-Hungary. Germany. What is the Concentration of Capabilities? ... Austria-Hungary. Germany. Alliance Tightness. No change in polarity but alliances are looser ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:101
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: political
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PS 142 War and Peace


1
PS 142War and Peace
  • Lecture 3
  • System Structure and War

2
What is the International System?
  • Set of actors that are
  • Self-Contained
  • Interactive
  • Interdependent
  • Most theories focus on states as the actors in
    the system
  • Increasing emphasis on non-state actors
  • IOs, NGOs, transnational groups

3
What is System Structure?
  • Two (relatively) unchanging aspects of structure
  • Anarchy is the ordering principal
  • States are the central actors
  • Theories of system structure and war largely
    ignore non-state actors
  • Three variable aspects of structure

4
What is System Structure?
  • Polarity
  • Number of major actors in the system
  • Capability concentration
  • Distribution of power across major actors
  • Alliance Tightness
  • Reinforcing or cross-cutting ties

5
What is Polarity?
  • Number of Great Power states in the system
  • Bipolar US USSR in Cold War
  • Multi-polar UK, Germany, France, Japan, Italy,
    US, USSR in 1930s
  • Today uni-polar?
  • Number of Great Power alliances groups in the
    system
  • Bipolar vs. multi-polar

6
Examples of PolarityPre-WWI Europe
  • May differ for states alliances
  • Pre-WWI multi-polar in terms of states

UK
Germany
France
Austria-Hungary
Russia
7
Examples of PolarityPre-WWI Europe
  • But largely bipolar in terms of alliances
  • Neither is wrong capture different parts of
    system

UK
Germany
France
Austria-Hungary
Russia
8
What is the Concentration of Capabilities?
  • Distribution of power across Great Power states
    in the system
  • Even vs. Uneven
  • Distribution of power across Major Power
    alliances groups
  • Capability aggregation model

9
The Concentration of Capabilities
  • Concentration may vary when polarity is constant
  • Concentration is even across states, but uneven
    across alliances

UK 20
Germany 20
France 20
Austria-Hungary 20
Russia 20
10
The Concentration of Capabilities
  • Now it is even is even across alliances, but
    uneven across states

UK 30
Germany 45
France 10
Austria-Hungary 5
Russia 10
11
Alliance Tightness
  • Ties reinforcing or cross-cutting
  • NATO WTO
  • Pre-WWI
  • Here alliances are tight

UK
Germany
France
Austria-Hungary
Russia
12
Alliance Tightness
  • No change in polarity but alliances are looser

UK
Germany
France
Austria-Hungary
Russia
13
How does System Structure cause war?
  • Leaders initiate wars, not the system
  • Any systemic theory of war must explain how
    system alters leader calculations
  • Key concept Systemic Uncertainty
  • Who will oppose whom with how much capability?

14
How Does System Structure Create Systemic
Uncertainty
  • Polarity many actors high uncertainty
  • Need many predictions
  • Concentration of Capabilities even distribution
    high uncertainty
  • More predictions are relevant
  • Tightness Loose alliances high uncertainty
  • More difficult to predict behavior based on
    alliances

15
How Does Systemic Uncertainty Relate to War?
  • Waltz Uncertainty causes errors
  • Buckpassing
  • Entrapment
  • War is a result of reckless errors
  • Certainty allows states to avoid war

16
How Does Systemic Uncertainty Relate War?
  • Singer Deutsch Uncertainty creates caution
  • War is a result of confidence in victory
  • Fear of possible defeat deters war

17
How Does Systemic Uncertainty Cause War?
  • What does the evidence show?
  • Very mixed results
  • Data suggest no relationship
  • Why?
  • Is systemic theory a waste of time?

18
The Contingent Effects of Systemic Uncertainty
  • Key to argument is the impact of risk
  • Individuals respond to risk in different ways
  • Risk-Propensity
  • Risk Acceptance
  • Risk Aversion
  • Effect of systemic uncertainty depends on risk
    propensity of leaders

19
The Contingent Effects of Systemic Uncertainty
  • For risk-acceptant leaders Waltz should be
    right
  • For risk-averse leaders Singer Deutsch should
    be right
  • Huth, Bennett Gelpi (1992) show this effect

20
What States Are Risk Takers?
  • States facing problems
  • Poor economy
  • Declining power
  • Internal unrest
  • Non-democracies
  • Leaders personalities
  • Driven to take risks?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com