AFET YNETIMI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

AFET YNETIMI

Description:

One of the most seismically active region in the world; ... TURKEY welcomes cooperation with all countries under this new vision and invites ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: kgel3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AFET YNETIMI


1
Hazard Risk Management in TURKEY Achievements
Challenges Ahead
Murat Sungur BURSA Director Prime
Ministry-PIU October 26, 2004
2
What is a natural disaster?
  • is a geophysical, hydrological or atmospheric
    event
  • impacts vulnerable communities or geographical
    areas,
  • causes substantial damage, disruption and
    casualties
  • leaves the affected communities unable to
    function normally.

3
TURKEY is prone to mainly three types of natural
disasters.
  • One of the most seismically active region in the
    world
  • 70 of the population lives in areas highly
    vulnerable to earhtquakes.
  • 66 of the country is located on active fault
    zones.
  • 75 of damaged buildings and 64 of total
    disaster losses in the last century are due to
    earthquakes
  • Vulnerable to floods
  • Mostly in coastal plains and exacerbated by
    deforestation, erosion and ignorant development.
  • 15 of total disaster losses are due to floods.
  • Annual average losses exceed 100 million US
  • Landslides
  • 25 of country area is exposed to landslide
    hazard.
  • 11 of total population is located in landslide
    areas.
  • 16 of total disaster losses are due to
    landslides.

4
(No Transcript)
5
  • EARTHQUAKE TOLL IN TURKEY
  • Avarege annual direct economic costs exceeded
  • 1 billion US in the last decade.
  • Average annual number of earthquakes equal or
    greater than a magnitude of 5.5 on the Richter
    scale 0.76
  • (6th in the world)
  • Number of people killed per year due to
    earthquakes 950
  • (3rd in the world)
  • Average number of people killed per million
    inhabitants 15.58 (4th in the world)
  • Average physical exposure per year 2 745 757
    people (8th in the world)
  • Killed per million exposed relative
    vulnerability 346 people (4th in the world)

6
(No Transcript)
7
In the last decade Turkey faced heavy natural
disasters
  • Erzincan Earthquake, 1992
  • Flood in Black Sea Region, 1998
  • Adana-Ceyhan Earthquake, 1998
  • Marmara Earthquake, 1999

8
Erzincan Earthquake, 6.8 Richter , 1992
  • 500 people died, 700 were injured
  • 6500 houses were destroyed.
  • direct loss is about 650 million US

Flood in Black Sea Region, 1998
  • area of 37.000 km2 with a population of 2.2
    million suffered
  • the worst flood of the last century
  • direct loss is about 500 million US

Adana-Ceyhan Earthquake, 6.3 Richter, 1998
  • 150 people died and 1000 injured
  • 74.300 houses collapsed, heavily or lightly
    damaged.
  • direct loss is about 1 billion US

9
1999 Marmara Earthquake, 7.4 Richter
  • 18000 lives lost
  • 113.000 housing units and business premises were
    completely destroyed, 264.000 damaged to varying
    degrees
  • Up to 600.000 people were forced to leave their
    homes.
  • 10-15 billion US direct cost

10
Lessons learned from Marmara Earthquake
  • Communication
  • Communication failed
  • Telephone lines were out of order in first 48
    hours
  • Mobiles did not function
  • First Aid Rescue
  • Lack of organization and coordination in search
    rescue activities
  • Caotic situation
  • Bureaucracy inhibiting efficiency and
    effectiveness
  • Insufficient logistic supports
  • Voluntary efforts were not trained and organised
  • Losses / Problems
  • Public buildings and infrastructure seriously
    damaged
  • Sub-standard buildings and infrastructure
  • Hazard ignorant development
  • Lack of code enforcement
  • Improper inspection during construction
  • Corrupted permitting and licensing
  • Serious Resource Gap
  • 10-15 billion as direct cost
  • 5-7 of Turkeys GNP

11
Distribution of Government Expenditures After
1999 Marmara Earthquake
  Source OECD and Ministry of Finance of TURKEY
12
Resource Gap
  • World Bank has been a leading lending institution
    together with European Investment Bank after
    major natural disasters in the last decade
  • ERZINCAN Earthquake Rehabilitation and
    Reconstruction Project (ERRP)
  • Turkey Emergency Flood and Earthquake Recovery
    Project (TEFER)
  • Marmara Earthquake Emergency Reconstruction
    Project (MEER)

13
(No Transcript)
14
Cost / Benefit Analysis
  • Cost of structural system is around 35 of total
    construction.
  • Spending an additional 15 in the structural
    system should save the buildings from collapsing.
    Accordingly
  • For every additional 1 spent during
    construction, savings are up to 40
  • For every 1 spent for retrofitting, savings
    are up to 8

No rational business-mind can resist such a high
rate of return
What about BUREAUCRACY??? We have the luxury of
not having business, mind But we have the
RESPONSIBILITY
15
Cost / Benefit Analysis
Saving LIVES ???
  • During Marmara Earthquake
  • 18.000 people lost their lives.
  • There were 70.000 casualties.
  • 600.000 people were forced to live their homes

16
Policy Shift in TURKEY
  • STRATEGIC
  • Choice
  • Proactive
  • Mitigation
  • Anticipate and prevent
  • Ex-ante
  • Risk management
  • Comprehensive approach
  • Sustainable development
  • CONVENTIONAL
  • Fate
  • Reactive
  • Recovery
  • Wait and see
  • Ex-post
  • Crisis management
  • Ad-hoc efforts
  • Development at risk

17
Developments in Turkey
  • Five Year Development Plan of TURKEY for the
    period 2001-2005 envisages
  • Minimization of hazard risks
  • Establishment of appropriate legal, social,
    institutional and technical structures with
    effective measures for disaster mitigation
  • Turkish Catastrophic Insurance Pool established
    after 1999 Marmara Earthquake to enable
    catastrophic risk transfer and risk financing
    (nearly 2 million housing units insured)
  • Local Government and Public Sector Reforms
    support serious decentralization of central
    governments functions and responsibilities
    including disaster management.
  • Sensitivity of citizens and NGOs for disaster
    mitigation is increasing
  • Disaster mitigation is a new challenge for
    municipalities
  • Candidates in the last municipal elections,
    competed with their disaster mitigation projects
    as part of their election campaigns.

18
Istanbul
  • Comparable seismic risk degree with San
    Francisco, Los Angeles and Tokyo cities
  • Probability of occurence of a large earthquake
    in next 30 years is greater than 50.
  • Probability of occurence of a large earthquake
    in next 10 years is greater than 20.
  • Impacts after a probable 7.5 Richter scale
    earthquake in Istanbul
  • Approximately 70.000 dead people,120.000
    injured-heavily injured people, 400.000 light
    injured people
  • direct economic loss 30 billion US

19
Istanbul Earthquake Master Plan
a road map....
Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality
Governorate
Objective Reducing the effects of probable
Istanbul Earthquake
District Municipalities
Institutions
Enterprises
NGOs
a social contract....
20
District Municipalities
  • Bakirköy Municipality
  • Vulnerability Assessment of 10.362 buildings
  • 3.500 buildings are high to very high risk
  • Feasibility study for retrofitting of 350
    residential buildings in Bakirköy is near to
    start.
  • Zeytinburnu Municipality
  • Vulnerability Assessment of 15.000 buildings
    have been completed
  • Framework for urban regeneration project of
    Zeytinburnu has been prepared. Operational models
    are under discussion.

21
Main Challenges Ahead
  • Regulatory Issues
  • Development Law
  • Condominium Law
  • Urban Regeneration Law
  • Building Code
  • Building Inspection Law
  • Retrofitting Regulation
  • Soil Improvement Regulation
  • Organizational Issues
  • Finalizing reorganization of disaster management
    functions
  • Between Prime Ministry / Ministries
  • At central / local government levels
  • Technical Studies
  • Microzonation
  • Cadastre Renovation
  • Risk Identification Assessment
  • Vulnerability Assessment

22
Main Challenges Ahead
  • Enforcement and Implementation
  • Effective code enforcement
  • Risk financing
  • Enlarging the risk insurance base
  • Capacity Building in all organizations
  • Awareness raising
  • Training at all levels
  • Public private partnerships
  • Citizen participation
  • Urban regeneration
  • Implementing risk mitigation measures and
    retrofitting of existing building stock
  • Sine-qua-nons
  • Technically feasible
  • financially affordable
  • economically justifiable
  • socially acceptable

23
Who has the POWER?
The POWER is in the hands of decision makers and
practitioners
  • If we are committed and engage our societies to
    take preparedness and mitigation measures at the
    adequate level,
  • many potential disasters will turn to be natural
    events.

THE POWER IS IN YOU!!!
24
Invitation for Cooperation
TRADITIONAL
NEW VISION
  • Humanitarian
  • Search and Rescue
  • Reactive
  • Ex-post
  • Recovery
  • Wait for the incident
  • Doctors,
  • nurses
  • Donor meetings
  • We will
  • Humanitarian
  • Search and Rescue
  • Proactive
  • Ex-ante
  • Mitigation
  • Continuous
  • Development planners, politicians, engineers,
    doctors, decision makers etc.
  • Risk management workshops
  • Let us

TURKEY welcomes cooperation with all countries
under this new vision and invites you all to
contribute to this process. RSVP
25
NEW VISION Cooperation
TRADITIONAL Cooperation
26
Let us all be pro-active, strategic,
comprehensive try to prevent or mitigate
27
(No Transcript)
28
7.5 Richter scale pleasure...
29
Thank you...
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com