Intonation and Communication - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Intonation and Communication

Description:

Intonation and Communication Martha C. Pennington Professor of Writing and Linguistics The Unreality of Grammars Traditional grammars, in relying on a written ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:148
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: lcHkbuEd
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intonation and Communication


1
Intonation and Communication
  • Martha C. Pennington
  • Professor of Writing and Linguistics

2
The Unreality of Grammars
  • Traditional grammars, in relying on a written
    language norm filtered through an ancient
    language Latin and in privileging the sentence
    as the essential unit of analysis, have described
    language in terms of an abstract ideal rather
    than as a central aspect of human behavior.
  • Pennington, M. C. (2002). Grammar and
    communication New directions in theory and
    practice. In Eli Hinkel and Sandra Fotos (eds.),
    New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second
    Language Classrooms. Mahwah, New Jersey and
    London Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, p. 96.

3
Communication is a process of
  • (i) A speaker signaling intentions to
  • an addressee, and then
  • (ii) The addressee making inferences
  • about what the speaker meant by
  • the signal.
  • Sperber, D., Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance
    Communication and Cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford
    Blackwell.

4
Means of Communicating Other Than Language
  • Gestures
  • (e.g. pointing, waving, shrugged shoulders)
  • Facial expressions
  • (e.g. smiling, frowning, quizzical look)
  • Eye contact
  • (brief or sustained, and lack thereof)
  • Physical distance
  • (from minimal separation to far apart)

5
AND
  • Bodily orientation
  • (e.g. directly facing or leaning
  • towards one or another participant)
  • Type and amount of touching
  • (e.g. of a persons arm while speaking)
  • Other forms of physical contact
  • (e.g. intimate contact such as kissing),
  • which may preclude or take precedence
  • over linguistic expression

6
3 Methods of Signaling
  • Describing-as
  • We describe something as a fish when we
  • present the word fish.
  • Indicating
  • We indicate an individual fish when we point at
    it.
  • Demonstrating
  • We demonstrate the size of a fish when we hold
    our hands so far apart.
  • Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using Language.
  • Cambridge Cambridge University Press, p. 391.

7
Meaning by Contrast
  • Instead of thinking of meaning as a property
    which is inherently attached to the word, we can
    focus upon the way people use wordsand, indeed,
    other linguistic itemsto create oppositions, as
    in friend not relative, friend not merely
    acquaintance, which are of relevance to whatever
    communicative purpose is presently being pursued.
  • Brazil, David (1995). A Grammar of Speech.
    Oxford Oxford University Press, p. 35.

8
An Everyday Example
  • PAT
  • AND
  • MARTY
  • They live together and are going about their
    normal Saturday routine.

9
Those 3 Little Words
  • I got it!

10
Some Meanings of Get
  • SUBJECT AS RECIPIENT
  • I got a letter. (receive)
  • I got the flu. (catch)
  • I got sick. (became)
  • I got stung by a bee. (be)
  • SUBJECT AS ACTOR
  • I got my child from the daycare center.
    (fetch)
  • I got my baby some new blankets. (obtain)
  • I got dinner ready. (caused to happen)

11
High Key Intonation
  • It narrows down the context of assumptions to one
    contrasting with all other possibilities.
  • Brazil, David (1997). The Communicative Value
  • of Intonation in English. Cambridge Cambridge
    University Press.

12
Intonation as a Signaling System
  • Informing (Informational) Function
  • Signaling informativeness Salience/non-salience
  • (high pitch vs. non-high pitch)
  • Structuring (Syntactic) Function
  • Signaling boundaries Completion/non-completion
  • (pitch fall vs. absence of fall)
  • Interactional (Participatory) Function
  • Signaling participation Hearer
    involvement/non-involvement (pitch rise vs.
    non-rise)

13
Functions of Intonation
  • Chunking and structuring information
  • Managing speech production and interaction
  • Revealing the ongoing state of knowledge
    construction and control of discourse

14
Speakers construct their utterances in relation
to
  • their own purposes and intentions
  • their knowledge of communicative context,
    including what the hearer
  • can be presumed to know and
  • their knowledge of contextual effects.

15
The communication is realized by means of
  • (i) the specific speakers selection of (ii)
    tonal pattern together with
  • (iii) specific words and
  • (iv) their arrangement as exactly the right
    language, no less and no more, given (v) the
    specific context and
  • (vi) intended audience, to trigger the intended
    interpretation.

16
Conclusions about Language
  • Language is necessarily social and must be
    referenced to the joint actions of at least two
    people.
  • Meaning does not inhere in a sentence but is
    created in the interaction between speaker and
    hearer.

17
Conclusions about Intonation
  • The tonal properties of an utterance are
    essential to the precise coding of a message to
    be both efficient and interpretable by a
    particular audience on a particular occasion.
  • The workings of intonation make a very good case
    that a grammar abstracted from real communicative
    events and contexts is not merely abstract but
    unreal and unworkable.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com