ECW3830 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

ECW3830

Description:

Equal time for all questions some spare time. Concise answers. ... At the right time. Access to product. At a 'reasonable' price. Regulatory tasks ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: wwwperson1
Category:
Tags: ecw3830

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ECW3830


1
ECW3830
Competition and Regulation
2
Week 7 Hilmer report and industry restructuring
Week 5-6 Regulating monopolies and access to
essential facilities
Week 8 Liberalisation in aviation
Week 4 Theories and practice of privatisation
Competition and Regulation
Week 9 Structural reform and regulation in
electricity
Week 3 Deregulation rationales and experiences
Week 10 Competition and regulation in
telecommunications
Week 2 Theories of regulation
Week 11 Mergers, Cartels and restrictive
practices
Week 1 Rationale for competition policy and
regulation
Week 12 - Research topic. Regulation,
deregulation and privatisation in small open
economies
Week 13 Revision
3
Examination
  • Two hours
  • 4 concise essay style questions based on the
    topics of the unit.
  • and
  • 1 research question
  • All questions are worth equal marks

4
Some suggestions
  • Equal time for all questions some spare time.
  • Concise answers.
  • The examiners are not after the word numbers.
    Clear writing is appreciated
  • Concentrate on main points
  • If one diagram is usable for more than one
    question, dont re-draw it, just refer to it.

5
Sample question 1
Week 13 Revision
  • Use an appropriate theory to explain, why natural
    monopolies are regulated. What in particular is
    supposed to be regulated? Does regulation always
    serves its purpose? If not what might be a
    reason? Give examples.
  • Topics
  • Regulating monopolies and access to essential
    facilities
  • Hilmer report
  • Deregulation, Privatisation
  • Theories of regulation

6
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
The theory of natural monopoly (revising
microeconomics)
Natural monopolies (no optimal scale of
production)
The nature of the industry is a very high level
of costs and sloping downwards AC curve, so that
there is an optimal scale of production.
Cost
AC
Q
7
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
The theory of natural monopoly (revising
microeconomics)
Natural monopolies (though there is an optimal
scale of production)
The nature of the industry is a very high level
of costs and the optimal scale of production is
beyond the capacity of the market.
D
Cost
AC
Q
8
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
The theory of natural monopoly (revising
microeconomics)
Natural monopolies How are they established?
Normally it is a public utility with no close
substitute Established Either by the
government as public infrastructure projects
(Electricity industry in Victoria) Or by market
forces (ATT in USA before it was broken in
several eternities)
9
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
The theory of natural monopoly (revising
microeconomics)
Natural monopolies and essential facilities
An input is essential for manufacturing if there
is no substitute input for the manufacturing of a
particular product And/or if an alternative
product cannot be manufactured at a comparable
price (Stephen King) A utility is essential for
household also is there is no substitute and/or a
substitute cannot be produced at a comparable
price
10
What is regulated
Structure, conduct an performance of the industry
  • Where the industry structure deviates from a
    perfectly competitive market
  • Restricted trade practices
  • Cartels, collusions
  • Access prising!

11
Reasons for regulation
For allocation purposes
  • Public goods
  • the market mechanism is perceived unable to
    determine the "right" amount which should be
    produced.
  • Externalities
  • The product attracts too many or too few
    resources, depending on whether the externality
    is negative or positive
  • Declining average cost (the case of natural
    monopoly)
  • Access regulation

12
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
Regulatory tasks
Product availability where market fails to
deliver
Product Access where market fails to deliver
  • Product availability
  • Sufficient quantity
  • At the right place
  • At the right time
  • Access to product
  • At a reasonable price.

13
Theories of regulation
Towards classification of theories
Positive theories Answer the question How
does regulation work The role of regulation
policies in advantaging of different sectoral
groups
Normative theories Answer the question What
and how to regulate Approaches to and methods
for the correction of market failure
Public interest theories
The Pareto Principle
The problem of second best
Capture theories
Stiglers theory Private interest
14
Theories of regulation
Positive theories
Attempts to explain the nature and mechanisms of
regulation Based on multi-disciplinary
studies Include elements of economics, political
science, sociology and social psychology
15
Theories of regulation
Positive theories
Public interest theory
The regulation is necessary to compensate
inequitable and/or allocatively inefficient
market outcomes to protect public interest
public interest consumer interest, employment
maintenance,
infrastructure maintenance, etc
The reason of failure of regulatory measures -
mismanagement
16
Theories of regulation
Positive theories
Capture theories
The deficiency of public interest theory it
ignores differences in the interests of different
groups of the society (consumers, producers,
policy makers, etc).
Life-cycle theories
Private interest theories
17
Theories of regulation
Positive theories
Capture theories
Life-cycle theories
Regulation intended to serve some particular
public interest. However, the groups of
regulated industries become to be able to affect
their regulators (governmental regulatory bodies)

or
Regulation was imposed by a majority political
group to serve public interest. However,
overtime it becomes to serve the interest of the
supporters of that political group.
18
Theories of regulation
Positive theories
Stiglers theory
Main ideas The regulation serves industry not
public interest A regulated industry is a
state-sanctioned cartel
19
Theories of regulation
Positive theories
Stiglers theory
The Demand for Regulation
  • Barriers to entry
  • A direct subsidy of money
  • State regulation affecting substitutes and
    complements
  • State price fixing

20
Theories of regulation
Positive theories
Stiglers theory
Supply costs
  • Non-profit-maximising form of delivery.
    Equalisation of advantages from regulation
  • The very cost of the bureaucracy of regulation
  • The distribution of advantages outside the
    industry

The industry seeks for the level and structure of
regulation where benefits superseed costs
21
Why regulation is inefficient
Deregulation Rationales and Experiences
Economic regulation of potentially competitive
industries
Regulation
  • Barriers to competition
  • Hidden costs
  • Exclusion of or restrictions on new products
  • Delay in the introduction of new technologies
    (Broadbend)
  • Effects contrary to intended objective (regulated
    natural monopolies become cost inefficient and,
    therefore, prices increase instead of decreasing
    or maintaining lower ones)

22
Theories and practice of Privatisation
The broader privatisation agenda
Common arguments for privatisation
  • Develop profit-maximisation initiatives
  • Making a privatised industry more
    competitive/efficient
  • Reducing costs/prices
  • Avoiding over-investment and creation of excess
    capacities
  • Testing the activity of a firm by market forces
  • Reducing public debt through sales proceedings

23
Theories and practice of Privatisation
The broader privatisation agenda
Common arguments against privatisation
  • Is it possible to promote competition within a
    natural monopoly
  • is it possible to make a privatised industry
    more competitive/efficient or to reduce
    prices/costs if the AC curve is sloping
    downwards
  • It is unreasonable to replace a public monopoly
    with a private monopoly
  • it is necessary to take into account all the
    costs of privatisation
  • the government gives up the revenue of government
    owned enterprise and therefore increases in the
    burden of taxation.

24
Theories and practice of Privatisation
The broader privatisation agenda
Natural monopoly privatisation
  • Is it possible to promote competition within a
    natural monopoly
  • is it possible to make a privatised industry
    more competitive/efficient or to reduce
    prices/costs if the AC curve is sloping
    downwards
  • It is unreasonable to replace a public monopoly
    with a private monopoly
  • it is necessary to take into account all the
    costs of privatisation
  • the government gives up the revenue of government
    owned enterprise and therefore increases in the
    burden of taxation.

25
Sample question 2
Week 13 Revision
  • Give examples of an industry where the third
    party access regulation is essential. Explain why
    it is required. Does the third party access
    regulation help in promoting competition?
  • Topics
  • Regulating monopolies and access to essential
    facilities
  • Hilmer report
  • Deregulation
  • One of the following industries
  • Telecommunication
  • Energy (high voltage transmission)
  • Airports

26
Access to essential facilities
  • Third party access to major infrastructure
    facilities is one of the key regulatory
    components of the National Competition Policy
  • Regulated through the mechanisms of ACESS PRICING
  • How the access price should be set?
  • Rate of return regulation is considered in the
    literature as the most desirable one
  • The access provider , through the regulated
    price, is guaranteed a reasonable rate of return
    on capital
  • This secures the attractiveness of access
    providers equities to shareholders.

27
Access to essential facilities
  • Theoretically, there are the following cases
  • The access provider does not have an
    interest/shares in the downstream provision of
    services
  • No conflict of interest
  • The access provider has an interest in the
    downstream provision of services
  • Conflict of interest the downstream wing of the
    access provider competes with other downstream
    providers.
  • The case of TELSTRA vs OPTUS, PRIMUS in fixed
    line telephony
  • TELSTRA vs several competitors in ADSL broadband
    internet services
  • As a result, the socially optimal access price
    differs from the one preferred by the access
    provider.

28
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
Approaches to monopoly regulation
Optimal uniformed pricing - advantages
  • PSRMC at the point of intersection with the
    D-curve.
  • Efficient sends correct signal to buyers
  • Socially optimal at any market structure
  • Attained by market forces in competitive markets
  • Must be regulated if the market is not
    competitive (such as government owned or private
    monopoly)

P, Cost
SRMC
AC
P
P
D
MR
Q
Q
Q
29
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
Approaches to monopoly regulation
The case of below average cost pricing
  • The company cannot supply at this price
    quantity demanded exceeds willingness to supply
  • Such a level of regulated price assumes a subsidy
    is payed to the company.
  • Two form of subsidy
  • A bulk operational grant
  • A subsidy on each purchase (such as ride in
    public transport)

P, Cost
SRMC
AC
P
P
D
MR
Q
Q
Q
30
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
Approaches to monopoly regulation
The case of below average cost pricing
  • A bulk operational grant (OG)
  • - the minimum level of operational grant.
    Can be regarded as offset to excessive fixed
    costs.
  • TCFC-OG VC
  • AC(TC-OG VC)/Q

P, Cost
AC
P
D
MR
Q
Q
31
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
Approaches to monopoly regulation
The case of below average cost pricing
A bulk operational grant (OG) Can be regarded as
a subsidy to the fixed costs TCFC-OG
VC AC(TC-OG VC)/Q Can be interpreted as a
shift of the AC curve downward as the result of
decrease in fixed costs.
P, Cost
AC
AC
P
D
MR
Q
Q
32
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
Approaches to monopoly regulation
The case of below average cost pricing
A subsidy on each purchase (such as ride in
public transport) (S) Can be regarded as a
subsidy to the variable costs TCTFC
TVC-SQ ACTFC/Q VC/Q-SAFCAVC-S Can be
interpreted as a shift of the AC curve downward
as the result of decrease in variable costs.
This option is logical where a public-owned
facility is outsourced to a private operator
P, Cost
AC
AC
P
D
MR
Q
Q
33
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
Approaches to monopoly regulation
Two (multi)-part pricing
  • P - Per-unit fee is equal to marginal costs (this
    can or cannot recover fixed costs)
  • plus
  • a fixed fee equal to the amount of consumer
    surplus (membership fee, service fee) if not
    regulated.
  • Club membership
  • Can be regulated below the whole consumer surplus
    level
  • Water
  • Telephone
  • Electricity
  • Gas

Unregulated price
P, Cost
SRMC
P
D
MR
Q
Q
34
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
Approaches to monopoly regulation
Two (multi)-part pricing
  • P - Per-unit fee is equal to marginal costs (this
    can or cannot recover fixed costs)
  • plus
  • a fixed fee equal to the amount of consumer
    surplus (membership fee, service fee) if not
    regulated.
  • Club membership
  • Can be regulated below the whole consumer surplus
    level
  • Water
  • Telephone
  • Electricity
  • Gas

Regulated price
P, Cost
SRMC
P
P
D
MR
Q
Q
Q
35
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
Approaches to monopoly regulation
Price-cap regulation (see Lecture 4)
  • A cap on price is established
  • above the SRMC
  • Below the optimal monopoly price.
  • A normal outcome bargaining between monopoly
    operator and government for increasing the cap
    faster than the rate of inflation
  • Electricity in Victoria
  • Private health insurance in Australia
  • Allows for increase in profit as the result of
    decrease in costs

P, Cost
SRMC
P
PC
D
MR
Q
Q
QC
36
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
Approaches to monopoly regulation
Cost of service average cost regulation
  • PQ/TC - at the point of intersection of the AC
    curve with the D-curve.
  • Advantages
  • Covers all the economic costs (including,
    perhaps, opportunity cost and normal profit)
  • Consumer does not pay more than the costs
  • Meant to be incentive for cost reduction as it is
    the only degree of freedom for any increase in
    profit

P, Cost
AC
P
D
Q
Q
37
Access to essential facilities
  • Problems with the rate of return regulation
  • Tends to be interventionist with respect to the
    structure of pricing allowed, often placing
    direct constraints on individual prices.
  • Resulting pricing structures often reflect
    political rather than economic imperatives.
  • This form of regulation tends to be
    informationally demanding. There are inherent
    problems of gathering and interpreting the
    information on operational costs, capital value
    to make efficient decisions about the cost basis
    for allowed pricing.
  • There is scope for a substantial amount of
    gaming between the regulator and the essential
    facility provider.
  • Rate-of-return regulation can lead to an
    incentive to overcapitalise. Where the allowed
    rate of return exceeds the cost of capital, the
    utility has an incentive to expand the base on
    which the return is reckoned and thereby increase
    profitability within the constraint.

38
Regulating Monopolies and Access to Essential
Facilities
Approaches to monopoly regulation
Disadvantages of price-setting regulation
  • Requires decision making and monitoring by
    regulator
  • Possibility of conflict of interest
  • Opportunity for corruption
  • Requires data gathering by the regulator
  • Submissions in Australia
  • Hearing in USA
  • Requires cost estimates
  • Historic/accounting costs can be misleading
  • Projected/forecasted costs can be inaccurate
  • Producers are tempted to inflate projected costs
  • Disallow for economic profit and, therefore,
    investment in
  • Growth, and/or
  • Research and development

39
Sample question 3
Week 13 Revision
  • Outline the moves that Australia has taken to
    reform the telecommunication sector and to
    develop a market of telecommunication services.
    How strong do you expect competition in the
    market to be, and is there a continuing role for
    regulation?
  • Topics
  • INDUSTRY SPECIFID QUESTION. One of the following
    industries
  • Telecommunication
  • Energy (high voltage transmission)
  • Airports
  • Regulating monopolies and access to essential
    facilities
  • Hilmer report
  • Regulation
  • Deregulation
  • Privatisation

40
Sample question 4
Week 13 Revision
  • ACCC has recently rejected the proposal of merger
    between QANTAS an Air New Zealand. Using an
    appropriate theory, explain what could be a
    reason for this decision. Do you agree it was
    justified?
  • Topics
  • Mergers, Cartels and Restrictive Practices
  • Theories of regulation

41
Mergers, Cartels and Restrictive Practices
Trade Blocs
Collusion and cartels
Cartel - an organisation of suppliers of a
commodity for quantity restriction and/or price
fixing
Collusion - an agreement between otherwise
independent suppliers of a commodity on price
fixing
Collusions and Cartels are explicitely illigal on
many contires
42
Mergers, Cartels and Restrictive Practices
Collusion and cartels
Cartel vs competitive market
Dx - market demand Sx - market supply MCx -
individual firms marginal cost MRx - marginal
revenue of cartel E - equilibrium of perfect
competition C - equilibrium of cartel Pe the
price of perfect competition Pc the price of
cartel Qe the quantity of perfect
competition Qc the quantity of cartel
  • Cartel fixes quantity at MRxMCx
  • and charges a monopoly price
  • The participants of quatas agree on the
  • allocation of quotas.

43
Mergers, Cartels and Restrictive Practices
Collusion and cartels
Cartel vs oligopolistic market
Two companies, a and b, produce a homogenous
product ar different marginal costs. Under
cartel agreement, they set the price at Pcartel,
corresponding to the intersection of MC and MR,
and allocate the output according to their
individual marginal costs. No economy of scale.
44
Mergers, Cartels and Restrictive Practices
Collusion and cartels
Cartel
  • Cartel fixes quantity at MRxMCx
  • and charges a monopoly price
  • The participants of quatas agree on the
  • allocation of quotas.

Disadvantages of Cartels for Participants Unstabl
e exit is very simple as the structure is not
backed by law Does not allow for economies of
scale or other cost efficiencies Preferred
option merger
45
Mergers, Cartels and Restrictive Practices
The effects of mergers
Merger amalgamation of the capital an
operations of two or more companies
  • Legal at certain conditions
  • Stable due to contractual obligations
  • Allows for economy of scale in production and
    other cost efficiencies
  • Combined investments in RD
  • Marketing
  • Logistics
  • Etc
  • Allow for synergies and risk spreading.
  • provide a mechanism by which underperforming
    firms and managers are replaced by better
    performing ones.
  • In some cases mergers may also have
    anti-competitive effects by altering the
    structure of markets and therefore the incentives
    for firms to behave in a competitive manner.

46
Mergers, Cartels and Restrictive Practices
The effects of mergers
Merger vs cartel

MCa
MCb
SMC
SMCmerger
Pcartel
If there is economy of scale, quantity supplied
to the market cab inrease at a lower price.
Pmerger
D
Qmerger
Qa Qb Qcartel
Quantity
MR
(QaQb)
47
Mergers, Cartels and Restrictive Practices
Is it possible to make competition policy more
effective?
Problem of industry in a small open economy
  • In a small open economy regulation of mergers
    restricting competition within the country
    contradicts promoting international
    competitiveness of the industry
  • Maintaining two or more smaller size companies in
    an oligopolistic industry may well keep the scale
    of production below the international optimal
    level
  • Allowing merger creates a domestic monopoly
  • Recent debate on merger between QANAS and Air New
    Zealand.
  • No general solution
  • Structured forecast of impact is impossible
  • Decision making on case by case basis
  • The art of decision making vs the science of
    economics
  • Creation of regional economic unions similar to
    EU.

48
Research question
Week 13 Revision
  • Consider any industry (in any country) where the
    price is regulated.
  • What kind of market structure is in the industry?
  • What is the reason for and aim of price
    regulation?
  • Which of the known approaches to/methods of price
    regulation is applied? (Use an appropriate
    theory/model for your explanation)
  • Is the aim of price regulation achieved?
  • In the case you are considering, are there
    negative consequences/side effects of price
    regulation?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com