Title: ECW3830
1ECW3830
Competition and Regulation
2Week 7 Hilmer report and industry restructuring
Week 5-6 Regulating monopolies and access to
essential facilities
Week 8 Liberalisation in aviation
Week 4 Theories and practice of privatisation
Competition and Regulation
Week 9 Structural reform and regulation in
electricity
Week 3 Deregulation rationales and experiences
Week 10 Competition and regulation in
telecommunications
Week 2 Theories of regulation
Week 11 Mergers, Cartels and restrictive
practices
Week 1 Rationale for competition policy and
regulation
Week 12 - Research topic. Regulation,
deregulation and privatisation in small open
economies
Week 13 Revision
3Examination
- Three hours
- 4 concise essay style questions based on the
topics of the unit. - and
- 1 research question
- All questions are worth equal marks
4Research question
- Consider any industry (in any country) where the
price is regulated. - What kind of market structure is in the industry?
- What is the reason for and aim of price
regulation? - Which of the known approaches to/methods of price
regulation is applied? (Use an appropriate
theory/model for your explanation) - Is the aim of price regulation achieved?
- In the case you are considering, are there
negative consequences/side effects of price
regulation?
5Sample question 1
- Use an appropriate theory to explain, why natural
monopolies are regulated. What in particular is
supposed to be regulated? Does regulation always
serves its purpose? If not what might be a
reason? Give examples. - Topics
- Regulating monopolies and access to essential
facilities - Hilmer report
- Deregulation
- Theories of regulation
6Sample question 2
- Give examples of an industry where the third
party access regulation is essential. Explain why
it is required. Does the third party access
regulation help in promoting competition? - Topics
- Regulating monopolies and access to essential
facilities - Hilmer report
- Deregulation
- One of the following industries
- Telecommunication
- Energy (high voltage transmission)
- Airports
7Sample question 3
- Outline the moves that Australia has taken to
reform the telecommunication sector and to
develop a market of telecommunication services.
How strong do you expect competition in the
market to be, and is there a continuing role for
regulation? - Topics
- INDUSTRY SPECIFID QUESTION. One of the following
industries - Telecommunication
- Energy (high voltage transmission)
- Airports
- Regulating monopolies and access to essential
facilities - Hilmer report
- Regulation
- Deregulation
- Privatisation
8Sample question 4
- ACCC has recently rejected the proposal of merger
between QANTAS an Air New Zealand. Using an
appropriate theory, explain what could be a
reason for this decision. Do you agree it was
justified? - Topics
- Mergers, Cartels and Restrictive Practices
- Theories of regulation
9Week 8 Liberalisation in Aviation
Why airlines are regulated?
Why airlines are deregulated?
USA historic routes of airline industry
deregulation
Australia Domestic airlines
Australia International airlines
Towards open skies
10Aims On completion of this topic students
should be able to
Liberalisation in Aviation
- Understand the basis rationale for regulation and
deregulation in the aviation industry - Be aware about the historic routes of the
deregulation of the aviation industry in USA
and - Judge the merit and outcome of deregulatory
polices of the domestic and international
segments of the airline industry in Australia and
overseas. -
11Essential Reading
Liberalisation in Aviation
- Quiggin, John, Evaluating Airline Deregulation
in Australia Australian Economic Review,
Mar1997, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p45-56, (Reeding 19) - Peter Forsyth, (2003) Low Cost Carriers in
Australia Experiences and Impacts, Journal of
Air Transport Management, 9 pp 277-284 (Library
reference - http//www.lib.monash.edu.au/resourcel
ists/e/ecw3830.html ) - Alan Johnston Andrew Trembath, Economic
regulation of intrastate aviation and the
National Competition Policy Discussion paper,
National Competition Council, 2005 (Free on the
internet - http//www.ncc.gov.au/pdf/PIReAv-001.p
df ). - Aviation policy and regulation - on the official
site of the Department of Transport and Regional
Services (http//www.dotars.gov.au/aviation/legisl
ation/policy/index.aspx )
12Liberalisation in Aviation
Why airlines are regulated?
- Airline services were historically heavily
regulated in all countries - Concerns about monopoly and oligopoly
- in most cases, only a small number of airlines
serve a given "city pair" market by providing
direct flights between the cities concerned. - Allowing for competition, was considered the same
uneconomical as in other network industries
(railway, energy telecommunications) - Concerns about security
- Concerns about safety
13Liberalisation in Aviation
Why airlines are regulated?
- Traditionally, apart from safety and security,
the following matters have been regulated - Domestic aviation
- Limited licensing of airlines
- Licensing each airlines access to every route it
pursues - Airfares
- International aviation
- Limited licensing of airlines
- Negotiating access of international competitors
to local destinations - Airfares
- Ownership of and access to airports
14Liberalisation in Aviation
Why airlines are deregulated?
Airline deregulation is the process of removing
restrictions on airlines affecting, in
particular, which carriers are permitted to serve
particular routes.
15Liberalisation in Aviation
USA historic origin of airline industry
deregulation
Regulation
- Since 1938, the Federal Civil Aeronautics Board
(CAB) had regulated all domestic air transport as
a public utility setting - fares
- routes
- schedules
- Advantages
- the CAB promoted air travel
- held fares down
- obliged to ensure that the airlines had a
reasonable rate of return. - Disadvantages
- bureaucratic complacency
- lengthy delays of the approval process
- Inefficiency of airlines due to lack of
competition
16Liberalisation in Aviation
USA historic origin of airline industry
deregulation
Deregulation
- The United States Airline Deregulation Act of
1978 - It also was part of a broader movement that, with
varying degrees of thoroughness, transformed - trucking,
- railroads,
- buses, cable television,
- stock exchange brokerage,
- oil and gas,
- telecommunications,
- financial markets, and
- local electric and gas utilities.
17Liberalisation in Aviation
USA historic origin of airline industry
deregulation
Deregulation
- The United States Airline Deregulation Act of
1978 - gradually eliminated the CAB's authority to set
fares - required the CAB to expedite processing of
various requests - liberalized standards for the establishment of
new airlines - allowed airlines to take over service on routes
underutilized by competitors or on which the
competitor received a local service subsidy - authorized international carriers to offer
domestic service - prohibited the CAB from introducing new
regulation of charter trips - terminated certain subsidies
- terminated existing mutual aid agreements between
air carriers - authorized the CAB to grant antitrust immunity to
carriers - authorized intrastate carriers to enter into
through service and joint fare agreements with
interstate air carriers - gradually transferred remaining regulatory
authority to the U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), and dissolved the CAB
itself.
18Liberalisation in Aviation
USA historic origin of airline industry
deregulation
Deregulation
- Effects
- Reduction in fairs by 30 in inflation ajusted
terms - Increase in passenger loads
- Airlines can now transfer larger aircraft to
busier routes and replace them with smaller ones
on shorter, low-traffic routes. - Development of low cost (no frills) carriers
- Issues
- The benefits of deregulation have not been evenly
distributed through the national air
transportation network. - Costs have fallen more dramatically on heavily
trafficked, longer-distance routes than on
shorter, lighter ones. - Exposure to competition led to heavy losses and
conflicts with labor unions. Between 1978 and
mid-2001 nine major carriers and over 100 smaller
ones had gone bankrupt - Eastern, Midway, Braniff, Pan Am, Continental,
America West Airlines, TWA
19Liberalisation in Aviation
In Australia
- Prior to 1990, Australia operated a Two Airlines
policy - Effectively guaranteed the maintenance of exactly
two airlines, - one public (TAA, later Australian Airlines and
then Qantas) and - one private (Annett),
- Almost identical fares, fleets and schedules.
- Discounting was only permitted to the extent that
it did not necessitate an increase in standard
economy fares. - Repeal of the two airlines agreement under the
Airline Agreement Termination Act, which came
into effect on 30 October 1990, - This restriction was abandoned, along with limits
on entry to the industry. - A number of unsuccessful attempts at entry were
made, but the first successful new entry was
Virgin Blue which was launched in 2000. - Virgin Blue's entry, the subsequent fare war, and
the decline in air travel following the September
11 attacks led to the collapse of Ansett and the
restoration of a duopoly market.
20Liberalisation in Aviation
In Australia
Domestic
- Fares are completely deregulated
- New entries are subject to licenses. Licenses
are not refused. - Fare recent fare wars
- However a duopoly has resulted in increase in
fares - No frills airlines/services (Jet Star versus
Virgin Blue) - Special status of QANTAS
- Small regional airlines monopolistic position of
flying to regional centres - extremely high fares
21Liberalisation in Aviation
In Australia
International
- Fares are completely deregulated
- Servicing routes subject to licensing
- Special status of QANTAS
- Protection of QANTASs international routes by
reciprocal arrangements with international
partners - 1 flight by QANTAS to 1 flight by a partner to a
particular destination if QANTAS services the
corresponding route. - Restricting international airlines from using
Australia for routes to third parties where
QANTAS operated - Singapore Airlines was recently not permitted to
service Australia-US route - Protection the majority Australian ownership of
QANTAS - Recent referral of a takeover bid to the
Australian Foreign Invest commission
22Liberalisation in Aviation
In Australia
Airports
- Airports have been privatised
- Prices are regulated. Why?
- regional natural monopoly
- there is a well developed demand for air
transport to and from each major city - travel is typically point to point
- demand is based on a specific destination
- within a city or adjacent areas, alternative
airports are not viable departure/arrival - new entry is unlikely
- other forms of transport (given distances) are
not close substitutes to air travel - airport operators also have an incentive to
price-discriminate among users airlines, for
extracting more profit - consumption is not affected and
- airlines may have a significant degree of
countervailing power (passing the airport fees
onto consumers)
23Liberalisation in Aviation
In Australia
The most recent development
- AVIATION REGULATION REVIEW TASKFORCE
- Minister for Transport and Regional Services
- Press Release 04 April 2007
- http//www.ministers.dotars.gov.au/mv/releases/200
7/April/059MV_2007.htm - The Group will work closely with the aviation
industry and provide advice to me on matters
including - the best practice safety regulatory model for
Australia - priorities for the Government's future regulatory
reform programme, including the development of
the timetable prioritising regulatory reforms and
key performance measures - the consultation arrangements between the
Government's aviation agencies and the industry
and - the change management and education and training
requirements in implementing regulatory changes.
24Revision questions for the next weektutorial
Liberalisation in Aviation
- Be prepared to discuss
- The reasons for regulation and deregulation of
the aviation industry - Elements of airline deregulatory policies in
Australia and overseas