Week 5 Monday, September 26 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Week 5 Monday, September 26

Description:

Bargaining power of buyers. Threat of substitute ... Customers and Buyers ... techniques, written procedures and policies that guide the planning process ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: kal90
Learn more at: https://www.csus.edu
Category:
Tags: monday | september | week

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Week 5 Monday, September 26


1
Week 5Monday, September 26
  • IT Planning
  • Strategic IS Alignment

2
Planning Techniques
  • Stages of Growth Nolan's Stages Theory
  • Rockart's Critical Success Factors (CSF)
  • Porter's Competitive Forces Model
  • Porter's Value Chain Analysis
  • e-Business value matrix
  • Linkage analysis planning
  • Scenario planning

3
Nolan's Stages Theory
An organizations experience with adopting IT
Investment in IT
IT Resource
Integration
Control
Contagion
Introduction
Diffusion
Time
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
4
Major Dimensions of CSFs
  • Sources
  • Industry
  • Strategy
  • Environment
  • Temporal
  • Position

Interest rates
New skill acquisition
Building (Innovation)
Monitoring (Control)
External
Internal
5
Porters Five Forces ModelForces that Shape
Strategy
?
How will the business react to threats (and
opportunities)?
Potential Entrants
Threat of new entrants
Industry Competitors
Bargaining power of buyers
Bargaining power of suppliers
Customers and Buyers
Suppliers
?
?
?
Rivalry among existing firms
Threat of substitute products or services
?
Substitutes
6
Porters Five Forces Model
Potential Entrants
?
Threat of new entrants
Industry Competitors
The strategy and actions an organization adopts
depend upon its perceptions of itself and these
threats.
Bargaining power of buyers
Bargaining power of suppliers
Customers and Buyers
Suppliers
  • Porters strategies
  • Product differentiation (non-duplicable product
    or service)
  • Low-cost producer
  • Market niche (market segment or geographical
    market)

?
?
?
Rivalry among existing firms
Threat of substitute products or services
?
Substitutes
7
Value Chain Analysis
Firm infrastructure
Human resource management
Support Activities
Margin
Technology development
Procurement
Customers
Inbound logistics
Outbound logistics
Marketing and sales
Operations
Service
Margin
Primary Activities
How can value be added at every activity?
8
e-Business Value Matrix
  • Project categories
  • New fundamentals
  • Operational excellence
  • Rational experimentation
  • Breakthrough strategy
  • Value of the project (low, high)
  • Criticality to business
  • Newness of idea

9
e-Business Value Matrix
Operational excellence, high criticality to
business, high newness of idea
New fundamentals
Operational excellence
Rational experimentation
High
Breakthrough strategy
Newness of Idea
Low
Low
High
Criticality to business
10
Linkage Analysis Planning
  • Steps
  • Define power relationships among various players
    and stakeholders Identify links between internal
    and external entities
  • Map out the extended enterprise to include
    suppliers, buyers and strategic partners Manage
    the linkages
  • Plan electronic channels to deliver the
    information component of products and services
    Facilitate and enhance the exchange of information

11
Linkage Analysis Planning
Top management
Middle management
Operations management
Electronic Channels
Traditional competitors
New competitors
Retailers
Suppliers
Distributors
Government
Stockholders
12
Scenario Planning
  • Steps
  • Define a decision problem and timeframe to bound
    the analysis (What if)
  • Identify the major known trends that will affect
    the decision problem
  • Identify just a few driving uncertainties
  • Construct the scenarios based on uncertainties
  • Trigger events

13
Strategic Information Systems Planning (SISP)
  • Definition... a process conducted within the
    contexts of scope, perspective, time frame, and
    level of abstraction, with any or all of the
    following agenda (1) supporting and influencing
    the strategic direction of the firm through
    identification of value-adding computerized
    information systems, (2) integrating and
    coordinating various organizational technologies
    through development of holistic information
    architectures, and (3) developing general
    strategies for successful systems
    implementation. Segars, Grover and Teng.1998

14
SISP Progression
Architectures for sharing organizational and
interorganizational data and integration
technologies
Enabling initiatives for gaining competitive
advantage
Alignment of IS strategy with corporate
strategy
IS viewed as strategic resource
15
Context Characteristics
Scope (broad)
Perspective (upper management)
Strategic Information Systems Planning
Time Frame (long range)
Level of Abstraction (conceptual)
16
Six Process Dimensions
Comprehensiveness
Formalization
Focus
Planning Effectiveness
Coalignment
Flow
Participation
Favorable coalignment will lead to effective
planning
Consistency
Alignment of dimensions
17
1. Comprehensiveness
  • Thoroughly canvassing a wide range of
    alternatives
  • Surveying a full range of objectives
  • Carefully weighing the costs and risks of various
    consequences
  • Intensively searching for information to evaluate
    alternative actions
  • Objectively evaluating information or expert
    judgment regarding alternative actions
  • Re-examining the positive and negative
    consequences of all known alternatives
  • Making detailed plans, including consideration of
    contingencies, for implementing a chosen action

18
2. Formalization
  • Existence of structures, techniques, written
    procedures and policies that guide the planning
    process
  • Written policies that structure the process of
    planning
  • Formalized techniques adopted for the purpose of
    conducting strategic planning
  • Known procedures for initiating the planning
    process
  • Processes systemize information collection and
    dissemination
  • Formalization vs. Flexibility

19
3. Focus
  • The balance between creativity and control
    orientations inherent within the strategic
    planning system
  • Innovation vs. Integration
  • Innovative orientation nurtures creativity
    (innovative, novel solutions)
  • Integrative orientation focuses more on control
    (budgetary, cost performance, controlled
    diffusion of assets within the organization)

20
4. Flow
  • Locus of authority or devolution of
    responsibilities for strategic planning
  • Roles played by corporate and divisional managers
    in the initiation of the planning process
    (vertical orientation)
  • Top-down vs. Bottom-up
  • Top-down limited participation of lower level
    managers in the initiation of the strategic
    planning process
  • Bottom-up functional management involvement in
    the initiation of strategic planning

21
5. Participation
  • Breadth of organizational involvement in
    strategic planning
  • Representation from the functional areas
  • Narrow vs. Broad
  • Narrow fosters an isolated approach to plan
    formulation with little involvement or
    interaction among various functional or
    operational managers
  • Broad a variety of functional and operational
    areas help offset bounded rationality of top
    managers

22
6. Consistency
  • Concerned with the frequency of planning
    activities or cycles, and evaluation /revision of
    strategic choices
  • Frequent vs. Infrequent
  • Infrequent time frame longer, face-to-face
    meetings tend to be ad hoc or sporadic, planning
    cycles may be year-to-year (vs. continuous or
    consistent process)
  • Frequent high levels on consistency
    characterized by continuous planning process with
    frequent meetings, constant communication among
    planning participants, and frequent assessment
    and revision of strategic direction

23
Proposition
  • Strategic IS planning systems that reflect a
    profile of rational adaptation will be positively
    associated with planning effectiveness. The
    structure or internal coalignment of a rational
    adaptive planning system includes
  • higher levels of comprehensiveness
  • higher levels of formalization
  • a focus on control vs. creativity
  • a top-down vs. bottom-up planning flow
  • higher levels of participation
  • higher levels on consistency

Segars, Grover and Teng.1998
24
Coalignment
  • Coalignment strongly associated with planning
    effectiveness
  • If dimensions of strategic planning systems
    favorably align, the planning system as a
    structure should be more successful than its
    individual dimensions
  • Effectiveness may beyond performance measurement
    (e.g., ROI, ROE)
  • Alternative value-added approach
  • Improved management making
  • Lower costs of development
  • Plans that are actionable and implemented

25
Internal Planning System Coalignment
  • The planning system should be structured process
    of opportunity search that adapts through
    consistent feedback and wide participation
  • Rational planning tendencies of extensive
    alternative generation and solution search,
    formalized procedures and policies for planning,
    a focus on control, and top-down planning flow
  • Adaptive tendencies of wide participation
    profiles and high levels of planning consistency

Planning effectiveness
Rational adaptation
26
Implications for Strategic IS Planning
  • Planning must be designed, evaluated, and refined
    such that the overall activity of planning does
    not become dysfunctional
  • Emergent systems of planning should reflect the
    environmental and organizational context within
    which they function

27
Source Strategic Information Systems Planning
Planning System Dimensions, Internal Coalignment
and Implications for Planning Effectiveness,
Albert H. Segars, Varun Grover, and James T.
Teng. Decision Sciences (journal), vol. 29, no. 2
(Spring 1998).
28
Architecture and Infrastructure
  • Architecture a blueprint that shows
    interrelationships of the components of a system
  • Emphasis on the whats
  • Based on the business model
  • IT Infrastructure implementation of the
    architecturePurpose To deliver the right
    information to the right people at the right time
  • Two parts
  • Technical IT infrastructure (processors,
    telecommunication, database, etc.)
  • Human IT infrastructure
  • Emphasis on the hows

29
Architecture
  • Defines guidelines and standards
  • Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
  • Emphases on accessibility of others systems to
    data and functions, and reusability of
    programming code
  • Supports the organization's agility

30
Infrastructure
  • Delivering IT resources to support users
    throughout the organization
  • Four layer infrastructure (Weill and Broadbent)
  • IT components
  • Human IT infrastructure
  • Shared IT services services that users can draw
    upon and share to conduct business
  • Shared and standard IT applications stable
    applications that change less frequently

31
Structure of the IT Infrastructure
Local applications
IT infrastructure
Shared and standard IT applications
Shared IT services
Human IT infrastructure
IT components
32
Three Views of Infrastructure
  • Economies of scale (utility) providing IT/IS as
    a service to the business to facilitate
    operations
  • Emphasis on reducing costs
  • Support for business programs (dependent) IT
    tied to business plan and value-added initiatives
  • Flexibility to meet changes in the marketplace
    (enabling) IT planning tied to business
    strategic plan
  • Co-alignment between business strategy and IT
    strategy
  • Strategic IT and strategic IT planning

33
Centralized vs. Distributed Processing
  • Centralized processing Processing centrally
    located usually at a single site (at least
    logically centralized)
  • Distributed process Processing divided between
    (among) different physically dispersed sites
  • Transparency The user or customer is unaware
    where the processing is handled
  • Reduces network traffic to one location
  • Closely places the data to where they are needed
    or used
  • Follows a system-wide protocol

Depends on the organization
34
Centralized Processing
Single Site
35
Distributed Processing
Geographically Distributed
Network
Transparency
Site 1
Site 3
Site 2
Heterogeneous vs. Homogenous
36
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com