Title: Kein Folientitel
1 Lead Optimization - From Leads to Developmental
Candidates -
2 Why do drugs fail in clinical development?
(Taken from Kennedy, Drug Discovery Today, 2
(10), 1997, 436-444)
3 Water Solubility as a parameter for lead
optimization
Is there a relationship between bioavailability
and water solubility?
Yes, there is. It's called MAD!
4 Water Solubility as a parameter for lead
optimization
The concept of the maximum absorbable dose
(MAD) MAD S x Ka x SIWV x SITT S water
solubility at pH 6.5 (mg/ml) Ka transintestinal
absorption rate constant (1/min) SIWV small
intestinal water volume ( 250 ml) SITT small
intestinal transit time ( 270 min)
Typical dose for a drug is 1 mg/kg ? for a 70 kg
patient, 70 mg drug substance must be
available in the blood
Ranges typical for drug candidates Ka 0.001 -
0.05 min-1 (50-fold) S 0.0001 - 100 mg/ml
(106-fold)
5 Water Solubility as a parameter for lead
optimization
The concept of the maximum absorbable dose (MAD)
6 Water Solubility as a parameter for lead
optimization
How soluble does a drug candidate have to be???
S MAD / (Ka x SIWV x SITT)
7 Water Solubility as a parameter for lead
optimization
Azithromycin
Very poor absorption (Ka 0.001 min-1) Very high
water solubility (S 50 mg/ml) ?MAD 3375 mg ?
Good oral bioavailability!
8- Goals and Concepts in Lead Optimization
- Increasing in-vitro potency/efficacy by
- bioisosteric replacement of functional groups
- gradual modification of 3D shape and/or
physicochemical properties - Improving PC/ADME/Tox behaviour by
- replacement of toxophores
- modification of physicochemical properties (e.g.
lipophilicity, charge, flexibility etc.) - replacement of metabolically labile groups
- pro-drug concept
9 Lead Optimization
What can be modified?
10 Lead Optimization
?Modifications of aromatic substituents
11 Lead Optimization
? Modifications of amide group
12 Lead Optimization
? Modifications of cyclohexyl group
13 Lead Optimization
? Modifications of carboxyl group
14 Lead Optimization
? Modifications of chain length
15 Lead Optimization
? Modifications of aromatic substituents
16 The Topliss Tree A systematic lead optimization
approach
17 Lead Optimization - Example I
- hormone of the thyroidal gland
- agonist of thyroxine receptor
- bioisosterical replacements of iodo groups
- potent agonist of thyroxine receptor
18 Lead Optimization - Example II
- hydrophilic neurotransmitters
- orally inactive
- no penetration of blood-brain barrier
- lipophilic adrenaline mimics
- orally active
- good penetration of blood-brain barrier
- centrally stimulating effect
19 Lead Optimization - Example III
- analgesic drug
- activity due to COX inhibition
- no analgesic effect
- bioisosteric replacement of ester by amide
failed!
20Acetyl salicylic acid Mechanism of Action
- acetyl group is transferred to serine in
active site of COX - gt labile ester group is required!
21 Lead Optimization - Example IVFrom Peptides to
Peptidomimetics
22 Lead Optimization - Example IVFrom Peptides to
Peptidomimetics
23- Prodrugs are weak or inactive precursers of drugs
- Active drug is only generated after
biotransformation of prodrug - by metabolic transformation
- by spontaneous chemical degradation
- Goal improved ADME/Tox- or physicochemical
properties
24 The Prodrug concept - Example I
- central analgesic
- orally inactive
- slow penetration of blood-brain barrier
- orally inactive
- rapid penetration of blood-brain barrier
- degradation to morphine in brain
- accumulation of morphine in brain
25 The Prodrug concept - Example II
- anti-hypertensive drug
- orally inactive
- orally active due to amino acid carrier
- degradation to Enalaprilat by esterases
26 The Prodrug concept - Example III
- Morbus Parkinson drug
- orally inactive
- slow penetration of blood-brain barrier
- orally active
- rapid penetration of blood-brain barrier due
to amino acid carrier!
Auxillary drugs
27 The Prodrug concept - Example IV
- anti-convulsive neurotransmitter
- orally inactive
- no penetration of blood-brain barrier
- orally active
- rapid penetration of blood-brain barrier
28 Drug Discovery What's next?
29 Differences between leads and drugs
- Drugs compared to leads
- are heavier
- are more lipophilic
- have more ring systems, rotatable bonds,
H-acceptors
30 The Graffinity Approach
Technology
- Small molecules are immobilized on gold surface
- Protein-Ligand Affinity is measured via
Surface-Plasmon Resonance
31 The Graffinity ApproachScreening Scenarios
drug like
lead like
Library Size
1,000,000 100,000 10,000 1,000 100 10
100 200 300
400 500 600
Molweight
32 The Graffinity Approach Library Synthesis
Technology
- Diversity in Microtiterplates
33 The Graffinity Approach Library Synthesis
Technology
34 The Graffinity Approach Detection
Technology
- Minimal Amounts of Protein
- Protein-Ligand Affinity Maps
- Surface-Plasmon Resonance
- No Assay Development
- Function-Blind
35 Principle of Surface Plasmon Resonance - a
means to detect Protein-Ligand binding
36 The Graffinity Approach Detection
Technology
- Immediate Rank-Order of Affinities
37 The Graffinity Approach SAR Analysis
Technology