Title: Diapositiva 1
1ENARPRI Trade Agreements and EU Agriculture
Brussels, 8 June 2006
European agriculture, the future of the CAP and
the WTO negotiations
Giovanni Anania Department of Economics and
Statistics University of Calabria, Italy
2the plan (all in 20 )
- the agricultural negotiations in the WTO Doha
Development Agenda round where are we?
what may happen? how relevant for EU
agriculture and the CAP?
- meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
- the future of the CAP where is it likely to
be heading? where should it be heading?
3the WTO negotiations on agriculture, where are
we?
- a quick review of the status of the negotiations
on agriculture
- the main elements of the agreement yet to be
decided in italics and underlined
- colors used as indicators of the sensitivity for
the EU (as I see it ) of the decisions left to
be made, from green (not a problem for the EU) to
red (sensitive)
4where are we on domestic support?
- linear reduction of the overall (amber box blue
box de minimis) trade distorting support three
tiers, the EU alone in the first one - linear reduction of the amber box support, three
tiers, the EU alone in the first one - product-specific caps on amber box support
- reduction of the de minimis support
- blue box modified, support capped at 5 (2.5?)
of value of production - formula(s) coefficients in the formula(s)
-
- 20 cut in the first year of implementation
- green box reviewed and clarified
5where are we on export competition?
- parallel elimination of export subsidies,
subsidized export credit, trade distorting
practices of exporting STEs, and improper forms
of food aid which displace commercial purchases - end date 31 December 2013
- operational commitments for export credits, STEs
and food aid - flexibility phasing will take into account
internal reform steps of members
6where are we on market access?
- four tiers
- the thresholds
- the tariff reduction formula (Swiss? UR-type?
tariff caps? ) - the coefficients in the formula
- sensitive products (how many? which deviation
from tariff reductions for normal products? how
large the TRQ expansion?) - TRQs (volume, in-quota tariff, administration)
- preference erosion, tariff escalation
7where are we on the other issues relevant for
agriculture?
in the agricultural negotiations
- geographical indications (?)
- the cotton initiative
- other sectoral initiatives
- export taxes
- tropical products
- SDT for developing countries
at the other tables of the negotiation
8the WTO negotiations on agriculture, what may
happen?
- whats the cost of not reaching an agreement?
-
- many believe an agreement is needed, but that
no agreement is better than a bad agreement - and what is seen as bad by some is seen as
good by others the ambitiousness of the agreement
9the WTO negotiations on agriculture, what may
happen?
- what I would see as an ambitious DDA Agreement on
agriculture - - current domestic support reduced
- - current market access increased
- - effective SDT component for poor
- developing and least developed
- countries, and a less far reaching SDT
- for more developed developing countries
- - ambitious cotton initiative
- - geographical indications on board
-
10the WTO negotiations on agriculture, what may
happen?
- whats the cost of not reaching an agreement?
-
- many believe an agreement is needed, but that
no agreement is better than a bad agreement - and what is seen as bad by some is seen as
good by others the ambitiousness of the agreement
- if an agreement is reached before the summer
recess it will not be ambitious
11the WTO negotiations on agriculture, what may
happen?
- modalities by the end of June?
- I doubt it
- modalities by the end of July?
- it is possible but, in my opinion, unlikely
- positions on some of the relevant elements
- of the agreements remain distant
- a huge amount of details has to be agreed
-
- on some elements of the agreement
- final-stages-type negotiations did not even
- start yet
- the who is to be blamed for the failure game
12the WTO negotiations on agriculture, how
relevant?
- how sensitive a DDA agreement would be for EU
agricultures and CAP? - for the defensive interests not a problem
- (it will be within the Commission negotiating
mandate) - for the offensive interests (in and outside
agriculture) little or no gains
- if an agreement is not reached, relevant
components of the reformed CAP will likely be
subjected to WTO disputes
13meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
14meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
15meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
16meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
17meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
18meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
19meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
20meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
21meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
22meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
23meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
24meanwhile, whats happening in international
markets?
- agricultural markets expand
- imports exports both grow, and do so in
developed as well as in developing countries
- net trade position of developing countries does
not show any significant change
- China net deficit expands, India surplus
declines, while Brazil surplus expands rapidly
- EU net trade position improves (while the
contrary is true for the US)
25whats important for the future of European
agricultures?
- the conclusion of the DDA round is important, but
the agreement, when it will occur, likely will
not be so ambitious to significantly affect
current CAP and EU competitiveness
- implications of (recent and future) rulings in
the WTO dispute settlement system seem
potentially more relevant
- the most important game field for the future
of the CAP is the domestic one the definition of
the post-2013 (post-2009?) EU agricultural and
rural development policies
26looking at the past to understand what may be
ahead
- from fully coupled support, linked to how much
the farm produced (pre-1992), to
partially decoupled support, linked to what
the farm produced (1992-2003)
27looking at the past to understand what may be
ahead
28looking at the past to understand what may be
ahead
- from fully coupled support, linked to how much
the farm produced (pre-1992), to
partially decoupled support, linked to what
the farm produced (1992-2003), to
decoupled support (post-2003), linked to
farming/land management
- declining financial resources for the CAP
29whats ahead?
- with respect to income support, we should expect
more of the same - more decoupling -
less financial resources - less support -
support to become more selective - more space
for implementation choices at the national
level - more cross-compliance constraints (?)
- more farm payments in exchange for the
production of specific non-market goods and
services
30whats ahead?
- how much more of the same and at which speed?
it remains to be seen
- plus, possibly, something a little different from
what we have already seen - new safety net
policy instruments - partial (re)nationalization
- is something missing? - more (and more
effective) policies to strengthen the
competitiveness of EU agri-food system,
domestically and abroad
31strengthening the competitive wedge
the farm structure adjustment issue (for
certain agricultures is a prerequisite) the
technological innovation wedge - product
innovation - innovation in the production
process - innovation in the services sold with
the product - from farm competitiveness to
chain/territory competitivenessthe quality
wedge quality ? qualities (consumer
driven) including origin, food safety
standards, organic, animal welfare standards,
no GMOs,
32(No Transcript)
33strengthening the competitive wedge
the farm structure adjustment issue (for
certain agricultures is a prerequisite) the
technological innovation wedge - product
innovation - innovation in the production
process - innovation in the services sold with
the product - from farm competitiveness to
chain/territory competitivenessthe quality
wedge quality ? qualities (consumer
driven) including origin, food safety
standards, organic, animal welfare standards,
no GMOs, made in Europe is
different!