Folie 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Folie 1

Description:

Initiated by the stakeholder dialog event on engineered ... Work in extractor, requirements. according to TRGS 526. Can dispersion, solid granules, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: twolf3
Category:
Tags: extractor | folie

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Folie 1


1
Guidance on handling and use of nanomaterials
Miriam Baron
Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health, Germany
2
Overview
  • Questionaire
  • Guidance for Handling and Use of Nanomaterials at
    the Workplace
  • Threshold limit values
  • Nanodialog

3
BAuA-questionaire 2006
  • Initiated by the stakeholder dialog event on
    engineered nanoparticles (october 2005)
  • Cooperation with
  • German Chemical Industry Association (VCI)
  • Federation of German Industries (BDI)
  • 217 companies participated
  • Industry
  • Small and medium enterprises
  • Research companies

4
BAuA-questionaire 2006 Situation in Germany
  • Participation according to the criterion use of
    nanomaterials above 10 kg/yr
  • 45 companies participated
  • 51 use above 100 kg/yr
  • Thereof 11 above 100 t/yr
  • Thereof 7 above 1000 t/yr (e.g. carbon black,
    silicic acid)
  • 56 produce/use more than one nanomaterial
  • 71 less than 10 exposed employees
  • Reported products 70

4.6/Baron
4
5
Questionary Activities (out of 70 products)
  • 96 working situations
  • 37 mixing and dispersing
  • 31 filling and baging
  • 17 loading and decanting
  • 7 drying
  • 4 milling
  • Multiple responses possible

6
Questionary Knowledge gaps (out of 70 products)
  • No knowledge on particle size and number 59
  • No measurement (unknown exposure) 31
  • No knowledge about potential health effects 28
  • No particle-specific health complaints among the
    workers were reported
  • Multiple responses possible

7
Questionary Protection measures (out of 70
products)
  • Protection Measures
  • Engineering controls 54
  • Ventilation 63
  • Personal protective equipment 55 (respiratory
    protection)
  • Multiple responses possible

8
Questionary Protection measures Engineering
Controls
  • Engineering controls (54 cases)
  • Wet processing 37
  • Closed system 27
  • Automatic processing 13
  • Multiple responses possible

4.6/Baron
8
9
Questionary Protection measures - ventilation
  • Ventilation (63 cases)
  • Open ventilation 29
  • Semi-open ventilation 21
  • Automatic ventilation 18
  • Closed ventilation 13
  • Natural ventilation 9
  • Multiple responses possible

4.6/Baron
9
10
Questionary Protection measures personal
protective equipment
  • For 80 of the activities usage of respiratory
  • protection (additionally to engineering
    controls and
  • ventilation)
  • Wide spectrum, ranging from general masks to
  • specific respirators (FFP1 to FFP3)
  • Multiple responses possible

4.6/Baron
10
11
Guidance for Handling and Use of Nanomaterials at
the Workplace
  • Cooperation with the German Chemical Industry
    Association (VCI)
  • Published 2007
  • To be updated this year
  • To be amended by industry sector specific
    Guidance (under progress for laboratories)

12
Contents
1 Introduction 2 General occupational health
and safety rules 3 Recommendations for workers'
protection in the handling and use of
nanomaterials 4 Current situation and
development of measuring methods for
nanoparticles Annex Flowchart on Hazard
Assessment for Nanomaterials at the Workplace
13
General occupational health and safety rules
Duties according to the Hazardous Substances
Ordinance 1. Information gathering 2. Hazard
assessment 3. Determination of protection
measures 4. Review of effectiveness of
measures 5. Documentation
14
Information gathering
Used product (properties, volume, type and
form of use). Activity (possible intake by
inhalation, dermal or oral). For oxidizable
materials, also fire and explosion risks must be
included Substitution options (including any
use of processes or preparations of the substance
that result in lower hazard)
15
Information gathering
  • Effectiveness of protection measures already in
    place
  • Implemented activities in preventive occupational
    medicine
  • In case of data gaps, this lack of information
    must be adequately taken into account when
    determining protection measures.

4.6/Baron
15
16
Determination of protection measures
  • STOP-Principle
  • Substitution options
  • Technical measures
  • Organizational measures
  • Personal protection measures

17
Determination of protection measures
  • Review of measure effectiveness in place
  • Comparative inspection with measurement
  • Documentation
  • Firstly hazard assessment including
  • Substances used
  • Working conditions
  • Protection measures taken
  • Available measurement data
  • To be used for assessment at a later stage

18
Substitution options
  • Replacing health-endangering substances or
    technical processes by less ones
  • Binding powder nanomaterials in liquid or solid
    media
  • Using dispersions, pastes or compounds instead of
    powder substances wherever technically feasible
    and economically acceptable

19
Technical protection measures
  • Contained installations, wherever possible
  • Otherwise avoid the formation of dusts or
    aerosols
  • Extract possibly forming dusts or aerosols
    directly at their source (e.g. in filling and
    emptying processes)
  • Ensure regular maintenance and function testing
    of extraction facilities
  • No recirculation without exhaust air purification

20
Organizational protection measures I
  • Instructions to the workers, including
  • Specific physical properties of free
    nanoparticles
  • Need for special measures
  • Potential long-term effects of dusts
  • Relevant information in the operating
    instructions
  • Limitation of exposed persons
  • Keep the number of potentially exposed workers as
    small as possible (e.g. by time arrangements)
  • Deny unauthorized persons access to the relevant
    work areas

21
Organizational protection measures II
  • Ensure clean work wear
  • Work wear must be cleaned by the employer
  • Work wear and private clothing must be stored
    separately
  • Ensure the regular cleaning of workplaces
  • Removing of deposits or spilled substances by
  • Suction device
  • Wiping up with a moist cloth
  • No blowing for removal

4.6/Baron
21
22
Personal protection measures
  • Only where technical protection measures are not
    sufficient or cannot be put into place
  • Depending on substance properties
  • Protective gloves
  • Protection goggles with side protection
  • Protective clothing
  • Respiratory protection equipment

23
Personal protection measures (respiratory
protection)
  • Efficacy of filters increases with decreasing
    particle size in the size range between 2-200 nm
  • Measuring data from BGIA(on sodium chloride
    particles from 14 to 100 nm)
  • Total number penetration efficiency" P3 filters
    penetration less than 0.026 (particle count)P2
    filters penetration of 0.2 (particle count)
  • Effectiveness must be reviewed

4.6/Baron
23
24
Personal protection measures (dermal protection)
  • Selection of gloves
  • Material must be suitable
  • Material must fulfill requirements for maximum
    wearing time under practical conditions
  • Permeation time is important relevant criterion
  • Additional protection of other areas of skin by
  • Protective suits
  • Aprons
  • Boots

4.6/Baron
24
25
Further protection measures
  • Depending on the properties of specific
    nanomaterials
  • Anti-explosion measures in the handling of
    oxidizable nanomaterials
  • Specific protection measures in the handling of
    reactive or catalytic nanomaterials
  • Conventional measures resulting from the hazard
    assessment

4.6/Baron
25
26
Flowchart Hazard assessment for Nanoparticles at
the Workplace (respiratory route)
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Activities in laboratories or small volumes?
Risks due to explosions, reactive or
catalyticallyactive nanoparticles?
Does the activity involve dust formation?
Is there a low hazard?
No
Yes
No
No
Can dispersion, solid granules,compounds be
used?
Open systems?
Process avoids dust and aerosol formation
because of closed system?
Sucking up with integrated or highly efficient
equipment?
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
4.6/Baron
26
27
Hazard assessment
  • With respect to
  • Substance related hazards including
  • Properties
  • Physical state
  • Processing options
  • Further hazards (e.g. electrical or mechanical)

28
Hazardous Substances Ordinance - Principles
  • Risk assessment by the employer before starting
    activities
  • Eliminating Risks
  • Minimize Risks
  • In case of uncertainty
  • Precautionary principle
  • The need for control measures increases with
    both the level of possible harm and the degree of
    uncertainty.

4.6/Baron
28
29
European Community/German Legislation
  • Placing on the market
  • REACH (European regulation 2006/1907/EC)
  • Applicable for nanomaterials
  • With reference to the substance
  • (optionally) consideration of the nanoform in
    the Chemical Safety
  • Report (CSR)
  • if necessary additional proofs concerning the
    special nanoform
  • Handling
  • Hazardous Substances Ordinance
  • (based on European directive 98/24/EC)

4.6/Baron
29
30
Data gaps (TRGS 400/TRGS 526)
Minimal hazard properties in case of
uncertainties R20/21/22 Harmful by inhalation,
in contact with skin and if swallowed. R38 Irr
itating to skin R43 May cause sensitization by
skin contact R68 Possible risk of irreversible
effects Unknown new substances in
research Toxic by inhalation, in contact with
skin and if swallowed Additionally corrosive,
(spontaneous) flammable, explosive
31
Information down the supply chain
Technical Data Sheet for Application Material
Safety Data Sheet Accompanying Letter
32
Material safety data sheet (MSDS)
  • Information about substance properties and
    occupational safety measures.
  • Problem Handling of nano properties is not
    regulated
  • Usual MSDS states This substance has no
    dangerous properties
  • Standard test methods are used to derive risks
  • Measures are not justified with risks

33
Existing threshold limit values (TLVs)
  • TLVs for poorly soluble dusts/fibers with
    specific toxicity
  • Quartz 0.075 0.3 mg/m³
  • Silver (metal) 0.01 0.1 mg/m³
  • Asbestos 0.01 2 fibres/cm³
  • Generic TLVs dusts with no specific toxicity
  • Inhalable dust/total dust 4 - 15 mg/m³
  • Respirable fraction (fine dust, lung) 1.5 - 10
    mg/m3e. g. for titanium dioxide, graphite, iron
    oxide
  • Covering also the nano sized fraction
  • Legally binding TLVs specifically for
    nanomaterials are very rare (Amorphous silica 2
    to 6 mg/m³)

4.6/Baron
33
34
Approaches for setting a TLV for nanomaterials (1)
  • Draft exposure limits from NIOSH (USA, 2005)
  • for titanium dioxide
  • Nanoscale titanium dioxide 0.1 mg/m3
  • Microscale titanium dioxide 1.5 mg/m3
  • Potency factor 15 between nanoparticles and
    microparticles based on long-term in vivo studies
  • Reduction of risk of lung cancer below 1 in 1000
  • Surface determines toxicity potential

4.6/Baron
34
35
Approaches for setting a TLV for nanomaterials (2)
  • Benchmark levels (BL) from BSI (UK, 2007) for
    four
  • classes of nanomaterials
  • Nano-BL
  • Fibrous nanomaterials (high aspect ratio) 0.01
    fibres/cm3
  • Nano-BL in relation to established TLVs
  • Insoluble nanomaterials 0.066 of TLV (NIOSH
    relation of 15)
  • CMAR nanomaterials 0.1 of TLV
  • Soluble nanomaterials 0.5 of TLV

4.6/Baron
35
36
Nano dialog
  • Stakeholder dialogNGO, Researcher, Industry,
    Other involved persons
  • Leaded by the Nano commission (temporary project
    group)
  • Three Working parties on
  • Chances for environment and health
  • Risks and safety research
  • Principles for a responsible use of nanomaterials
  • First period 2006 2008, will be elongated to
    2010
  • First Report just released

4.6/Baron
36
37
Nano commission Five basic Principles for a
Responsible Use of Nanomaterials
  1. Defined Responsibility and management disclosed
    (Good Governance)
  2. Transparency regarding nanotechnology relevant
    Information, Data and Processes
  3. Willingness to the dialogue with Interest groups
  4. Established Risk management
  5. Responsibility down the supply chain

4.6/Baron
37
38
Thanks to
  • My co-workers at BAuA
  • Dr Torsten Wolf (Hazardous substances management)
  • Dr Rolf Packroff (Hazardous and biological
    substances)
  • Dr Bruno Orthen (Toxicology)
  • Judith kleine Balderhaar (Database research)
  • Sabine Plitzko (Measurement)
  • Dr. Eva Lechtenberg-Auffahrt (Occupational safety)

4.6/Baron
38
39
Further questions
Miriam Baron Federal Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (BAuA) Unit 4.6 Hazardous
Substances Management Friedrich-Henkel-Weg
1-25D-44149 Dortmund Germany mail-to
baron.miriam_at_baua.bund.de www
http//www.baua.de
4.6/Baron
39
40
Useful links/sources
  • Questionaire
  • http//www.baua.de/nn_49456/en/Topics-from-A-to-Z/
    Hazardous-Substances/Nanotechnology/pdf/survey.pdf
  • Guidance
  • http//www.vci.de/Default2cmdget_dwnlddocnr121
    306fileLeitfadenNano5Fengl5FFINAL2Epdf.htm
  • Nano-Dialog
  • http//www.bundesumweltministerium.de/english/nano
    technology/nanodialog/doc/40549.php
  • Other
  • http//www.baua.de/en/Topics-from-A-to-Z/Hazardous
    -Substances/Nanotechnology/Nanotechnology.html?__n
    nntrue__nnntrue
  • http//www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/safew
    ork/ctrl_banding/toolkit/other_toolkits/nanotool_s
    ynopsis.pdf
  • http//www.bmu.de/gesundheit_und_umwelt/nanotechno
    logie/doc/37643.php
  • http//www.baua.de/nn_39406/en/Topics-from-A-to-Z/
    Hazardous-Substances/TRGS/pdf/Hazardous-Substances
    -Ordinance.pdf
  • http//www.vci.de/template_downloads/tmp_VCIIntern
    et/122301Guidance20SDS20for20Nanomaterials20_0
    620March202008DokNr122301p101.pdf
  • http//www.bmbf.de/en/nanotechnologie.php
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com