Title: Promotion and Tenure
1Promotion and Tenure
- Stephen A. Lerner, M.D.
- Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs
- WSU School of Medicine
2Significance of Promotion (and Tenure)
- Recognition of academic accomplishment and
advancement by faculty members at the Department
and School levels - Recognition and commitment by the University PT
Committee and the Provost (and the Board of
Governors) - Promotion raise
3Faculty Tracks
- Know your track!
- Research-Educator
- Clinician-Educator
- Research
- Track is stated explicitly by the Chair in the
Letter of Offer which you sign at the time of
appointment - The criteria for appointment and promotion depend
on the rank and track - Refer to the Factors and Guidelines for Promotion
4Curriculum Vitae (CV)
- The official record of your academic career
- Use WSU format (for ease and efficiency of
review) - Assure accuracy (inaccuracies jeopardize
credibility) - The CV can be updated at any stage in the review
process, up to the review by the WSU PT Committee
5Scholarship
- Important for all faculty, but less emphasis for
Clinician-Educators - Omit submitted manuscripts, but include submitted
grant proposals - Include accepted articles (in press)
- No expectation of prescribed numbers of papers or
grants
6Scholarship (2)
- The SOM Executive Committee looks for focus of
interest and accomplishment, and at the
trajectory of papers over time (consistency, esp.
recently) - A disproportionate excess of abstracts over
published papers (i.e., abstracts not converted
to publications) raises a red flag
7Teaching
- Important for all faculty, esp.
Clinician-Educators - Teaching Portfolio
- Documentation of quantity and impact
(evaluations by learners by peers, if available)
- Documentation of innovative teaching and/or
curriculum development
8Service
- Department
- School of Medicine
- University
- DMC or VA
- Profession (includes external visibility)
- Scholarly (editorial board, study section,
abstract reviewer, scientific program organizer) - Society committees
9Explain
- You know yourself better than anyone else.
- The reviewers will not always understand the
significance of an entry in the CV. - For publications, provide an explanation of
quality, significance, and impact,either in the
CV, in an appended personal statement, and/or the
Chairs letter. - For multi-authored publications, grants, and
contracts, indicate in the CV your contribution
and role. For instance, for clinical studies
design and execution of the study, analysis of
the data, role in writing the publication.
10Personal Statement
- Not required at this time, but recommended to
convey your view of your academic career and
where you are heading. - Set your evaluation materials in the perspective
of your discipline, so an outside evaluator
understands the big picture of your academic life
and the relationships among the various
components. - Can also be used for self-evaluation and for
helping others to mentor you.
11Personal Statement (2)
- Possible points to consider
- What am I doing?
- Why am I doing it?
- How am I doing it (methods/strategies)?
- How well am I doing it?
- Where am I going in this aspect of my career?
- Where am I going overall? What is my vision?
What do I want to accomplish?
12External Review Letters
- Extremely important!
- Candidate and Chair (or designee) provide six
names, contact information, and position and
qualifications all reviewers must be at or above
the rank to which the candidate is to be promoted
- The Department solicits three, and the Exec.
Comm. solicits three - Reviewers should not have any direct academic
relationship with the candidate (e.g., mentor,
former departmental colleague, collaborator)
13External Review Letters (2)
- The most credible letters critically review the
scholarly (and teaching, if known)
accomplishments of the candidate - It adds credibility if the writer mentions
his/her prior experience on a PT Committee - Very helpful if the writer concludes with a
statement that the candidate would surely be
promoted in a comparable track at his/her
institution (or even would be competitive)
14PT Process
- Promotion package is initiated by Department
- CV, TP, and 3 external review letters are
reviewed by Dept. PT Committee - If approved by PT Comm., Dept. Chairs letter of
support (very important) accompanies the package
to SOM Executive Committee - Exec. Comm. (EC) of the Fac. Senate functions as
the SOM PT Committee - Package (plus 3 additional external letters
solicited by the SOM) is reviewed by PT Comm. in
early Dec. - If denied, can be appealed in Jan.
- If approved (2/3 vote), sent to WSU with EC Chair
letter
15PT Process (2)
- WSU PT Comm. reviews packages in March-April
- Provost reviews decisions and can overrule
President is the ultimate judge, but rarely
intervenes - Congratulations! Promotion is effective in
August
16Faculty Development Environment
17Current Activities
18Manuscript Writing Course
- Faculty with data ready for writing
- Each participant is matched with an individual
faculty mentor - Six monthly didactic and interactive sessions
- Regular assignments and deadlines
19Welcome to Wayne SOM New Faculty Orientation
20Workshop Academic Documentation for Annual
Merit Review and Promotion and Tenure
ProcessesPowerPoint Presentations on Faculty
Senate websitehttp//www.med.wayne.edu/faculty_s
enate/ Streaming video available on SOM
websitehttp//www.med.wayne.edu/news_media/strea
mingmedia/somevents/index.asp
21Faculty Affairs Website (Soon to go live)
- Directory of SOM, WSU, regional, and national
resources and information for faculty - Research
- Teaching
- Career development
- Link to Faculty Senate website
- Online resources
22Future Activities
- Repeat manuscript writing course annually
- Offer new faculty orientation programs annually
or semiannually - Maintain and improve faculty affairs website
- Offer leadership development programs
- Offer teaching improvement programs
23For any questions regarding faculty issues
- Contact
- Stephen A. Lerner, M.D.
- Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs
- slerner_at_med.wayne.edu