Kein Folientitel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Kein Folientitel

Description:

Ralf Bennartz1, Tom Greenwald2, Andrew Heidinger3, Chris O'Dell1, Martin Stengel1, Kenneth Campana4, Peter Bauer5. 1: Atmos. ... Including Cloud liquid water ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:14
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: rene161
Category:
Tags: folientitel | kein | ralf

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Kein Folientitel


1
Towards passive microwave radiance assimilation
of clouds and precipitation Ralf Bennartz1, Tom
Greenwald2, Andrew Heidinger3, Chris ODell1,
Martin Stengel1, Kenneth Campana4, Peter
Bauer5 1 Atmos. Oceanic Sci.,University
of Wisconsin 2 CIMSS,University of Wisconsin 3
NOAA/NESDIS 4 NOAA/NCEP 5 ECMWF
2
  • Outline
  • Introduction
  • Comparison of different models for cloud/precip
    assimilation
  • Accuracy
  • Speed
  • Phase function
  • Slant path
  • Including Cloud liquid water/precipitation
    First results
  • Biases GFS/AMSR under cloud-free and cloudy
    conditions
  • MSG SEVIRI
  • Status
  • Plans for year 3

3
Definitions
Gas Absorption properties
Radiative Transfer
Particle scattering properties
4
GFS interface against OPTRAN-RT (gas absorption
only) (Sanity check for our implementation)
5
OPTRAN-RT versus Eddington (gas absorption only)
Difference 89 GHz
6
Speed Test (SOI versus Eddington)
7
Accuracy of Results (Eddington and SOI versus
Monte-Carlo model)
8
  • Comparisons satellite/simulations including cloud
    liquid water
  • Screening strategy
  • Stay within 1.0 hours between GFS forecast and
    AMSU/ AMSR observation
  • Use CLAVR-X (Heidinger, 2003) AVHRR gridded cloud
    product to find boxes that are at least 95
    cloudy (or at maximum 5 cloudy for cloud-free)
  • Compare AMSU-A/B window frequencies and AMSU-B
    183 X GHz water vapor absorption channels

9
  • First assessment of AMSR versus GFS (period Jan
    2004)
  • (cloud-free 6.9, 10.7, 18.7 GHZ versus scan
    position)

10
  • First assessment of AMSR versus GFS (period Jan
    2004)
  • (cloud-free 23, 36, 89 GHZ versus scan position)

11
  • Simulation example forward and adjoint

12
  • Simulation example forward and adjoint

13
  • HG versus Mie phase function

14
  • Comparison MSG-SEVIRI versus GFS
  • June 2004
  • SOI
  • RTTOV-8 gas absorption
  • Only cloud-free so far

15
  • Infrared MSG SEVIRI No. of cloud-free obs,
  • June 2004

16
  • Infrared MSG SEVIRI

17
  • Infrared MSG SEVIRI

Channel RMSE K Bias K
6.2 1.93 0.22
7.3 1.91 -1.25
8.7 1.54 1.17
10.8 1.38 0.73
12.0 1.37 0.64
13.4 1.37 1.06
18
  • Infrared MSG SEVIRI BIAS mid-trop WV

19
  • Infrared MSG SEVIRI BIAS window

20
  • Infrared MSG SEVIRI BIAS CO2

21
  • Status after year 2
  • Fast RT models (SOI) developed, tested and
    integrated in CRTM
  • Tangent linear and adjoint model developed,
    tested, and integrated in CRTM
  • Bias statistics for passive microwave
  • Initial results also for infrared SEVIRI
    cloud-free

22
  • Plans for year 3
  • Monitor bias statistics over longer time
    period,especially
  • Fully include scattering (need more complete GFS
    input data)
  • Biases in IR including scattering
  • Precipitation assimilation
  • Include cloud diagnostics to generate
    precipitation rate
  • 1DVAR loop to optimize moisture profiles versus
    direct assimilation?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com