Bild 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Bild 1

Description:

'The idea of communicating scientific ideas as a 'paper' is an ancient one. ... calls for papers on: X 'Open access serves the interests of all: readers, authors, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: stig2
Category:
Tags: bild

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bild 1


1
  • Från papper till web och från prenumeration till
    Open Access
  • Några erfarenheter av arbete som chefredaktör
    under 10 år
  • Stig Wall.
  • Professor i epidemiologi

2
(Går)dagens Metafor KUNSKAP som ett
papper KUNSKAP som produkt KUNSKAP som
ägodel (John Wilbanks, Science Commons,
IATUL, Juni 2007)
3
  • (Går)dagens Metafor
  • KUNSKAP som ett papper
  • KUNSKAP som produkt
  • KUNSKAP som ägodel
  • SKAPAD av forskare
  • ÄGD av förläggare
  • ARKIVERAD av bibliotek
  • (John Wilbanks, Science Commons, IATUL, Juni
    2007)

4
(No Transcript)
5
  • Nya Metaforer
  • Kunskap som ett NÄTVERK
  • Kunskap som INFRASTRUKTUR
  • The idea of communicating scientific ideas as a
    paper is an ancient one. But the need to
    compress information to a single flat plane
    evaporates with the Internetwe still remain
    focused on the article as PDF, a digitization
    of the metaphor of paper. . the potential roles
    that libraries might play in the evolution of a
    science commons.
  • (John Wilbanks, Science Commons, IATUL, Juni
    2007)

6
(No Transcript)
7
  • Tre dimensioner på hälsoklyftan
  •  
  •  
  •  Hälsan själv
  • Forskningsresurserna
  • Hälsoinformationen

8
(No Transcript)
9
For one billion people living in the worlds
poorest countries, where the burden of disease is
highest, those who are born or who die are still
not counted (Indepth,1998)
10
THE HEALTH RESEARCH DISEQUILIBRIUM
Researchers in eight industrialised countries
produce 85 of the worlds leading science 163
countries, including most of the developing
world, account for less than 2.5

(www.scidev.net).
11
When a single observer from a developing country
systematically reviewed all the 1509 articles
published in four leading journals JAMA, NEJM,
BMJ and Lancet -
12
THE HEALTH RESEARCH DISEQUILIBRIUM
There is evidence of bias against diseases of
poverty in the leading medical journals. The
frequency of articles relevant to developing
countries was - 0 for Annals of Internal
Medicine - 2 for JAMA - 4 for NEJM - 6 for
BMJ - 16 for Lancet (The Lancet 2003 361712-3)
13
Collaboration in tropical medicine by
development level of country (n2384 articles in
the six leading journals)


High only
Medium only
High and medium
Low only
High and Low
Medium and Low
High, medium and Low
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
of articles
BMJ 20043281229-32
14
Thus, the content of medical journals vastly
under-represents the diseases affecting
populations in developing countries.
15
(No Transcript)
16
Editorial Board of Scand J Public Health 2000
-2007
Co-editor
Editor in Chief
Co-editor
Editorial Assistant
Managing Editor
Co-editor
Co-editor
Co-editor
17
(No Transcript)
18
Incoming manuscripts by year
2005 (n251)
2005 (n251)
2005 (n251)
2005 (n251)
2005 (n251)
2004 (n205)
2003 (n163)
2002 (n156)
2001 (n141)
2000 (n131)
2006
2006
2006
2006
(n58)
(n58)
(n58)
(n58)
Jan
Feb
March
April
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
19
Decisions about manuscripts submitted 2000-2006
(editorials excluded)

Rejection rate ()
No of manuscripts
100
300
250
80
200
60
150
40
100
20
50
0
0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Rejection rate
Rejected
Accepted
Not decided
Reconsidered
20
Review process of all 985 manuscripts submitted
2000 - 1 Sep 2005
Delay in days
Peer-reviews (n579)
120
111.8
100
79.4
In-house decisions after external review (n212)
77.3
80
65.8
60
40
26.8
14.1
15.5
In-house rejections (n194)
20
0
Finding first reviewer
Finding last reviewer
Receiving from last reviewer
Suggestion to co-editor
Answer to author
21
Submitted
772
In-house rejection
Rejection after review
Accept with changes
Reconsider
122
320
185
145
Accepted
Accepted
149
145
Accepted 294/772 38
22
(No Transcript)
23
OPEN ACCESS BENEFITS
24
OPEN ACCESS BENEFITS
VISIBILITY Free from access barriers the work
can potentially reach the global network of
researchers in a field giving maximum visibility.
25
OPEN ACCESS BENEFITS
VISIBILITY Free from access barriers the work
can potentially reach the global network of
researchers in a field giving maximum visibility.
EASY ARCHIVING Most academic institutions now
require researchers to archive their work in an
institutional or subject repository. OA
facilitates that on authors behalf.
26
OPEN ACCESS BENEFITS
VISIBILITY Free from access barriers the work
can potentially reach the global network of
researchers in a field giving maximum visibility.
EASY ARCHIVING Most academic institutions now
require researchers to archive their work in an
institutional or subject repository. OA
facilitates that on authors behalf.
RE-USE OF RESEARCH WORK OA articles are
published according to a Creative
Commons License, which allows authors and others
to re-use the work without permission, as long as
the author is recognized.
27
OPEN ACCESS BENEFITS
HIGH IMPACT Several studies show that Open
Access leads to higher citation rates.
VISIBILITY Free from access barriers the work
can potentially reach the global network of
researchers in a field giving maximum visibility.
EASY ARCHIVING Most academic institutions now
require researchers to archive their work in an
institutional or subject repository. OA
facilitates that on authors behalf.
RE-USE OF RESEARCH WORK OA articles are
published according to a Creative
Commons License, which allows authors and others
to re-use the work without permission, as long as
the author is recognized.
28
OPEN ACCESS BENEFITS
HIGH IMPACT Several studies show that Open
Access leads to higher citation rates.
VISIBILITY Free from access barriers the work
can potentially reach the global network of
researchers in a field giving maximum visibility.
EASY ARCHIVING Most academic institutions now
require researchers to archive their work in an
institutional or subject repository. OA
facilitates that on authors behalf.
DEMOCRACY Publishing OA, directly contributes to
the democratization of knowledge, and helps
reduce the digital divide between rich and poor
nations.
RE-USE OF RESEARCH WORK OA articles are
published according to a Creative
Commons License, which allows authors and others
to re-use the work without permission, as long as
the author is recognized.
29
OPEN ACCESS BENEFITS
HIGH IMPACT Several studies show that Open
Access leads to higher citation rates.
VISIBILITY Free from access barriers the work
can potentially reach the global network of
researchers in a field giving maximum visibility.
EASY ARCHIVING Most academic institutions now
require researchers to archive their work in an
institutional or subject repository. OA
facilitates that on authors behalf.
DEMOCRACY Publishing OA, directly contributes to
the democratization of knowledge, and helps
reduce the digital divide between rich and poor
nations.
RE-USE OF RESEARCH WORK OA articles are
published according to a Creative
Commons License, which allows authors and others
to re-use the work without permission, as long as
the author is recognized.
AFFORDABILITY GHA strives to maintain fair
publishing fees and offers partial and full
waivers for those authors facing an undue
financial burden.
30
Our Vision
31
International Advisory Board
Krisela Steyn, South Africa
Ruth Bonita, New Zeeland
Wendy Graham, Scotland
Jane Menken, USA
Tom Pearson, USA
Tedros Gebreyesus, Ethiopia
Rainer Sauerborn, Germany
Stig Pramming, UK
Vinod Diwan, Sweden
Osman Sankoh, Ghana
Heiko Becher, Germany
32
X
calls for papers on
Health information the foundations of health
research Health determinants the
epidemiological risks and benefits Health
interventions the actions for health and their
outcomes Environmental change and health - the
impacts of global physical and biological
changes Health and gender systems the effects
of gender on health and health care
33
Open access serves the interests of all
readers, authors, teachers, students, libraries,
universities, funding agencies and ultimately
governments and citizens. It increases the
visibility of individual authors work key
resources are equally accessible to rich and
poor the mission of most universities to
disseminate and share knowledge is facilitated,
and funders (including governments) are
given return on investment. Can we afford not
to? Excerpt from Inaugural Editorial Global
Health Action , 2008
34
Currently 38 sites in 19 countries 22 sites in
Africa 9 sites in Asia 1 site in Oceania 1 site
in Latin America
Over 2,000,000 people under surveillance
INDEPTH Network
35
(No Transcript)
36
www.globalhealthaction.net
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com