SLHC tracking issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SLHC tracking issues

Description:

Phase 0: max performance w/o hardware changes to the LHC. Increase B to 9 T E to 7.54 TeV ... Phase 1: max performance while keeping the LHC arcs. b* = 0.5 0.25 m ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: dang5
Category:
Tags: slhc | issues | tracking

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SLHC tracking issues


1
SLHC tracking issues
  • Regina Demina,
  • University of Rochester
  • International Workshop on Future Hadron
    CollidersPhysics, Detectors, Machines

2
Outline
  • Accelerator upgrade stages
  • Requirements on tracking
  • Radiation hard RD
  • Electronics issues
  • System integration issues
  • Summary
  • AIaction item (to be addressed in future
    workshops)

3
LHC upgrade stages
  • LHC performance
  • 7 TeV beam
  • Beam-beam tune spread 0.01
  • 1.1 E11 p/bunch
  • L 1E34 cm-1 s-1
  • Phase 0 max performance w/o hardware changes to
    the LHC
  • Increase B to 9 T ? E to 7.54 TeV
  • Increase bunch intensity to 1.7E11p/bunch ?
    L2.3E34
  • O. Brüning et al., LHC Luminosity and Energy
    Upgrade a Feasibility Report, LHC Project Report

4
LHC upgrade stages
  • Phase 1 max performance while keeping the LHC
    arcs
  • b 0.5 ?0.25 m
  • Crossing angle 300 mrad?425 mrad (essential at
    decreased b to minimize long range collisions)
  • Bunch intensity at 1.7 E11 ? L 3.3 E34 cm-2 s-1
  • Bunch crossing interval 25 ?12.5 ns
  • Increased intensity and other modifications L4.7
    E34 cm-2 s-1
  • Phase 2 max performance with major hardware
    changes to LHC
  • Modify injectors
  • Superconduct magnets for SPS (injection E?1TeV)
  • Mech and dynamic aperture changes ?x2 in L
  • L 1.0 E35 cm-2 s-1 by 2015
  • New superconducting dipoles E?14 TeV (a lot more
    RD is needed) not considered in this discussion

5
Tracking in SuperLHC1. Radiation damage
  • Design luminosity 10xLHC
  • Running time ½ LHC (5 years)
  • Radiation dose 5xLHC
  • Inner layers of SiTrk (r20cm) are expected to be
    operated at bias voltage 600V after 10 years of
    LHC
  • SuperLHC ? 3kV (?!)
  • Need replacement
  • Need improved more rad hard technology
  • The goal is to maintain tracking and b-tagging
    performance

6
Tracking in SuperLHC 2. Granularity
R20 cm
  • With collider energy and/or luminosity increase
    the emphasis shifts towards higher energy jets.
  • Energetic jets are more collimated ? need higher
    granularity
  • A.I. Local occupancy is more critical. Need to
    understand for typical jet E for objects at the
    threshold of sensitivity (e.g. use 7th heavy
    quark MQ production model)

7 of tracks in 500 GeV jets have merged hits
2.5 of tracks in 100 GeV jets
7
Possible detector configuration
  • What to replace?
  • Most likely 100 of the tracking system
  • Lifetime (no relation to radiation damage) of Si
    systems so far lt3-4 years, LHC8-10 years
  • Increase granularity
  • Electronics compatibility
  • To fix all the problems that are not known now
  • Scaling law radiation 1/r2
  • Rlt20 cm new technology
  • 20ltRlt60 cm pixels
  • Rgt60 microstrips (with some technology pushing)

8
Directions in Tracking RD
  • Use of defect engineering silicon
  • E.g. DOFZ is now used for ATLAS pixels,
    possibility for CMS
  • 3D and new biasing schemes
  • New sensor materials
  • Significant success with CVD diamonds
  • Cryogenic Silicon Tracker development
  • Lazarus effect x10 increase in rad hardness
  • Monolithic pixel detectors
  • Sensorreadout on the same silicon substrate (no
    bump bonding)

9
Why now?
  • CMS SiTrk detectors design time line
  • RD2 report 1994
  • CMS technical proposal - 1994
  • RD20 report - 1995
  • RD48 report 1997
  • Start construction phase 2003
  • Start data taking 2007 199413years
  • SuperLHC start data taking 2015
  • RD?? report 2015-132001
  • RD50 is formed 10/02 to address the needs of
    Super LHC

10
RD50
  • Approved by CERN 06/2002
  • 52 institutions, 5 from US (Fermilab, Purdue,
    Rutgers, Syracuse, BNL)
  • Areas of research
  • Material engineering
  • Oxygenation, si carbite
  • Device engineering
  • Pad, 3D, thin detectors
  • Rad hard technologies used for LHC are not
    completely characterized

11
RD50
12
Radiation damage microscopic defects
13
Radiation damage
Leakage current grows with rad dose P-type
impurities concentration increases, sensor goes
through n?p type inversion and then depletion
voltage grows indefinitely Annealing Reverse
annealing
14
Oxygen enriched silicon
  • DOFZ (Diffusion Oxygenated Float Zone) O
    1016-1017 cm-3
  • Introduced to HEP in 1999
  • Slows down V depl growth after type inversion

Reverse annealing delayed and saturated at high
fluences
15
Device Engineering 3D detectors
  • Electrodes
  • Narrow columns along detector thickness 3D
  • Diameter 10 mm, distance 50-100 mm
  • Lower Vdepl
  • Thicker detector possible
  • Fast signal

16
CVD diamonds
  • Good progress lately Main issues charge
    collection distance reached 250 um
  • S/N 8/1
  • Very radiation hard
  • Resolution improves (!) after 2E15 p/cm-2
  • Pretty

17
Electronics issues
  • 0.25 um ? 0.13 um
  • 0.25 um might not be available on SLHC time scale
    or even worse only few vendors will be left
  • 0.13 um more rad hard
  • Tracker in L1 trigger
  • Binary? ATLAS experience will tell
  • Power supplies (why do they always become an
    issue)
  • AIs
  • Cost of 0.13 um development is very high
  • must managed cooperatively
  • Power consumption at 80 MHz
  • Signal level
  • At 1V every welder in your neighborhood is your
    signal

18
System integration issues
  • Large complex systems cannot be treated just as
    the sum of the parts
  • Installed in experiment detector systems exhibit
    features not present in laboratory testing
  • Commissioning is becoming a lengthy process 1-1.5
    years
  • Why we are never able to get to b-tagging
    efficiency seen in Monte Carlo?

19
Examples of integration issues
  • SuSy will jump at you after 2-3 weeks of LHC data
    taking
  • Not the first two weeks

DØ
Susy? No, calorimeter noise
  • Silicon tracker (WSMT) ?? calorimeter cross
    talk
  • Welders

20
Examples of integration issues
  • CDF L00 signal carried by analogue cables
  • Readout the whole L00
  • Fit pedestals with Chebyshev polynomials
  • Another interesting story
  • Resonance Lorentz force ? wirebond breaks

21
AI on integration
  • A lot of experience gained by Tevatron
  • on integration and commissioning of large
    detector systems
  • Statistics of failure modes (e.g. 12 of a system
    lot due to poor cable connection)
  • grounding
  • Documentation
  • System integration is a worthy RD project

22
Summary
  • LHC upgrades will deliver x10 in L and possibly
    x2 in energy
  • Most likely entire tracking systems of both high
    Pt experiments will have to be replaced
  • Requirements to tracking upgrades
  • Radiation hardness
  • Higher granularity
  • Fast response
  • RD program has started
  • RD50 silicon detectors
  • RD42 good progress with CVD diamonds
  • Electronics 0.25 ? 0.13 um transition
  • System integration must be given high priority

23
Action Items
  • Understand local occupancy for typical jet E for
    objects at the threshold of sensitivity (e.g. use
    7th heavy quark MQ production model)
  • Electronics
  • Cost of 0.13 um submissions
  • Power consumption
  • Signal and noise levels
  • Integration
  • Documentation of Tevatron experience
  • RD task
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com