Reconstructive memory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Reconstructive memory

Description:

'Did the car stopped at a yield (or stop) sign?' Phase III - Recognition. Stop sign vs Yield sign ... explicit - free recall and recognition. Compared - normal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:12
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: chsbs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reconstructive memory


1
Reconstructive memory
  • Another insight.
  • We dont just activate what we encoded.
  • We reconstruct.
  • Often inaccurate.

2
Eyewitness memory
  • Loftus
  • Phase I - Car stopping at an intersection.
  • Either stop (or yield) sign.
  • Phase II - Questions
  • Did the car stopped at a yield (or stop) sign?
  • Phase III - Recognition
  • Stop sign vs Yield sign
  • Phase II often influences Phase III

3
False Memory
  • Roediger and McDermott (1995)
  • Water, stream, lake, Mississippi, boat, tide,
    swim, flow, run, barge, creek, fish, bridge,
    winding
  • Stream? Creek? Lake? River?
  • Confidence level is high.

4
Why?
  • Implicit activation during encoding.
  • Reconstructive memory
  • Fuzzy trace theory
  • Verbatim memory
  • Gist memory

5
Flashbulb memory
  • Emotional events.
  • Remember like taking a photograph.
  • Accurate?
  • Maybe or maybe not.

6
Implicit memory
  • Unconscious retrieval - indirect test
  • Big question
  • How do you know implicit is different from
    explicit?
  • Answer
  • Experimental dissociation
  • single dissociation
  • double dissociation

7
Single dissociation
  • One variable X affects one memory test but not
    the other test.
  • Test A
  • X
  • Test B

8
Double dissociation
  • One variable Xaffects one memory test but the
    other variable Y affects the other test.
  • X Test A
  • Y Test B

9
  • Double dissociation is more difficult to obtain
    than single dissociation.
  • Most of the evidence - single dissociation.

10
Jacoby (1983)
  • Used
  • implicit test - Perceptual identification
  • explicit test - recognition test
  • Manipulated - Study method
  • Generate - hot - c_____
  • Context - hot - cold
  • No context - xxxx - cold

11
  • Found
  • Explicit test - Generate gt Context gt No context
  • Implicit - No context gt Context gt Generate
  • Study method influences explicit and implicit
    tests differently.

12
Kihlstrom (1980)
  • Used
  • implicit test - free association
  • explicit test - free recall
  • Compared - hypnotizability
  • Very high
  • high
  • Medium/low

13
  • Procedure
  • Under hypnosis, they learned a list of words.
  • Then, post hypnotic suggestion - you forget the
    words.
  • After being awaken, they took the test.

14
  • Found single dissociation.

15
Warrington and Weiskrantz (1974)
  • Used
  • implicit - word stem completion word fragment
    completion
  • explicit - free recall and recognition
  • Compared - normal vs. amnesic
  • normal
  • amnesic - Korsakoff Brain damaged

16
  • Found
  • single dissociation
  • Amnesic patients have similar implicit memory as
    normal people.
  • Amnesic condition does not wipe out all memories.

17
Schacter et al. (1991)
  • Used pictorial material.
  • Implicit - perceptual decision (possible objects)
  • Explicit - recognition
  • Manipulated - studying method
  • perceptual - an object is facing left or right
  • conceptual - which category (e.g., furniture)

18
  • Found
  • Single dissociation
  • Encoding method influenced explicit memory but
    not implicit memory.

19
So, many concluded that..
  • Explicit and implicit memories are different
    types of memory.

20
Theories
  • What is the difference?
  • Tulving
  • Explicit - Retrieval from episodic memory
  • Used to store personal memories.
  • Encoding method matters.
  • Implicit - Activation of semantic memory
  • Used to comprehend language.
  • Encoding method does not matter.
  • Elephant is elephant no matter how you encode it.

21
  • Roediger
  • Implicit - Data driven process
  • Activation of perceptual trace.
  • The way it was presented matters.
  • E.g., modality effect
  • Auditory - Visual
  • Visual - Visual
  • Transfer appropriate processing

22
  • Explicit - Conceptually driven process.
  • Activation of conceptual trace - proposition.
  • It doesnt matter how it was presented.
  • No modality effect.
  • Anderson
  • Explicit - Declarative memory
  • You can make it conscious.
  • Study method - influences retrievability

23
  • Implicit - Procedural
  • You cannot make it conscious.
  • E.g., swimming
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com