Negotiating the Labor Agreement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Negotiating the Labor Agreement

Description:

Subcomponents of bargaining (Walton and McKersie 'A behavioral ... Distributive bargaining (win/loss) Integrative bargaining (win/win) Attitudinal structuring ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: usu98
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Negotiating the Labor Agreement


1
SECTION 2
  • Negotiating the Labor Agreement

2
Basic Outline of Most Negotiations
  • Posturing
  • Settling in
  • Finalization
  • Agreement
  • Impasse Resolution

3
Items to consider
  • Type of bargaining unit
  • Small/large unit
  • Single or multi-employer (conglomerate?)
  • Pattern established?
  • Choice of bargaining team

4
Formulating Proposals
  • Seek input from key administrative components
  • 1st line supervisors
  • Shop stewards/rank and file workers
  • Gather info of opponent and comparative data
    on
  • Economy
  • Industry
  • CBAs
  • Know your bargaining range

5
Processes in Negotiations
  • Subcomponents of bargaining (Walton and McKersie
    A behavioral theory of negotiations)
  • Distributive bargaining (win/loss)
  • Integrative bargaining (win/win)
  • Attitudinal structuring
  • Intra-organizational bargaining
  • Subcomponents reflected in messages
  • Does it translate into agreement?
  • Tactics can help, but other items affect your
    innate bargaining power.

6
What Affects Bargaining Power?
  • Unemployment
  • Reputation affects (image or goodwill)
  • Government intervention
  • Risk preferences of bargainers
  • TIME FOR A GRAPH

7
Y
V
X
V
8
Y
V
b
X
a
V
9
Y
Region of overlap is Contract Zone
V
b
If common threat pt. lies below v-boundary, CZ
will exist
X
a
V
10
Y
V
45 degree line highlights split the pie outcome
b
X
a
V
11
Y
Nash Bargaining equations Xah(V-a-b) Ybk(V-
a-b) Together they imply Y(b-(ak)/h)(k/h)x
V
b
X
a
V
12
Y
This Nash Bargaining Line Y(b-(ak)/h)(k/h)x Ide
ntifies the Nash outcome Note k/h is the slope
of the Nash line
V
b
X
a
V
13
Y
Slope of k/hgt1 implies better tactics of Player B
(i.e., a better outcome for a given CZ). Slope
of k/hlt1 implies better tactics of Player A
V
b
X
a
V
14
Y
What if Player A uses a strategy to increase
his/her threat point to a? Nash line goes
through new common threat point
V
b
X
a
a
V
15
Y
Player A is made better off
V
b
X
a
a
V
16
Y
Same is accomplished by reducing Player Bs
threat point (a,b) or by reducing both Players
threat points (a,b)
V
b
b
b
X
a
a
a
V
17
Benefits of Dixit and Skeath Model
  • Bargaining outcomes analyzed as a function of
  • Initial threat points (a and b)
  • Tactical abilities of bargainers (k and h)
  • Strategies..they can affect outcomes by varying
    threat points
  • Risk preferences.they can also be thought to
    affect initial location of threat points.
  • Note two risk loving bargainers will not have a
    contract zone..no agreement predicted

18
Ethics and good-faith
  • Bluffing and puffing considered o.k., but
    volunteering critical information can harm
    bargaining power, and misreprentation can be
    fraudulent.
  • NLRB has designated issues as
  • Illegal
  • Mandatory
  • Voluntary

19
What is good faith bargaining?
  • Its required on mandatory topics
  • Bad faith bargaining includes
  • Surface bargaining
  • No concessions offered
  • Unreasonable proposals
  • Unilateral changes
  • Bypassing official reps
  • Committing ULPs
  • NLRB considers totality of conduct
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com