Title: Negotiating the Labor Agreement
1SECTION 2
- Negotiating the Labor Agreement
2Basic Outline of Most Negotiations
- Posturing
- Settling in
- Finalization
- Agreement
- Impasse Resolution
3Items to consider
- Type of bargaining unit
- Small/large unit
- Single or multi-employer (conglomerate?)
- Pattern established?
- Choice of bargaining team
4Formulating Proposals
- Seek input from key administrative components
- 1st line supervisors
- Shop stewards/rank and file workers
- Gather info of opponent and comparative data
on - Economy
- Industry
- CBAs
- Know your bargaining range
5Processes in Negotiations
- Subcomponents of bargaining (Walton and McKersie
A behavioral theory of negotiations) - Distributive bargaining (win/loss)
- Integrative bargaining (win/win)
- Attitudinal structuring
- Intra-organizational bargaining
- Subcomponents reflected in messages
- Does it translate into agreement?
- Tactics can help, but other items affect your
innate bargaining power.
6What Affects Bargaining Power?
- Unemployment
- Reputation affects (image or goodwill)
- Government intervention
- Risk preferences of bargainers
- TIME FOR A GRAPH
7Y
V
X
V
8Y
V
b
X
a
V
9Y
Region of overlap is Contract Zone
V
b
If common threat pt. lies below v-boundary, CZ
will exist
X
a
V
10Y
V
45 degree line highlights split the pie outcome
b
X
a
V
11Y
Nash Bargaining equations Xah(V-a-b) Ybk(V-
a-b) Together they imply Y(b-(ak)/h)(k/h)x
V
b
X
a
V
12Y
This Nash Bargaining Line Y(b-(ak)/h)(k/h)x Ide
ntifies the Nash outcome Note k/h is the slope
of the Nash line
V
b
X
a
V
13Y
Slope of k/hgt1 implies better tactics of Player B
(i.e., a better outcome for a given CZ). Slope
of k/hlt1 implies better tactics of Player A
V
b
X
a
V
14Y
What if Player A uses a strategy to increase
his/her threat point to a? Nash line goes
through new common threat point
V
b
X
a
a
V
15Y
Player A is made better off
V
b
X
a
a
V
16Y
Same is accomplished by reducing Player Bs
threat point (a,b) or by reducing both Players
threat points (a,b)
V
b
b
b
X
a
a
a
V
17Benefits of Dixit and Skeath Model
- Bargaining outcomes analyzed as a function of
- Initial threat points (a and b)
- Tactical abilities of bargainers (k and h)
- Strategies..they can affect outcomes by varying
threat points - Risk preferences.they can also be thought to
affect initial location of threat points. - Note two risk loving bargainers will not have a
contract zone..no agreement predicted
18Ethics and good-faith
- Bluffing and puffing considered o.k., but
volunteering critical information can harm
bargaining power, and misreprentation can be
fraudulent. - NLRB has designated issues as
- Illegal
- Mandatory
- Voluntary
19What is good faith bargaining?
- Its required on mandatory topics
- Bad faith bargaining includes
- Surface bargaining
- No concessions offered
- Unreasonable proposals
- Unilateral changes
- Bypassing official reps
- Committing ULPs
- NLRB considers totality of conduct