Title: Background for climate negotiations
1Background for climate negotiations
2Content
- Science recap
- Dirty job
- One step backward
- Practicalities
3Science recap
4- .stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations
in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
dangerous anthropogenic interference with the
climate system. - Such a level should be achieved within a
time-frame sufficient to allow ecosystems to
adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that
food production is not threatened and to enable
economic development to proceed in a sustainable
manner.
5- The ultimate objective of this Convention and any
related legal instruments that the Conference of
the Parties may adopt is to achieve, in
accordance with the relevant provisions of the
Convention, stabilization of greenhouse gas
concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that
would prevent dangerous anthropogenic
interference with the climate system. Such a
level should be achieved within a time-frame
sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally
to climate change, to ensure that food production
is not threatened and to enable economic
development to proceed in a sustainable manner.
Environment
Society
Environment
Economy
Society
Economy
6Key messages of science (AR4, Stern)
- Human-induced change is unequivocal
- Faster than expected
- Impacts generally negative
- Compounding poverty, fragility, inequality
- Warming beyond 2C danger (EU promoted)
- Prevention is cheaper than cure (globally)
- Early action costs less than inaction
- Stern 5 to 20 times less (global estimate)
- Pathway to safety will knock lt3 off global GDP
growth to 2030 - lt0.12 per annum
7Global average temperature increases above 2C
are expected to cause significant ecological and
social disruption
14
Scenario A1B
IPCC AR4 worstcase scenarios
Temperature above preindustrial
1º C
2º C
3º C
4º C
5º C
1. Weather
More intense storms, forest fires, droughts,
flooding, and heat waves
2. Water
Changes in water availability, threatening up to
a billion people
Threat to local water supply as glaciers melt
Major cities around the world threatened by
sea-level rise
3. Food
Falling yields in many developed regions
Falling crop yields in many developing regions
4. Ecosystem
Ecosystems extensively and irreversibly damaged
Many more species face extinction
5. Social
More than a billion people may have to migrate
increasing the risk of conflicts
6. GDP
Loss of up to 20 of global GDP
Loss of GDP in developing countries
SOURCE Stern Review IPCC, 4TH Assessment
Report, Climate Change 2007 Synthesis Report
8Impacts evolution of knowledge (2001-2009)
9Sea level rise -projection
10Dirty job
11Projected global temperature increase
Continued global emission growth means1.1ºC -
6.4ºC global average temperature increase during
21st century
12Projected and observed fossil fuel emissions
13The Risk
Indicator Emissions Probability of ecxeeding 2ºC Probability of ecxeeding 2ºC
  Intervallum Representative case
Total CO2 emission 200049 886Â Gt CO2 837 20
 1,000 Gt CO2 1042 25
 1,158 Gt CO2 1651 33
 1,437 Gt CO2 2970 50
Total Kyoto gas emission 200049 1,356Â Gt CO2 eq. 837 20
 1,500 Gt CO2 eq. 1043 26
 1,678 Gt CO2 eq 1551 33
 2,000 Gt CO2 eq. 2970 50
- An emission budget of a trillion tonnes CO2
during the first 50 years of this century. - Of that budget, we already used up a third in
the first nine years - At present rates of emissions, we will use up
the remaining two-thirds in another 20 years, by
around 2030
14Current proposals leave us on track to 3 degrees
or more!
2050
Global GHG emissions and pathways for GHG
stability
GtCO2e per year
Low range of proposals
High range of proposals
Probability of temperature increase under 2C
Expected temperature increase
3.0C
15-30
2.0C
40-60
1.8C
70-85
Source IPCC WG3 AR4,, den Elzen, van Vuuren
Meinshausen Global GHG Abatement Cost Curve
v2.0 Catalyst analysis C-ROADS
15Delay in peaking of emissions
16The developing country financing need can be met
by a combination of direct and indirect carbon
market financing and public finance
Financing needs and sources assuming 25 caps in
developed countries, billion, annual average
2010-20 rounded to nearest 5 billion
- Could be delivered through
- Government offset purchases ( 5 billion)
potentially increased by market interventions (
0-5 billion) - AAU auctioning ( 5-30 billion) - as per
Norwegian proposal
10-15
65-100
10-20
- Could be mobilised through
- AAU offset purchases ( 5 billion)
- AAU market intervention ( 0-5 billion)
- AAU auctioning ( 5-30 billion) - as per
Norwegian proposal
5-15
55-80
5-20
10-20
45-50
10-20
10-25
Mitigation
Adaptation
Public fiscal revenues
Total need
Internat- ional transport levies
Concess-ional debt
Public finance
ETS auction revenues
Carbon market inter-ventions
Direct carbon markets
ETS markets
Source Project Catalyst analysis
17One step backward
18Per capita fossil fuel CO2 emissions
Today 1750-2007
19Interest groups top 25 footprints
Top 25 in Population
Top 25 in GDP
(Taiwan), Netherlands, Argentina
Turkey
USA, China, EU25, Russia, India, Japan, Germany,
Brazil, UK, Italy, France, Mexico, Indonesia,
Iran, Thailand
Canada, Rep. Korea, Australia, S.
Africa, Spain, Poland
Egypt, Nigeria, Vietnam, Philippines, Bangladesh,
Ethiopia, Pakistan
Myanmar, D.R.Congo
Top 25 in CO2 emissions (incl. LUCF)
Saudi Arabia, Malaysia
20Assessing the problem
- Negotiations are driven by science
- Growing confidence in IPCC assessments
- Caveat re Summary for policy-makers
- Motivation to act is highly variable
- Low spatial correlation between cause and effect
- Large variation in capacity to cope
- Many losers - but some short-term winners
21Debate of the appropriate response
- Mitigation or Adaptation?
- Mitigation division, confrontation
- Vulnerability unifying condition
- Adaptation unifying message
- Adaptation first?
22Lost in translation?
- Responsibility
- common but differentiated responsibilities
- historical responsibility (equity)
- responsibility for the future
- national circumstances,respective capabilities
- burdens or opportunities
23Mitigation strategyoptions
- 5. Targets
- National OR sectoral
- Absolute OR intensity
- 6. Policies
- Market-based (top-down) OR
- Technology-driven (bottom-up)
- 7. Vision
- Low-hanging fruit (energy efficiency, reducing
deforestation) OR - Low-carbon future technologies
24Effectiveness, fairness, responsibility,
potential (Data for 2000, 6 KP gases - except
1950-2000)Source CAIT
World emissions World emissions Tons per cap (tCO2e) Tons per cap (tCO2e) 1950-2000 cumulative CO2 - world T/cap 1950-2000 cumulative CO2 - world T/cap Intensity Kt/MGDP
Excl LUCF Incl LUCF Excl LUCF Incl LUCF Energy Energy Plus LUC Excl LUCF
USA 19.2 19.2 24.3 24.3 0.70
EU 25 13.2 13.2 10.5 10.5 0.46
Annex I 48.4 39.3 14.1 13.9 73.8 456 T/cap 52.6 457 T/cap 0.64
World 5.9 7.2 122 T/cap 171 T/cap 0.80
Non-Annex I 43.7 54.2 3.3 4.9 27.1 42 T/cap 47.6 103 T/cap 0.91
China 13.6 3.9 3.9 0.98
India 4.5 1.6 1.6 0.67
25Effectiveness, fairness, responsibility,
potential (Data for 2000, 6 KP gases - except
1950-2000)Source CAIT
World emissions World emissions Tons per cap (tCO2e) Tons per cap (tCO2e) 1950-2000 cumulative CO2 - world T/cap 1950-2000 cumulative CO2 - world T/cap Intensity Kt/MGDP
Excl LUCF Incl LUCF Excl LUCF Incl LUCF Energy Energy Plus LUC Excl LUCF
USA 19.2 19.2 24.3 24.3 0.70
EU 25 13.2 13.2 10.5 10.5 0.46
Russian Fed. 5.3 5.3 13.0 13.0 1.86
Japan 3.8 3.8 10.8 10.8 0.41
Annex I 48.4 39.3 14.1 13.9 73.8 456 T/cap 52.6 457 T/cap 0.64
Non-Annex I 43.7 54.2 3.3 4.9 27.1 42 T/cap 47.6 103 T/cap 0.91
China 13.6 3.9 3.9 0.98
India 4.5 1.6 1.6 0.67
Brazil 2.7 5.3 5.5 13.4 0.76
Indonesia 1.4 7.0 2.4 14.9 0.84
26(No Transcript)
27Strategic parameters
- Aim avoid dangerous interference
- Two aspects Mitigation Adaptation
- To limit climate change to safe (tolerable)
levels - So that the challenge of adaptation is manageable
- sustainable devt. and food security not
impaired - Criteria
- Inclusiveness (gt effective, fair)
- Solidarity
- Urgency .but
- Question safe, tolerable, manageable
- but for whom?
28Shared vision differentiated future
- Long-term mitigation goal (5050)
- Low-carbon future technology, markets and
finance - 2020 peak with current technologies (efficiency)
- New technologies market share or shared
remedies? (IPRs) - Market incentives vital but not enough
- Need for green FDI and more public finance
- Differentiated commitments in common framework of
accountability
29Practicalities
30Main actors Parties and coalitions
- Parties
- Coalitions
- Non-actors
- Lobbyist
- NGOs
- Media
31Major negotiating groups
- The Association of Small Island States AOSIS
- The European Union
- Umbrella Group, which emerged at Kyoto and
afterwards, brings the JUSSCANNZ countries except
Switzerland together with the Russian Federation
and Ukraine. - JUSSCANNZ consists of Japan, the Unites States,
Switzerland, Canada, Australia, Norway and New
Zealand - G-77/China
- Environmental Integrity Group Swiss, Mexico,
Korea - BASIC - Brazil, South Africa, India and China
The Secretariat of the UNFCCC
32Negotiating groups G-77, China
- Negotiating groups within the G77 China
- African Group which consists of 53 African
countries, which is mainly concerned with the
impacts of climate change - Group of Latin America and the Caribbean which
has 33 members and is primarily concerned with
economic development opportunities - Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) which
consists of 42 members which are the especially
vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and - Organization for Petroleum Exporting Countries
(OPEC) the members of which have a mutual concern
regarding the impact on the oil export revenue as
a result of reduced use of fossil fuel. - Least Developed Countries - countries with the
lowest income
33Regional groups
- Africa
- Asia
- Central and Eastern Europe
- Latin America and the Caribbean States (GRULAC)
- Western Europe and Others (WEOG)
34Bodies of the Convention
- Five bodies are established by the UNFCCC
- The supreme body of the UNFCCC is the Conference
of Parties (COP) - which meets every year and
- it is a supreme body of the UNFCCC.
- comprised of all Parties that have ratified the
Convention - The COP is supported by the Secretariat,
Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technical
Advice (SBSTA) and the Subsidiary Body for
Implementation (SBI) - SBSTA provides scientific, technical and
methodological advice to the COP - SBI assist with the assessment and review of the
implementation of the Convention - The two bodies (SBSTA and SBI) also work on
compliance, mechanisms and capacity building.
35Bodies of the Protocol
- Conference/Meeting of the Parties similar role
as COP under UNFCCC - The COP/MOP is supported by the Secretariat,
Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technical
Advice (SBSTA) and the Subsidiary Body for
Implementation (SBI) - SBSTA provides scientific, technical and
methodological advice to the COP/MOP and - the SBI assist with the assessment and review of
the implementation of the Protocol - JISC, CDM EB, Compliance committee
36Innovations of Bali
- AWG-LCA something new
- Extension of mandate in Copenhagen
- AWG-KP post 2012 structure of the Protocol
- Extension of mandate in Copenhagen
37Negotiating rules
- Submissions
- Interventions
- Informal meetings
- Coalition formation
- Horse trading
- Chairing
38Decision making process
- Formal rules of engagement
- Bodies, bodies and bodies
- UNFCCC
- Kyoto Protocol
- Regional representation
- Levels of negotiation
- Behind the curtains (off-record)
39Meetings the iceberg
40Practicalities
- Information sources
- Daily Programme
- ENB
- Screens
- Documents
- Deciphering abbreviations
- When to get what?
- What to read, leave aside
- Dramatic arrangements
- Food and drink, logistics
41Daily Programme
- Official meetings
- Informal groups
- Groups other than Convention and Protocol bodies
- Contact information
- Status report of consideration of agenda items
- Events
42Issues where to get the info?
- Annotated agenda
- Background information on the site of the
Convention (www.unfccc.int) - Document counter
- Ask the neighbour, whoever comes.
- The Screen
- Earth Negotiations Bulletin (www.iisd.ca) (Eco)
- Daily Programme
43Types of documents
- FCCC/CP or FCCC/CMP Provisional or regular
documents/agenda - INF.docs Information documents
- Misc.docs Miscellaneous documents
- Add. Addendum
- CRP Conference room papers
- L. Documents Limited documents
- Non-papers Informal documents
- TP Technical papers
44- Thank you!
- Jozsef Feiler
- feiler_at_obh.hu