Campaign Charts

1
Campaign Charts

• Ideas for Charts for Campaign Performance

2
Session
3
Session

• Ask questions anytime about any of the material.
• Would rather do less overheads and more
  discussion.
• Session will be more interesting for us all. More
  interaction more fun. (Especially if the
  deadly after lunch, late afternoon or end of
  conference session.)
• All slides and handouts also available on web
  site so you wont miss anything if we dont get
  through them all.

4
Handouts

• Handouts are not always handouts.
• Most reference a web site so you can print out or
  view without having to carry around.
• http//www .
• Some actually are handouts and will also be
  available on the web site.
• You wont miss anything.

5
History, Experience, Contact Info.
brian.dowling_at_utoronto.ca [phone]
6
U of T Backdrop

• 80 - 130 million raised annually.
• Decentralized advancement.24 distinct
  divisions.3 affiliated universities.Geographical
  ly disbursed.Other associated and legally
  related entities such as teaching hospitals.
• About 300 staff work within advancement.

7
U of T Backdrop

• 600,000 entities in database.
• 1.1 million pledge rows.
• 1.4 million payment rows.
• About 45 staff in the processing and technical
  support group.
• Central and decentralized data entry and
  maintenance.
• Other experience Small to mid to other larger
  organizations.

8
Lets Get Started
9
Benchmarking AgainstCampaigns of Similar Size
Institution 1 510 M (1999)
Institution 2 500 M (1998)
Your Institution 496 M (2004)
Institution 3 480 M (2002)
Institution 3 460 M (2003)
Institution 5 425 M (2003)
10
Benchmarking AgainstDonor Groups i.e. Giving per
Alumnus
Institution 1 15,500
Institution 2 14,400
Your Institution 13,000
Institution 3 12,000
Institution 3 11,500
Institution 5 10,000
11
Benchmarking AgainstDonor Groups i.e. Giving per
Student
Institution 1 5,500
Institution 2 4,400
Your Institution 3,000
Institution 3 2,000
Institution 3 1,500
Institution 5 0,000
12
Campaign History

• 2000, Pre-Campaign 100 Million
• 2002, Kickoff 125 Million
• 2003, Goal Increase 250 Million
• 2004, Final Total 300 Million

13
Progress to Goal
Close
Public
Kickoff
14
Annual Giving During Campaign
Close
15
Progress Overview

• Gifts Pledges 500,000,000
• Future Support 25,000,000
• Total 525,000,000
• Percentage of Goal 110.80

16
Donor Ratings and Realities
10 M (0) 1
5 M (2) 3
1 M (10) 12
500 K (25) 27
250 K (50) 43
100 K (100) 114
17
Units Meeting Goals
Architecture 110
Arts and Science 160
Athletics 120
Business 110
Education 80
Engineering 116
18
Units Totals
Architecture 110 Million
Arts and Science 80 Million
Athletics 65 Million
Business 160 Million
Education 56 Million
Engineering 140 Million
19
Endowments

• 154 Professorships
• 122 Fellowships
• 411 Scholarships
• 351 Other Restricted Endowments
• 100 Other Unrestricted Endowments

20
Capital Projects

• Library
• Computer Technology Laboratory
• Engineering Building
• Varsity Stadium
• Student Union Building
• Other Projects Completed

21
Gift Analysis

• Number of Gifts Received 560,000
• Number of Donors 283,000
• Average Gift Size 2,808
• Number of Multiple Donors 58,000
• Number of First Timer Donors 25,000
• Number of First Time Alumni Donors 23,000
• Percent Participation by Alumni 65

22
Gift Analysis

• Number of Million Dollar Donors 25
• Total Dollars Given 62 Million
• Percentage of Campaign60 of the dollars were
  given by 2of the donors.

23
Progress by Donor Group
24
Progress by Commitment Type
25
Progress by Restriction
26
Giving Societies

• Presidents Council8,556 have given 56.5 Million
• Deans Club10,556 have given 28.3 Million
• Faculty Club60,000 have given 20.6 Million

27
Awards Recognition

• Circle of Excellence for 3 Years in a Row
• Over 18 awards in alumni relations,
  communications, special events, medial relations.
• 28 Community Service Awards
• 186 Media Articles
• 380 Television News Coverage Events

28
Questions?
http//www.supportingadvancement.com services_at_supp
ortingadvancement.com