Diapositiva 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Diapositiva 1

Description:

Title: Diapositiva 1 Author: Martin Last modified by - - Created Date: 9/20/2005 11:41:18 AM Document presentation format: Presentazione su schermo – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Mart2253
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Diapositiva 1


1
RFX-mod in the European fusion programme
priorities for 2009 and medium-term plans
Piero Martin M.E. Puiatti on behalf of the
RFX-mod team Consorzio RFX- Associazione
Euratom-ENEA sulla fusione, Padova,
Italy RFX-mod 2009 programme seminar, Padova,
January 20-22, 2009
2
Welcome to a live facility!
  • 2008 rich of excellent results, which
  • met the goals of the program,
  • dramatically advanced our knowledge of RFP,
  • gave a brighter and clearer vision on its future,
  • and are having a significant impact on the
    broader fusion community.
  • We can build on that !

3
Info on the workshop
  • Margherita Basso, Federica Bonomo, Elisa Carlini
    and Alessandro Fassina
  • workshop organizers
  • Enrico Scek Osman and Paolo Barbato
  • Computer videoconference support
  • Agenda is tight please be on time with your
    talks, so we can have enough time for discussion
  • Informal meeting, feel free to ask whatever you
    want (more or less)
  • Group picture this morning _at_coffee break (next to
    RFX, follow the crowd)
  • Lunch at the RFX cantine (guests ask for ticket
    to Margherita)
  • Dinner tonight (we leave from here)

4
RFX timeline
  • 1991 - 1999 RFX operation
  • 2000 - 2004 Shut-down and upgrade
  • 2005 - now RFX-mod

5
The fusion-oriented RFX mission
  • understanding the RFP physics and optimizing
    confinement to assess the configuration reactors
    potentials
  • Providing state-of-the-art facilities for
    developing active control of MHD stability in
    fusion devices and in ITER in particular
  • contributing to the understanding of fusion
    science, in particular
  • to test tokamak physics at the extreme of low
    field
  • to improve predictive capabilities for the
    numerical tokamak
  • to study analogies and synergies with the
    stellarator

2008 IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Geneva - P.
Martin
6
Accomplishing the goal, supporting the missions
  • Since its restart at the end of 2004, RFX-mod has
    continuously progressed towards its goals, in
    particular in
  • Performance extension and understanding of RFP
    physics,
  • reliability of plasma operation,
  • ability of addressing key topics in MHD stability
    feedback control and
  • integration with the international fusion
    programme
  • ability of building an efficient and agreed
    programme
  • Guidelines for the RFX-mod programme are the
    seven missions identified in the EFDA
    work-programme and endorsed by the EU commission
    facility review panel

7
A positive 2008 !
  • A new regime (Single Helical Axis), discovered at
    Igt1 MA, provides a substantial improvement in
    confinement and robust core electron transport
    barriers.
  • Active MHD mode control has contributed to the
    improvement of RFX performance and to the tokamak
    effort
  • Induced rotation of RWMs
  • Benchmark of ITER codes
  • Advanced control modelling, in particular for
    multimode cases
  • Broad and supportive recognition of RFX-mod
    science and technology, both at European and
    international level
  • Increasing collaborations with tokamak and
    stellarator communities (both ways)
  • Excellent visibility at international conferences
    (EPS, APS, IAEA)
  • Increasing confidence in RFX-mod as a key player
    in the EU fusion program
  • Increasing effort on education (with very
    positive response!)

8
RFX-mod new physics at 1.5 MA
upgraded MHD active control 2008
with MHD active control 2006
no MHD active contro 2004l
  • (s)

A new regime is discovered, where the plasma
spontaneously self-organizes in a single-axis
helical state, with strongly improved core
confinement.
2008 IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Geneva - P.
Martin
9
A new boundary condition
  • RD Needs and Required Facilities for the
    Development of Fusion as an Energy Source
  • Report of the Fusion Facilities Review Panel
  • October 2008

10
The time-line of the facility review
  • It is conceivable and reasonable that within 5
    years we are in a position of making a statement
    on the RFP confinement at high current and on its
    perspectives, i.e. to complete the mission of
    the present device.
  • This is accompanied with the complementary effort
    in MST (current drive, advanced regimes,
    diagnostics.), and with the programs of T2R and
    RELAX
  • The time frame of the facility review report
    gives time to design a strategy based on the
    results of the present RFX-mod

11
From the facility review report
  • These ITER and DEMO priorities must be
    complemented by
  • Pursuing innovation for
  • Improving theoretical understanding based on
    first-principles
  • Developing novel solutions in physics and
    technology and unifying experimental and
    theoretical knowledge from different confinement
    schemes
  • Extending fusion physics and technology, and the
    relevant data bases.
  • New ideas from science driven RD, access to
    professional and academic excellence in the
    fusion disciplines and adjacent fields and
    intensive links to universities will be vital for
    optimal progress in the long-term development of
    fusion energy.
  • Maintaining and renewing the staffing basis of
    the Programme
  • The training of young scientists and engineers is
    a particularly important task for the long-term
    future of the programme.

12
From the facility review report
  • While recommending for the core projects a clear
    top-down RD planning, the Panel is aware that
    the overall research field is still too wide to
    rely exclusively on such an approach.
  • As a complementary part of the programme, there
    must be an effort of sufficient weight to explore
    more tentative perspectives for innovations and
    improvements in areas where RD options are still
    too open for exclusively pursuing target-oriented
    top-down approaches.
  • Unifying the knowledge from the experimental and
    theoretical work on different confinement schemes
    (in particular the Tokamak and the Stellarator,
    but also others such as the Spherical Tokamak and
    the RFP) will be an interesting area for the
    exploration of possible innovative concept
    improvements.

13
An integrated facilities road-map
  • The Reversed Field Pinch RFX is contributing
    with results in otherwise inaccessible parameter
    ranges and there is, for the next years, scope
    and interest for these studies.
  • Research on RFX is contributing to the
    understanding of a range of physics features in
    toroidal plasmas.
  • Mission 2, Reliable Tokamak Operation On RFX
    specific studies for the active MHD and plasma
    wall control can be undertaken.
  • Mission 4, Physics and technology of long pulse
    and steady state RFX can offer a contribution
    to the physics and control of resistive wall
    modes and to feedback systems
  • Mission 5, Predicting Fusion performance An
    intensive activity in theoretical work and
    numerical modelling must interact with
    comprehensive experimental studies in a wide
    parameter range in order to validate the
    capability of codes to predict fusion.
    Capabilities exist experimentally in particular
    by the step-ladder facilities COMPASS - ASDEX-UG
    (and DIII-D, Alcator C-Mod) JET (and JT-60U) and
    by devices which can access different shapes and
    features, in particular MAST, TCV, the circular
    Tokamaks TORE SUPRA, FTU, TEXTOR and the Reversed
    Field Pinches RFX (and EXTRAP) as well as the
    Stellarator TJ-II.

14
Challenges and options
  • Unless something dramatically changes, it is
    likely that a healthy fusion programme needs a
    portfolio of devices and concepts, and a strong
    science effort (see report).
  • The case for RFP as a fusion device to support
    the international program in the ITER era is
    still well open, and we need to work strongly to
    defend it
  • Completing the mission does not mean that, while
    we are doing it, we do not think to an extended
    and more ambitious one, of course always taking
    into account scientific results

15
A strong momentum with interesting times
VERY POSITIVE SCIENTIFIC OUTCOME FROM RFX
ENTHUSIASTIC PARTICIPATION IN THE SCIENTIFIC
(both physics AND engineering) PROGRAMME
CHALLENGES and OPPORTUNITIES
THE INTERNATIONAL FUSION PROGRAMME IS UNDERGOING
A VERY PROFOUND AND DYNAMIC CHANGE
WELL DEFINED OBJECTIVES FOR RFX IN THE ITER
ERA Explore confinement, MHD control, fusion
physics, contribute to fusion performance
prediction, education, maintenance of a strong
and motivated experimental team for future
projects
A vision for a strong sci tech program is
required
16
Project work, innovation and scientific
excellence fostered in the report
  • The broader scientific and technological RD for
    ITER and DEMO in the associated laboratories
    including the joint exploitation of JET is
    undertaken under EFDA by pan-European (and
    international) task forces and topical groups.
  • () Also on ASDEX-Upgrade, RFX and other
    facilities the programmes for forthcoming periods
    of exploitation are set up, by international
    calls for proposals with the criterion of
    optimally serving the established RD objectives.
    Subsequently they are executed by corresponding
    international task forces.

17
Guidelines for the 2009 programme
  • Supported by the success of the first 2008
    attempt, also for 2009 the details of the
    experimental work-programme will be defined on
    the basis of a public call for proposals.
  • This has been open to EU and international
    laboratories and universities, with the aim of
    opening even more the RFX-mod facility to the
    community use. The call for proposal has been
    launched in early December, together with the new
    Task Force Structure.
  • 128 proposals
  • 8 external institutions making proposals (3 EU, 2
    JP, 3 USA)

451 experimental days requested (vs. 120-130
good run days expected)
18
2008 task force structure
SOME TIMES ORGANIZING THE EXPERIMENT WAS HARDER
THAT RUNNING IT.
  • TWO TASK FORCE LEADERS FROM EXTERNAL LABS
  • ENEA Frascati and University of Wisconsin, Madison

RFP performance high current operation and
advanced scenarios Carraro, Sarff
Databases and scaling laws Pasqualotto
MHD and active control of instabilities Buratti,
Zanca
Density control and plasma-wall
interaction Cavazzana, Dal Bello
VERY GOOD JOB, THANK YOU VERY MUCH !
Particle, momentum and energy transport Spolaore
Optimization of RFX-mod discharges RFP, tokamak
and non-standard plasmas Bolzonella, Zanotto
gt120 exp. proposals for 2008, also from external
laboratories
19
2009 task force structure
RFP performance high current operation and
advanced scenarios
Particle, momentum and energy transport
Magnetic and fuelling optimization
MHD and active control of stability
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT TEAM
DATA VALIDATION AND SCALING TEAM
20
2009 task force structure
  • RFP performance high current operation and
    advanced scenarios
  • Rita Lorenzini, Francesco Milani
  • MHD and active control of instabilities
  • Giuseppe Marchiori, David Terranova
  • Particle, momentum and energy transport
  • Gianluca Spizzo, Nicola Vianello
  • Magnetic and fuelling optimization
  • Roberto Cavazzana
  • Program implementation support team
  • Samuele Dal Bello, Loris Zanotto
  • Data validation and scaling team
  • Paolo Franz, Monica Spolaore
  • MST ambassador
  • Brett Chapman

21
High current operation optimization towards 2 MA
  • The 2007 and 2008 experience shows that a careful
    optimization of the scenario, including MHD
    active control, is an essential ingredient for
    the success of the high current operation.
  • 2008 was mainly dedicated to exploration of 1.5
    MA, mainly driven by the new results and by the
    IAEA deadline
  • During 2009 the work on the high current
    operation will proceed along two synergistic main
    projects
  • optimization of the 1.5 MA scenario
  • initial exploration of the current regime between
    1.5 and 2 MA, where the optimization and the
    scenarios developed for point 1) will be used.

22
2 steps strategy
  • This 2-steps strategy acknowledges that the route
    towards the nominal target current of RFX-mod, 2
    MA, has to be followed
  • preserving machine safety,
  • Improving the diagnostic portfolio (Ti, B over
    all)
  • making each additional step ahead in current
    based on a well-optimized discharge, and
  • allowing for an adequate amount of time for
    physics and technology exploration at
    intermediate current (e.g., the very successful
    RWM and turbulence experiments are normally
    conducted at lower currents).
  • This guarantees that 2 MA will be reached in the
    safest and most performance-effective way.
  • Within this framework, we expect that the
    achievement of a baseline 2 MA plasma, ready for
    full exploitation of confinement, will be an
    integrated goal of both the 2009 and 2010
    experimental campaigns.

23
Density control
  • Goal sustainment of the high-confinement helical
    configuration at high density.
  • The strategy proposed to solve the problem
    consists in two steps, one short-term and one
    medium-term.
  • The first one (short term), on a short term, is
    based on the use of pellets to fuel the plasma
    core and on a series of experiments for
    optimizing the pre-loading of the wall.
  • A second project (medium term) concerns first
    wall lithization, to reduce recycling
  • Initially Li pellets will be injected into the
    plasma, and subsequently a Liquid Lithium Limiter
    will be installed for a more uniform coverage.
    Collaboration in this field has been established
    with the ENEA laboratories in Frascati, as the
    technique has been already successfully applied
    to FTU (Mazzitelli, tomorrow).

24
Key science topics (more in the TF sessions)
  • Transport (helical)
  • Equilibrium and stability (helical)
  • Turbulence
  • Current Drive
  • Preparation for the power beam injector
    installation (on loan from AIST)
  • Collaborations and synergies with other RFP,
    tokamaks and stellarator

25
MHD active control, with significant external
collaborations
  • A significant fraction of the experimental
    programme will be devoted to experiments on
    active feedback control of MHD stability. This
    program will build upon the fact that a thick
    shell is no longer necessary for the RFP.
  • The experiments will aim at optimizing existing
    techniques and developing new ones for the
    control of
  • resistive wall modes (RWM) and
  • tearing modes.
  • The RFX-mod coil system will also be used for
    projects at the forefront of MHD active stability
    worldwide programme and co-ordinated with the
    EFDA workprogramme (e.g. ITER code benchmarking,
    studies on mode non-rigidity and on the effect of
    partial coil coverage, mode locking and
    un-locking studies, study on non-resonant
    perturbations).
  • Moreover, an intense activity on control
    engineering will be realized, to develop new
    control algorithms and tools, which will be
    tested in RFX-mod.

26
6 sessions
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Some of us are facing big challenges
  • We look forward of seeing you soon back !

30
The end
31
Developments on feedback control in low-rotation
plasmas
  • The MHD feedback control system can be on purpose
    downgraded both in power and number of coils,
    to study tokamak-relevant problems
  • The effect of reduced available power
  • Effects of mode non-rigidity with a reduced set
    of coils
  • Interaction between RWMs and Tearing Modes (TM)

2008 IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Geneva - P.
Martin
32
Developments on feedback control in low-rotation
plasmas
  • The MHD feedback control system can be on purpose
    downgraded both in power and number of coils,
    to study tokamak-relevant problems
  • The effect of reduced available power
  • Effects of mode non-rigidity with a reduced set
    of coils
  • Interaction between RWMs and Tearing Modes (TM)

2008 IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Geneva - P.
Martin
33
Interesting times
  • RFX-mod is producing very good results, with
    reliable operation and strong integration of the
    various components of the team
  • The case for fusion relevance is now fully open
  • RFX team might be a world leader in MHD control
  • We are giving key contributions in collaboration
    with tokamak
  • We are publishing good papers
  • There is interest and resonance in the
    international community
  • This is true because we are a well-identified
    team based on RFX, even when we work outside.
  • Synergy counts.
  • There is an extra-value in being a team, for now
    AND for the future, for physicists and engineers

Like on a bike to avoiding falling down we need
to run together !
34
  • ? ? ? ? - Frascati (FTU)? ? ? ? - DIIID? ? ? ? -
    EXTRAP-T2R? ? ? ? - RELAX? ? ? ? - MST? ? ? ? -
    ASDEX? ? ? ? - PPPL

35
Advanced RWM control and mode un-locking
Active rotation of non-resonant wall-locked RWM
is induced by applying complex gains (keeping the
mode at the desired constant amplitude)
RWM amplitude
RWM phase
Bolzonella, Igochine et al, PRL 08
2008 IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Geneva - P.
Martin
36
From the facility review report
  • The dedicated ITER and DEMO oriented work should
    therefore be complemented by innovative RD aimed
    at opening new options and improving present
    modelling by improving the theoretical
    understanding based on first principles,
    developing novel solutions in physics and
    technology and extending fusion physics and
    technology knowledge and the relevant data bases.

37
  • The international fusion programme is undergoing
    a very profound and dynamic change, mainly driven
    by ITER.
  • We have to play this game better we do it as
    best as we can.
  • A success of RFX is a necessary condition for the
    survival and development of a plasma physics and
    engineering group in Padova with its own identity
    and the goal of becoming a main actor in the next
    generation of fusion devices (ITER, FAST, )
  • A vision for a strong sci tech program required
  • Exploitation of RFX-mod
  • Innovation and creativity to enhance our
    contribution to tokamak main stream
  • Focussing on leading topics, both for RFX and
    collaborations
  • Building a Consensus implementing the decisions
  • Start NOW to build the future
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com